Priority Action Report Toxicology Subcommittee Chemistry / Instrumental Analysis Scientific Area Committee Marc A. LeBeau, PhD, F-ABFT February 23, 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ASTM OFFICERS CONFERENCE SUBCOMMITTEE CHAIRMENS DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES.
Advertisements

The National Commission on Forensic Science and the formation of the Organization of Scientific Area Committees (OSAC) ABA CRIMINAL JUSTICE SECTION SIXTH.
Presentation to the National Commission on Forensic Sciences October 2014 Erica L. Smith Chief, Law Enforcement Statistics Unit Bureau of Justice Statistics.
TITLE OF PROJECT PROPOSAL NUMBER Principal Investigator PI’s Organization ESTCP Selection Meeting DATE.
ORGANIZATION. 2 Problem scenario  Develop an organizational chart for your laboratory showing lines of authority from the head of the organization to.
ORGANIZATION. 2 Purchasing & Inventory Assessment Occurrence Management Information Management Process Improvement Customer Service Facilities & Safety.
Enhancing Data Quality of Distributive Trade Statistics Workshop for African countries on the Implementation of International Recommendations for Distributive.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
Publishing qualitative studies H Maisonneuve April 2015 Edinburgh, Scotland.
ACCREDITATION SITE VISITS.  DIVISION 010 – SITE VISIT PROCESS  DIVISION 017 – UNIT STANDARDS  DIVISION 065 – CONTENT STANDARDS.
The Molecular Diagnostics Research Laboratory University of Malaya Development and Implementation of a Quality System The Molecular Diagnostics Research.
Accreditation and Proficiency Testing. APT Subcommittee MembershipMeeting Activities 21 members, 15 non- Commissioners Representation: Accreditation bodies.
Multi-Agency Radiological Laboratory Analytical Protocols Manual: MARLAP Presentation to the Radiation Advisory Committee/Science Advisory Board April.
CPA is a UKAS company The Assessment Process 2014 Seminars.
Codex Guidelines for the Application of HACCP
Lecture 7 Analytical Quality Control
Good Laboratory Practice
WWLC Standard Operating Procedures Presented by Frank Hall, Laboratory Certification Coordinator.
Introduction to ISO New and modified requirements.
Chemistry B.S. Degree Program Assessment Plan Dr. Glenn Cunningham Professor and Chair University of Central Florida April 21, 2004.
Module 5: Assuring the Quality of HIV Rapid Testing
1 Accredited Standards Committee C63 ® - EMC ANSI ASC C63 Subcommittee 7 Spectrum Etiquette Report to C63 H. Stephen Berger Chair, SC7 November 13, 2014.
Demystifying the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge Central Iowa IIBA Chapter December 7, 2005.
NIST OSAC - Quality Infrastructure Committee
American Association for Laboratory Accreditation Practical Solutions to Traceability and Uncertainty in Accreditation Presented to CITAC-NCSLI Joint Workshop.
STANDARDS OVERVIEW Wednesday, April 30, 2015 KAREN RECZEK, STANDARDS COORDINATION OFFICE, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY
FDA Recommendations: Sampling Plans for Blood Establishments Lore Fields MT(ASCP)SBB Consumer Safety Officer OBRR/CBER/FDA October 19, 2012.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection August 8-9, 2007.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
P1516.4: VV&A Overlay to the FEDEP 20 September 2007 Briefing for the VV&A Summit Simone Youngblood Simone Youngblood M&S CO VV&A Proponency Leader
Program Evaluation Presenter: Dr. Laura R. Dawson Executive Vice President/COO The Dawson Group of Virginia, Inc.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 24, 2009.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
1 Accredited Standards Committee C63 ® - EMC ANSI ASC C63 Subcommittee 7 Spectrum Etiquette Report to C63 H. Stephen Berger Chair, SC7 May 7, 2015.
Quality Infrastructure Committee (QIC) Update July 27, 2015.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION GRAVES COUNTY SCHOOLS © 2010 AdvancED.
Priority Action Report Video/Imaging Technology and Analysis (VITAL) Subcommittee Digital and Multimedia SAC Carl Kriigel Subcommittee Chair 01 FEB 2016.
Priority Action Report Facial Identification Digital Multimedia SAC Lora S. Sims 22 Feb 2016.
1 Accredited Standards Committee C63 ® - EMC ANSI ASC C63 Subcommittee 7 Spectrum Etiquette Report to C63 H. Stephen Berger Chair, SC7 May 1, 2014.
Priority Action Report Anthropology Crime Scene/Death Investigation Thomas D. Holland, Ph.D. January 27, 2016.
Priority Action Report Digital Evidence Digital / Multimedia James Darnell 2/1/2016.
Priority Action Report Friction Ridge Subcommittee SAC Physics/Pattern Melissa R. Gische February 23, 2016.
Priority Action Report Gunshot Residue (GSR) Subcommittee Chemistry/Instrumental Analysis SAC Michael V. Martinez Subcommittee Chair February 23, 2016.
Priority Action Report Seized Drugs Subcommittee SAC Chemistry/Instrumental Analysis Sandra E. Rodriguez-Cruz, Ph.D. – Chair February 23, 2016.
Priority Action Report Biology Biology Data Interpretation and Reporting Committee Mechthild Prinz February 22, 2016.
AAFS Biological Methods Subcommittee Progress Kimberly Murga February 22, 2016.
Priority Action Report Wildlife Forensics Biology/DNA SAC M. Katherine Moore, Chair Mary K. Burnham-Curtis, Vice Chair February 22, 2016.
Priority Action Report Medicolegal Death Investigation Crime Scene/Death Investigation SAC John Fudenberg Jan 29,2016.
Priority Action Report Geological Materials Chemistry/Instrumental Analysis Brad Lee February 23, 2016.
Priority Action Report Footwear and Tire Physics/Pattern SAC G. Matt Johnson, Chair February 23, 2016.
Priority Action Report Fire Debris and Explosives Subcommittee Chemistry and Instrumental Analysis SAC Vincent J. Desiderio February 23, 2016.
Priority Action Report
Priority Action Report Fire and Explosion Investigation Crime Scene/Death Investigation Craig Beyler, Chair 30 January 2016.
Priority Action Report Materials (Trace) Chemistry/Instrumental Analysis Susan Gross, Chair February 23, 2016.
DOCUMENTATION ISO/IEC 17025:2005 Documentation.
SEMINAR ON PRESENTED BY BRAHMABHATT BANSARI K. M. PHARM PART DEPARTMENT OF PHARMACEUTICS AND PHARMACEUTICAL TECHNOLGY L. M. COLLEGE OF PHARMACY.
Internal Audit Quality Assessment Guide
Priority Action Report Forensic Document Examination Pattern/Physics Rigo Vargas 2/23/2016.
Priority Action Report Dogs and Sensors Kenneth G. Furton, Ph.D. David R. Kontny February 22, 2016.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
Physics and Pattern Evidence Scientific Area Committee Chair: Austin Hicklin, Noblis February 2016.
BSB Biomanufacturing CHAPTER 4 GMP – Documentation Part I (SOP)
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Overview of Quality Assurance
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
EPA Method Equivalency
Have Instrument, make method; How new methods are made and validated
Mark D. Stolorow Director of OSAC Affairs
Presentation transcript:

Priority Action Report Toxicology Subcommittee Chemistry / Instrumental Analysis Scientific Area Committee Marc A. LeBeau, PhD, F-ABFT February 23, 2016

Discipline Description The OSAC Subcommittee on Toxicology will focus on standards and guidelines related to the analysis of biological samples for alcohol, drugs, or poisons, and the interpretation of these results. 2

Subcommittee Leadership PositionNameOrganizationTerm Chair Marc A LeBeau, PhD Vice Chair Melissa Kennedy, MS Executive Secretary Fiona Couper, PhDWA State 3

Subcommittee Members #NameOrganizationTerm 1Daniel Anderson, MS CO Bureau of Investigation 2Connie Borror, PhDAZ State 3Sabra Botch-Jones, MSBoston 4Nichole Bynum, MSRTI 5Kenneth Ferslew, PhDEast TN State 6Marilyn Huestis, PhD National Institute on Drug Abuse (Retired) 7Robert Johnson, PhD Tarrant County ME’s Office 8Matthew Juhascik, PhD Montgomery County Coroner’s Office 9Philip Kemp,

Subcommittee Members #NameOrganizationTerm 10Jennifer Limoges, MSFSNY State 11Robert Middleberg, PhDNMS 12Madeline 13Christine Moore, PhDImmunalysis 14Sumandeep Rana, PhD Redwood Toxicology Laboratories 15Robert Sears, MS SC Law Enforcement Division 16Ruth Winecker, PhDNC Office of Chief 17Dustin Tate Yeatman, MS Palm Beach County Sheriff

6 January 2016 OSAC Toxicology Subcommittee Meeting Leesburg, Virginia

Summary of Standards/Guidelines Priority Actions TopicWorking Title of Document 1Standard Practices for Method Validation in Forensic Toxicology 2 Standard Practices for Measurement Traceability in Forensic Toxicology 3 Standard Practices for Method Validation in Forensic Toxicology – Breath Alcohol Measuring Instrument Calibration 4Standard Practices for Quality Control in Forensic Toxicology 5 Guidelines for Opinions and Testimony in Forensic Toxicology 7

OSAC Review/Approval of Standards of Practice Priority Action Project and Task Group Established Task Group Develops First Draft of Document Draft Presented to Subcommittee for Comments (30 days) Revisions by Task Group to Form Draft Final Document Draft Final Document Approved by Task Group Draft Final Document Provided to Subcommittee for Discussion OSAC Packet Prepared OSAC Packet Approved by Subcommittee (15 days) OSAC Packet Provided to SAC and RCs for Comments (30 days) Revisions by Task Group (as appropriate) Final Document Approved by Task Group Final Document Provided to Subcommittee for Discussion Final Document Approved by Subcommittee (15 days) Approval by SAC to Send Final Document to SDO (15 days) Final Document Sent to SDO SDO-Revised Document Provided to Subcommittee for Discussion OSAC Packet Revised for SDO Document SDO Packet Approved by Subcommittee to Place on Registry (30 days) SDO Packet Approved by SAC to Issue Notice of Intent to Place on Registry (30 days) Notice of Intent to Place on Registry for Public Comments (30 days) Public Comments Reviewed and Addressed SDO Packet Approved by SAC to Place on Registry SDO Packet Approved by FSSB to Place on Registry (30 days) SDO-Revised Document Placed on Registry

Topic 1: Method Validation Document Title: Standard Practices for Method Validation in Forensic Toxicology Laboratories Scope:Minimum standards of practice for validating analytical methods in forensic toxicology. Objective/rationale:Provide objective evidence that a method is capable of successfully performing at the level of its intended use and identify limitations under normal operating conditions. Issues/Concerns:Revision of SWGTOX Validation Standard Task Group Chair Name: Marc LeBeau Task Group Chair Contact Information: Date of Last Task Group Meeting: October

Key Components of Standard: Delineates when to validate and revalidate analytical methods Requires formation of validation plan Defines required validation parameters based on method’s scope Provides specific requirements for conducting validation experiments Explains documentation requirements of validation records Appendices provide examples, as well as recommendations on how to streamline method validation experiments 10 Topic 1: Method Validation

11 Priority Action Project and Task Group Established Task Group Develops First Draft of Document Draft Presented to Subcommittee for Comments (30 days) Revisions by Task Group to Form Draft Final Document Draft Final Document Approved by Task Group Draft Final Document Provided to Subcommittee for Discussion OSAC Packet Prepared OSAC Packet Approved by Subcommittee (15 days) OSAC Packet Provided to SAC and RCs for Comments (30 days) Revisions by Task Group (as appropriate) Final Document Approved by Task Group Final Document Provided to Subcommittee for Discussion Final Document Approved by Subcommittee (15 days) Approval by SAC to Send Final Document to SDO (15 days) Final Document Sent to SDO SDO-Revised Document Provided to Subcommittee for Discussion OSAC Packet Revised for SDO Document SDO Packet Approved by Subcommittee to Place on Registry (30 days) SDO Packet Approved by SAC to Issue Notice of Intent to Place on Registry (30 days) Notice of Intent to Place on Registry for Public Comments (30 days) Public Comments Reviewed and Addressed SDO Packet Approved by SAC to Place on Registry SDO Packet Approved by FSSB to Place on Registry (30 days) SDO-Revised Document Placed on Registry Topic 1: Method Validation

Topic 2: Measurement Traceability Document Title: Standard Practices for Measurement Traceability in Forensic Toxicology Scope:Minimum standards of practice for establishing measurement traceability in forensic toxicology testing and calibration methods. Objective/rationale:Provide objective evidence that measurement traceability has been established in forensic toxicology methods. Issues/Concerns:New concept for laboratories accredited by bodies that do not follow ISO standards Task Group Chair Name: Dustin Yeatman Task Group Chair Contact Information: Date of Last Task Group Meeting: January

Key Components of Standard: Explains what may be considered a measurement Provides NIST’s essential elements of measurement traceability Demonstrates how measurement traceability may be established through the calibration of equipment and use of certified reference materials Describes measurement traceability requirements based on method scope Defines laboratory equipment that must be calibrated to establish measurement traceability 13 Topic 2: Measurement Traceability

14 Priority Action Project and Task Group Established Task Group Develops First Draft of Document Draft Presented to Subcommittee for Comments (30 days) Revisions by Task Group to Form Draft Final Document Draft Final Document Approved by Task Group Draft Final Document Provided to Subcommittee for Discussion OSAC Packet Prepared OSAC Packet Approved by Subcommittee (15 days) OSAC Packet Provided to SAC and RCs for Comments (30 days) Revisions by Task Group (as appropriate) Final Document Approved by Task Group Final Document Provided to Subcommittee for Discussion Final Document Approved by Subcommittee (15 days) Approval by SAC to Send Final Document to SDO (15 days) Final Document Sent to SDO SDO-Revised Document Provided to Subcommittee for Discussion OSAC Packet Revised for SDO Document SDO Packet Approved by Subcommittee to Place on Registry (30 days) SDO Packet Approved by SAC to Issue Notice of Intent to Place on Registry (30 days) Notice of Intent to Place on Registry for Public Comments (30 days) Public Comments Reviewed and Addressed SDO Packet Approved by SAC to Place on Registry SDO Packet Approved by FSSB to Place on Registry (30 days) SDO-Revised Document Placed on Registry Topic 2: Measurement Traceability

Topic 3: Breath Alcohol Calibration Document Title:Standard Practices for Method Validation in Forensic Toxicology – Breath Alcohol Measuring Instrument Calibration Scope: Minimum standards for validating calibration methods in forensic toxicology laboratories performing evidentiary Breath Alcohol Measuring Instrument calibration. Objective/rationale:Provide objective evidence that a method is capable of successfully performing at the level of its intended use and identify limitations under normal operating conditions. Issues/Concerns:None Task Group Chair Name: Melissa Kennedy Task Group Chair Contact Information: Date of Last Task Group Meeting: January

Key Components of Standard: Delineates when to validate and revalidate analytical methods Requires formation of validation plan Defines required validation parameters based on method’s scope Provides specific requirements for conducting validation experiments Explains documentation requirements of validation records Appendices provide examples, as well as recommendations on how to streamline method validation experiments 16 Topic 3: Breath Alcohol Calibration

17 Priority Action Project and Task Group Established Task Group Develops First Draft of Document Draft Presented to Subcommittee for Comments (30 days) Revisions by Task Group to Form Draft Final Document Draft Final Document Approved by Task Group Draft Final Document Provided to Subcommittee for Discussion OSAC Packet Prepared OSAC Packet Approved by Subcommittee (15 days) OSAC Packet Provided to SAC and RCs for Comments (30 days) Revisions by Task Group (as appropriate) Final Document Approved by Task Group Final Document Provided to Subcommittee for Discussion Final Document Approved by Subcommittee (15 days) Approval by SAC to Send Final Document to SDO (15 days) Final Document Sent to SDO SDO-Revised Document Provided to Subcommittee for Discussion OSAC Packet Revised for SDO Document SDO Packet Approved by Subcommittee to Place on Registry (30 days) SDO Packet Approved by SAC to Issue Notice of Intent to Place on Registry (30 days) Notice of Intent to Place on Registry for Public Comments (30 days) Public Comments Reviewed and Addressed SDO Packet Approved by SAC to Place on Registry SDO Packet Approved by FSSB to Place on Registry (30 days) SDO-Revised Document Placed on Registry Topic 3: Breath Alcohol Calibration

Topic 4: Quality Control Document Title: Standard Practices for Quality Control in Forensic Toxicology Scope: Minimum standards of practice for quality control in forensic toxicology laboratories Objective/rationale: Provide objective evidence that day-to-day use of a method continues to perform as validated Issues/Concerns:None Task Group Chair Name: Ruth Winecker Task Group Chair Contact Information: Date of Last Task Group Meeting: January

Key Components of Standard: Defines requirements of quality control programs within forensic toxicology laboratories Explains use and verification of QC materials Provides direction on preparation, storage, expiration, and documentation of calibrators and controls Instructs on calibration and control of chromatographic, immunoassay, spectrophotometric, and other assays Explains elements of quality control reviews, as well as long-term monitoring of QC data 19 Topic 4: Quality Control

20 Priority Action Project and Task Group Established Task Group Develops First Draft of Document Draft Presented to Subcommittee for Comments (30 days) Revisions by Task Group to Form Draft Final Document Draft Final Document Approved by Task Group Draft Final Document Provided to Subcommittee for Discussion OSAC Packet Prepared OSAC Packet Approved by Subcommittee (15 days) OSAC Packet Provided to SAC and RCs for Comments (30 days) Revisions by Task Group (as appropriate) Final Document Approved by Task Group Final Document Provided to Subcommittee for Discussion Final Document Approved by Subcommittee (15 days) Approval by SAC to Send Final Document to SDO (15 days) Final Document Sent to SDO SDO-Revised Document Provided to Subcommittee for Discussion OSAC Packet Revised for SDO Document SDO Packet Approved by Subcommittee to Place on Registry (30 days) SDO Packet Approved by SAC to Issue Notice of Intent to Place on Registry (30 days) Notice of Intent to Place on Registry for Public Comments (30 days) Public Comments Reviewed and Addressed SDO Packet Approved by SAC to Place on Registry SDO Packet Approved by FSSB to Place on Registry (30 days) SDO-Revised Document Placed on Registry Topic 4: Quality Control

Topic 5: Opinions and Testimony Document Title:Guidelines for Opinions and Testimony in Forensic Toxicology Scope:Delineates guidelines for practices in forensic toxicology opinion reports and testimony. Objective/rationale:Recommends practices to be used in expert opinions, including those defined as “appropriate” and “inappropriate”. Issues/Concerns:None Task Group Chair Name: Madeline Montgomery Task Group Chair Contact Information: Date of Last Task Group Meeting: January

Key Components of Guideline: Explains difference between basic analytical toxicology reports and opinion reports Provides direction on elements of expert opinions Defines appropriate opinions and testimonies that are scientifically supported Describes opinions and testimony that are inappropriate for a toxicologist to address 22 Topic 5: Opinions and Testimony

23 Priority Action Project and Task Group Established Task Group Develops First Draft of Document Draft Presented to Subcommittee for Comments (30 days) Revisions by Task Group to Form Draft Final Document Draft Final Document Approved by Task Group Draft Final Document Provided to Subcommittee for Discussion OSAC Packet Prepared OSAC Packet Approved by Subcommittee (15 days) OSAC Packet Provided to SAC and RCs for Comments (30 days) Revisions by Task Group (as appropriate) Final Document Approved by Task Group Final Document Provided to Subcommittee for Discussion Final Document Approved by Subcommittee (15 days) Approval by SAC to Send Final Document to SDO (15 days) Final Document Sent to SDO SDO-Revised Document Provided to Subcommittee for Discussion OSAC Packet Revised for SDO Document SDO Packet Approved by Subcommittee to Place on Registry (30 days) SDO Packet Approved by SAC to Issue Notice of Intent to Place on Registry (30 days) Notice of Intent to Place on Registry for Public Comments (30 days) Public Comments Reviewed and Addressed SDO Packet Approved by SAC to Place on Registry SDO Packet Approved by FSSB to Place on Registry (30 days) SDO-Revised Document Placed on Registry Topic 5: Opinions and Testimony

Other Ongoing Topics Document Evaluation Task Group Evaluation of existing standards and guides Identification of gaps in the catalog of standards and guides Facilitation of document reviews and approvals using canvass or SDO processes Task Group Chair Name: Fiona Couper Task Group Chair Contact Information: Date of Last Task Group Meeting: January Terminology Task Group Establish glossary of terms in the field of forensic toxicology to be used within documents developed by the subcommittee Task Group Chair Name: Kenneth Ferslew Task Group Chair Contact Information: Date of Last Task Group Meeting: January 2016

Additional Topics of Interest Standard for Mass Spectrometry Data Evaluation in Forensic Toxicology* Standard for Forensic Toxicology Reports* Standard for Identification Criteria for Forensic Toxicology* Standard for Content of Forensic Toxicology Standard Operating Procedures Standard for Estimating Measurement Uncertainty in Forensic Toxicology Guideline for Specimen Collection and Storage in Forensic Toxicology Standard for Quality Control Practices for Breath Alcohol Testing Standard for Proficiency Testing in Forensic Toxicology Standard for Minimum Testing Requirements in Forensic Toxicology 25 * Indicates new Task Group initiated

Research Gaps Identified Emerging Drugs of Abuse and Therapeutic Agents Develop analytical methods, evaluate existing and novel sample preparation techniques, epidemiological studies, metabolite identification, post-mortem distribution, pharmacodynamics/pharmacokinetic studies Herbal and Dietary Supplements and Plant-based Toxins Develop analytical methods, improve understanding of toxicity 26

Research Gaps Identified Human Factors Impact on Forensic Toxicology Determine whether cognitive and contextual biases impact how cases are analyzed and conclusions made, impacts of motivational issues, fitness for duty (e.g. fatigue, visual acuity), scientific culture, group dynamics and error management Postmortem Distribution and Redistribution Comprehensive tissue distribution studies to provide data on relationship between tissue and blood drug/metabolite concentrations, further characterization of chemical/biological mechanisms of PMR, specific chemical markers to provide evidence of PMR, development of mathematical relationships to evaluate PMR 27

Summary TopicTitle 1 Standard Practices for Method Validation in Forensic Toxicology 2 Standard Practices for Measurement Traceability in Forensic Toxicology 3 Standard Practices for Method Validation in Forensic Toxicology – Breath Alcohol Measuring Instrument Calibration 4 Standard Practices for Quality Control in Forensic Toxicology 5 Guidelines for Opinions and Testimony in Forensic Toxicology Continue to coordinate efforts of SWGTOX with OSAC Toxicology Subcommittee Finalize unfinished SWGTOX documents Initiate development of key documents related to quality assurance in forensic toxicology 28