EAS 4480 – Data Analysis James Hite.  Motivation: Census Growth  Monitoring Sites (5)  Sdekalb, Yorkville  Bledsoe,Douglasville, Conyers  O 3, CO,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NASA AQAST 6th Biannual Meeting January 15-17, 2014 Heather Simon Changes in Spatial and Temporal Ozone Patterns Resulting from Emissions Reductions: Implications.
Advertisements

Southern Ute Indian Tribe’s Participation in the 2011 Passive Ammonia Study Conducted by EPA Region 6.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Washington July 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Colorado May 2013.
1 Asheville Air Quality Megan Stone. 2 Clean Smokestacks Act Passed in 2002 by the General Assembly of North Carolina Passed in 2002 by the General Assembly.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Nevada May 2013.
Temporal and Spatial Variations of PM2.5 Mass in Georgia Xiaolu Zhang EAS 6410 Spring 2007.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review New Jersey May 2013.
Forty-five Years of the Clean Air Act Ron Gore ADEM August,2015.
Ramifications of Charlotte Regional Growth and Weekday Activities on Primary and Secondary Emissions Jenny L. Perry and Patrick M. Owens Department of.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Utah May 2013.
1 Ozone Trends at Cleanest 10% Sites March 2010 Till Stoeckenius, Lan Ma, Lynsey Parker ENVIRON International Corp. & Gregory Stella Alpine Geophysics,
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Virginia May 2013.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Current Status of Air Quality Laura Boothe North Carolina Division of Air Quality MCIC Workshops March 2012.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Connecticut July 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review New York May 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Alabama May 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Maryland May 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Florida May 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Arkansas July 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review North Dakota July 2013.
Weekday/Weekend O 3 and PM Differences in Three Cities Outside California Betty K. Pun and Christian Seigneur AER, San Ramon, CA Warren White Washington.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Michigan July 2013.
Arno Graff Susan Klose UBA-II 4.2 – Air Quality Assessment Some Aspects on Air Quality in Germany related to SOER 14th EIONET Meeting, Warsaw,
The Relationship of Weather and Movie Ticket Sales An analysis to show if temperature and precipitation influence ticket sales of Atlantic Station Regal.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review New Hampshire July 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Idaho July 2013.
Picture from Flickr Creative Commons. User: tomgrundyphoto.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Iowa May 2013.
Applicability of CMAQ-DDM to source apportionment and control strategy development Daniel Cohan Georgia Institute of Technology 2004 Models-3 Users’ Workshop.
PM2.5 in China: Cycles, Trend, and Regional Correlation Shitian Liu.
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
The role of weather conditions on PM2.5 concentrations in Beijing
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Jenny L. Perry and Patrick M. Owens Department of Chemistry
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Impacts of hydrogen pathways vs
Within-Week Variability and Long-Term Trends in Traffic, Power Plant Emissions, and Ambient CO, NOy and Ozone for the Charlotte Metropolitan Area Jennifer.
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Presentation transcript:

EAS 4480 – Data Analysis James Hite

 Motivation: Census Growth  Monitoring Sites (5)  Sdekalb, Yorkville  Bledsoe,Douglasville, Conyers  O 3, CO, NO x, PM 2.5  Previous Study on VOCs Population Change DeKalb: (43,737, 16.7%) Douglas: (16,847, 48.4%) Spaulding: (3,776, 16.4%) Rockdale: (8,190, 32.7%) Paulding: (22,856, 78.1%) Polk: -- (1,849, 14.6%) Haralson: -- (1,568, 12.3%) (expressed in housing units)

 Initial Results  Overall Negative Trends - in line with VOC study  Interesting points ▪ Full positive: Conyers, Sdklb O 3 ▪ 00-10: none/negative  Motivation for reanalysis (averaging) –diurnal cycle Method ======= LS Regression, Bootstrap resampling to determine 95% normal confidence interval

 Overall: increase in negative slopes  Daily: Most retained negative trends except  Full&00-10 Conyers O3 – no trend  Neg/none: Douglasville O3; pos/neg Sdekalb O3  Monthly: Less noise  less apparent trends  (in addition) Sdekalb O3: no full trend (00-10 less)  No-trends: Bledsoe O3, Sdkelab PMfine  Yorkville O3  no trend (full still neg.)

10-year loss: -7.20E-03 ppmv (daily) vs -6.77E-03 ppmv (monthly

 Linear Trends identified across indv. months  Interesting results:  JFM, ND off-season (Bedsole): positive trends  (other stations don’t really measure at this time)  Conyers Apr. (+), Aug. (-)  Sdekalb Jul./Aug. (-) Trends in Individual Monthly Averages: OzoneSlopes: ppmv/year MonthBedsoleConyersDouglasvilleSdekalbYorkville Jan no data Feb no data Mar Apr E May Jun-8.43E E Jul-3.79E Aug Sep9.63E E Oct E Nov no data Dec no data

Mar., Nov. off-season (Bedsole): positive trends Conyers : Aug. (-) Sdekalb : Aug. (-) Note: other sites have similar slopes, did not pass resampling test for 95% confidence interval Interesting: less urban areas have higher [March]

 Yorkville / sdekalb pollutants: all significant trends were negative  PSD/CPSD Analysis  Bedsole plot:  (Lombscargle method on 1-hr avgs)  … took ~20 minutes

 Separate psd each station  Cpsd analysis & phase lag  Daily Nox cpsd shows a shared weekly cycle with a lag of ~.5 day (york  sdekalb), would expect this since prevailing wind is easterly (coherence ~.7)

 Data Source: Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Environmental Protection Division, Air Protection Branch Ambient Monitoring Program - Susan Zimmer-Dauphinee, Program Manager  Blanchard et. al  2009 Ambient Air Surveillance Report