January 20, 2009 ET-WP3 Geometryy 1 ET Geometry/Topology Some possible studies January 20, 2009 B. Mours.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Michele Punturo INFN Perugia and EGO On behalf of the Einstein Telescope Design Study Team 1GWDAW-Rome 2010.
Advertisements

S3/S4 BBH report Thomas Cokelaer LSC Meeting, Boston, 3-4 June 2006.
A walk through some statistic details of LSC results.
For the Collaboration GWDAW 2005 Status of inspiral search in C6 and C7 Virgo data Frédérique MARION.
September 21, 2005Virgo Status – ESF Workshop1 Status of Virgo B. Mours.
Cascina, January 25th, Coupling of the IMC length noise into the recombined ITF output Raffaele Flaminio EGO and CNRS/IN2P3 Summary - Recombined.
GWDAW 16/12/2004 Inspiral analysis of the Virgo commissioning run 4 Leone B. Bosi VIRGO coalescing binaries group on behalf of the VIRGO collaboration.
Adaptive Hough transform for the search of periodic sources P. Astone, S. Frasca, C. Palomba Universita` di Roma “La Sapienza” and INFN Roma Talk outline.
LIGO - Fermi Sub-Threshold Search for the 1 st Advanced LIGO Science Run Jordan Camp NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Moriond Gravitation Meeting March.
VIRGO: WHERE WE COME FROM WHERE WE ARE GOING GIOVANNI LOSURDO - INFN Firenze Advanced Virgo Project Leader for the Virgo Collaboration (and the LIGO Scientific.
THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY Infrasound Technology Workshop, November 2007, Tokyo, Japan OPTIMUM ARRAY DESIGN FOR THE DETECTION OF DISTANT.
Searching for pulsars using the Hough transform Badri Krishnan AEI, Golm (for the pulsar group) LSC meeting, Hanford November 2003 LIGO-G Z.
Parameter Estimation Using 3.5 post-Newtonian Inspiral Waveforms GWDAW, December 15-18, 2004, Annecy K. Arun, B.R. Iyer, B.S. Sathyaprakash and P. Sundarajan.
Systematic effects in gravitational-wave data analysis
G Z April 2007 APS Meeting - DAP GGR Gravitational Wave AstronomyKeith Thorne Coincidence-based LIGO GW Burst Searches and Astrophysical Interpretation.
Cavalier Fabien on behalf LAL group Orsay GWDAW 10 December, 14 th 2005 Reconstruction of Source Location using the Virgo-LIGO network Presentation of.
1/25 Current results and future scenarios for gravitational wave’s stochastic background G. Cella – INFN sez. Pisa.
Optical Configuration Advanced Virgo Review Andreas Freise for the OSD subsystem.
DelayRatio: A Gravitational Wave Event Physical Likelihood Estimator Based on Detection Delays and SNR Ratios Amber L. Stuver LIGO Livingston ObservatoryCalifornia.
TWIST Measuring the Space-Time Structure of Muon Decay Carl Gagliardi Texas A&M University TWIST Collaboration Physics of TWIST Introduction to the Experiment.
Telecommunications JBCardenas © 1982 Com3 1Q1516 Antenna Design JBC © 198 v A2,2 Key design requirements 1.Provide the theoretical computations of shapes.
March 17, 2008LSC-Virgo meeting1/12 Virgo Status B. Mours.
Advanced VIRGO WG1: Status VIRGO, Cascina Andreas Freise University of Birmingham.
LIGO- G D Status of LIGO Stan Whitcomb ACIGA Workshop 21 April 2004.
SHMS Optics Studies Tanja Horn JLab JLab Hall C meeting 18 January 2008.
TWIST A Precision Measurement of Muon Decay at TRIUMF Peter Kitching TRIUMF/University of Alberta TWIST Collaboration Physics of TWIST Introduction to.
1 Virgo commissioning: Next steps December 12 st 2005 Hannover, ILIAS-GWA WG1 Matteo Barsuglia, LAL/CNRS.
Topology comparison RSE vs. SAGNAC using GWINC S. Chelkowski, H. Müller-Ebhardt, S. Hild 21/09/2009 S. ChelkowskiSlide 1ET Workshop, Erice, 10/2009.
1SBPI 16/06/2009 Heterodyne detection with LISA for gravitational waves parameters estimation Nicolas Douillet.
Status of straw-tube tracker V.Peshekhonov, D.Peshekhonov, A.Zinchenko JINR, Dubna V.Tikhomirov P.N.Lebedev Physics Institute, Moscow Presented on the.
January 12, 2006ILIAS-WG3 Frascati1 Virgo+ & Advanced Virgo B. Mours With material from G. Losurdo, M. Punturo, A. Viceré and others.
1 Calorimeter in G4MICE Berkeley 10 Feb 2005 Rikard Sandström Geneva University.
1 Testing coherent code for coalescing binaries network analysis Simona Birindelli INFN Pisa, Università di Pisa Leone B. Bosi INFN Perugia, Università.
Status of coalescing binaries search activities in Virgo GWDAW 11 Status of coalescing binaries search activities in Virgo GWDAW Dec 2006 Leone.
1 LESSONS FROM VIRGO+ May 17th 2010 E. Calloni for the Virgo collaboration.
Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
1 Status of Search for Compact Binary Coalescences During LIGO’s Fifth Science Run Drew Keppel 1 for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 California Institute.
Chapter 2 Fundamentals of Data and Signals
Stefan Hild 111th WG1 meeting, Hannover, January 2007 DC-Readout for GEO Stefan Hild for the GEO-team.
COMPARISON OF PARAMETER ESTIMATION BETWEEN ET-B AND ET-C SENSITIVITIES Tjonnie Li (Nikhef) 2 September ET F2F, Nice.
LIGO-G E Network Analysis For Coalescing Binary (or any analysis with Matched Filtering) Benoit MOURS, Caltech & LAPP-Annecy March 2001, LSC Meeting.
Fundamental Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology with ET p1 Michele Punturo on behalf of the ET team GA # A short introduction to the project.
LIGO- G D Experimental Upper Limit from LIGO on the Gravitational Waves from GRB Stan Whitcomb For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Informal.
Joint LIGO-Virgo data analysis Inspiral and Burst Summary of the first project results Overview of the future activities M.-A. Bizouard (LAL-Orsay) on.
Seth Timpano Louis Rubbo Neil Cornish Characterizing the Gravitational Wave Background using LISA.
LIGO-G All-Sky Burst Search in the First Year of the LSC S5 Run Laura Cadonati, UMass Amherst For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration GWDAW Meeting,
Peter Shawhan The University of Maryland & The LIGO Scientific Collaboration Penn State CGWP Seminar March 27, 2007 LIGO-G Z Reaching for Gravitational.
Stochastic Background Data Analysis Giancarlo Cella I.N.F.N. Pisa first ENTApP - GWA joint meeting Paris, January 23rd and 24th, 2006 Institute d'Astrophysique.
LIGO-G Z TFClusters Tuning for the LIGO-TAMA Search Patrick Sutton LIGO-Caltech.
GWDAW91Thursday, December 16 First Comparison Between LIGO &Virgo Inspiral Search Pipelines F. Beauville on behalf of the LIGO-Virgo Joint Working Group.
Igor Yakushin, December 2004, GWDAW-9 LIGO-G Z Status of the untriggered burst search in S3 LIGO data Igor Yakushin (LIGO Livingston Observatory)
High Resolution Array Detector Design of Infrasound Detection and Parameter Estimation Systems Hein Haak & Läslo Evers June-September 2003.
Tuning the hierarchical procedure searching for the key where there is light S.Frasca – Potsdam, December 2006.
GW – the first GW detection ! Is it a start of GW astronomy ? If “yes” then which ? «Счастлив, кто посетил сей мир в его минуты роковые !...» Ф.Тютчев.
ASTA Bunch Length Interferometer, et al… Randy Thurman-Keup ASTA Science Mtg Feb 21, 2014.
LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.
Gravitational Waves What are they? How can they be detected?
Thomas Cokelaer for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Cardiff University, U.K. APS April Meeting, Jacksonville, FL 16 April 2007, LIGO-G Z Search.
G v1Heterogeneous Detector Networks1 Heterogeneous Detector Networks Sky Localization with 3G Detectors May 26, 2016 Daniel Sigg LIGO Hanford Observatory.
A 2 veto for Continuous Wave Searches
Topology comparison RSE vs. SAGNAC using GWINC
Searching for pulsars using the Hough transform
Virgo Status Detector Status Computing Data Analysis status and Plans
Coherent wide parameter space searches for gravitational waves from neutron stars using LIGO S2 data Xavier Siemens, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Advanced Wireless Networks
M.-A. Bizouard, F. Cavalier
Stochastic background search using LIGO Livingston and ALLEGRO
Background estimation in searches for binary inspiral
LISA Data Analysis & Sources
Mass spectrometry (MS) is an analytical technique that can be used to determine the mass, elemental composition or chemical structure of molecules. Mass.
Presentation transcript:

January 20, 2009 ET-WP3 Geometryy 1 ET Geometry/Topology Some possible studies January 20, 2009 B. Mours

January 20, 2009 ET-WP3 Geometryy 2 ET vs the Ultimate Advanced ITFs Remarks:  The detectors are in a network  ET will have more than one ITF  ET Geometry/Topology depends on the other existing detectors Questions:  What makes ET unique? »The low frequency »The full spectrum??  What could be the “ultimate” sensitivity of AdL/AdV/LCGT? »Could they do as well as ET at high frequency? – Ready to loss the low frequency part of the spectrum By the way, this is a key question when selling ET… S. Hild

January 20, 2009 ET-WP3 Geometryy 3 Pointing Typical timing resolution   t ~ 1/(f typical *SNR) For low frequency signals  Pointing probably not from timing »SNR 10; 10 Hz ->  t ~ 10ms = LLO-LHO distance »For usual L-V signal (100Hz-1kHz) pointing resolution is a few degrees → for a 10Hz signal ~ 1 radian…  Direction from signal amplitude probably as good as time resolution To be investigated S. Hild

January 20, 2009 ET-WP3 Geometryy 4 ET layout Basic question: For a given infrastructure cost what is the best set of ITFs?  Geometry? »Triangle, one site L shape, two sites L shape, other ?  Multiple frequency bands per site? »High Frequency + Low frequency ITFs, tunable ITF?  Orientation?  How to best use AdV+ & AdL+? »Location/orientation with respect to the existing site (LIGO/Virgo) »To which extend could we rely on AdV+ a& AdL+ for source location? »What if there is or there is not an LCGT/Australian detector?  What are the constrain/impact for an US ET?  Phasing of the construction/commissioning of the ITFs? ? or L shape or ?

January 20, 2009 ET-WP3 Geometryy 5 Input for the basic question? Basic question: For a given infrastructure cost what is the best set of ITF? What is the model the infrastructure cost?  Fix the overall beam tube length?  Include some cost overhead (extra vacuum chambers, access..) per ITF?  Need a more refine model? What are the criteria for “Best”  Select a few leading science case: »Binaries inspiral for cosmology, i.e. (which masses?) »Stochastic signal »High SNR event (which is the most interesting frequency band?)

January 20, 2009 ET-WP3 Geometryy 6 Rough Actions Plan Estimate the ultimate AdV/AdL/LCGT sensitivity  Single or two frequency bands ITF for them? Study the frequency dependence of the pointing capability  Timing vs amplitude Analytic study for several configurations  Compute (use/collect existing tools/results): »Beam pattern »Range »Limit for stochastic signals Do Monte Carlo studies  Focus on distance range and resolution on source location  Study with coherent analysis  Include simulation of dead time; operation schedule  Use the LV coherent analysis as a debugging & bench mark