Three-Dimensional Structure of Coronal Mass Ejections From LASCO Polarization Measurements K. P. Dere, D. Wang and R. Howard ApJL, 620; L119-L122 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Solar Theory (MT 4510) Clare E Parnell School of Mathematics and Statistics.
Advertisements

Estimating the magnetic energy in solar magnetic configurations Stéphane Régnier Reconnection seminar on Thursday 15 December 2005.
Chapter 8 The Sun – Our Star.
Valbona Kunkel June 18, 2013 Hvar, Croatia NEW THEORITICAL WORK ON FLUX ROPE MODEL AND PROPERTIES OF MAGNETIC FIELD.
High Altitude Observatory (HAO) – National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) The National Center for Atmospheric Research is operated by the University.
SWPC CME Imaging Requirements for the post-SOHO era Douglas Biesecker 3/25/2014.
SECCI/COR2 Status Report SECCHI CONSORTIUM MEETING D. Socker, S. Plunkett, A. Vourlidas.
NoRH Visit February, 2005Angelos Vourlidas, NRL On Deriving Mass & Energetics of Coronal Mass Ejections Angelos Vourlidas NRL A Tutorial.
E. Robbrecht – SIDC- Royal Observatory of Belgium 8 March 2007 The statistical importance of narrow CMEs Open questions to be addressed by SECCHI Eva Robbrecht,
Physics 202: Introduction to Astronomy – Lecture 13 Carsten Denker Physics Department Center for Solar–Terrestrial Research.
Alfvén Waves in the Solar Corona S. Tomczyk, S. Mclntosh, S. Keil, P. Judge, T. Schad, D. Seeley, J. Edmondson Science, Vol. 317, Sep., 2007.
Chapter 7 The Sun. Solar Prominence – photo by SOHO spacecraft from the Astronomy Picture of the Day site link.
The Sun is not a static body, but very active.The Sun is not a static body, but very active. Solar activity can have dramatic effects on the EarthSolar.
From Geo- to Heliophysical Year: Results of CORONAS-F Space Mission International Conference «50 Years of International Geophysical Year and Electronic.
2007 March 61 The SECCHI Campaign Jean-Pierre Wuelser SECCHI Consortium Meeting Orsay.
1 The Sun in STEREO K. Murawski Department of Astrophysics, UMCS.
When will disruptive CMEs impact Earth? Coronagraph observations alone aren’t enough to make the forecast for the most geoeffective halo CMEs. In 2002,
The First Space-Weather Numerical Forecasting Model & Reconstruction of Halo CMEs Xuepu Zhao NAOC Oct.
1. Background2. Flux variation3. Polarity reversal4. Electron evolution5. Conclusions The role of coronal mass ejections in the solar cycle evolution of.
An Introduction to Space Weather J. Burkepile High Altitude Observatory / NCAR COSMO K-Coronagraph Science Requirements Joan Burkepile
Coronal Mass Ejection Also known as CME CMEs are huge bubbles of gas within magnetic field lines that are ejected from the Sun over the course of several.
Solar Rotation Lab 3. Differential Rotation The sun lacks a fixed rotation rate Since it is composed of a gaseous plasma, the rate of rotation is fastest.
The Dangers of Solar Storms and Solar Cycles.  For every 1 million atoms of hydrogen in the entire sun  98,000 atoms of helium  850 of oxygen  360.
Evolution of the 2012 July 12 CME from the Sun to the Earth: Data- Constrained Three-Dimensional MHD Simulations F. Shen 1, C. Shen 2, J. Zhang 3, P. Hess.
Coronal Mass Ejection As a Result of Magnetic Helicity Accumulation
1Yang Liu/Magnetic FieldHMI Science – 1 May 2003 Magnetic Field Goals – magnetic field & eruptive events Yang Liu Stanford University.
RECREATING THE THREE DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURE OF INTERPLANETARY CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS Timothy A. Howard and S. James Tappin AGU Fall Meeting, December,
Instrument Performance Spefication 13 July 2001 SECCHI Consortium Meeting Cosner’s House, Abington Dan Moses.
Arrival time of halo coronal mass ejections In the vicinity of the Earth G. Michalek, N. Gopalswamy, A. Lara, and P.K. Manoharan A&A 423, (2004)
SHINE SEP Campaign Events: Long-term development of solar corona in build-up to the SEP events of 21 April 2002 and 24 August 2002 A. J. Coyner, D. Alexander,
New STEREO/SECCHI Processing for Heliospheric Transients David F. Webb ISR, Boston College, MA, USA New England Space Science Consortium.
CASS/UCSD - Jeju 2015 A Jets in the Heliosphere: A Solar Wind Component B.V. Jackson, H.-S. Yu, P.P. Hick, and A. Buffington, Center for Astrophysics and.
Lessons Learnt from SOHO: CME Onsets CME Properties: to kg km/s Average span 45 o Significance: - Coronal evolution - Space weather.
Sunspots. X-ray solar image Solar Flair Solar Corona.
Connecting Near-Sun CME flux Ropes to the 1-AU Flux Ropes using the Flare-CME Relationship N. Gopalswamy, H. Xie, S. Yashiro, and S. Akiyama NASA/GSFC.
Michael L. Kaiser STEREO Project Scientist NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center STEREO June 11, 2008 STEREO at 1.4 years.
POST CME EVENTS: COOL JETS AND CURRENT SHEET EVOLUTION A. Bemporad, G. Poletto, S. T. Suess IAU Symposium 226 Coronal and Stellar Mass Ejections September.
-1- Coronal Faraday Rotation of Occulted Radio Signals M. K. Bird Argelander-Institut für Astronomie, Universität Bonn International Colloquium on Scattering.
ESMP-14 Dublin Li Feng, Bernd Inhester, Yuming Wang, Fang Shen, Chenglong Shen, Weiqun Gan 1. Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research, Germany 2.
Fast Magnetosonic Waves and Global Coronal Seismology in the Extended Solar Corona Ryun Young Kwon, Jie Zhang, Maxim Kramar, Tongjiang Wang, Leon Ofman,
Measurements of White-Light Images of Cometary Plasma as a Proxy for Solar Wind Speed J.M. Clover, M.M. Bisi, A. Buffington, B.V. Jackson, P.P. Hick Center.
White light coronagraph showing prominances and streamers The Coronal Magnetic Field.
Coronal and Interplanetary Magnetic Fields in October-November 2003 and November CMEs Vasyl Yurchyshyn Big Bear Solar Observatory,
Flare Irradiance Studies with the EUV Variability Experiment on SDO R. A. Hock, F. G. Eparvier, T. N. Woods, A. R. Jones, University of Colorado at Boulder.
CASS/UCSD ILWS 2009 SMEI 3D reconstructions of density behind shocks B.V. Jackson, P.P. Hick, A. Buffington, M.M. Bisi, J.M. Clover, S. Hamilton Center.
Xie – STEREO SWG – Dublin – March 2010 Low Mass Coronal Mass Ejections Missed by STEREO A/B or LASCO and Associated ICMEs H. Xie 1,2, O. C. St. Cyr 2,
A Numerical Study of the Breakout Model for Coronal Mass Ejection Initiation P. MacNeice, S.K. Antiochos, A. Phillips, D.S. Spicer, C.R. DeVore, and K.
Coronal X-ray Emissions in Partly Occulted Flares Paula Balciunaite, Steven Christe, Sam Krucker & R.P. Lin Space Sciences Lab, UC Berkeley limb thermal.
Part 2: CME Analysis with StereoCAT for Space Weather: Limitations Barbara Thompson (NASA/GSFC) (presented by Leila Mays)
Center for Astrophysics and Space Sciences, University of California, San Diego 9500 Gilman Drive #0424, La Jolla, CA , U.S.A
Probing Coronal Mass Ejections with Faraday Rotation Measurements Steven R. Spangler and Catherine A. Whiting University of Iowa.
Observations –Morphology –Quantitative properties Underlying Physics –Aly-Sturrock limit Present Theories/Models Coronal Mass Ejections (CME) S. K. Antiochos,
Analysis of 3 and 8 April 2010 Coronal Mass Ejections and their Influence on the Earth Magnetic Field Marilena Mierla and SECCHI teams at ROB, USO and.
How massive is a CME? The greater accuracy offered by STEREO Eoin Carley R.T. James McAteer, Peter T. Gallagher Astrophysics Research Group, TCD.
1 Determination of CME 3D Trajectories using Stereoscopy STEREO CMES of 16Nov2007 and 31AUG2007 P. C. Liewer, E. M. DeJong, J. R. Hall, JPL/Caltech; R.
BBSO 2007 Science Planning. Focal Plane Instruments AO (Wenda, Nicolas, Deqing, Patricia and Park) AO (Wenda, Nicolas, Deqing, Patricia and Park) IRIM.
Detecting, forecasting and modeling of the 2002/04/17 halo CME Heliophysics Summer School 1.
An Introduction to Observing Coronal Mass Ejections
On the three-dimensional configuration of coronal mass ejections
ICME in the Solar Wind from STEL IPS Observations
Jason E. Kooi1,2 and Steven R. Spangler2
Lessons learnt from the STEREO Heliospheric. Imagers: Tracking
COR1 Current Status and Future Plans
CORONAL LOOPS.
The Sun: Portrait of a G2V star
Corona Mass Ejection (CME) Solar Energetic Particle Events
Direct Observations of the Magnetic Reconnection Site of an Eruption on 2003 November ,ApJ, 622,1251 J. Lin, Y.-K. Ko, L. Sui, J. C. Raymond, G.
A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR DERIVING PROMINENCE MASS FROM SOHO/EIT Fe XII (19
Filament/Prominence Eruption Corona Mass Ejection (CME)
CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS
Presentation transcript:

Three-Dimensional Structure of Coronal Mass Ejections From LASCO Polarization Measurements K. P. Dere, D. Wang and R. Howard ApJL, 620; L119-L February Monday Seminar; Rapid; Taro Morimoto

Abstract Polarimetric measurements with LASCO The LASCO movie of the 2002 August 1 CME. Three-dimensional structure of a CME. Two particularly well observed events are discussed August 1 CME August 7 CME. A rising arcade of loops. A flux-rope type.

Introduction Another CME event on 2002 August 7. An understanding of the three-dimensional density and magnetic structure of CMEs in the solar corona is still lacking. It is very important from the “space weather” point of view. for understanding the physics of CMEs. The angle at which a CME emerges. Direction of the magnetic field. CME shape – spherical shell? expanding loop? CME evolution. The method described in the papers can provide the information on

Introduction Previous studies 1.Poland and Munro 1976 (ApJ, 209; ) White-light and He 304 images from Skylab. Ha images from SacPeak. Composite photographs of He 304 & white-light image UT 1441 UT 1511 UT1615 UT They measured the angle of the CME’s leading edge from the plane of the sky, and demonstrated that it was quite different from that of the accompanying prominence Aug 21 CME & prominence eruption.

Introduction 2. Crifo, Picat and Cailloux 1982 (SolPhys, 83, ) Bubble and loop type CME topologies. 1973, Aug 10 CME. White-light images from Skylab. They performed polarization measurements and found that the CME is more likely to be a bubble-shaped structure, than a loop.

Introduction 3. Moran and Davila 2004 (Science, 305, 66-70) x (West) z y (North) Sun Earth 03:56 UT Brightness Side View (z, y) Top View (x, z) Topological map (distance from the [x,y] plane LASCO movie of the 1998, Oct 31 event. [Ro]

Method Thomson Scattering of Radiation The observed radiation of a CME is assumed to be due to scattering from electrons in the CME, thus it becomes polarized. Its polarization fraction depends on the angle of the scattering. To measure I, Q, and U, the fraction of linear polarization, p, is given as. The polarization brightness is defined as In order to remove the contributions from F-corona and instrumental polarization, “background” polarization and brightness must be subtracted. f : contributions from CME alone b: background (pre CME)

Method The polarization for Thomson scattering as a function of angle (  ) from the plane of the sky. Calculation Observation Weighted average angle (distance) of the scattering plasma from the plane of the sky.

Data LASCO C2 data during a special month-long (2002 July – August) campaign “LASCO C2 Polarization Measurement”. Binning = 2 (512 x 512 sized images; Pixel size = 22.8”) 1hr cadence. (Exposure time = 100s for each image). Default wavelength = 550 nm. 41 CME observations during the period. Especially well observed CMEs on 2002, Aug 1, 2002, Aug 7.

Result 2002 August 1 CME. LASCO C2 movie of the 2002, Aug 1 CME. LASCO images of the event at 06:48 UT. When the CME plasma is out of the plane of the sky, the polarization (polarized brightness) become would be reduced.

Result deg rotation deg rotation. Loop arcade. Visualization of the 2002 August 1 CME event.

Result Can be interpreted as consisting of flux-rope or helical structure. The observation and visualization of the 2002, Aug 7 CME Aug, 7 CME

Summary The foreground/background ambiguity. The assumption that the line-of-sight integrated intensity can be placed at a single (x, y, z) point. This is convenient for visualization, but may cause misunderstandings of the topology of a CME. Three-dimensional visualization of CMEs has significant impact on understanding CME physics space weather forecast etc. The polarization technique, STEREO imaging, and spectroscopic techniques can complementary provide mutual measure to view a solar ejection structure.

LASCO data The absolute calibration of C2 = 3 %. The polarization characteristics of the C2 coronagraph is less known. Assumption that the polarizers are ideal is made. There are two flat mirrors on the path of the light.