2009-2010 Pillar Goal Progress Leadership Development Institute July 23, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.
Advertisements

Promotion and Tenure in Department of Family Medicine Faculty Development Workshop August 12, 2011.
Johns Hopkins Medicine Strategic Plan
BALANCED SCORECARD AND KPI S FOR THE EVALUATION OF UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE LUISS Guido Carli – Advanced Organization Design - Charlie’s Group.
2006 Student Opinion Survey Summary November 2006 GUSTO Town Meeting on Accreditation & Assessment Genesee Community College Presented by: Carol Marriott.
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
SCCP Excellence. TOP-10 Quality Blueprint for Excellence SCCP Excellence Key performance indicators Pillar Goals MUSC Excellence LDI.
Relentless Rounding for Outcomes
Facilities Management 2013 Manager Enrichment Program U.Va.’s Strategic Planning Initiatives Colette Sheehy Vice President for Management and Budget December.
Charting a New Course EDUCATION & STUDENT LIFE OPEN FORUM AUGUST 18, 2009 First Quarter Fiscal Year EDUCATION & STUDENT LIFE Open Forum October.
Building a Research CV Yeoh Khay Guan Deputy Chief Executive, NUHS Dean, NUS Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine 30 September 2014.
SCHOOL OF HEALTH RELATED PROFESSIONS STRATEGIC PLAN 2003 DRAFT.
Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Catalyst High School May 11,12,13, 2014.
It’s About Us: Employee Experience Survey Gender umanitoba.ca.
2010 MUSC Excellence Faculty/Staff Survey Leadership Development Institute July 23, 2010.
Office of Medical Student Education
FY 2010 Leadership Performance Management Process and Form Who should take this course? All Leaders Content Expert: Jane Pettit
1 Q3: How do we get there? Cohort B 2 GOALS AND ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAMS INSTRUCTIONAL TIME DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION/ ORGANIZATION.
College Strategic Plan by Strategic Planning and Quality Assurance Committee.
DRAFTFall ’08 / Spring ’09 Undergoing significant revision and expansion. Strategic Plan Draft October 1, 2008 Fall ’08/Spring ’09 Undergoing significant.
Insert Title Here No More than 1 or 2 Lines, Point Font Statement of Technology/Best Practice No More Than 2-3 Lines Point Easy to Read.
PRESENTATION TO THE STRATEGIC PLAN STEERING COMMITTEE Priorities for an Engaged Community of Employees TRU People Make Things Happen.
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
Role of Optical Shops and Pharmacies In Financial Sustainability of OE Partner Hospitals Dr. Santosh Moses Assistant Director – Eye Health.
Creating Sustainable Organizations The Baldrige Performance Excellence Program Sherry Martin HIV Quality of Care Advisory Committee September 13, 2012.
The Dream & & The Challenge UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY Strategic Plan UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY Strategic Plan.
ENGAGING LEADERS FOR CHANGE AND INNOVATION ADEA CCI 2011 Summer Liaison Meeting San Diego, CA June 27-29, 2011 Janet M. Guthmiller, DDS, PhD University.
Pillar Update Leadership Development Institute February 15, 2013.
Improving recognition of teaching in academic promotion Prof Sandra Wills Executive Director Learning & Teaching University of Wollongong.
Marshall Public Schools World’s Best Workforce September 2014.
MEASUREMENT TEAM MUSC Excellence. Measurement Team Co-chairs – Lynn Shull (CON) and Becki Trickey (CHP) Members –  Wally Bonaparte (President’s Office)
ASSESSMENT. Assessment is the systematic and on-going process of collecting and reviewing evidence about the College's academic and administrative programs.
June 3, Vision “MUSC should be a Leading and Transformative Academic Health Center.” President Ray Greenberg, M.D., Ph.D. Academic Leadership Retreat-
Campus Quality Survey 1998, 1999, & 2001 Comparison Office of Institutional Research & Planning July 5, 2001.
Promotion Process A how-to for DEOs. How is a promotion review initiated? Required in the final probationary year of a tenure track appointment (year.
Self Assessment Using EFQM Excellence MODEL Down Lisburn Trust’s Experience of Continuous Improvement John Simpson Down Lisburn Trust.
2009 MUSC Excellence Faculty/Staff Survey Leadership Development Institute September 25, 2009.
Quality Journey – Wednesday March 28, 2012 Sarah Bush Lincoln Health System.
Welcome Framework for Excellence Provider Briefing Event.
Field Directors’ Forum Spring Meeting Columbus Airport Marriott Columbus, Ohio April 19, 2006
MUSC Excellence University Excellence 101 Getting Connected.
What are Pillar Goals? What are the goals and metrics for the university? How do our unit level goals fit in? What happens next? 11/19/2015 University.
Division of Education and Student Services Open Forum January 26, 2009.
Teacher Satisfaction Whitney Zimmerman Christine Henry.
June 2, 2005 Summary Overview Performance Funding Ratings impacting
Elevating Excellence, Restoring Growth Strategic Formulation Update.
SUS Performance Funding Institute for Academic Leadership Joe Glover October 2015.
UKRA 3 Socio-Economic Development. Objectives To produce oustanding graduates by providing competitive engineering and technological programmes. To spearhead.
Survey Results and Pillar Goal Progress Leadership Development Institute June 3, 2011.
Loudon County Schools External Review Exit Report February 19-21, 2013.
Evaluating Our Assessment Program Spring 2004 What is assessment? Assessment is the ongoing process of understanding and improving student learning.
Janice Smolowitz, EdD, DNP. To improve the delivery of health care services in the Bronx, surrounding regions, and globally by providing outstanding education.
Business and Finance Strategic Planning Agenda Introduction Overview: B&F Strategic Plan Discussion: B&F as one B&F Values with Behaviors.
How can Quality be Assessed? Dr. Abdelrahman Mohamed Spring2014 SQU College of Education Instructional & Learning Technologies Department TECH4211.
Institutional Effectiveness at CPCC DENISE H WELLS.
DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION – 5/26/2010 Advancing the University of Tennessee, Knoxville Towards the Top 25.
Human Resources Office of 1 Summary of Results College of Design Dean’s Reports.
Education 2018: Excellence for Every Student Presented to the Board of Education August 27,
Development of Key Performance Indicators: Lebanese Case Study
World’s Best Workforce (WBWF)
Blackburn College Employer Portal
Assessing the Impact of Governors
Assessment Committee Meeting Continuous Program Improvement
Expectation #9 – Personal Well Being Personal Goals Finance
SUS Performance Funding
Assessment Leadership Day Continuous Program Improvement
الجــودة الشاملة في مؤسسات التعليم العالي
CalSWEC 2014: Aging Initiative Summit
Butler University Great Colleges To Work For
La Mesa-Spring Valley Schools
Presentation transcript:

Pillar Goal Progress Leadership Development Institute July 23, 2010

Acknowledgements Measurements Team – Suzanne Thomas- Sandra Morris – David Howell- Joanne Sullivan – Carol Lancaster- Bart Yancey – David McNair - Jim Zoller

WINS! Faculty made the right choice in selecting MUSC-goal exceeded Staff pleased to be working at MUSC-goal exceeded Culture values diversity-4 pt improvement Graduating students believe they made the right choice – 3 pt improvement Students increased their understanding of other professionals through MUSC experience – exceeded goal by 14 points

Service Achieve Pass Rate on licensure, credentialing, or board exams of 96% Determine Key Sustainable Financial Metrics for each academic unit by that links unit goals to clearly identified unit Assess the viability of an RCM model for the University Develop an institutional infrastructure and platform for the delivery of international education programs PeopleQualityFinanceGrowth University/Colleges & Units Graduating students believe they made the RIGHT choice in selecting MUSC at 90% or higher or would choose this experience again (97 +3) Develop Baseline - Current students believe they are receiving a high quality education at 96% or higher Faculty made right choice in selecting MUSC at 90% or higher (91%) Achieve 95% graduation rate within each program Achieve E- Value score of 4.2 or higher for ‘students satisfied with faculty eff. as teacher’ (4.34) 90% of Staff pleased to be working at MUSC (93%) Faculty & Staff ‘believe their environment is conducive to performing high quality research and scholarship at 84% or higher (80-same) Each unit will define what service satisfaction is and how it will be measured by March Achieve top 50% ranking for total funding of research as compared to ‘peer institutions’ Develop Baseline - Achieve __% patient satisfaction or higher in faculty clinical practice settings 90% faculty, staff, & students evaluate ‘MUSC’s culture as valuing diversity (91- +4pt ) As we begin our pursuits in Excellence – we will be striving to reach or exceed the top quartile in most key areas (some yet unmeasured as indicated below). Once benchmark data are available, we will establish step goals to move us upwards at all times. 75% of students agree their understanding of the contributions of other professionals to health care delivery or research increased through their experience at MUSC. (89%) 5% overall improvement in employee recognition score (76 -1%) Green = exceeded Yellow = not met, but close Orange = not surveyed Red= not met White = data still in process

Graduating students believe they made the RIGHT choice in selecting MUSC at 90% or higher or would choose this experience again (97 +3)

Service Goal #2 Develop Baseline - Current students believe they are receiving a high quality education at 96% or higher

Quality Goal #3 Achieve E-Value score of 4.2 or higher for ‘students satisfied with faculty effectiveness as teacher’ Achieve E- Value score of 4.2 or higher for ‘students satisfied with faculty eff. as teacher’ (4.34)

Quality Goal #4 Faculty and staff believe their environment is conducive to performing high quality research and scholarship 2009 baseline 80.9% 2010 goal 84% 2010 actual 80% Faculty & Staff ‘believe their environment is conducive to performing high quality research and scholarship at 84% or higher (80-same)

Quality Goal #5 Achieve top 50% ranking for total funding of research as compared to ‘peer institutions’ NIH Funding (2009) Achieved in several colleges Very close in others!

Growth goal #1 Develop an institutional infrastructure and platform for the delivery of international programs In progress!

Growth goal #2 75% of students agree their understanding of the contributions of other professionals to health care delivery or research increased through their experience at MUSC 2010 actual 89% ACHIEVED!

Finance Goals #1 & #2 #1 Determine key sustainable financial metrics for each academic unit that links unit goals to clearly identified unit #2 Assess the viability of an RCM model for the University In progress!