Surface pressure PROVOR/ARVOR floats Coriolis DAC V. Thierry DMQC 4 – Toulouse – September 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RRC 04/05 ITU Information meeting September Computer methods for planning Ken Hunt Rapporteur for Chapter 10.
Advertisements

1 Introduce characters. Establish the setting. 2 Introduce the main conflict. 3 Actions taken to deal with the conflict. Resulting complications. 4 Actions.
ADMT10 - Toulouse, 30 Sept 2009 ADMT9 Action 24 “Develop a common method for determining the positions and observation times at DACs”
1 ICES/NAFO Symposium Santander May Seasonal to interannual variability of temperature and salinity in the Nordic Seas: heat and freshwater budgets.
Groom-gliders data-management workshop Brest, December 2012 Groom gliders data management n In 2012 : vertical profiles from 26 platforms.
Air-Deployable Profiling Floats
Argo Technologies Argo TC Inputs by S. Riser (UW) DBCP #22, Technical Workshop La Jolla, California.
Pacific Gyre Digital Minimet Drifters Hurricane Rita 2005 DBCP 21 October 17 th -18 th Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Argo Status M. Belbeoch, Argo TC (inputs from AST)
Argo Project Status Report B. Owens, D. Roemmich, S. Riser, G. Johnson, S. Garzol Ocean Climate Observation Annual System Review Silver Spring October.
The Argo Program NOAA Climate Observation Division 8th Annual PI Meeting and Workshop The U.S. Argo Float Consortium D. Roemmich (SIO), S. Riser (UW),
Argo a year ago. 500 floats. Regional coverage only.
SCOS-2000 Training U2c i2r1 18/06/04 © Copyright 2004 European Space Agency Unit 2c – Telecommanding Functions Command Verification CEV - command.
Argo QC with an emphasis on the North Atlantic Justin Buck British Oceanographic Data Centre Joseph Proudman Building 6 Brownlow Street Liverpool L3 5DA,
Technological developments
10th Argo data management 2009 Toulouse User’s manual comment Here is a list of comments received on User’s manual version 2.2 since August 28 th. Jean-Philippe.
Argo Profilers missions, sampling rates, accuracy etc Howard Freeland D.F.O. Science/Pacific Region, Canada Tel: (250)
Error Analysis Accuracy Closeness to the true value Measurement Accuracy – determines the closeness of the measured value to the true value Instrument.
Japanese activity in Argo project Nobie Shikama (JAMSTEC)
ARGO, Profiling Floats, and Iridium Stephen C. Riser Dana Swift School of Oceanography, University of Washington [acknowledgements to NOAA, ONR, NSF, NASA]
JCOMMOPS & Argo, DBCP, SOT, OceanSITES 2 nd GODAE Observing System Evaluation Workshop Toulouse, June 2009 Mathieu Belbeoch & Hester Viola.
EXPANDING THE CAPABILITIES OF ARGO-TYPE FLOATS Stephen C. Riser University of Washington Seattle, Washington USA
Editing RT QC flag in delayed mode ? Virginie Thierry DMQC 4 Toulouse, 28 septembre 2009.
Zenghong Liu & Jianping Xu State Key Lab of Satellite Ocean Environment Dynamics The Second Institute of Oceanography, SOA GOVST-V , Beijing.
SAMOS-GOSUD Meeting. Boulder 2-4 May Potential collaboration between the Coriolis project and the Samos initiative L. Petit de la Villéon. Ifremer-France-
OOI Annual Review Year 2 May 16 – 20, 2011 Ocean Observatories Initiative Surface and Subsurface Mooring Telemetry Inductive and acoustic technology and.
O RGANIZATION OF A MERICAN S TATES QUOTA SCALE QUOTAS OF MEMBER STATES TO THE REGULAR FUND Office of Budgetary and Financial Services – September 1, 2005.
 decimals/cc-7th-fracs-to-decimals/v/converting-fractions-to-decimals-example.
Status of Meta-Files, ADMT 13 Hyderabad, India Esmee van Wijk, Nov 2012 CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, Australia Photo from Katy Hill.
Summary: Within the frame of the TARA expedition, we deployed a Bio-Argo float in the Marquesas plume to investigate and better understand the productivity.
Argo workshop in Ghana, December North Atlantic Regional Centre S Pouliquen, V Thierry, C Coatanoan, F Gaillard, PM Poulain & al.
Argo & New Telecom. Systems Technical Workshop Introduction and Summary. ADMT#11 October 2010, Hamburg/Germany.
Doc.: IEEE /0863r0 Submission July 2012 David Halasz, Motorola MobilitySlide 1 Propagation delay and extended range IEEE Date:
The Binomial Distributions
Adding, Subtracting, Multiplying, and Diving Integers!!!
The APEX Truncated Negative Pressure Drifts (TNPDs)
OCB Scoping Workshop Observing biogeochemical cycles at global scales with floats and gliders April 2009, Moss Landing, CA
Name Next Spelling Word #1 Next Previous Spelling Word #2 Next.
Summary of issues and conclusions from DMQC-4 1.Pressure Issues, especially Surface pressure offset, Druck microleak, APEXs that truncate negative pressures.
Geneva, April 2007 GTSPP by Bob Keeley (Canada) and Charles Sun (U.S.A)
1 The Argo project 21st Century in-situ Ocean Observing System M. Belbeoch, Argo Technical Coordinator with inputs from D. Roemmich, Argo Steering Team.
E-SURFMAR 17 th June 2008, Toulouse Jean Rolland - Pierre Blouch Météo-France IABP/IPY.
Andrea Kaiser-Weiss, Melbourne Joint GHRSST Workshop, 6 th March 2012 Experiences with SST profiles from near-surface Argo measurements A. Kaiser-Weiss.
Diurnal Variability Working Group: GHRSST-10 Breakout Session Report Chris Merchant Gary Wick.
DBCP Monthly Report January 2016 Prepared By DBCP Technical Coordinator
Argo Floats and Near-Surface Temperature Stephen Riser University of Washington, USA.
WEC meeting TED status and WEC timing.
Surface Velocity Profiler (SVP)
TAIYO KOBAYASHI and Shinya Minato
PROVOR / ARVOR ARGO profiling floats
On the use of the CRC for decoding Argo data
ARGO FLOAT TECHNOLOGY: ACHIEVEMENTS AND CHALLENGES
Status on anomalies detected with altimetry
The Bering Slope Current System Revisited Gregory C
Argo Delayed-Mode Salinity Data
Metadata files updates
Comparisons of Argo profiles and nearby high resolution CTD stations
Transmission Decay Taken from Statistical Inference in a Stochastic Epidemic SEIR Model with Control Intervention: Ebola as a Case Study, by Phenyo E.
Errors in Numerical Methods
2012 סיכום מפגש 2 שלב המשכי תהליך חזוני-אסטרטגי של המועצה העליונה של הפיזיותרפיה בישראל.
Errors in Numerical Methods
International Argo Data Management Team
EDLC(Embedded system Development Life Cycle ).
Present Status of APEX Float Technology
5018 Sensors Channels 420 at 150 V.
By Sanjay and Arvind Seshan
ARGO, Profiling Floats, and Iridium
5018 Sensors Channels 420 at 150 V.

NINJA (TSK) float – recent operation Toshio Suga (JAMSTEC / Tohoku Univ.) 7 profiling floats with oxygen/chlorophyll sensors were funded by Japanese Fisheries.
Presentation transcript:

Surface pressure PROVOR/ARVOR floats Coriolis DAC V. Thierry DMQC 4 – Toulouse – September 2009

downtimeuptime telemetry period A C B D Surface pressure for PROVOR/ARVOR floats  Psurf is measured just before the float dives  The Psurf value is taken into account for the next cycle and for the next profile (in general 10 days later) Psurf is simply substracted from the pressure measurements for CTF and CTS2 PROVOR floats A reset of the pressure sensor is done with the “RESETOFFSET” command of the SBE41CP sensor for the CTS3 PROVOR and ARVOR floats

Surface pressure for PROVOR/ARVOR floats  Data are then truncated (-0.3 → 0; 0.6 → 0 ) and transmitted with a 1 dbar resolution for the CTF, CTS3, CTS3 et ARVOR  With an Iridium transmission and for CTS3 deployed since June 2009, the data are transmitted with a 1cbar resolution  Those differences are significant when dealing with the microleak problem.

 Psurf measurements (1cbar resolution) subtracted to the pressure measurements  No reset of the pressure sensor  8% of the CTS2 affected by the micrloeak problem  The floats affected by the microleak problem have not been re-considered in D mode but the drift is corrected at each cycle PROVOR – CTS2

 Reset of the pressure sensor before each dive (RESETOFFSET command)  Transmission of a relative offset with a 1 dbar resolution  Statistics: 140 floats with Psurf = 0 6 floats with Psurf = ± 1 dbar 2 floats with |Psurf | > 1 dbar  Unknown percentage of the floats concerned by the microleak problem PROVOR CTS3 Surface pressure offset relative to the previous profile

PROVOR CTS3 Cumulative surface pressure offset  Reset of the pressure sensor before each dive (RESETOFFSET command)  Transmission of a relative offset with a 1 dbar resolution  Statistics: 140 floats with Psurf = 0 6 floats with Psurf = ± 1 dbar 1 floats with |Psurf | > 1 dbar  Unknown percentage of the floats concerned by the microleak problem

CTS3 Iridium  Reset of the pressure sensor before each dive (RESETOFFSET command)  Transmission of a relative offset with a 1 cbar resolution  73 % of the floats concerned by the microleak problem PROVOR CTS3 – cbar transmission

CTS3 Iridium  Reset of the pressure sensor before each dive (RESETOFFSET command)  Transmission of a relative offset with a 1 cbar resolution  73 % of the floats concerned by the microleak problem PROVOR CTS3 – cbar transmission