The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method November 2, 2005 Federal Aviation Administration 0 0 The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method Steve Summer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WHAT IS DRS? Thermoflow, Inc.
Advertisements

Federal Aviation Administration 0 The Impact of Synthetic Fuels on FAA Flammability Requirements June 24, The Impact of Low Flashpoint Fuels on.
International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Conference Fuel Tank Inerting Modeling Ivor Thomas Consultant to FAA
Inerting Systems for Commercial Airplane Fuel Tanks
Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research – Lisbon, Portugal In-Flight Fuel Tank Flammability Testing The 4th Triennial Int’l Aircraft Fire and.
JET A VAPORIZATION IN A SIMULATED AIRCRAFT FUEL TANK (INCLUDING SUB-ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURES AND LOW TEMPERATURES) C. E. Polymeropoulos, and Robert Ochs Department.
Modeling of Fuel Tank Inerting for FAA OBIGGS Research
William Cavage AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J
Modeling Wing Tank Flammability Dhaval D. Dadia Dr. Tobias Rossmann Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Piscataway, New Jersey Steven Summer Federal.
Propagation of Error Ch En 475 Unit Operations. Quantifying variables (i.e. answering a question with a number) 1. Directly measure the variable. - referred.
Cargo Bay Fire Protection with a Fuel Tank Inerting System William Cavage AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal Aviation Administration.
Mr. D. Cannoletta - Environmental Control System Department Mr. E. Riegel - Environmental Control System Department ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL SYSTEM CABIN.
An Update on FAA Fuel Tank Ullage Modeling
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Intermixing of Cells in Nickel-Cadmium Batteries for Aircraft Usage May 11, Intermixing of Cells in Nickel-Cadmium.
State of the Art of Fuel Tank Ullage Oxygen Concentration Measurement William Cavage AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal.
CSUN Engineering Management Six Sigma Quality Engineering Week 4 Measure Phase.
Six Sigma Quality Engineering
UNCLASSIFIED Schopenhauer's Proof For Software: Pessimistic Bias In the NOSTROMO Tool (U) Dan Strickland Dynetics Program Software Support
Aircraft Cargo Compartment Fire Detection David Blake FAA William J. Hughes Technical Center Atlantic City Airport, NJ Phone:
Modeling of Single Bay Fuel Tank Inerting for FAA OBIGGS Research
CNG STATION & GARAGE MODIFICATION CODES & STANDARDS Graham Barker Business Development Manager.
Mike Hadjimichael, Ph.D. MITRE / CAASD April 2014 Dispatching Safer Flights Using FORAS Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited
Warm-Up – 5/7 – 10 minutes Utilizing your notes and past knowledge answer the following questions: Describe the effect of a tailwind and headwind on an.
The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Flammability Analysis Federal Aviation Administration 0 0 The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method Flammability.
Fuel Tank Inerting Joint Airbus/FAA, A320 Flight Tests
Modeling In-flight Inert Gas Distribution in a 747 Center-Wing Fuel Tank William Cavage AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal.
Flight Testing of the FAA OBIGGS On the NASA 747 SCA
Chapter 36 Quality Engineering Part 2 (Review) EIN 3390 Manufacturing Processes Summer A, 2012.
Towards the Enhancement of Aircraft Cargo Compartment Fire Detection System Certification using Smoke Transport Modeling Walt Gill and Jill Suo-Anttila.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 FTFAM – Version 11 Update May 19 th, Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method – Version 11 Update Steve Summer.
Modeling Jet-A Vaporization in a Wing Fuel Tank
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Composite Wing Tank Flammability April 2-3, Composite and Aluminum Wing Tank Flammability Comparison Testing Steve.
Jet Fuel Vaporization and Condensation: Modeling and Validation C.E. Polymeropoulos Robert Ochs Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey International.
Federal Aviation Administration Status of Research & Testing to Replace Halon Extinguishing Agents in Civil Aviation Fire Safety Team FAA Wm. J. Hughes.
Systems Fire Protection Working Group DTA - Grenoble, France June 21-22, 2003 FAA Inerting System Flight Testing on an Airbus A320 William Cavage AAR-440.
FAA R&D Efforts Leading to Fuel Tank Inerting
Presented to: International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group. Atlantic City, NJ By: Dave Blake. FAA Technical Center. Atlantic City, NJ.
Federal Aviation Administration Handheld Advisory Circular Update Louise Speitel Fire Safety Branch FAA Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Atlantic City International.
Federal Aviation Administration Presented to: 2008 US/Europe International Aviation Safety Conference By: Robert W. Reich, Asst Manager (Operations), Seattle.
S The European Up-Front Risk Assessment Tool (EUFRAT) The European Up-Front Risk Assessment Tool (EUFRAT) (EUFRAT)
Propagation of Error Ch En 475 Unit Operations. Quantifying variables (i.e. answering a question with a number) 1. Directly measure the variable. - referred.
U.S./Europe International Aviation Safety Conference By: Date: “Global Aviation Safety Processes: Refining Reinforcing, and Streamlining” Federal Aviation.
Federal Aviation Administration Measuring Ullage Oxygen Concentration November 17-18, Measuring Oxygen Concentration in a Fuel Tank Ullage Federal.
IASFPWG – Seattle, WA Jet-A Vaporization Computer Model A Fortran Code Written by Prof. Polymeropolous of Rutgers University International Aircraft.
Chapter 10 Verification and Validation of Simulation Models
5-1 ANSYS, Inc. Proprietary © 2009 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved. May 28, 2009 Inventory # Chapter 5 Six Sigma.
Reticulated Foam Advantages: 100% protection Passive System
Overview Background Harmonization Goals
Cargo Bay Fire Protection with a Fuel Tank Inerting System
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Composite Wing Tank Flammability November 20, Composite and Aluminum Wing Tank Flammability Comparison Testing.
Jet Fuel Vaporization and Condensation: Modeling and Validation Robert Ochs and C.E. Polymeropoulos Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey International.
6/13/02IASFPWG – London, UK Ongoing Fuel Flammability Work at the FAA Technical Center International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group London,
Federal Aviation Administration Measuring Ullage Oxygen Concentration February 10-12, Measuring Oxygen Concentration in a Fuel Tank Ullage Federal.
OBIGGS Sizing Data for Transport Canada Trade Study William Cavage AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal Aviation Administration.
March 26-27, 2003 International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Phoenix, Az Inerting of a Scale 747SP Center-Wing Fuel Tank During a Typical.
October 30-31, 2002 International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Atlantic City, NJ Inerting of a Scale 747SP Center Wing Fuel Tank During.
Statistics Presentation Ch En 475 Unit Operations.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Composite Wing Tank Flammability May 19 th, Composite and Aluminum Wing Tank Flammability Comparison Testing Steve.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Composite Wing Tank Flammability May 20, Composite and Aluminum Wing Tank Flammability Comparison Testing Steve.
IASFPWG – Ottawa, Canada In-Flight Fuel Tank Flammability Testing Steve Summer Project Engineer Federal Aviation Administration Fire Safety Branch.
Systems Fire Protection Working Group DTA - Grenoble, France June 21-22, 2003 Preliminary Results of FAA Fuel Tank Inerting Flight Testing on the NASA.
Presented at:Friends/Partners in Aviation Weather By:Tom Bond, FAA – Aircraft Icing Technical Advisor Date:November 19, 2015 Location:Las Vegas Convention.
________________________________________________________ GBI Cost Analysis SAE Advances in Aviation Safety April 11th, 2000 SAE Advances in Aviation Safety.
IASFPWG – Atlantic City, NJ Limiting Oxygen Concentration (LOC) Work Update International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Atlantic.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 EFB Hazard Assessment November 17, Electronic Flight Bag (EFB) Hazard Assessment Steve Summer Federal Aviation.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 Composite Wing Tank Flammability May 11, Composite and Aluminum Wing Tank Flammability Comparison Testing Steve.
IASFPWG – Ottawa, Canada Low Fuel Load Flammability Work International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Ottawa, Canada February.
Presented to: International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group. London, UK By: Dave Blake. FAA Technical Center. Atlantic City, NJ.
IASFPWG – Atlantic City, NJ Nitrogen Inerting Requirements – A Lit. Review International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Atlantic.
Wing Tank Flammability Testing William Cavage Steven Summer AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal Aviation Administration International.
Presentation transcript:

The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method November 2, 2005 Federal Aviation Administration 0 0 The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method Steve Summer Project Engineer Federal Aviation Administration Fire Safety Branch Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Atlantic City, NJ November 2, 2005

The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method November 2, 2005 Federal Aviation Administration 1 1 Background The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method is an Excel based macro originally developed by the 1998 ARAC Fuel Tank Harmonization Working Group as a comparative tool to assist in determining the potential fleet wide flammability exposure of a given fuel tank. The program utilizes Monte Carlo statistical methods to determine several unknown variables, using standardized distributions. Fuel flashpoint temperature Flight mission length Ambient ground temperature Ambient cruise temperature

The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method November 2, 2005 Federal Aviation Administration 2 2 Background (cont.) By Monte Carlo theory, generating these values over a sufficiently large number of trials will minimize the errors associated with the statistical analysis. Additional functionality of the program: Single flight analysis (for troubleshooting) Random Number Freeze (for troubleshooting) Warm day analysis Flammability Reduction Method (FRM) effectiveness analysis For detailed information regarding the program, users should reference FAA document DOT/FAA/AR-05/8 (pending publication)

The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method November 2, 2005 Federal Aviation Administration 3 3 Program Overview

The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method November 2, 2005 Federal Aviation Administration 4 4 Program Overview – User Inputs User inputs for the program are divided into six categories: Airplane Data Flight Data Fuel Tank Usage Data Body Tank Input Data Tank Thermal Data Multi-Flight Monte Carlo Data

The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method November 2, 2005 Federal Aviation Administration 5 5 Program Overview – User Inputs User inputs for the program are divided into six categories: Airplane Data Maximum range of aircraft Number of engines OAT cutoff temperature Flight Data Fuel Tank Usage Data Body Tank Input Data Tank Thermal Data Multi-Flight Monte Carlo Data

The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method November 2, 2005 Federal Aviation Administration 6 6 Program Overview – User Inputs User inputs for the program are divided into six categories: Airplane Data Flight Data Cruise Mach number Tank ram recovery Cruise altitude steps Fuel Tank Usage Data Body Tank Input Data Tank Thermal Data Multi-Flight Monte Carlo Data

The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method November 2, 2005 Federal Aviation Administration 7 7 Program Overview – User Inputs User inputs for the program are divided into six categories: Airplane Data Flight Data Fuel Tank Usage Data Tank full/empty times Engine/equipment start time Body Tank Input Data Tank Thermal Data Multi-Flight Monte Carlo Data

The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method November 2, 2005 Federal Aviation Administration 8 8 Program Overview – User Inputs User inputs for the program are divided into six categories: Airplane Data Flight Data Fuel Tank Usage Data Body Tank Input Data Is the tank in the fuselage? Is the tank pressurized? Pressure altitude of tank in cruise Temperature of compartment surrounding tank Tank Thermal Data Multi-Flight Monte Carlo Data

The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method November 2, 2005 Federal Aviation Administration 9 9 Program Overview – User Inputs User inputs for the program are divided into six categories: Airplane Data Flight Data Fuel Tank Usage Data Body Tank Input Data Tank Thermal Data Fuel temperature differentials relative to ambient Exponential time constants (define how fuel heats/cools in response to heat input) Multi-Flight Monte Carlo Data

The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method November 2, 2005 Federal Aviation Administration 10 Program Overview – User Inputs User inputs for the program are divided into six categories: Airplane Data Flight Data Fuel Tank Usage Data Body Tank Input Data Tank Thermal Data Multi-Flight Monte Carlo Data Number of Flights Random number freeze? (y/n) Warm day analysis? (y/n)

The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method November 2, 2005 Federal Aviation Administration 11 Program Overview – User Inputs (cont.) Additional user inputs when performing an FRM analysis: Reliability Effects MTBF - # of hours that the FRM is functional between failure events Failure detection capability - # of flights before a failure would be detected MEL Assumption – Average time, in flight hours, for FRM system to be restored once failure is detected Performance Effects Performance aspects of the FRM must be programmed by the user into the existing code and shown to provide an accurate representation of the FRM

The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method November 2, 2005 Federal Aviation Administration 12 Program Overview – Main Calculations

The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method November 2, 2005 Federal Aviation Administration 13 Program Overview – Outputs Monte Carlo Flammability Analysis Table displaying the following data for each flight: Preflight ground time Flight time Ambient temperature Cruise temperature Fuel flashpoint temperature Amount of time that the tank was flammable % of flight time that the tank was flammable Table displaying warm day (ground ambient temperature > 80  F) results Chart showing a summary of the Multi-Flight Monte Carlo Analysis

The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method November 2, 2005 Federal Aviation Administration 14 Program Overview – Outputs (cont.) Monte Carlo with FRM Analysis Table displaying baseline (i.e., no FRM) flammability data and corresponding flammability data due to reliability issues of the FRM Table displaying baseline flammability data and corresponding flammability data due to performance issues of the FRM for each phase of flight Table showing overall FRM effectiveness (reliability and performance issues)

The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method November 2, 2005 Federal Aviation Administration 15 Program Overview – Outputs (cont.) Single Flight Analysis Time-based and altitude-based plots of fuel temperature, TAT, LFL and UFL

The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method November 2, 2005 Federal Aviation Administration 16 Screenshots – User Inputs & Results Page

The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method November 2, 2005 Federal Aviation Administration 17 Screenshots – FRM Page

The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method November 2, 2005 Federal Aviation Administration 18 Screenshots – Single Flight Page

The Fuel Tank Flammability Assessment Method November 2, 2005 Federal Aviation Administration 19 Current Status Program is complete and will be released for comment with the pending NPRM Visual Basic version of model is currently under development User manual is written and is undergoing internal review Will have FAA report number DOT/FAA/AR-05/8 Will be released in draft format, for comment with the pending NPRM Current status of NPRM can be viewed online at