1 NDA 21-673 Clofarabine Cl-F-Ara-A Presented by Martin Cohen, M.D. at the December 01, 2004 meeting of the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Moskowitz CH et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 290.
Advertisements

Brown JR et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 523.
Phase 1/2 Study of Weekly MLN9708, an Investigational Oral Proteasome Inhibitor, in Combination with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients with Previously.
1Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 114.
Roberts AW et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 325.
Results of a Phase II Trial of Brentuximab Vedotin as First Line Salvage Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory HL Prior to AHCT Chen RW et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract.
Presented by Martin H. Cohen, M.D. at the 27 July 2004 meeting of the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee.
Efficacy of Denileukin Diftitox Retreatment in Patients with Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed After Initial Response 1 Identification of an Active,
Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma Following Bortezomib: Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics from the.
1 Phase II trial of sequential gemcitabine and carboplatin followed by paclitaxel as first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma Presented by.
Taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC): investigational agents TTP = median time to disease progression OS = median overall survival.
Weekly MLN9708, an Investigational Oral Proteasome Inhibitor, in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Results from a Phase I Study After Full Enrollment.
1 SNDA Gemzar plus Carboplatin Treatment of Late Relapsing Ovarian Cancer.
Results of Docetaxel Plus Oxaliplatin (DOCOX) +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Metastatic Gastric and/or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: Results.
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 175.
Rituximab efficacy in other haematological malignancies Christian Buske.
FDA Case Studies Pediatric Oncology Subcommittee March 4, 2003.
Reduced-Intensity Conditioning (RIC) and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation (allo-SCT) for Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) in the Brentuximab.
Viardot A et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 4460.
Ibrutinib in Combination with Bendamustine and Rituximab Is Active and Tolerable in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory CLL/SLL: Final Results of a Phase.
A Phase II Study with Carfilzomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (CCd) for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Bringhen S et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract.
Updated Results of a Phase I First-in-Human Study of the BCL-2 Inhibitor ABT-199 (GDC-0199) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Chronic Lymphocytic.
Improved Survival in Patients with First Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Treated with Vosaroxin plus Cytarabine versus Placebo plus.
Locatelli F et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 4378.
. Background Paclitaxel and Irinotecan in Platinum Refractory or Resistant Small Cell Lung Cancer: a Galician Lung Cancer.
Phase II trial of chemotherapy with high-dose FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in the front-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin (IO; CMC544), a CD22 Monoclonal Antibody Attached to Calicheamycin, Produces Complete Response (CR) plus Complete Marrow Response.
SNDA Letrozole (Femara®) Indication: First-line therapy in post- menopausal women with advanced breast cancer. Prior approval: Second-line therapy.
Gemcitabine With or Without Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer (ABC): Results of a Multicentre, Randomized Phase III.
A Phase 1 Study of the Selective Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase-Delta (PI3Kδ) Inhibitor, Idelalisib (GS- 1101) in Combination with Rituximab and/or Bendamustine.
A Phase 2 Study with a Daily Regimen of the Oral mTOR Inhibitor RAD001 (Everolimus) in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Cancer Amato RJ et.
A Phase II Study of Lenalidomide for Previously Untreated Deletion (del) 5q Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Patients Age 60 or Older Who Are Not Candidates.
Low Dose Decitabine Versus Best Supportive Care in Elderly Patients with Intermediate or High Risk MDS Not Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: Final Results.
EORTC OSN/CTOS11 Safety of Caelyx combined with ifosfamide in previously untreated adult patients with advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcomas. Final.
A Phase II Study of Sorafenib Combining with Docetaxel and Cisplatin in the Treatment of Metastatic or Advanced Unresectable Gastric and Gastroesophageal.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
Agency Review of sNDA SE-006 DOXIL for Ovarian Cancer Division of Oncology Drug Products Office of Drug Evaluation 1 Center for Drug Evaluation.
1 Presented by Martin Cohen, M.D. at the Pediatric Oncology Subcommittee of the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee.
Phase II Multicenter Study of Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Subjects with Mantle Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed or Progressed After or Were Refractory to Bortezomib:
1 NDA Nelarabine. 2 Proposed Indication Nelarabine is indicated for the treatment of patients with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and.
Daunorubicin VS Mitoxantrone VS Idarubicin As Induction and Consolidation Chemotherapy for Adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia : The EORTC and GIMEMA Groups.
Romidepsin in Association with CHOP in Patients with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma: Final Results of the Phase Ib/II Ro-CHOP Study Dupuis J et al. Proc ASH.
Kantarjian HM et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract Long-Term Follow-Up of Ongoing Patients in 2 Studies of Omacetaxine Mepesuccinate for Chronic Myeloid.
New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage* of ASH 2015, December 5-8, 2015, Orlando, Florida ARRAY : Phase II Trial of Carfilzomib.
1 Zarnestra NDA Qin Ryan MD, PhD DODP/CDER/FDA.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage* of the 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting, June 3-7, 2016 Phase II MONARCH 1: CDK4/6 Inhibitor Abemaciclib in HR+/HER2- MBC.
New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage* of ASH 2015, December 5-8, 2015, Orlando, Florida Venetoclax + Decitabine or Azacitidine in.
ELIANA: CTL019 Shows High CR Rate in Pediatric/Young Adult Patients With Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell ALL New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference.
Immunotherapy with CD19 CAR redirected T-cells for high risk, relapsed paediatric CD19+ acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) and other haematological malignancies.
39th ESMO Congress Madrid, Spain – 30 September Poster 979P
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
19-28z CAR T-Cell Efficacy and Toxicity in Adults With R/R B-Cell ALL
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 200.
Reeder CB et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Poster)
Blinatumomab After AlloHSCT in Patients With R/R B-Precursor ALL
Shustov AR et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 961.
Nivolumab in Patients (Pts) with Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (R/R cHL): Clinical Outcomes from Extended Follow-up of a Phase 1 Study.
DiNardo C et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 327.
Oki Y et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 252.
KEYNOTE-087: Pembrolizumab in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage.
Rigosertib + Azacitidine in Patients With Higher-Risk MDS
New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage
Dimopoulos MA et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract LBA-6.
Erba HP et al. Blood 2008;112: Abstract 558
Fenaux P et al. Lancet Oncol 2009;10(3):
Faderl S et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 6503.
Seymour JF et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 872.
Zaja F et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 966.
Blinatumomab Versus Chemotherapy for Advanced Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Advani RH et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 443.
Presentation transcript:

1 NDA Clofarabine Cl-F-Ara-A Presented by Martin Cohen, M.D. at the December 01, 2004 meeting of the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee meeting

2 NDA Clofarabine Cl-F-Ara-A

3 Proposed Indication Clofarabine is indicated for the treatment of pediatric patients 1 to 21 years old with refractory or relapsed acute leukemias.

4 Clofarabine Dose and Schedule Recommended pediatric dose is 52 mg/m2 intravenously over 1 to 2 hours daily for 5 consecutive days. Treatment cycles are repeated every 2 to 6 weeks following recovery or return to baseline organ function.

5 Clofarabine Pediatric Studies ProtocolSponsorPhaseDisease CLO-222Ilex2AML CLO-212Ilex2ALL ID MDACC1Hematologic malignancies

6 Study Objectives Primary Objective CR plus CRp rate Secondary Objectives - PR rate - Remission duration - Overall survival ( OS)

7 Inclusion criteria Age < 21 > 25% marrow blasts First or subsequent relapse and/or refractory (AML), Second or subsequent relapse and/or refractory (ALL) Ambulatory performance status Adequate organ status

8 Response Definitions CR: - no circulating blasts or extramedullary disease; - an M1 bone marrow (< 5% blasts); and - platelets >100 × 10 3 /mcL and ANC >1.0 × 10 3 /mcL). CRp: Patients who have met all criteria for CR except for recovery of platelet counts to > 100 × 10 3 /mcL. PR: : - no circulating blasts; - an M2 bone marrow (>5% and < 25% blasts); and appearance of normal progenitor cells - an M1 marrow that does not qualify for CR or CRp.

9 Study participants 18 Sites – all in the United States 13 sites enrolled patients in CLO sites enrolled patients in CLO-212 Independent response review panel Independent pathology review

10 AML - Demographics and KPS VariableN=35 Age [median (range)12 (1 - 22) Sex Female Male 13 (37%) 22 (63%) Ethnicity Hispanic Caucasian Other 7 (20%) 19 (54%) 9 (26%) KPS (40%) 17 (49%) 4 (11%)

11 AML Prior Therapies Prior therapyN=35 Median number of prior induction regimens (range) 3 (1 -5) Prior transplants (37%) 5 (14%)

12 AML Best Response Response CategoryN=35% CR 0 0 CRp13 PR823 TF1954 NE*720 * 1 transplanted while hypoplastic; 2 early deaths; 2 d/c 1 st cycle; 2 ineligible

13 AML - Patients Transplanted Clofarabine response No. of patients No of cycles CRp15 PR62-4 NE*31-4 TF21-2 * 2 study ineligible; 1 transplanted while still hypoplastic

14 Clofarabine Efficacy Considerations Traditional endpoints: -Confirmed CR rate and duration, OS Current study confounding factors: -Some patients were transplanted early -Some patients had pre-CLO transplant Exploratory endpoint: TTP of CLO + transplant compared to TTP of prior therapy + transplant

15 AML - Clofarabine + Transplant Patient TTP for immediate prior treatment[s] (d) , 30 Prior Stem cell transplantYNY (2)N Transplant TTP (d) , No. of clofarabine cycles5132 Clofarabine responseCRpPR Clofar + transplant TTP (d) Post-clofarabine OS (w)

16 ALL - Demographics and KPS VariableN=49 Age [median (range)12 (1 - 20) Sex Female Male 20 (41%) 29 (59%) Ethnicity Hispanic Caucasian Other 20 (41%) 9 (18%) KPS (31%) 19 (39%) 14 (29%)

17 ALL - Prior Therapies Prior therapyN=49 Median number of prior induction regimens (range) 3 (2 -6) Prior transplants (27%) 2 (4%)

18 ALL - Best Response Response CategoryN=49% CR CRp48.2 PR510.2 TF NE816.3

19 ALL - Patients Transplanted Clofarabine response No. of patients No. of cycles of CLO CR12 CRp32,3,3 PR22,2 NE*12

20 ALL - CR Patients: TTP from Clofarabine Alone Patient TTP for immediate prior treatment[s] (d) 60, 3030, 30 Prior Stem cell transplantNN Transplant TTP (d)-- No. of clofarabine courses32 Clofarabine TTP (d)14376 Post-clofarabine OS (w)

21 ALL - CRp Patients: TTP from Clofarabine + Transplant Patient * TTP for immediate prior treatment (d) Prior Stem cell transplantYNN Transplant TTP (d)60-- No. of clofarabine courses322 Clofarabine TTP (d) Post-clofarabine OS (w) * No post-clofarabine transplant

22 MDACC Supporting Phase 1 study ResponseMDACCIRRP CR5/25 (20%)2 CR (ALL) 1 CRp (AML) 2 PR (ALL) PR3/25 (12%) --

23 Clofarabine Exposure by Cycle CycleNMedian total mg/cycle ~240

24 Baseline Conditions; N=113 (%) TotalGrade 1Grade 2Grade 3/4 Tachycardia Fatigue Pyrexia Nausea Anorexia20767 Vomiting Anxiety Diarrhea13103-

25 AE Summary; n=113 Patients with > 1 AE99% Patients with > 1 SAE83% Patients discontinued because of an AE 4% CTC Grade 3 AE53% CTC Grade 4 AE23% CTC Grade 5 AE20%

26 Frequent AE’s; N=113 (%) TotalGrade 3Grade 4 Vomiting8391 Nausea73151 Febrile neutropenia59544 Diarrhea5210- Headache485- Pyrexia4015- Rigors373- Fatigue3731 Anorexia3046

27 Other AE’s Infections (bacterial, fungal, viral) SIRS/capillary leak syndrome Renal insufficiency Hypotension Hepatobiliary toxicity (increased AST, ALT, bilirubin, alk phosphatase) Left ventricular systolic dysfunction Hand-foot syndrome

28 Efficacy Conclusions Pediatric AML Standard Criteria 1 CRp (3%) and 8 PR’s (23%) among 35 treated patients Remission duration cannot be determined because of transplant

29 Efficacy Conclusions Pediatric AML Exploratory 4 CLO + transplant patients had a longer TTP with that Rx than with the treatment immediately preceding CLO which may or may not have included transplant Of 2 patients with a prior transplant 1 had a longer TTP with clofarabine + transplant than with his preceding transplant. The other is too early to evaluate.

30 Efficacy Conclusions Pediatric ALL Standard 6 CR’s (12%), 4 CRp’s (8%) and 5 PR’s among 49 treated patients. 2 CR’s who did not have a transplant had a longer time to progression than was achieved with their immediate prior therapies. 1 CRp who did not have a transplant had a longer time to progression than was achieved with his immediate prior therapy.

31 Efficacy Conclusions Pediatric ALL Exploratory 2 CRp patients had a longer TTP with clofarabine + transplant than with the treatment immediately preceding clofarabine 1 of the above 2 patients had a pre-clofarabine transplant. This pt also had a longer TTP with clofarabine + transplant than with his preceding transplant regimen.

32 Safety Conclusions Toxicity was as expected for a heavily pretreated acute leukemia population Principal toxicities were nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, hematologic toxicity, fever and febrile neutropenia, hepatobiliary toxicity, infections and renal toxicity. SIRS, tumor lysis syndrome, multi-organ failure, hypotension, renal insufficiency and left ventricular systolic dysfunction can also occur.

33 Clofarabine Efficacy Considerations Traditional endpoints: -Confirmed CR rate and duration, OS Current study confounding factors: -Some patients were transplanted early -Some patients had pre-CLO transplant Exploratory endpoint: TTP of CLO + transplant compared to TTP of prior therapy + transplant