Watershed Assessment Tables and Graphs June 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Warm-up Is the following set of ordered pairs a function? Explain why or why not. {(-1, -2), (0, 2), ( 1, 4), (3, 8)} Make a table, or T-chart, using.
Advertisements

Nutrients in Waterways
By Team 0: Louisiana Judy Armstrong Michelle Hicks Linda Messina Michelle Smith Protecting Your Watershed: Modeling of Surface- Water Quality.
Surface Water Geochemistry of Deckers Creek Basin Geology 399 Qingyun Sun.
Watershed Assessment Analysis of Data. Q Values Raw data values are NOT Q values. We need to convert the raw data/observations into “grades” (Q values)
P449. p450 Figure 15-1 p451 Figure 15-2 p453 Figure 15-2a p453.
Displaying Data: Graphing “A Picture is Worth a 1,000 Words”
Water Quality Analysis of Tryon Creek State Park By Matthew J LaForce Environmental Chemistry II WQT134 Spring 07 Water Quality Analysis of Tryon Creek.
5-in-5 Template 1.Start by selecting a background Theme – Nothing too showy/distracting – Easy on the eye 2.Use the following slides as a template for.
Water Quality Completing Lab 8. Reminder - What’s Due for Lab 8 Full Lab Report (One per Group) (a)Title & Abstract start with catchy title and list of.
Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) Why watersheds? ERS 482/682 Small Watershed Hydrology.
Data Interpretation and Graphs. The Display Display the data you collect with tables and graphs. Include these in both your Project Binder and on your.
How do you create a line plot to show measurement data? 3 in 5 in 19 cm 5 cm XX.
Data Handling GCSE coursework. Hypothesis Collection of Data Data Handling GCSE coursework Hypothesis.
Scientific Method Review
Quarry Rejuvenation. Our Aim The goal of our project was to discourage trespassing in an abandoned and dangerous quarry. We decided that the best way.
The Urban Watershed Unit 1, Topic 1. 1 Urban vs. Suburban vs. Rural.
Identify a Health Problem Qualitative Quantitative Develop Program -theory -objectives -format -content Determine Evaluation -design -sampling -measures.
Example apples A lot with apples contain 500 boxes, sender, variety and size are the same 12 kilos in each box How to select a sample?
An assessment of water quality in tropical streams located in primary and secondary rainforest By Emily Schultz Supervisor: Cheryl Baduini.
Water Quality Monitoring in the Upper Illinois River Watershed and Upper White River Basin Project Brian E. Haggard University of Arkansas.
METHODS. Physical Methods Steam Profile Discharge Air Temperature Water Temperature Relative Humidity.
Recording Data. Record Data Record Data in a Table or Chart. Make sure to have as much information as possible Record Everything that you do.
If there is pollution in the Chesapeake Bay then the Blue Crabs will decrease.
INDIAN HEAD RIVER PROJECT Whitman-Hanson Regional High School RiverNet Club 2005.
Science Fair Projects Riverview STEM Academy School.
Water Quality in Tryon Creek Initial Results from Portland’s Revised Watershed Monitoring Approach.
NCSCS Objectives 1.01 Identify questions and problems in earth and environmental science that can be answered through scientific investigation 1.01 Identify.
Coles Creek Watershed Assessment and Education Summary The Coles Creek Watershed, located in the southwestern quadrant of the state of Mississippi, with.
Water Quality in Stormwater Retention Ponds on UWB Campus Rick Vos.
Fresh Water Table of Contents Water on Earth Surface Water
Game Board Let’s Play Jeopardy Game Board Unit 1 Jeopardy Go to the next slide by clicking mouse. Choose a category and number value clicking on the.
Stream Pollution Assessment of Beaver Creek By Joe Wendtland and Loyal Wergedal.
Control the population proportion through the slider.
JOHNSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS SEPTEMBER , 2013 STAR MATH ! YES YOU CAN!
Team members: Block: 2A Elijah K (Team Leader) Jasmine C Christian D Armina R Angelina V Trey W OTTW Water Quality Presentation!
D value – The time requires to inactivate 1 log scale (90%) of bacterial population at a particular temperature. Z value – The difference of temperature.
Table 2. Borehole water parameters compared with WHO standards and Flood water results © The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Mathematics for GCSE Science
Computing and Data Analysis
D and Z values determination
Shirley Birosik Environmental Specialist
Significant figures.
Presenting Scientific Data
CE 394 K GIS in water resources
Regents Review.
Figures & Tables from the textbook.
Mathematics for GCSE Science
Independent Variable:
Hydrogeologic Investigations of the Silver Lake Wetland
Basic Statistics For Science Fair
Presentation Title Presentation Title Presentation Title
Centennial High School logo cbe. ab
Earth and Environmental Science
Discussion Discuss your calculations.
WATER YOU LOOKING AT? LAND USE AND WATER QUALITY ON THE DINGLE PENINSULA Elizabeth Bouchard, Jenna Rondeau, Mark Beekey, and LaTina Steele Sacred Heart.
Ch 1 G’raph Science.
Jacob Piske, Eric Peterson, Bill Perry
The Scientific Method Notes
Жирэмслэлт ба тархины харвалт
School of Behavioral Sciences
Graphing in Science.
Figure 11-1.
Figure Overview.
Figure Overview.
D and Z values determination
Environmental Science Lab 110 Yurika Kato
Scientific Method.
THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD.
DATA TABLES.
Presentation transcript:

Watershed Assessment Tables and Graphs June 2012

Use the formatting as a template to standardize the presentation of data. Present the following variables in a chart – Air temp & RH in one chart – Water temp & DO in one chart – Conductivity, pH and discharge in separate charts Present the following variables in a table – Nitrate-nitrogen & Phosphate in one table – E. coli in table – Landuse (from RS analysis)

ClassesTOTAL YearWaterRoadCommericalForestResidential Apartment/ Townhouse % impervious surface in watershed Table XX. Percent % of impervious surface in Long Island Creek Watershed (as based on ARC impervious quotients)

Nitrate (mg/L)Phosphate (mg/L) Sites*maxminaveragemaxminaverage 1A* <1 1B* <1 2A <1 2B <1 3A <1 3B <1 4A B0.25 2<1< A <10.00<1 5B <10.00<1 6A <10.00<1 6B <10.00<1 *n = 6 collected over 3 days; all other are n =4 collected over 2 days

E. coli (cfu/100mL) Sites7-Jun Jun Jun Jun A7333-TTC- 1B A B A B A B A B A B "-" = no sample taken TTC = Too many to count Each result is an average of n=3 For groups 3 and 4, please put in your June 23 results – should be an average of your 3 plates. If any data you provided is incorrect, let the group doing results know ASAP.

The * refers to a measurement on June 16 and a + is a measurement from June 23. You need to make a note of this in the Figure Caption for this graph.