J. Diaz, D. Kolukhin, V. Lisitsa, V. Tcheverda Coupling of the Discontinuous Galerkin and Finite Difference techniques to simulate seismic waves in the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Courant and all that Consistency, Convergence Stability Numerical Dispersion Computational grids and numerical anisotropy The goal of this lecture is to.
Advertisements

4 th order Embedded Boundary FDTD algorithm for Maxwell Equations Lingling Wu, Stony Brook University Roman Samulyak, BNL Tianshi Lu, BNL Application collaborators:
Sedan Interior Acoustics
Joint Mathematics Meetings Hynes Convention Center, Boston, MA
The Asymptotic Ray Theory
Multiple Removal with Local Plane Waves
Algorithm Development for the Full Two-Fluid Plasma System
Modelling techniques and applications Qing Tan EPFL-STI-IMT-OPTLab
5/4/2015rew Accuracy increase in FDTD using two sets of staggered grids E. Shcherbakov May 9, 2006.
Numerical Simulation of Wave-Seawall Interaction Clive Mingham, Derek Causon, David Ingram and Stephen Richardson Centre for Mathematical Modelling and.
Waveform Modeling and Comparisons with Ground Truth Events David Norris BBN Technologies 1300 N. 17 th Street Arlington, VA
Multi-source Least-squares Migration with Topography Dongliang Zhang and Gerard Schuster King Abdullah University of Science and Technology.
Numerical methods in the Earth Sciences: seismic wave propagation Heiner Igel, LMU Munich III The latest developments, outlook Grenoble Valley Benchmark.
Analysis of the performance of the Interior Penality Discontinuous Galerkin method C. BALDASSARI, H. BARUCQ, H. CALANDRA, B. DENEL, J. DIAZ.
Session: Computational Wave Propagation: Basic Theory Igel H., Fichtner A., Käser M., Virieux J., Seriani G., Capdeville Y., Moczo P.  The finite-difference.
MATHIEU GAUTHIER PIERRE POULIN LIGUM, DEPT. I.R.O. UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL GRAPHICS INTERFACE 2009 Preserving Sharp Edges in Geometry Images.
Non-axisymmetric modes of differentially rotating neutron stars Andrea Passamonti Southampton, 13 December 2007 University of Southampton In collaboration.
1 Internal Seminar, November 14 th Effects of non conformal mesh on LES S. Rolfo The University of Manchester, M60 1QD, UK School of Mechanical,
Wavelet Spectral Finite Elements for Wave Propagation in Composite Plates with Damages Ratneshwar Jha, Clarkson University S. Gopalakrishnan, Indian Institute.
Finite Difference Time Domain Method (FDTD)
1 Residual Vectors & Error Estimation in Substructure based Model Reduction - A PPLICATION TO WIND TURBINE ENGINEERING - MSc. Presentation Bas Nortier.
A TWO-FLUID NUMERICAL MODEL OF THE LIMPET OWC CG Mingham, L Qian, DM Causon and DM Ingram Centre for Mathematical Modelling and Flow Analysis Manchester.
A finite volume solution method for thermal convection in a spherical shell with strong temperature- und pressure-dependent viscosity CIG Workshop 2005.
HYBRID NUMERICAL METHOD FOR NON-STATIONARY CONTINUUM MECHANICS N.G. Burago 1,3, I.S. Nikitin 2,3 1 IPMech RAS, 2 ICAD RAS, 3 Bauman MSTU Volodarka
Finite Differences Finite Difference Approximations  Simple geophysical partial differential equations  Finite differences - definitions  Finite-difference.
Multisource Least-squares Reverse Time Migration Wei Dai.
Hybrid WENO-FD and RKDG Method for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws
A Look at High-Order Finite- Volume Schemes for Simulating Atmospheric Flows Paul Ullrich University of Michigan.
4. Reflection/transmisson coefficients Introduction R/T coefficient – reflectivity/transmissivity Zoeppritz type equations Critical angles/complex R/T.
Version, Date, POC Name 1 Purpose: To investigate multiscale flow discretizations that represent both the geometry and solution variable using variable-order.
Simulating Electron Dynamics in 1D
Grating reconstruction forward modeling part Mark van Kraaij CASA PhD-day Tuesday 13 November 2007.
C M C C Centro Euro-Mediterraneo per i Cambiamenti Climatici COSMO General Meeting - September 8th, 2009 COSMO WG 2 - CDC 1 An implicit solver based on.
LBNLGXTBR FY2001 Oil and Gas Recovery Technology Review Meeting Diagnostic and Imaging High Speed 3D Hybrid Elastic Seismic Modeling Lawrence Berkeley.
MSc Thesis presentation – Thijs Bosma – December 4th 2013
Discontinuous Galerkin Methods Li, Yang FerienAkademie 2008.
Mid-Term Review Meeting, February 13-14, Tutzing Seismic wave Propagation and Imaging in Complex media: a European network XUAN NHI NGUYEN.
7. Introduction to the numerical integration of PDE. As an example, we consider the following PDE with one variable; Finite difference method is one of.
Gratings and the Plane Wave Spectrum
Lai-Ching Ma & Raj Mittra Electromagnetic Communication Laboratory
Numerical Evaluation of Tsunami Wave Hazards in Harbors along the South China Sea Huimin H. Jing 1, Huai Zhang 1, David A. Yuen 1, 2, 3 and Yaolin Shi.
Computation of the complete acoustic field with Finite-Differences algorithms. Adan Garriga Carlos Spa Vicente López Forum Acusticum Budapest31/08/2005.
Present / introduce / motivate After Introduction to the topic
Methods for Slope Failure Induced by EQ 1 There is no analytical solution for wave equation in general boundary condition. FEM (Finite Element Method),
1 IV European Conference of Computational Mechanics Hrvoje Gotovac, Veljko Srzić, Tonći Radelja, Vedrana Kozulić Hrvoje Gotovac, Veljko Srzić, Tonći Radelja,
Engineer Research and Development Center US Army Corps of Engineers Nearshore Breakwater System Jeffrey A. Melby, PhD.
M. Zareinejad
1 EEE 431 Computational Methods in Electrodynamics Lecture 7 By Dr. Rasime Uyguroglu
Simple numerical scheme for modelling of nonlinear pulse propagation in coupled microring resonators Anna Sterkhova, Jiří Petráček, Jaroslav Luksch ICTON.
RELIABLE DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS Mehdi Modares, Robert L. Mullen and Dario A. Gasparini Department of Civil Engineering Case Western.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review April , 2004, BNL Target Simulations Roman Samulyak in collaboration with Y.
SPICE Research and Training Workshop III, July 22-28, Kinsale, Ireland Seismic wave Propagation and Imaging in Complex media: a European.
M. Khalili1, M. Larsson2, B. Müller1
Regional Weather and Climate Modeling:
Computational Methods for Kinetic Processes in Plasma Physics
CHAPTER 2 - EXPLICIT TRANSIENT DYNAMIC ANALYSYS
FDTD 1D-MAP Plane Wave TFSF Simulation for Lossy and Stratified Media
A TWO-FLUID NUMERICAL MODEL OF THE LIMPET OWC
Computations of Force and Motion Response to Arbitrary Fluid Motions around Stationary Vessels J.A. Pinkster.
1 DICA, Università di Trento; 2 Institut f. Geophysik, ETH Zürich
THE METHOD OF LINES ANALYSIS OF ASYMMETRIC OPTICAL WAVEGUIDES Ary Syahriar.
FTCS Explicit Finite Difference Method for Evaluating European Options
High-accuracy PDE Method for Financial Derivative Pricing Shan Zhao and G. W. Wei Department of Computational Science National University of Singapore,
17-Nov-18 Parallel 2D and 3D Acoustic Modeling Application for hybrid computing platform of PARAM Yuva II Abhishek Srivastava, Ashutosh Londhe*, Richa.
A first step towards the P wave only modeling plan
Elastic and Acoustic Wave Phenomena
A THEORETICAL MODEL for MAGNETIC FIELD IMAGING with “SWISS ROLLS” STRUCTURES V. Yannopapas J. B. Pendry M. C. K. Wiltshire J. Hajnal.
High Accuracy Schemes for Inviscid Traffic Models
Comparison of CFEM and DG methods
Reflection.
Presentation transcript:

J. Diaz, D. Kolukhin, V. Lisitsa, V. Tcheverda Coupling of the Discontinuous Galerkin and Finite Difference techniques to simulate seismic waves in the presence of sharp interfaces J. Diaz, D. Kolukhin, V. Lisitsa, V. Tcheverda 1

Motivation for mathematicians 2 σ = 1.38, I = 44.9 м Free-surface perturbation

Motivation for mathematicians 3 σ = 1.38, I = 44.9 м Free-surface perturbation 30%

Motivation for geophysicists 4

5

6 Original source

Motivation for geophysicists 7 Diffraction of Rayleigh wave, secondary sources

Motivation 8

Standard staggered grid scheme 9

10 Easy to implement Able to handle complex models High computational efficiency Suitable accuracy Poor approximation of sharp interfaces

Discontinuous Galerkin method Elastic wave equation in Cartesian coordinates:

Discontinuous Galerkin method

Use of polyhedral meshes Accurate description of sharp interfaces Hard to implement for complex models Computationally intense Strong stability restrictions (low Courant numbers)

Dispersion analysis (P1) Courant ratio 0.25

Dispersion analysis (P2) Courant ratio 0.144

Dispersion analysis (P3) Courant ratio 0.09

DG + FD 18 Finite differences: Easy to implement Able to handle complex models High computational efficiency Suitable accuracy Poor approximation of sharp interfaces Discontinuous Galerkin method: Use of polyhedral meshes Accurate description of sharp interfaces Hard to implement for complex models Computationally intense Strong stability restrictions (low Courant numbers)

A sketch P1-P3 DG on irregular triangular grid to match free-surface topography P0 DG on regular rectangular grid = conventional (non-staggered grid scheme) – transition zone Standard staggered grid scheme 19

Experiments 20 PPWReflection 15~3 % 30~0.5 % 60~0.1 % 120??? % DG

FD+DG on rectangular grid P0 DG on regular rectangular grid Standard staggered grid scheme 21

Spurious Modes 2D example in Cartesian coordinates

Spurious Modes 2D example in Cartesian coordinates

Interface Incident waves Reflected waves Transmitted artificial waves Transmitted true waves

Conjugation conditions Incident waves Reflected waves Transmitted artificial waves Transmitted true waves

Experiments 26 PPWReflection % % % %

Numerical experiments 27 P S Surface Xs=4000, Zs=110 (10 meters below free surface), volumetric source, freq=30Hz Zr=5 meters below free surface Vertical component is presented Source

Comparison with FD 28 DG P1 h=2.5 m. FD h=2.5 m. The same amplitude normalization Numerical diffraction

Comparison with FD 29 DG P1 h=2.5 m. FD h=1m. The same amplitude normalization Numerical diffraction

Numerical experiments 30 Xs=4500, Zs= 5 meters below free surface, volumetric source, freq=20Hz Zr=5 meters below free surface

Numerical Experiments 31

Numerical Experiment – Sea Bed Source position x=12,500 m, z=5 m Ricker pulse with central frequency of 10 Hz Receivers were placed at the seabed.

Numerical Experiments

Conclusions Discontinuous Galerkin method allows properly handling wave interaction with sharp interfaces, but it is computationally intense Finite differences are computationally efficient but cause high diffractions because of stair-step approximation of the interfaces. The algorithm based on the use of the DG in the upper part of the model and FD in the deeper part allows properly treating the free surface topography but preserves the efficiency of FD simulation.

Thank you for attention 35