Supported by NSTX-U Overview of Research Plans for NSTX Upgrade* Jon Menard (PPPL) NSTX-U Program Director Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PPPL,NFRI Study of Error Field and 3D Plasma Response in KSTAR J.-K. Park 1, Y. M. Jeon 2, In collaboration with J. E. Menard 1, K. Kim 1, J. H. Kim 2,
Advertisements

Potential Upgrades to the NBI System for NSTX-Upgrade SPG, TS NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U.
V. A. SOUKHANOVSKII, NSTX-U FACILITY ENHANCEMENT BRAINSTORMING, 7 February 2012 Proposed Facility Enhancements for NSTX Upgrade V. A. Soukhanovskii for.
Study of tearing mode stability in the presence of external perturbed fields Experimental validation of MARS-K/Q and RDCON codes Z.R. Wang 1, J.-K. Park.
NSTX-U T&T TSG Contributions to FY15 JRT NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U.
Development and characterization of intermediate- δ discharge with lithium coatings XP-919 Josh Kallman Final XP Review June 5, 2009 NSTX Supported by.
NSTX-U 5 year plan text finalization J. Menard 5YP Update Meeting B318 March 28, 2013 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima.
Particle control task force early run discussion R. Maingi, J. Canik Particle Control Task Force Meeting PPPL LSB B318 January 20, 2015 NSTX-U Supported.
NSTX Status and Plans College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics New York.
NSTX-U Collaboration Status and Plans for: ORNL Boundary Physics and RF Research J.M. Canik, J.B.O. Caughman, J.-W. Ahn, S.J. Diem, T.K. Gray, D.L. Green,
Quality Assurance Readiness for Operations Review Judy Malsbury, Head of QA Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory NSTX Upgrade LSB B318 December 9-11, 2014.
Sustainment and Control Chapter Status Stefan Gerhardt 12/5/12 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu.
NSTX-U Program Update J. Menard For the NSTX-U Research Team NSTX-U Team Meeting PPPL – B318 June 5, 2015 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu.
ISTP (and other…) Update Stefan Gerhardt NSTX-U Monday Physics Meeting Feb. 20, 2015 B318 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima.
XP1518: RWM PID control optimization based on theory and experiment S. A. Sabbagh, J.W. Berkery, J.M Bialek Y.S. Park, (et al…) Department of Applied Physics,
EP-TSG session Meeting agenda et al. M. Podestà NSTX-U Research Forum 2015 EP-TSG session PPPL, Room B252 02/24/2015 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr.
Non-axisymmetric Control Coil Upgrade and related ideas NSTX Supported by V1.0 Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U.
NSTX-U Collaboration Status and Plans for: Charged Fusion Product Diagnostic FIU Werner U. Boeglin Ramona Perez, Alexander Netepenko, FIU D.S. Darrow PPPL.
RF Operations: Commissioning the RF systems and antenna conditioning J. Hosea et al. NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima.
ASC 5-Year Plan Discussion: TSG Goals and Diagnostic Requirements NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo.
NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS Niigata U U Tokyo JAEA Hebrew.
Radiative divertor with impurity seeding in NSTX V. A. Soukhanovskii (LLNL) Acknowledgements: NSTX Team NSTX Results Review Princeton, NJ Wednesday, 1.
Prototype Multi-Energy Soft X-ray Diagnostic for EAST Kevin Tritz Johns Hopkins University NSTX-U Monday Physics Meeting PPPL, Princeton, NJ June 25 th,
Boundary Physics Plan in NSTX Rajesh Maingi* For the NSTX Team *Oak Ridge National Laboratory Tokamak Planning Workshop PSFC, MIT Sept 17-19, 2007 Supported.
Direct measurement of plasma response using Nyquist Contour Z.R. Wang 1, J.-K. Park 1, M. J. Lanctot 2, J. E. Menard 1,Y.Q. Liu 3, R. Nazikian 1 1 Princeton.
NSTX-U cryo/particle control discussion #8 December 19, 2012 What have we done, or plan to do to be responsive to PAC questions, and in prep for 5 year.
NSTX-U Program Update J. Menard NSTX-U Team Meeting B318 May 7, 2013 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto.
NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS Niigata U U Tokyo JAEA Inst for Nucl.
ASC SPG NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS Niigata U U Tokyo JAEA Inst.
Second Switching Power Amplifier (SPA) Upgrade Physics Considerations Discussion S.A. Sabbagh 1, and the NSTX Research Team 1 Department of Applied Physics,
Absorber arc mitigation during CHI on NSTX D. Mueller, M.G. Bell, A.L. Roquemore, R. Raman, B.A. Nelson, T.R. Jarboe and the NSTX Research Team DPP09 Meeting.
ASC Five Year Plan Chapter Status Stefan Gerhardt NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu.
Wave Heating and Current Drive TSG: XMP for Recomissioning the HHFW System R.J. Perkins, J. C. Hosea Theory & Modeling: N. Bertelli NSTX-U Supported by.
Progress and Plans for Solenoid-free Plasma Start-up and Ramp-up R. Raman D. Mueller, S.C. Jardin and the NSTX-U Research Team NSTX-U PAC-35 Meeting PPPL.
1 R Raman, B.A. Nelson, D. Mueller 1, T.R. Jarboe, M.G. Bell 1, J. Menard 1, R. Maqueda 2 et al. University of Washington, Seattle 1 Princeton Plasma Physics.
Pedestal Structure & Control TSG A. Diallo, R. Maingi, D. Smith NSTX-U Pedestal NSTX-U Pre-forum 2 January 29, 2015 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr.
M&P TSG Prioritization for FY2015 and campaign startup M.A. Jaworski, C.H. Skinner, R. Kaita NSTX-U Science and Topical Science Group organizational meeting.
Progress and Plans for Non-inductive Ramp-up/Sustainment Modeling Francesca Poli for the NSTX-U team NSTX-U PAC-35 Meeting PPPL – B318 June 11-13, 2013.
NSTX-U Collaboration Status and Plans for: X Science LLC Ricky Maqueda NSTX-U Collaborator Research Plan Meetings PPPL – LSB B318 April / May 2014 NSTX-U.
Macroscopic Stability TSG Pre-forum Meeting #1 J.W. Berkery Department of Applied Physics, Columbia University, New York, NY NSTX-U Supported by Culham.
EP-TSG: draft plans for commissioning & first research phases of NSTX-U operation M. Podestà, D. Liu, N. Gorelenkov, N. Crocker for the NSTX-U EP-TSG Pre-Forum.
1: ASC “Theory and Computation” Prep 2: NSTX-U Five Year Plan Discussion SPG NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima.
Development and characterization of intermediate- δ discharge with lithium coatings XP-919 Josh Kallman XP Review - ASC Feb 2, 2009 NSTX Supported by College.
NSTX-U Collaboration Plans for UCLA PI: Neal A. Crocker Co-PI: Prof. Troy Carter Grad. Student (planned 2 nd year onward) PPPL Research Contacts and Collaborators:
Supported by Office of Science NSTX S.M. Kaye, PPPL For the NSTX Research Team ITPA T&C Mtg. Naka, Japan 31 March – 2 April 2009 The Effect of Rotation.
Solenoid Free Plasma Startup Progress and Plans R. Raman, D. Mueller S.C. Jardin (Theory) for the NSTX Research Team NSTX PAC-29 PPPL B318 January 26-28,
NSTX-U Collaboration Status and Plans for: Local Helicity Injection - U. Wisconsin R.J. Fonck,B. T. Lewicki, A. J. Redd University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Macroscopic Stability TSG Research Forum J.W. Berkery Department of Applied Physics, Columbia University, New York, NY NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr.
Wave Heating and Current Drive TSG: XMP/XPs for the 2015 NSXT-U Campaign RF-TSG R.J. Perkins, J. C. Hosea Theory & Modeling: N. Bertelli Univ. Rep: P.
Overview of Results from the FY10 National Spherical Torus Experiment Run Eric Fredrickson For the NSTX Team NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado Sch.
Effect of 3-D fields on edge power/particle fluxes between and during ELMs (XP1026) A. Loarte, J-W. Ahn, J. M. Canik, R. Maingi, and J.-K. Park and the.
FY WEP TSG Goals & WEP-Relevant Diagnostic Upgrades NSTX Supported by WEP TSG Meeting September 14,
NSTX Research Plans and Key Diagnostics for Macroscopic Stability Jong-Kyu Park and Jack Berkery for NSTX team Macroscopic Stability Group Meeting.
Supported by Office of Science NSTX S.M. Kaye, PPPL ITPA PPPL 5-7 Oct Confinement and Transport in NSTX: Lithiumized vs non-Lithiumized Plasmas Culham.
NSTX-U Disruption PAM Working Group – Controlled Shutdown XP Discussion S. A. Sabbagh and R. Raman Department of Applied Physics, Columbia University,
Upgrades to PCS Hardware (Incomplete) KE, DAG, SPG, EK, DM, PS NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo.
XP-945: ELM Pacing via Vertical Position Jogs S.P. Gerhardt, J.M. Canik, D. Gates, R. Goldston, R. Hawryluk, R. Maingi, J. Menard, S. Sabbagh, A. Sontag.
V. A. Soukhanovskii, XP1002 Review, 9 June 2010, Princeton, NJ 1 of 9 XP 1002: Core impurity density and P rad reduction using divertor condition modifications.
Advanced Scenario Development on NSTX D. A. Gates, PPPL For the NSTX Research Team 50th APS-DPP meeting Dallas, TX November 17, 2008 College W&M Colorado.
NSTX-U Collaboration Status and Plans for: M.I.T. Plasma Science and Fusion Center Abhay K. Ram, Paul Bonoli, and John Wright NSTX-U Collaborator Research.
1 Status of the 2008 ASC TSG Run plan Presented by D. A. Gates (J. Menard Deputy) At the NSTX Mid-run asessment PPPL April 16, 2008 Supported by Office.
NSTX-U NSTX-U PAC-31 – NSTX-U Program Overview, J. Menard (04/17/2012) NSTX-U 5 year plan goal: implement cryo-pumping and begin transition to metallic.
1 Roger Raman for the NSTX Research Team University of Washington, Seattle Update on the NSTX Run Plan PPPL, Princeton, NJ, 15 May, 2006 Supported by Office.
GO : Progress toward fully non-inductive operation in NSTX Jonathan Menard, PPPL For the NSTX Team 47 th Annual Meeting of the DPP Monday–Friday,
NSTX-U Research Highlights and Plans Jonathan Menard, PPPL For the NSTX Research Team IAEA FEC Meeting October 2012 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr.
Comments on HC Measurements for NSTX- Upgrade SPG CS Upgrade Meeting 11/2/11 NSTX Supported by Culham Sci Ctr U St. Andrews York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima.
J-W. Ahn 1 K.F. Gan 2, F. Scotti 3, R. Maingi 1, J.M. Canik 1, T.K. Gray 1, J.D. Lore 1, A.G. McLean 4, A.L. Roquemore 3, V.A. Soukhanovskii 4 and the.
Correlation between Electron Transport and Shear Alfven Activity in NSTX College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins.
Neutron diagnostic calibration transfer XMP D. Darrow and the NSTX Research Team XMP & XP review meeting Control Room Annex June 11, 2015 NSTX-U Supported.
Profiles Variations in NSTX-U and their Potential Impact on Equilibrium and Stability Magnetoboss 12/6/2013 NSTX-U Supported by Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu.
Presentation transcript:

Supported by NSTX-U Overview of Research Plans for NSTX Upgrade* Jon Menard (PPPL) NSTX-U Program Director Culham Sci Ctr York U Chubu U Fukui U Hiroshima U Hyogo U Kyoto U Kyushu U Kyushu Tokai U NIFS Niigata U U Tokyo JAEA Inst for Nucl Res, Kiev Ioffe Inst TRINITI Chonbuk Natl U NFRI KAIST POSTECH Seoul Natl U ASIPP CIEMAT FOM Inst DIFFER ENEA, Frascati CEA, Cadarache IPP, Jülich IPP, Garching ASCR, Czech Rep Coll of Wm & Mary Columbia U CompX General Atomics FIU INL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Lehigh U Nova Photonics ORNL PPPL Princeton U Purdue U SNL Think Tank, Inc. UC Davis UC Irvine UCLA UCSD U Colorado U Illinois U Maryland U Rochester U Tennessee U Tulsa U Washington U Wisconsin X Science LLC 17 th International Spherical Torus Workshop University of York September 2013 *This work supported by the US DOE Contract No. DE-AC02-09CH11466

17 th International ST Workshop – NSTX-U Research Plans (Menard)September 19, 2013 NSTX-U NSTX Upgrade mission elements 2 ITER Advance ST as candidate for Fusion Nuclear Science Facility (FNSF) Develop solutions for the plasma- material interface challenge Explore unique ST parameter regimes to advance predictive capability - for ITER and beyond Develop ST as fusion energy system Lithium“Snowflake” ST-FNSF

17 th International ST Workshop – NSTX-U Research Plans (Menard)September 19, 2013 NSTX-U NSTX Upgrade will access next factor of two increase in performance to bridge gaps to next-step STs Non-inductive start-up, ramp-up, sustainment Confinement scaling (esp. electron transport) Stability and steady-state control Divertor solutions for mitigating high heat flux * Includes 4MW of high-harmonic fast-wave (HHFW) heating power VECTOR (A=2.3) JUST (A=1.8) ARIES-ST (A=1.6) Low-A Power Plants Key issues to resolve for next-step STs ParameterNSTX NSTX Upgrade Fusion Nuclear Science Facility Pilot Plant Major Radius R 0 [m] – 2.2 Aspect Ratio R 0 / a  1.3  1.5  1.7 Plasma Current [MA]124 – 1011 – 18 Toroidal Field [T]0.512 – 32.4 – 3 Auxiliary Power [MW]≤ 8≤ 19*22 – 4550 – 85 P/R [MW/m] – 6070 – 90 P/S [MW/m 2 ] – – 0.9 Fusion Gain Q1 – 22 – 10 3

17 th International ST Workshop – NSTX-U Research Plans (Menard)September 19, 2013 NSTX-U NSTX-U aims to access performance levels of next-steps, approach Pilot-Plant regimes NSTX-U NSTX ST-FNSF ST-Pilot Bootstrap fraction f BS H 98y2 NSTX-U NSTX ST-FNSF ST-Pilot Normalized Confinement NN NSTX-U NSTX ST-FNSF ST-Pilot Normalized Beta NSTX-U NSTX ST-FNSF ST-Pilot Power exhaust challenge P/S [MW/m 2 ] Full non-inductive (NI) current drive for steady-state operation  ST requires NI start-up/ramp-up High confinement to minimize auxiliary heating, device size Sustained high  to minimize magnet size, forces, power Divertor/first-wall survival with intense power/particle fluxes Requirements for ST / tokamak next-steps: 4

17 th International ST Workshop – NSTX-U Research Plans (Menard)September 19, 2013 NSTX-U 5 NSTX Upgrade incorporates 2 new capabilities: TF OD = 40cm Previous center-stack TF OD = 20cm Normalized e-collisionality e *  n e / T e 2 ITER-like scaling ST-FNSF ? constant q, ,  NSTX Upgrade  Reduces *  ST-FNSF values to understand ST confinement Expect 2x higher T by doubling B T, I P, and NBI heating power  5x longer pulse-length q(r,t) profile equilibration Test non-inductive ramp-up  Reduces *  ST-FNSF values to understand ST confinement Expect 2x higher T by doubling B T, I P, and NBI heating power  5x longer pulse-length q(r,t) profile equilibration Test non-inductive ramp-up New center-stack  2x higher CD efficiency from larger tangency radius R TAN  100% non-inductive CD with core q(r) profile controllable by: NBI tangency radius Plasma density, position (not shown)  2x higher CD efficiency from larger tangency radius R TAN  100% non-inductive CD with core q(r) profile controllable by: NBI tangency radius Plasma density, position (not shown) New 2 nd NBI Present NBI R TAN [cm] __________________ 50, 60, 70, , 70,120,130 70,110,120,130 n e /n Greenwald I P =0.95MA, H 98y2 =1.2,  N =5,  T = 10%, B T = 1T, P NBI = 10MW, P RF = 4MW NSTX

17 th International ST Workshop – NSTX-U Research Plans (Menard)September 19, 2013 NSTX-U Proposed longer-term facility enhancements: ( ) Improved particle control tools – Control deuterium inventory and trigger rapid ELMs to expel impurities – Access low *, understand role of Li Disruption avoidance, mitigation – 3D sensors & coils, massive gas injection ECH to raise start-up plasma T e to enable FW+NBI+BS I P ramp-up – Also EBW-CD start-up, sustainment Begin transition to high-Z PFCs, assess flowing liquid metals – Plus divertor Thomson, spectroscopy 6 Midplane + off-midplane non-axisymmetric control coils (NCC) Extended low-f MHD sensor set 1-2MW 28 GHz gyrotron Divertor cryo-pump Upward Li evaporator Li granule injector (LGI) High-Z tiles Actively-supplied, capillary-restrained, gas-cooled LM-PFC

17 th International ST Workshop – NSTX-U Research Plans (Menard)September 19, 2013 NSTX-U NSTX-U team developed 5 year plan for FY Highest priority goals: 7 5 year plan successfully peer-reviewed in May Demonstrate 100% non-inductive sustainment at performance that extrapolates to ≥ 1MW/m 2 neutron wall loading in FNSF 2.Access reduced * and high-  combined with ability to vary q and rotation to dramatically extend ST physics understanding 3.Develop and understand non-inductive start-up and ramp-up (overdrive) to project to ST-FNSF with small/no solenoid 4.Develop and utilize high-flux-expansion “snowflake” divertor and radiative detachment for mitigating very high heat fluxes 5.Begin to assess high-Z PFCs + liquid lithium to develop high- duty-factor integrated PMI solutions for next-steps

17 th International ST Workshop – NSTX-U Research Plans (Menard)September 19, 2013 NSTX-U Highest priority research goals for NSTX-U: 8 1.Demonstrate 100% non-inductive sustainment 2.Access reduced * and high-  combined with ability to vary q and rotation 3.Develop/understand non-inductive start-up, ramp-up (overdrive) for ST-FNSF with small/no solenoid 4.Develop high-flux-expansion “snowflake” divertor + radiative detachment to mitigate high heat fluxes 5.Assess high-Z + liquid Li plasma facing components

17 th International ST Workshop – NSTX-U Research Plans (Menard)September 19, 2013 NSTX-U TRANSP simulations support goal of accessing and controlling 100% non-inductive plasma operation 9 Contours of Non-Inductive Fraction H 98y2 Maximum sustained non-inductive fractions of 65% w/NBI at I P = 0.7 MA % non-inductive transiently with HHFW current-drive + bootstrap Total non- inductive current fraction I p (MA) NSTX Results NSTX-U projections via high harmonic FW NSTX achieved:NSTX-U projections (TRANSP): 100% non-inductive at I P = MA for range of power, density, confinement I P =1 MA, B T =1.0 T, P NBI =12.6 MW

17 th International ST Workshop – NSTX-U Research Plans (Menard)September 19, 2013 NSTX-U Advanced Scenarios and Control 5 Year Goals: 100% non-inductive operation Lower *: high-current, partial- inductive scenarios, extend to long-pulse Implement axisymmetric control algorithms and tools –Current and rotation profile control –Improved shape and vertical position control –Heat flux control for high-power scenarios Develop disruption avoidance by controlled plasma shutdown 10 Torque Profiles From 6 Different NB Sources Rotation Profile Actuators Neutral Beams (TRANSP) Largest R tan Smallest R tan Also torques from 3D fields

17 th International ST Workshop – NSTX-U Research Plans (Menard)September 19, 2013 NSTX-U Rapid TAE avalanches could impact NBI current-drive in advanced scenarios for NSTX-U, FNSF, ITER AT 11 Discrepancy between reconstruction and total assuming classical J NBCD Minor radius 700kA high-  P plasma with rapid TAE avalanches has time-average D FI = 2-4m 2 /s NSTX: rapid avalanches can lead to redistribution/loss of NBI current drive NSTX-U TRANSP simulations 1 MA, 1T, H 98 =1, near non-inductive 1.6 MA, 1T, partial inductive 1.2 MA, 0.55T, high  T All: f GW =0.7, H 98 =1 1 MA, 1T, H 98 =1, near non-inductive 1.6 MA, 1T, partial inductive 1.2 MA, 0.55T, high  T All: f GW =0.7, H 98 =1

17 th International ST Workshop – NSTX-U Research Plans (Menard)September 19, 2013 NSTX-U Energetic Particle 5 Year Goals: 12 Assess requirements for fast-ion phase-space engineering –AE spectroscopy, also stability control using NBI, q, rotation, 3D fields Develop predictive tools for projections of *AE-induced fast ion transport in FNSF and ITER –Compare data to simulation, develop reduced models ORBIT, NOVA-K, M3D-K, HYM to understand mode-induced transport –Vary fast-ion instability drive using NBI, q, rotation, 3D fields –Measure *AE mode structure Magnetics, BES, reflectometry –Characterize fast ion transport vs. *AE type

17 th International ST Workshop – NSTX-U Research Plans (Menard)September 19, 2013 NSTX-U NSTX/NSTX-U is making leading contributions to high-  N stability physics, and assessing possible 3D coil upgrades 13 Identified several off-midplane 3D coil sets favorable for profile and mode control –~40% increase in n=1 RWM  active /  no-wall –~5x reduction in n=1 EF resonant torque –~10-100x variation in ratio of non- resonant to resonant n=3 torque in edge Important for control, understanding of RMP ELM control, NTV rotation profile control Resonant Field Amplification (G/G) n=1 MHD spectroscopy: high  N can be more stable –Combination of rotation and current profile effects at high beta –Important for advanced scenarios NCC options:

17 th International ST Workshop – NSTX-U Research Plans (Menard)September 19, 2013 NSTX-U NSTX has also made leading contributions to disruption warning research 14 False positives Neutron emission RWM growth Model locking V loop, v   E dZ/dt f p, l i Disruption warning algorithms: –Based on sensors + physics- based variables (not neural net) –< 4% missed, 3% false positives –ITER requires 95-98% prediction success for VDE, thermal quench –Will assess applicability to ITER through ITPA Joint Activity –Will also assess for ST-FNSF Will use to trigger ramp-down and/or mitigation in NSTX-U

17 th International ST Workshop – NSTX-U Research Plans (Menard)September 19, 2013 NSTX-U Macroscopic Stability 5 Year Goals: Study effects of reduced *, q and rotation on LM, RWM, NTM Test state-space control for EF, RWM for ITER, next-steps Assess 3D field effects to provide basis for optimizing stability through rotation profile control by 3D fields –EF penetration, rotation damping, ELM triggering and suppression 15 Understand disruption dynamics, develop prediction and detection, avoidance, mitigation –Enhance measurements of disruption heat loads, halos –Develop novel particle delivery techniques for mitigation: MGI in private-flux-region (PFR), electromagnetic particle injector

17 th International ST Workshop – NSTX-U Research Plans (Menard)September 19, 2013 NSTX-U Beginning to test/utilize transport models to predict NSTX temperature profiles, identify possible missing physics Over-prediction of core T e in NSTX may be due to transport from GAE/CAE modes not included in gyro-Landau-fluid model T e (keV) T i (keV) Utilizing neoclassical + drift wave models to simulate NSTX T i and T e profiles (collaboration with GA) –Need model for  in edge region –Discrepancy in core T e prediction for beam-heated H-modes r/a T e (keV) NSTX H-modes showed broadening of T e profile as B T was increased –Similar broadening trend observed with increased lithium deposition –B T  E scales as ~1/ * in both datasets 16

17 th International ST Workshop – NSTX-U Research Plans (Menard)September 19, 2013 NSTX-U Transport and Turbulence 5 Year Goals: Characterize H-mode global energy confinement scaling in the lower collisionality regime of NSTX-U 17 – Builds on identification of ETG w/ novel high-k r scattering in NSTX Establish and validate reduced transport models Identify modes causing anomalous electron thermal, momentum, particle/impurity transport –Exploit scaling dependencies of modes Example:  -tearing  e ~ 1, ETG  e ~ 0 –Relate predicted turbulence to data: Low-k (BES),  B (polarimetry), high k r & k  (  -wave)

17 th International ST Workshop – NSTX-U Research Plans (Menard)September 19, 2013 NSTX-U Highest priority research goals for NSTX-U: 18 1.Demonstrate 100% non-inductive sustainment 2.Access reduced * and high-  combined with ability to vary q and rotation 3.Develop/understand non-inductive start-up, ramp-up (overdrive) for ST-FNSF with small/no solenoid 4.Develop high-flux-expansion “snowflake” divertor + radiative detachment to mitigate high heat fluxes 5.Assess high-Z + liquid Li plasma facing components

17 th International ST Workshop – NSTX-U Research Plans (Menard)September 19, 2013 NSTX-U Simulations support non-inductive start-up/ramp-up strategy TRANSP: NSTX-U more tangential NBI  3-4x higher CD at low I P (0.4MA) TSC: non-inductive ramp-up from 0.4MA to 1MA possible w/ BS + NBI TSC code (2D) successfully simulates CHI I P ~200kA achieved in NSTX TSC + tools included in 5 year plan support CHI I P  400kA in NSTX-U ms1.6 ms2.7 ms R (m) Z (m) –Higher injector flux, toroidal field, CHI voltage –1MW 28GHz ECH (increases T e ) But, RF heating (ECH and/or HHFW) of CHI likely required to couple to NBI 19

17 th International ST Workshop – NSTX-U Research Plans (Menard)September 19, 2013 NSTX-U HHFW can efficiently heat low I P targets for plasma start-up NSTX high-harmonic fast-wave (HHFW) antenna will also be utilized on NSTX-U –12 strap, 30MHz, P RF ≤ 6MW –HHFW: highest ST T e (0) ~ 6keV 20 T e (0)=3keV RF-heated H-mode at I P = 300kA with only P RF = 1.4MW Non-inductive fraction ≥ 70% –f BS ~50%, f RFCD ~ 20-35%

17 th International ST Workshop – NSTX-U Research Plans (Menard)September 19, 2013 NSTX-U Start-up/Ramp-up + RF Heating/Current Drive Goals: 21 Test higher-current CHI start-up (~400kA) Test NBI + bootstrap current overdrive/ramp-up Develop HHFW and EC heating for fully non- inductive plasma current start-up and ramp-up –Extend HHFW to higher power (3-4MW), demonstrate HHFW-driven 100% non-inductive at kA Goal: maintain I P to confine 2 nd NBI fast-ions Validate advanced RF codes for NSTX-U, predict RF performance in ITER and FNSF –Use ECH (~1MW, 28GHz), then HHFW to increase T e of CHI plasmas for NBI –Test high-power EBW to generate start- up current - builds on MAST results

17 th International ST Workshop – NSTX-U Research Plans (Menard)September 19, 2013 NSTX-U Highest priority research goals for NSTX-U: 22 1.Demonstrate 100% non-inductive sustainment 2.Access reduced * and high-  combined with ability to vary q and rotation 3.Develop/understand non-inductive start-up, ramp-up (overdrive) for ST-FNSF with small/no solenoid 4.Develop high-flux-expansion “snowflake” divertor + radiative detachment to mitigate high heat fluxes 5.Assess high-Z + liquid Li plasma facing components

17 th International ST Workshop – NSTX-U Research Plans (Menard)September 19, 2013 NSTX-U Snowflake divertor effective for heat flux mitigation NSTX: can reduce heat flux by 2-4× via partial detachment Snowflake  additional x-point near primary x-point –NSTX: High flux expansion = lowers incident q  –Longer field-line-length promotes temperature drop, detachment 23 Snowflake/X Divertor Standard Divertor

17 th International ST Workshop – NSTX-U Research Plans (Menard)September 19, 2013 NSTX-U Boundary Physics, SOL/Divertor, PMI 5 Year Goals: Assess, optimize, control pedestal structure, transport, stability Assess and control divertor heat fluxes –Measure SOL widths at lower, higher B T, I P, P SOL Compare data to fluid and gyro-kinetic models –Assess, control, optimize snowflake/X-divertor –Develop highly-radiating divertor w/ feedback control –Assess impact of high-Z tile row(s) on core impurities Establish, compare particle control methods –Validate cryo-pump physics design, assess density control –Compare cryo to lithium coatings for n e, impurity, * control Explore Li/liquid-metal plasma material interactions –Li surface-science, continuous vapor-shielding, material migration and evolution, lab R&D: flowing Li loops, capillary-restrained Li surfaces 24

17 th International ST Workshop – NSTX-U Research Plans (Menard)September 19, 2013 NSTX-U Lithium Granule Injector (LGI) developed for NSTX is promising tool for pedestal control and scenario optimization Successful EAST collaboration –Demonstrated LGI ELM-pacing at 25 Hz with nearly 100% triggering reliability –Capable of up to 1 kHz injection LGI will be tested on NSTX-U for high-frequency ELM pacing –Possible density control technique: Combine Li coatings for D pumping with LGI for ELM-expulsion of carbon –Goal: reduce Z eff to ~2-2.5 –Injection of Li granules could also potentially replenish PFC Li coatings JET/ITER: potentially interested in testing Be granules for ELM pacing 25 EAST data

17 th International ST Workshop – NSTX-U Research Plans (Menard)September 19, 2013 NSTX-U Summary: NSTX-U aims to carry out leading research in support of FNSF/next-steps and ITER Non-inductive sustainment: NSTX-U aims to be the ST leader, will complement AT approach (DIII-D, KSTAR, EAST) Aim to make major advancements in transport understanding: Low * + high  + turbulence diagnostics unique in world NSTX-U will advance non-inductive start-up/ramp-up using unique combination of helicity injection + RF + NBI techniques With MAST-U, STs will lead development of novel divertors: –Snowflake / X-divertor, Super-X –NSTX-U aiming to lead development of replenishable / liquid metal PFCs 26

17 th International ST Workshop – NSTX-U Research Plans (Menard)September 19, 2013 NSTX-U Backup 27

17 th International ST Workshop – NSTX-U Research Plans (Menard)September 19, 2013 NSTX-U NSTX-U internal component staging supports goal to assess compatibility of high  E and  + 100% NICD with metallic PFCs 28 Cryo + full lower outboard high-Z divertor Lower OBD high-Z row of tiles C BN Li High-Z Cryo + U+L OBD high-Z rows of tiles Nominal year plan steps for implementation of cryo-pump + high-Z PFCs + LLD High-Z tile rowBakeable cryo- baffle for liquid Li Base budget case Flowing Li module All high-Z FW + divertors + flowing LLD module Cryo + high-Z FW and OBD + liquid Li divertor (LLD) Cryo-pump

17 th International ST Workshop – NSTX-U Research Plans (Menard)September 19, 2013 NSTX-U NSTX-U internal component staging supports goal to assess compatibility of high  E and  + 100% NICD with metallic PFCs 29 Flowing liquid Li divertor (LLD) module Full toroidal flowing Li Cryo-pump Upper cryo + all high-Z & higher-T PFCs + full toroidal LLD All high-Z FW + divertors + flowing LLD module Lower OBD high-Z row of tiles C BN Li High-Z Cryo + high-Z FW and OBD PFCs Nominal year plan steps for implementation of cryo-pump + high-Z PFCs + LLD High-Z tile row 2021 Bakeable cryo- baffle for liquid Li Incremental budget case Cryo-pump Cryo + high-Z FW and OBD + liquid Li divertor (LLD)

17 th International ST Workshop – NSTX-U Research Plans (Menard)September 19, 2013 NSTX-U Materials and PFCs 5 Year Goal: Initiate comparative assessment of high-Z and liquid metal PFCs for long-pulse high-power-density next-step devices 3.Establish the science of continuous vapor-shielding –Continue studies of Li vapor-shielding in linear plasma device Magnum-PSI –Extend Magnum results to NSTX-U 30 1.Understand Li surface-science at extended PFC operation –“Atoms to tokamaks” collaboration with PU 2.Assess tokamak-induced material migration and evolution –QCMs, marker-tiles, MAPP + QCM for shot-to-shot analysis of migration MP Thrusts: Lab-based R&D: flowing Li loops, capillary-restrained Li surfaces Magnum-PSI collaboration: M. Jaworski, T. Abrams (grad student) (PPPL) –Materials Analysis Particle Probe (MAPP) (Purdue - J.P. Allain, 2010 ECRP) to identify in-situ between-shot surface composition (LTX  NSTX-U)

17 th International ST Workshop – NSTX-U Research Plans (Menard)September 19, 2013 NSTX-U Plasma initiation with small or no transformer is unique challenge for ST-based Fusion Nuclear Science Facility ST-FNSF has no/small central solenoid 31 NSTX-U Non-Inductive Strategy:

17 th International ST Workshop – NSTX-U Research Plans (Menard)September 19, 2013 NSTX-U NSTX-U goal staging: first establish ST physics + scenarios, transition to long-pulse + PMI integration (5YP incremental) Establish ST physics, scenarios New center-stack 2nd NBI Upgrade Outage Integrate long-pulse + PMI solutions Increase CHI closed-flux current Assess plasma gun start-up at increased device size Develop/understand ECH/EBW H&CD for ST Increase/extend ramp-up heating and off-axis current-drive for advanced scenarios Establish main-ion density and * control Understand snowflake divertor performance Understand high-Z first-wall erosion, migration, particle sources & sinks Assess high-Z tile/divertor impact and performance Assess high-Z divertor and/or first-wall Assess impact of high- temperature first-wall Establish low impurities / Z eff, assess increased Li coverage, replenishment Assess flowing LM PFC with full toroidal coverage Test flowing liquid metal for heat-flux mitigation, surface replenishment Understand ES and EM turbulence at high  low *, emphasizing e-transport Extend wave-number coverage of turbulence measurements Characterize AE stability, fast-ion transport, NBI-CD, support plasma start-up, assess effectiveness of fast-wave in NBI H-modes Prototype driving edge-harmonic oscillations (EHOs) and/or *AE Demonstrate full non-inductive, high I P & P AUX operation Control: boundary, , divertor heat flux,  & q profiles Assess integrated control of long-pulse / high- performance Boundary Physics Materials and PFCs MHD Transport & Turbulence Scenarios and Control Waves and Energetic Particles Liquid metals / lithium 32 Understand kinetic MHD, extend mode and disruption detection, develop mitigation Enhance non-axisymmetric field spectrum and capabilities with off-midplane coils for control of: RWM, EF, RMP, rotation, NTM, EP Assess baseline graphite PFC performance Achieve NI start-up/ramp-up Start-up and Ramp-up Inform choice of FNSF: aspect ratio, divertor, and PFCs

17 th International ST Workshop – NSTX-U Research Plans (Menard)September 19, 2013 NSTX-U 10 year plan tools with 5YP incremental funding 1.1 × (FY % inflation) New center-stack 2nd NBI Start-up and Ramp-up Scenarios and Control 33 Boundary Physics Materials and PFCs MHD Transport & Turbulence Waves and Energetic Particles Liquid metals / lithium Upgrade Outage Upward LiTER Li granule injector High-Z first- wall + lower OBD tiles NCC SPA upgrade Enhanced MHD sensors Divertor Thomson High-Z PFC diagnostics MGI disruption mitigation High k  Partial NCC 4 coil AE antenna 1 coil AE antenna  B polarimetry 1 MW ECH/EBW up to 1 MA plasma gun Lower divertor cryo-pump High-Z tile row on lower OBD Upgraded CHI for ~0.5MA LLD using bakeable cryo-baffle MA CHI Metallic PFCs, 5s  10-20s Extend NBI duration to s and/or implement 2-4 MW off-axis EBW H&CD Hot high-Z FW PFCs using bake-out system Flowing Li divertor or limiter module Full toroidal flowing Li lower OBD Full NCC 1.5  2 MA, 1s  5s High-power AE antenna HHFW straps to excite EHO Charged fusion product, neutron-collimator HHFW limiter upgrade DBS, PCI, or other intermediate-k All high-Z PFCs Upper divertor cryo-pump Establish control of: 2 MW Control integration, optimization with long- pulse and full metal wall Control integration, optimization Rotation Divertor P rad q min Snowflake nene Run Weeks: Inform choice of FNSF: aspect ratio, divertor, and PFCs

17 th International ST Workshop – NSTX-U Research Plans (Menard)September 19, 2013 NSTX-U 5 year plan tools with 5YP base funding (FY % inflation) New center-stack 2nd NBI Start-up and Ramp-up Boundary Physics Materials and PFCs MHD Transport & Turbulence Scenarios and Control Waves and Energetic Particles Liquid metals / lithium Enhanced MHD sensors Full high-Z lower OBD MGI disruption mitigation Partial NCC 1 coil AE antenna High-Z tile row on cryo-baffle Li granule injector High-Z tile row on lower OBD Upward LiTER 4 coil AE antenna Establish control of: 1.5  2 MA, 1s  5sUpgrade Outage Upgraded CHI for ~0.5MA High k   B polarimetry 1 MW ECH/EBW up to 0.5 MA plasma gun Lower divertor cryo-pump Charged fusion product High-Z PFC diagnostics LLD using bakeable cryo-baffle Divertor P rad Rotation Snowflake q min nene Cryo-pump, high-Z tile row on cryo-baffle, and partial NCC would be installed in-vessel during ~1 year outage between FY2016 and FY2017  NSTX-U would operate 1 st half of FY2016 and 2 nd half of FY2017 Cryo-pump, high-Z tile row on cryo-baffle, and partial NCC would be installed in-vessel during ~1 year outage between FY2016 and FY2017  NSTX-U would operate 1 st half of FY2016 and 2 nd half of FY Run Weeks:

17 th International ST Workshop – NSTX-U Research Plans (Menard)September 19, 2013 NSTX-U NSTX-U 5 year plan aims to develop ST physics and scenario understanding necessary for assessing ST viability as FNSF Integrate long-pulse + PMIEstablish ST physics, scenarios High-Z and lithium PFCs Snowflake and radiative divertor exhaust location LowerLower or UpperLower + Upper P heat [MW] with q peak < 10MW/m 2 NBI+BS I P ramp-up: initial  final [MA] Sustained  N * / * (NSTX) 4 – 65 – 63 – 5NCC Non-inductive fraction (  t ≥  CR ) CHI closed-flux current [MA] 0.15 – – – –    – – 0.1 Cryo 70 – 90%80 – 110%90 – 120%100 – 140% ECH Inform choice of FNSF plasma facing components Flowing Li moduleIncreased Li coating coverageLiquid Li on high-Z divertor tiles Flowing Li divertor High-Z first-wallHigh-Z tile rowHigh-Z tile rowsHigh-Z outboard divertor All high-Z Structural force and coil heating limit fractions Maximum B T [T] and I P [MA] Nominal  pulse [s] Extend NBI, plasma duration from 5s to 10-20s 1 – 22 – 44 – 5 0.5, , , , 1.61, Inform choice of FNSF aspect ratio and divertor Divertor heat-flux control