BLC Analysis using the ISDC System A. Strong MPE Dec 2001 This presentation can be obtained from www.gamma.mpe-garching.mpg.de/~aws/integral.html.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam direction and flux measured by MUMON K. Matsuoka (Kyoto) for the MUMON group Contents: 1.Beam stability (direction/flux) 2.Absolute  beam flux.
Advertisements

Epic-Cal 4 Feb 2003 Flux check Richard Saxton XMM-SOC/SSC Flux Comparisons.
XMM EPIC MOS Andy Read EPIC Calibration Meeting Mallorca, Spain 01/02/05 What can we do with Pattern 31s? - Central pixel (red) has.
Performance of Compton Alignment in OPERA CS, 2008 run Seigo Miyamoto Jan., 2009, MIZUNAMI.
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
HAWCPol / SuperHAWC Software & Operations J. Dotson July 28, 2007.
XMM EPIC MOS Steve Sembay MPE 04/05/06 The Effective Area of EPIC A comparison of MOS1, MOS2 and PN derived fluxes of 17 on-axis AGN.
Relative and (maybe) Absolute RHESSI Detector Efficiency: J.McTiernan 2-dec-2009.
Slews: Fast and Slow. Fast Slew Status  XMMSL1: catalogue of slew sources released May 2006 Revs , 5180 detections, 2692 Revs , 5180 detections,
“Imaging Spectroscopy” with RHESSI visibilities and inverse DRMs J.McTiernan RHESSI/NESSI workshop 4-apr-2006.
Michele Gallinaro, "QCD Results at CDF" - XXXVIII Rencontres de Moriond, March 22-29, QCD Results at CDF Inclusive Jet Cross Section Dijet Mass.
GAMMA RAY SPECTROSCOPY
Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay, for the LHCb Collaboration, 16 December 2014
XMM EPIC MOS Steve Sembay Mallorca 06/11/07 Report on three NRCO calibration observations On axis observation of absorbed Seyfert.
Gamma ray spectrum, its acquiring and analysis
Material Gamma Ray Astronomy at MPE For further information contact Helmut Steinle, MPE – NaIBGO component22 keV122 keV1.275 MeV4.4 MeV.
1 XP720: EBW Emission in H-Mode Plasmas S.J. Diem Presented at the 2007 NSTX Results Review July 23-24, 2007.
1 Report on analysis of PoGO Beam Test at Spring-8 Tsunefumi Mizuno July 15, 2003.
A multi-colour survey of NGC253 with XMM-Newton Robin Barnard, Lindsey Shaw Greening & Ulrich Kolb The Open University.
Search for Direct CP Violation in 3-body Cabibbo Suppressed D 0 Decays Kalanand Mishra, G. Mancinelli, B. T. Meadows, M. D. Sokoloff University of Cincinnati.
Gamma-Ray Bursts observed with INTEGRAL and XMM- Newton Sinead McGlynn School of Physics University College Dublin.
The National Standard of the Radionuclides Activity Unit in Poland R. Broda, A. Chyliński, T. Radoszewski, K. Małetka, T. Terlikowska-Droździel Radioisotope.
A look at XMM slew data Richard Saxton, Andrew Read, Michael Freyberg, Bruno Altieri, Puri Munuera.
Source flux accuracy from BLC analysis A. Strong MPE June 2002.
Neutron Monitoring Detector in KIMS Jungwon Kwak Seoul National University 2003 October 25 th KPS meeting.
GLAST Science Support Center May 8, 2006 GUC Meeting Demonstration of GRB Spectral Analysis with the SAE David Band (GSSC/JCA-UMBC)
Herman L. Marshall (MIT), Allyn Tennant (MSFC), Catherine E. Grant (MIT), Adam P. Hitchcock (Dept. Chemistry, McMaster U.), Steve O’Dell (MSFC), Paul P.
Pedro Arce Introducción a GEANT4 1 GAMOS tutorial Compton Camera Exercises
Plan for 2009 CALICE beam test with ScECAL + AHCAL + TCMT Jan-28 th CALICE TB Satoru Uozumi (Kobe)
Bill Atwood, SCIPP/UCSC, May, 2005 GLAST 1 A Parametric Energy Recon for GLAST A 3 rd attempt at Energy Reconstruction Keep in mind: 1)The large phase-space.
Grid Fabrication and Characterization Brian Dennis, GSFC Gordon Hurford, UCB.
Data Processing for the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory Aksel Hallin Queen’s, October 2006.
PSF in-flight calibration - PN IFC/CNRRingberg, April 2-4, 2002 PSF in-flight calibration for PN camera Simona Ghizzardi Silvano Molendi.
X-Ray Binary Light-Curve Analysis in optical and x-ray or “the ‘crazy’ LMXB (low mass x-ray binary) EXO “ Trainee: Alexander Kolodzig Origin: HU.
SPI Data Analysis A. Strong MPE Moriond, Les Arcs 2002.
Antimatter in our Galaxy unveiled by INTEGRAL
M.Shirchenko, JINR KIAE detectors test & restoration 1. Restoration of the detectors 2. Characterization of KIAE detectors 3. Next steps and.
A. Bross MICE CM17 February MuCool RF Program 805 and 201 MHz Studies.
Peterson xBSM Optics, Beam Size Calibration1 xBSM Beam Size Calibration Dan Peterson CesrTA general meeting introduction to the optics.
Idea for next data taking at FNAL Dec-14 th 2008 ScECAL S. Uozumi (Kobe)
Absolute Polarization Measurement at RHIC in the Coulomb Nuclear Interference Region September 30, 2006 RHIC Spin Collaboration Meeting RIKEN, Wako, Japan.
Alignment for 2010 run and n_TOF 2009 beam profile M. Calviani (CERN), S. Andriamonje (CERN), E. Berthoumieux (CEA), C. Guerrero (CIEMAT),
Steven Moon, A.J. Boston, H. Boston, J. Cresswell, L. Harkness, D. Judson, P.J. Nolan PSD9, Aberystwyth, Wales th September 2011 Compton imaging.
Second Workshop on large TPC for low energy rare event detection, Paris, December 21 st, 2004.
ArgonneResult_ ppt1 Comparison of data and simulation of Argonne Beam Test July 10, 2004 Tsunefumi Mizuno
Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor
Investigation of the proton-induced reactions on natural molybdenum.
X-Ray Binary Light-Curve Analysis in optical and x-ray or “the ‘crazy’ LMXB (low mass x-ray binary) EXO “ Trainee: Alexander Kolodzig Origin:
M. Sullivan Apr 27, 2017 MDI meeting
Phisymmetry in 2011 Phisymmetry was used:
Validation status overivew
Validation status overivew
Future Physics at HERMES
Institute of Cosmos Sciences - University of Barcelona
Fangfang Yu, Xiangqian Wu and Tom Stone
Panagiotis Kokkas Univ. of Ioannina
Detection of muons at 150 GeV/c with a CMS Preshower Prototype
GOES Lunar Calibration
Mo-92 EC/beta+ search with CaMoO4 crystal at Y2L
DAMA Calibrations – low energy
Erik Strahler UW-Madison 4/27/2008
Find sin 2x, cos 2x, and tan 2x from the given information: {image} Select the correct answer:
HyCal Energy Calibration using dedicated Compton runs
ESA’s INTEGRAL Mission
Echidna: current status and expected performance
Pulse Profile Decomposition: Geometry and Beam Patterns of EXO and 4U
Calibration Activities – the MOS perspective
Kristin K Madsen, IACHEC 2017
Insight-HXMT observation on Swift J
ATLAS full run-2 luminosity combination
Presentation transcript:

BLC Analysis using the ISDC System A. Strong MPE Dec 2001 This presentation can be obtained from

Data and s/w at ISDC Remote logon from MPE, works fine Analysis of 60 Co, 137 Cs, 241 useful for getting experience with ISDC data, following SPI BLC pipeline development spiskymax imaging at various angles multiple detectors dithering IRF performance New IRF with central absorber

Most BLC data available but still a few gaps No monitor calibration available for 137 Cs PROBLEMS

Singles BLC run Co 1173 keV 125m on-axis spiskymax IRF from GSFC

Singles+PSD+doubles+triples BLC run Co 1173 keV 125m on-axis spiskymax IRF from GSFC

Singles+PSD+doubles+triples BLC run Co 125m 2 o spiskymax IRF from GSFC

Singles+PSD+doubles+triples BLC run Co 125m -2 o spiskymax IRF from GSFC

Singles+PSD+doubles+triples BLC run Co 125m 4 o IRF from GSFC

Singles+PSD+doubles+triples BLC run Co 125m 6 o IRF from GSFC

Singles+PSD+doubles+triples BLC run 40, Co 125m source at 8 o, 10 o IRF from GSFC 8o8o 10 o

Singles+PSD + doubles +triples BLC run Co 125m 1 pointing on-axis 30 o rotation about X spiskymax IRF from GSFC

Multidetectors: Singles+PSD + doubles +triples 60 Co 125m 11 pointings spiskymax IRF from GSFC

Multidetectors: doubles + triples ONLY 60 Co 125m 1 pointing, on-axis, BLC run 31 spiskymax IRF from GSFC

Multidetectors: doubles + triples ONLY 60 Co 125m 1 pointing, 2 o, BLC run 37 spiskymax IRF from GSFC

Multidetectors: singles +PSD +doubles + triples 60 Co 125m 2 pointings, 2 o, BLC run SUMMED spiskymax IRF from GSFC Analysed as single pointing -> 2 sources 2 o sep In absence of dithering: poor result

Synthesize dithered observation of 2 sources separated by 2 o 5 pointings, spisumhist to synthesize data 60 Co 125m singles + PSD +doubles+triples Sources Synthetic pointing Pointings 4o4o Shows how dithering improves imaging by sampling full mask pattern

Synthesize dithered observation of 2 sources separated by 2 o 5 pointings, spisumhist to synthesize data 60 Co 125m singles + PSD +doubles+triples Sources Synthetic pointing Pointings 4o4o Shows how dithering improves imaging by sampling full source pattern Higher iteration

Synthesize dithered observation of 2 sources separated by 1 o 5 effective pointings, spisumhist to synthesize data 60 Co 125m singles + PSD +doubles+triples Sources Synthetic pointing Pointings 2o2o 4545

Synthesize dithered observation of 2 sources separated by 1 o 5 effective pointings, spisumhist to synthesize data 60 Co 125m singles + PSD +doubles+triples Sources Synthetic pointing Pointings 2o2o 4545 Higher iteration

Comparison of observed and predicted counts 60 Co 125m using new GSFC IRFs. Obs Pred Obs BLC Run 31 on-axis Doubles overpredicted! Central obscurer well modelled Singles (inc PSD) doubles triples Spihist and livetime problems: improved in next slide

Comparison of observed and predicted counts 60 Co 125m using new GSFC IRFs. Obs Pred Obs Central obscurer well modelled Singles (inc PSD) doubles triples BLC Run 31 on-axis, spihist multiples livetime factor 0.98 for consistency with singles GOOD FIT !

Comparison of observed and predicted counts 60 Co 125m using GSFC IRFs. Obs Pred Obs BLC Run 37 inclination = 2 o

Singles+PSD+doubles+triples BLC run Cs 125m 0 o spiskymax IRF from GSFC

Singles+PSD+doubles+triples BLC run Cs 125m 2 o spiskymax IRF from GSFC

Singles+doubles+triples BLC run Am 59.5 keV 125m 0 o spiskymax IRF from GSFC

Singles+doubles+triples BLC run Na 2754 keV 125m 0 o spiskymax IRF from GSFC

Comparison of observed and predicted counts 137 Cs 125m using GSFC IRFs. Obs Pred BLC Run 65 0 o 137 Cs 661 keV Central absorber response OK Observed Predicted

Comparison of observed and predicted counts 137 Cs 125m using GSFC IRFs. Obs Pred BLC Run 66 2 o

241 Am 59.5 keV BLC run 134 on-axis predicted NB prediction without background observed Central absorber Det #1 pred. too high

24 Na 2754 keV BLC run 329 on-axis Predicted Observed on-axis, spihist multiples livetime factor 0.98 for consistency with singles

60 Co 1173 keV BLC 125m run 31 spiros fitted flux = 1.54 cm -2 s -1 Monitor-> 2.11 cm -2 s -1 ?? monitor->1.74 cm -2 s -1 Absolute long-distance source fluxes Using new GSFC response, singles+doubles+triples 241 Am 59.5 keV BLC 125m run 134 spiros fitted flux = cm -2 s -1 Monitor-> cm -2 s -1 [Monitor value from B. Teegarden, preliminary] Monitor values using gaspan + Schanne & Tauzin calibration 60 Co 1332 keV BLC 125m run 31 spiros fitted flux = 1.70 cm -2 s -1 Monitor-> 2.22 cm -2 s Cs 661 keV BLC 125m run 65 fitted flux = 1.44 cm -2 s -1 spiros/monitor=0.73, 0.77 cf GSFC photopeak ratio ~ 0.8 OK spiros/monitor=1.06 cf GSFC photopeak ratio ~ 0.8 !

60 Co 1173 keV BLC 125m runs spiros fitted fluxes cm -2 s -1 Absolute long-distance source fluxes Flux measured at various angles Angle Angle flux