NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Mission Operations Laboratory Increment 21 & 22 Training Readiness Review April 2009 CREW TRAINING COORDINATOR (CTC) Kathy H. Brown Marshall Space Flight Center Training and Crew Operations Group (Cell)

Page 2 NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC Page 2 Topics Crew Assignments/ Flights Research Plan Crew Expedition Templates Task Assignment Philosophy Task Assignments – (included as attachments – not in presentation) Overall Training Status Training Plan – Remaining Training Forward Work Acronyms List Backup Charts

Page 3 NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC Page 3 CREW ASSIGNMENTS/Codes Primes Inc. 20/21 Prime: –Rom: Roman Romanenko – 19S –Dew: Frank DeWinne – CDR E21 –Thi: Bob Thirsk – 19S –St: Nicole Stott – 17A –Wl: Jeff Williams – CDR E22 –Sur: Maxim Suraev – 20S Inc. 22/23 Prime: –Kt: Oleg Kotov – CDR E23 –Ng: Soichi, Noguchi – 21S –Cc: TJ Creamer – 21S –Kal: Alexander Kaleri – CDR E24 –Kor: Mikhail Kornienko – 22S –Cl: Tracy Caldwell – 22S Note: Reference these crews codes for the following charts Backups Inc. 20/21 Backups: – Kon: Dmitry Kondratyev – Kui: Andre Kuipers – Hd: Chris Hadfield – C: Cady Coleman – 17A – Skv: Alexander Skvortsov – Wa: Shannon Walker Inc. 22/23 Backups: – Shk: Anton Shkaplerov – Fu: Satoshi Furukawa – Wo: Doug Wheelock – Tu: Mikhail Tyurin – Sam: Alexander Samokutyayev – Ks: Scott Kelly

Page 4 NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC Page 4 Inc. 21/22 Flights & Crew

Page 5 NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC Page 5 Inc. 21/22 Payload/Research Plan –Payload Training Plan requirements are based on the RPWG baselined Research Plan and Manifest (MPCB - December 10, 2008) The Increment Lead Scientist, Kenol Jules, presented an overview of all increment payloads on January 20, 2009 (including IP payloads).

Page 6 NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC Page 6 Crew ExpeditionTemplates Target Payload Weeks: May 4 week, July 6 week, and September 14 week

Page 7 NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC Page 7 Crew Task Assignment Philosophy General Philosophy: Payload tasking for NASA payloads is level loaded as much as feasible across USOS crewmembers. The task assignment decisions for crewmembers include assessment of training accomplished in previous flows; crew availability at partner sites/template constraints; crew consent on subject payloads; crew interest/ preferences; and crew overall loading. CTC reviews increment specific payload task assignments with crewmembers. Crewmember interest, preferences, and requests are accommodated unless constrained by expedition templates; facility/instructor loading; and/or individual crew loading. Training philosophy for freezer facilities (MELFI/GLACIER) –Cosmonauts will not be trained unless specific requirements for freezer facilities are identified - early enough in their training flow to be accomplished. –All USOS crewmembers will be trained to either Specialist or User level One Specialist per Increment Remaining USOS crewmembers will be trained as Users

Page 8 NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC Page 8 Crew Task Assignment Philosophy (p2) For 6 Person Crew Ops, for NASA payload training, the number of payload specialist trained for each payload will be assessed by the Training Strategy Team - based on a specific criteria set. (Shown in backup charts) –Generally one specialist or operator per increment (example: one for I21 & one for I22) but some payloads will require only 1 across the two increments. For Single Flow to Launch (SFTL) Ops, backup crews will not be trained unless certain criteria are met. Payload training requirements for backup crewmembers will be assessed by the Training Strategy Team - based on a specific criteria set. (Shown in backup charts) After the Increment Specific Research Plan is baselined and payload task assessments are completed, the task assignments are reflected in the Prime and Backup Master CQRMs. (CQRMs are provided as attachments 1 & 2 to this presentation.) CQRMs are used by the Increment Training Integrators and the International Training Implementation Working Group as the integration tool for identifying and documenting crew task assignments. Just prior to Increment start, a Crew Training Matrix is developed and baselined for POIC use.

Page 9 NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC Page 9 Overall Crew Training Status Overall I21-22 Training Status as of March 31,2009:

Page 10 NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC Page 10 Crew Training Remaining (p1) Note: May classes are already scheduled with CAMS.

Page 11 NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC Page 11 Crew Training Remaining (p2)

Page 12 NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC Page 12 Crew Training Remaining (p3)

Page 13 NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC Page 13 I21 & I22 Forward Work Shuttle training coordination for 17A flight Review and respond to CEFs as required Update training plan and CQRMs as required Develop Crew Training Matrix at I-2 months

Page 14 NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC Page 14 ACRONYM LIST CDR – Commander CEF – Change Evaluation Form CQRM – Crew Qualifications Responsibility Matrix CTC – Crew Training Coordinator FE – Flight Engineer POIC – Payload Operations & Integration Center SFTL – Single Flow to Launch SOC – Shuttle Operations Coordinator USOS – United States On-Orbit Segment Note: Payload acronyms are spelled out on task sheets

Page 15 NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC Page 15 Backup charts - Training Requirements Criteria (NASA) A set of criteria will be added to the TST process to determine and document the appropriate crew training requirement for each payload (one specialist per Soyuz, per crew of 6, etc.) (a) One specialist in a crew of 6 Lower priority payloads Infrequently operated payloads Non time-critical payloads Payloads with minimal crew interfaces OBT is available (b) One specialist on each Soyuz Critical payloads –Safety (containment, thermal, mass, etc.) –Continuously powered (EXPRESS) –Keep alive (Animals, etc.) –Cold stowage (MELFI, Cold Bag) High impact payloads –Limited window of opportunity (decay, life cycle stage, short fuse) –Loss of substantial data collection or ops investment –Program priority (agreements, contracts, obligations) Operational considerations –Crew request –High volume –Scheduling flexibility (c) All USOS crewmembers USOS complement training USOS user training USOS HRP informed consent briefing (d) All crewmembers Payload complement minimum familiarization and safety User training

Page 16 NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC Page 16 Backup charts - NASA Backup Crew Training Criteria A set of criteria will be added to the TST process to determine and document whether it is required to train backup crew members for each payload No other concurrent onboard crew will be trained; –A payload no one else has been trained on –2 persons required and only one trained person is onboard and Payload is difficult / unique; –Complex operations –Finesse skills –Scientific judgment and decision making and Payload has high impact; –Safety (containment, thermal, mass, etc.) –Continuously powered (EXPRESS) –Keep alive (Animals, etc.) –Cold stowage (MELFI, Cold Bag) –Limited window of opportunity (decay, life cycle stage, short fuse) –Risk of loss of substantial data collection or ops investment –Program priority (agreements, contracts, obligations) and if applicable Baseline Data Collection (BDC) is possible. –Is there time to perform pre-flight BDC? –Is the crew member eligible (data type, custom gear)? –Informed consent signed? –Hardware / equipment available at crew site (e.g. Russia)?