Doc.: IEEE 802.19-10/0019r0 Submission February 2010 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 1 High Level Architecture View Notice: This document has been prepared to.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0046r0 Submission July 2009 Ari Ahtiainen, NokiaSlide 1 A Cooperation Mechanism for Coexistence between Secondary User Networks on.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0165r1 SubmissionPäivi Ruuska, NokiaSlide 1 Implementation aspects of a coexistence system Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /0129r1 Submission July 2012 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 1 How to accommodate different CE-CM interaction approaches in IEEE ?
Doc.: IEEE /0129r0 Submission July 2012 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 1 How to accommodate different CE-CM interaction approaches in IEEE ?
Doc.: IEEE /0129r2 Submission July 2012 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 1 How to accommodate different CE-CM interaction approaches in IEEE ?
Submission doc.: IEEE /0010r0 January 2015 Sho Furuichi, SonySlide 1 Coexistence Scenario and Use Cases Date: Authors: Notice: This.
Submission doc.: IEEE /XXXXr0 Month Year John Doe, Some CompanySlide 1 Insert Presentation Title Here Date: YYYY-MM-DD Authors: Notice: This document.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0032r0 April 2015 Sho Furuichi, SonySlide 1 The new coexistence use cases for IEEE Date: Authors: Notice:
Doc.: IEEE /0021r0 Submission May 2012 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 1 Coexistence system in a cognitive radio testbed Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /0104r0 Submission July 2010 Alex Reznik, et. al. (InterDigital)Slide 1 Channel Selection Support in TVWS Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0115r1 Submission July 2012 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 1 Design Principles for Entity Responsibilities Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /0024r0 Submission February 2010 Päivi Ruuska, NokiaSlide 1 Process Considerations Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc.: IEEE /0287r0 Submission March 2011 Slide 1Hyunduk Kang, et al, ETRI Overview and Issues Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0040r1 Submission May 2011 Miika Laaksonen, NokiaSlide 1 Coexistence Discovery Procedures Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0118r0 Submission July 2012 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 1 How to run WSO decision making with coexistence report announcements? Notice:
Doc.: IEEE /0074r2 Submission May 2010 Tuncer Baykas, NICTSlide TG1 Introduction and Status Notice: This document has been prepared to.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0097r0 November 2015 Sho Furuichi, SonySlide 1 Information exchange between independent IEEE systems Date: xx.
Doc.: IEEE /0061r0 Submission June 2011 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 1 Discovery system overview Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc.: IEEE /0054r0 Submission March 2013 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 1 TG1 Closing Report for March 2013 Notice: This document has been prepared.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0011r2 January 2016 Sho Furuichi, SonySlide 1 System architecture for information exchange between independent IEEE
Doc.: IEEE /41r0 SubmissionSlide 1 P System Architecture Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered.
Doc.: IEEE /20rev0 SubmissionSlide 1 P Assumptions and Architecture Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It.
Doc.: IEEE /0013r0 Submission January 2012 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 1 Motivation for Monitor WSO Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc.: IEEE /129r0 Submission September 2010 Junho Jo/Jihyun Lee, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 IEEE System description Notice: This document.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0015r0 January 2016 Sho Furuichi, SonySlide 1 Proposal for CM discovery/selection/ association as CE operation Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0017r0 January 2016 Sho Furuichi, SonySlide 1 Proposal on proxy coexistence service for moving WSO Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0037r0 Submission February 2010 Joe Kwak (InterDigital)Slide 1 TVWS Architecture for SDD Date: Authors: Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0013r0 Submission January 2010 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 1 Coexistence architecture of Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0085r1 Submission June 2010 Tuncer Baykas, NICTSlide TG1 and System Design Document Notice: This document has been prepared.
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: hwnm Title: Thoughts on IEEE relation with IEEE Date Submitted: May 13, 2010.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0052r1 March 2016 Sho Furuichi, SonySlide 1 Supplemental document for text proposal on amendment to entity operations Date:
Submission Title: [Add name of submission]
TG1 Introduction and Status
Proposal on system description, reference model and draft outline
June 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed Scenarios for Usage Model Document.
On the Objectives and Scope of the WS Coexistence PAR
TG1 Tutorial Review Date: Authors: May 2010 May 2010
Reference Model Proposal
P System Architecture Date: Authors: March 2010
Resource allocation principles for coexistence system
Reference Model Date: Authors: September 2010
July Tutorial – Possible Solutions
Possible Effects of FCC rules to design
Design Principles for Entity Responsibilities
PAR Comments Date: Authors: July 2010 May 2010
TG1 Introduction and Status
FCC rules and design Date: Authors: October 2010
Coexistence of CMs with different decision making algorithms
P System Architecture Date: Authors: March 2010
TG1 Tutorial Review Date: Authors: May 2010 May 2010
Neighbors and Neighbor Discovery
Coexistence Media Service Access Point (COEX_MEDIA_SAP)
Updates to the Draft Authors:
Updates to the Draft Authors:
Concept of Operation Date: Authors: July 2010
TG1 and System Design Document
Examples of deployment scenarios
July Tutorial – Possible Solutions
TG1 Draft Topics Date: Authors: September 2012 Month Year
Requirements Date: Authors: March 2010 Month Year
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER
Possible Action Items Date: Author:
Possible Action Items Date: Author:
P System Architecture Date: Authors: March 2010
Coexistence Decision Making Topologies
P System Architecture Date: Authors: March 2010
List of Remaining Proposals for Downselection
September 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Suggested TG3c PAR Changes] Date Submitted:
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 January 2016
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0019r0 Submission February 2010 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 1 High Level Architecture View Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Date: Authors:

doc.: IEEE /0019r0 Submission February 2010 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 2 Abstract This presentation has been submitted to the Architecture and Assumptions ad hoc group for discussion. The intent is to facilitate development of the System Design Document (SDD) the TG agreed to prepare before starting work on specification. Proposed elements and interfaces have been designed to enable both centralized and distributed decision making.

doc.: IEEE /0019r0 Submission Acronyms Used in the Presentation February 2010 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 3 APAccess Point CECoexistence Enabler CMCoexistence Manager SMEStation Management Entity SDDSystem Description Document TVBDTelevision Band Device WSWhite Space

doc.: IEEE /0019r0 Submission Logical Elements and Interfaces Logical Elements –Coexistence Manager –Coexistence Enabler Interfaces –Interface A –Interface B –Interface C –Interface C’ External Elements –WS Database –SME February 2010 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 4 Coexistence Manager Coexistence Enabler Interface B WS Database Interface C’ Coexistence Manager Interface C Scope SME Interface A

doc.: IEEE /0019r0 Submission Logical Elements Coexistence Manager (CM) –Makes decisions on operation parameters of TVBD networks/devices it serves to facilitate coexistence –Can serve multiple Coexistence Enablers, i.e. can be interfaced to multiple Coexistence Enablers Every compliant TVBD network/device is served by one CM only Coexistence Enabler (CE) –Implements decisions from the Coexistence Manager –Provides operational parameters etc. to the Coexistence Manager –Every compliant TVBD network/device has a Coexistence Enabler One-to-one mapping between a TVBD network/device and a CE February 2010 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 5

doc.: IEEE /0019r0 Submission Logical Interfaces (1/3) Interface A –Interface between a CE and a SME –Provides means for the CE to a.Acquire information about radio resource usage and needs of the TVBD network/device b.Affect on the operational parameters of the TVBD network/device –Used to exchange information like a.Radio resource usage and needs b.Radio environment –Note Not sure if we need to specify this in the details like the other interfaces February 2010 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 6

doc.: IEEE /0019r0 Submission Logical Interfaces (2/3) Interface B –Interface between a CM and CE(s) –Used by the CE to provide information about radio resource usage and needs of the TVBD network/devices –Used by the CM to give coexistence commands to CE’s it serves –Used to exchange information like a.Radio resource usage and needs of the TVBD networks/devices served by the CM (CE => CM) b.Radio environment (CE => CM) c.TVBD network/device operational parameters (CM => CE) February 2010 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 7

doc.: IEEE /0019r0 Submission Logical Interfaces (3/3) Interface C –Interface between CM’s –Used for coexistence communication between CM’s –Used to exchange information like a.Radio resource usage and needs of the TVBD networks/devices served by the CM b.Radio environment Interface C’ –Interface between a CM and a WS Database –Used at least for WS Database access but possibly also e.g. to open communication channels in the Interface C –Note The reason for noting this interface with C’ is that from high level perspective this interface is very much like the Interface C between CM’s; message content differs but same transport should be applicable February 2010 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 8

doc.: IEEE /0019r0 Submission A Few Deployment Examples Distributed ApproachCentralized Approach February 2010 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 9 Spectrum mgmt entity CM Device (e.g. AP) CE Device (e.g. AP) CE Device (e.g. AP) CE Device (e.g. AP) CE CM Device (e.g. AP) CE CM Device (e.g. AP) CE CM Device (e.g. AP) CE CM All interfaces are not mandatory in all deployment scenarios. SME interfaces are not visible in these pictures. WS Database

doc.: IEEE /0019r0 Submission Summary In this submission we propose a high level architecture view for SDD –Logical elements –Logical interfaces –External elements as basic assumptions The proposed architecture allows for both distributed and centralized decision making –A few exemplary deployment scenarios presented to illustrate this February 2010 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 10