Closing session Issues and questions from the audience and some from me Rüdiger Schmidt.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Powering Tests and Safety Electrical Safety Hugues Thiesen Power Converter Group.
Advertisements

IMPACT Safety sub-working Group 1 Fernando B. S. Pedrosa IMWG – 07/Oct/2014 EDMS id:
LHC Performance Workshop - Chamonix January 2010 Session 4 - Safety for Personnel Underground - He Evacuation What can the Safety Coordination.
New HV test specification for the LHC N. Catalan for the EI section.
TE-MPE –TM, 16/05/2013, Mateusz Bednarek, TE/MPE-EE ELQA testing during and beyond LS1.
LHC HARDWARE COMMISSIONING SAFETY TRAINING DAY S. Claudet (AT-ACR-OP) With great help from G. Lindell (Safety commission) CRYOGENICS.
Session th January 2010 R.Schmidt TE/MPE Hardware Commissioning 2010 and beyond R.Schmidt.
LARP Collaboration April 26 th 2006 The Commissioning of the Technical Systems of LHC 1.The final validation that all the collider components/systems.
Operational tools Laurette Ponce BE-OP 1. 2 Powering tests and Safety 23 July 2009  After the 19 th September, a re-enforcement of access control during.
Chamonix Risks due to UPS malfunctioning Impact on the Superconducting Circuit Protection System Hugues Thiesen Acknowledgments:K. Dahlerup-Petersen,
LHC Hardware Commissioning Review May 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 LHC Hardware Commissioning Review Contribution ID: 20 – Quality assurance and.
HC Review, May 2005 Hardware Commissioning Review Hardware Commissioning Review Quality Assurance and Documentation of Results Félix Rodríguez Mateos,
1 Copper Stabilizer Continuity Measurement Project Copper Stabilizer Continuity Measurement Status & Plans – May 2011 MPE-TM – 12 May 2011 M. Koratzinos,
Summary and Discussion Rüdiger Schmidt Summary and discussions.
V.Montabonnet - Safety during Hardware Commissioning 18 October Contents  Electrical circuits in the LHC context  Electrical Hazards  Preventions.
Training LHC Powering R. Denz Quench Protection System R. Denz AT-MEL.
AT-MEL-PM, R. Denz, CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23 1 QPS system and its risks  Principal risks  General remarks  Quench heater circuits  Quench detection.
For more info:
Review of the operation scenarios and required manning of the activities P. Schnizer and L. Serio.
M. POJER, ON BEHALF OF THE USUAL BUNCH OF SUSPECTS… S UPERCONDUCTING CIRCUITS RE - COMMISSIONING AFTER THE 2011 C HRISTMAS BREAK.
M. Arnaud, C. Bedel, J. Etheridge, E. Paulat CERN SAFETY AND COORDINATION TEAM.
Hardware Commissioning  Preparation Documentation MTF Programme  Status The Review The commissioning activity in Resources  Outlook The new.
Review of Sector th of February Electrical Safety for the interventions during Hardware Commissioning of LHC Anne Funken, TS-ICC.
Power Converters and DC cablesSlide 1/.. LHC - HC review Hugues THIESEN – AB/PO Thursday, 12 May 2005 Water cooled cables warm bus bars power converter.
1 Commissioning and Early Operation – View from Machine Protection Jan Uythoven (AB/BT) Thanks to the members of the MPWG.
TE/MPE activities currently planed for YETS Reiner Denz, Knud Dalherup-Petersen, Markus Zerlauth & Bruno Puccio YETS coordination meeting.
BCWG - 16/11/20102 Content WHY do we need a HW Commissioning campaign? WHAT are we going to do? HOW are we going to do it? ElQA QPS Powering Tests Planning.
SAFETY DURING HARDWARE COMMISSIONING, 18 October 2007, D. Bozzini, AT/MEL-EM 1 Safety during Hardware Commissioning Davide Bozzini on behalf of the ELQA.
Luigi Serio CRYOGENICS PERFORMANCE AND OPERATION L. Serio, on behalf of the LHC Cryogenics Operation and Cryogenics Performance Panel.
[R. Alemany] [CERN AB/OP] [Engineer In Charge of LHC] HWC Workshop ( ) Consolidation and major changes that have impact on the powering circuits.
NA62 Organisation of the work - proposal 2/24/20161PD/DT/PO-MH.
AB/CO Review, Interlock team, 20 th September Interlock team – the AB/CO point of view M.Zerlauth, R.Harrison Powering Interlocks A common task.
Review of Sector th of February Tunnel Access During Powering Tests Hugues Thiesen, AB-PO.
AT-MEL Group Meeting, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 ElQA activities during hardware commissioning N. Catalan Lasheras.
LHC Machine Status Report Mike Lamont for the LHC team Acknowledgements: Mirko Pojer, Matteo Solfaroli, Katy Foraz et al.
Conclusions on UPS powering test and procedure I. Romera Acknowledgements: V. Chareyre, M. Zerlauth 86 th MPP meeting –
Machine Protection Review, R. Denz, 11-APR Introduction to Magnet Powering and Protection R. Denz, AT-MEL-PM.
CERN Jan 2006 Specific safety Issues for 2006 compared to 2004 P. Cennini AB Safety Requirement in case the Installation activities are going on.
Can we change a magnet without warming-up a full arc ? Serge Claudet, With help from P. Cruikshank & J-P. Tock (Chamonix Jan’10)
Quality Assurance Overview Ranko Ostojic 12 Nov 2012.
TE-MPE, MPE Workshop 2010, G.D’Angelo, 14-Dec TE-MPE on-call service for the LHC Giorgio D’Angelo on behalf of TE-MPE On call team, with inputs.
MPE Workshop for LS1 Summary of Global Activities Thanks to Speakers Arjan Verweij Hugues Thiesen Zinur Charifoulline Kajetan Fuchsberger.
Training LHC Powering - Markus Zerlauth Powering Interlocks Markus Zerlauth AB/CO/MI.
Roberto Saban TS HC Review bis Outline  Interviews of all the Group Leaders loosely or tightly concerned by hardware commissioning proposing them.
An invitation to an open discussion We are team reviewing its performance globally We want to help each other to reach the objectives We know the other.
SPHENIX MECHANICAL D. Lynch August 21, /15/2014sPHENIX Mechanical Design.
Training LHC Powering Robin Lauckner Software Tools for Commissioning Robin Lauckner 28 th March, 2007.
CSCM (Thermal Amplifier) Sequence and detailed planning 07/10/2011 M.Solfaroli Thanks to: K.Brodzinski, G.D’Angelo, M.Koratzinos, M.Pojer, R.Schmidt, J.Steckert,
Training LHC Powering – Blanca Perea Solano From Individual System Tests to Powering to Nominal Blanca Perea on behalf of Hardware Commissioning Coordination.
EDMS N° V.1 TE-EPC Activities during LS1 V. Montabonnet [TE-EPC]
Hardware Commissioning Review, R. Denz, 12-May Superconducting circuits: what remains to be done during hardware commissioning R. Denz AT-MEL-PM.
Main MPE Activities during YETS/EYETS/LS2 and the Provision of Resources Andrzej Siemko Andrzej Siemko TE-MPE1.
(Access system for HWC)
Equipment simplified model SMR UR safety
Minimum Hardware Commissioning – Disclaimer
Experience: past events and accidents
Consequences of warming-up a sector above 80 K
Powering the LHC Magnets
Status of ELQA equipment and related software
Survey on “Chargés de Consignation” Follow-up
Powering from short circuit tests up to nominal
EP Experiments safety validation process Safety Permits
Re-Commissioning (IST) of Electrical Systems: QPS, EE & PIC
Disabling Rules.
Agenda Contents Different types of documents
Brief report of the hardware commissioning activities
Circuit Disconnector Boxes Implementation of our safety first policy
Powering and Safety day Underground access during powering tests
Review of hardware commissioning
Presentation transcript:

Closing session Issues and questions from the audience and some from me Rüdiger Schmidt

Programme Introduction Roberto Saban Safety for the LHC John Robert Etheridge (CERN) Safety for the LHC Safety during Hardware Commissioning Matteo Solfaroli Camillocci Safety during Hardware Commissioning Safety during the interventions Hugues Thiesen Safety during the interventions Electrical works vs Not electrical works in electrical environment Valerie Montabonnet Electrical works vs Not electrical works in electrical environment Special cases of cryogenic intervention Serge Claudet Special cases of cryogenic intervention ElQA activities David Bozzini ElQA activities Energy Extraction system Knud Dahlerup-Petersen Energy Extraction system QPS system and its risks Reiner Denz QPS system and its risks New documentation Hugues Thiesen New documentation General CERN safety Marc Vadon General CERN safety Closing session Rüdiger Schmidt Closing session

Introduction Roberto Saban No comments

Safety for the LHCSafety for the LHC John Robert Etheridge The documents for health and safety are public, could they included into the documentation systems to have simpler access? Journal of documents to be created?

Safety during Hardware CommissioningSafety during Hardware Commissioning Matteo Solfaroli Camillocci Teams from ACR managing the access card / key / token for the cooldown from 300K – 80 K, after agreement of HCC. Access to powering subsector for magnets powered with more than 1 kA (others than main dipole and quadrupole magnets) – access close-by the magnets / DFS that is powered is not possible, to be detailed. – allowed to pass-by?

Safety during the interventionsSafety during the interventions Hugues Thiesen During the phase when power converters are not connected to the magnets (e.g. cooldown), what is required to work on eg. current leads, DC cables? The EIC must agree to the intervention, and the “Chargé de travaux” asks for the consignation. One key for locking-off a power converter remain with PO “Chargé de Consignation”. An additional lock can/must be done by the “Chargé de travaux”? Not required, decision left to “Chargé de travaux”. Are the procedures expained differently in the training in French / English? The “Permit de travail” is not sufficient to start the intervention. Who decides what circuits must be locked-off? “Chargé de travaux” should compile the list of the PCs to be locked off. The data should exist to assist compiling the list. Other will help. Info on web pages help. What kind of interventions fall under this category? Also minor interventions with no electrical risks? How to decide if there is a risk? Similar procedures for fluids, cryofluids, ….. see S.Claudet presentation

Electrical works vs Not electrical works in electrical environmentElectrical works vs Not electrical works in electrical environment Valerie Montabonnet Any kind of work (e.g. mechnical) on electrical systems requires the same procedure! Example CV Group: should there be some members with the correct “habilitation electrique type B2”? (being debated…..) – this does not seem to be always current practice – should have been done years ago and other accelertors? We we are running the LHC hardware commissioning, other accelerators and other project phases are not within our mandate (risks are different) Other groups face similar issues during commissioning, there is some immediate action required, for example for the warm magnet commissioning If several teams are working on the same circuits, how to go about the locking-off? Analyse of the risks is the first step, several actors can be involved (you have help) Could we pre-analysis risks and provide documentation for typical type of interventions? Has started…..

Special cases of cryogenic interventionSpecial cases of cryogenic intervention Serge Claudet From 300K to 80K members from ACR provide access card / key / token, coordinated with HCC Below 80K: HCC can give access Opening, cutting and welding requires a “work permit” “Chargé de travaux”– “Intervention Team Leader” – We need a dictonary with the teminology in French and English (DSO for AT) for the interventions on the electrical / cryogenic systems For working on a cryo-magnet, first vent the vacuum envelope: is a work permit required for opening the vacuum? The level 4 training is available on the Web, but can also be done on several PCs in bat.55

ElQA activitiesElQA activities David Bozzini Electrical safety subsector: very useful! Does if correspond to the areas in the warmap? Not quite, since it does not include the power converter What about other activities after ELQA, do we still need to consider the entire arc as an Electrical safety subsector? Do we need to lock off all power converters? According to the rule: YES! How to go about it? Special procedures? Example: exchange of one of the 6200 QPS Heater supplies. Who is the GLIMOS? Also QPS equipment has to be locked-off Not for all interventions all type of equipment needs to be locked off (for example, to exchange a QP heater supply no consignation is required) Slide 13: very good example of the responsibilities, could be an example for others (iteration required on details)

ElQA activitiesElQA activities David Bozzini Electrical safety subsector: very useful! Does if correspond to the areas in the warmap? Not quite, since it does not include the power converter What about other activities after ELQA, do we still need to consider the entire arc as an Electrical safety subsector? Do we need to lock off all power converters? According to the rule: YES! How to go about it? Special procedures? Example: exchange of one of the 6200 QPS Heater supplies. Who is the GLIMOS? Also QPS equipment has to be locked-off Slide 13: very good example of the responsibilities, could be an example for others (iteration required on details) Names required, roles to be clearly defined Not clear who is responsible for future intervention, if electrical / cryogenics / vacuum equipment is concerned – what about the longer term future after HC? Do we have the manpower to do all this? No shortcuts to be taken!

Energy Extraction systemEnergy Extraction system Knud Dahlerup-Petersen everything is locked, and Knud will not tell us where to find it

QPS system and its risksQPS system and its risks Reiner Denz How to identify quench heater PS that needs to be switched-off (locked- off). Needs at least stickers. Procedure needs to be formalised / publicised. Additional labels on connectors were proposed – tbd.

New documentationNew documentation for HC Hugues Thiesen New EDH documents “avis de travail”, also “to be commissioned” Development for “avis de travail” in EDH with all kind of tools (what happen(s)ed yesterday, today, tomorrow, …..) For the first type of intervention a visit of the workplace is required.

General CERN safetyGeneral CERN safety Marc Vadon no questions

Example of another risks Collimators can close, keep your finger out! In general, DO NOT TOUCH