Damping Ring Specifications S. Guiducci ALCPG11, 20 March 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ILC Accelerator School Kyungpook National University
Advertisements

Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider.
Bunch compressors ILC Accelerator School May Eun-San Kim Kyungpook National University.
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Linear Collider Bunch Compressors Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory USPAS Santa Barbara, June 2003.
Damping ring K. Ohmi LC Layout Single tunnel Circumference 6.7 km Energy 5 GeV 2 km 35 km.
Design and Performance Expectation of ALPHA accelerator S.Y. Lee, IU 2/26/ Introduction 2. Possible CIS re-build and parameters 3. Issues in the.
SuperB Damping Rings M. Biagini, LNF-INFN P. Raimondi, SLAC/INFN A. Wolski, Cockroft Institute, UK SuperB III Workshop, SLAC, June 2006.
SuperB and the ILC Damping Rings Andy Wolski University of Liverpool/Cockcroft Institute 27 April, 2006.
Damping Rings Baseline Lattice Choice ILC DR Technical Baseline Review Frascati, July 7, 2011 Mark Palmer Cornell University.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
2011 Damping Rings Lattice Evaluation Mark Palmer Cornell University March 8, 2011.
ILC RTML Lattice Design A.Vivoli, N. Solyak, V. Kapin Fermilab.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Report on the Damping Ring Meeting at CERN, Nov , 2005 J. Gao IHEP, Beijing, China Nov. 24, 2005, ILC-Asia Meeting.
The Overview of the ILC RTML Bunch Compressor Design Sergei Seletskiy LCWS 13 November, 2012.
Global Design Effort Dubna, 5 June 2008 Part I of Summary for WG C/D Conveners: Ewan Paterson (SLAC), Nikolay Solyak (FNAL), Andrei Seryi (SLAC), Masao.
Comparison between NLC, ILC and CLIC Damping Ring parameters May 8 th, 2007 CLIC Parameter working group Y. Papaphilippou.
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
November 14, 2004First ILC Workshop1 CESR-c Wiggler Dynamics D.Rubin -Objectives -Specifications -Modeling and simulation -Machine measurements/ analysis.
1 Simulations of fast-ion instability in ILC damping ring 12 April ECLOUD 07 workshop Eun-San Kim (KNU) Kazuhito Ohmi (KEK)
1 Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility M. Palmer & D.Rubin November 8, 2005.
Lattice DSB (new version in progress) S. Guiducci Webex 8 February 2011.
Damping Ring S. Guiducci AAP Review Tsukuba 20 April 2009.
DR 3.2 km Lattice Requirements Webex meeting 10 January 2011.
Positron Source Relocation Damping 10Hz S. Guiducci (INFN-LNF) BAW2, SLAC Tuesday 18 January 2011.
Damping Ring Parameters and Interface to Sources S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 7 July 2011.
ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design ( Modified FODO ) ** Yi-Peng Sun *,1,2, Jie Gao 1, Zhi-Yu Guo 2 Wei-Shi Wan 3 1 Institute of High Energy Physics,
1 Alternative ILC Bunch Compressor 7 th Nov KNU (Kyungpook National Univ.) Eun-San Kim.
ILC Damping Rings Electron Cloud Working Group Meeting Introduction S. Guiducci (LNF) ECLOUD10, Cornell 13 October
DR Layout Description ILC DR Technical Baseline Review Frascati, July 7, 2011 Mark Palmer Cornell University.
ML (BC) Studies update Nikolay Solyak Arun Saini.
2011 Damping Rings Lattice Evaluation WebEx Meeting May 24, 2011 Mark Palmer Cornell University.
LNF Frascati, July 8, 2011 DR Technical Baseline Rev. Global Design Effort 1 DR Technical Baseline Review INFN LNF · Frascati, Italy July 7 and 8, 2011.
2011 Damping Rings Lattice Evaluation Mark Palmer Cornell University March 20, 2011.
Global Design Effort ILC Damping Rings: R&D Plan and Organisation in the Technical Design Phase Andy Wolski University of Liverpool and the Cockcroft Institute,
ILC Damping Rings: Configuration Status and R&D Plans Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory January 19, 2006.
F Project X: Recycler 8.9 GeV/c Extraction D. Johnson, E. Prebys, M. Martens, J. Johnstone Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee August 8, 2007 D. Johnson.
Injection System Update S. Guiducci (LNF) XVII SuperB Workshop La Biodola, Isola d'Elba, May 29 th 5/29/111.
Investigation of Injection Schemes for SLS 2.0
CESR-c Plans for CESR (or Life Without CLEO) Mark A. Palmer David L. Rubin Second ILC Accelerator Workshop August 18, 2005.
IntraBeam Scattering Calculation T. Demma, S. Guiducci SuperB Workshop LAL, 17 February 09.
1 DR 10 Hz Repetition Rate S. Guiducci (LNF) AD&I webex, 23 June 2010.
Third ILC Damping Rings R&D Mini-Workshop KEK, Tsukuba, Japan December 2007 Choosing the Baseline Lattice for the Engineering Design Phase Andy Wolski.
Off-axis injection lattice design studies of HEPS storage ring
ILC DR Lower Horizontal Emittance, preliminary study
CLIC Damping ring beam transfer systems
Recent Developments in Damping Rings and their Wigglers
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Status and Plan of GDE Design Work (Including Road Map for RDR)
IntraBeam Scattering Calculation
IntraBeam Scattering Calculation
BINP Tau-Charm Project
XII SuperB Project Workshop LAPP, Annecy, France, March 16-19, 2010
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
M. Biagini, S. Guiducci ECLOUD WG webex meeting December 15, 2009
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Session Introduction & Damping Rings Baseline Lattice Decision
J. Seeman Perugia Super-B Meeting June 2009
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
Kicker specifications for Damping Rings
Injection design of CEPC
CDR2 – Injection System Injection system overview (Seeman) (2 pages)
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Evaluation of 1GHz vs 2GHz RF frequency in the damping rings
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Presentation transcript:

Damping Ring Specifications S. Guiducci ALCPG11, 20 March 2011

Nominal parameters of beams injected into damping rings

Positron Acceptance The injected positron beam has a normalized betatron amplitude: with: The equivalent rms beam size and emittance are: Configuration Studies and Recommendations for the ILC Damping Rings, ILC-NOTE

All particles in the injected positron beam should lie within the shaded areas specification on betatron amplitudesspecification in coordinate space  x =  y = 1  m

Longitudinal acceptance From RDR Check with positron source From RDR Check with positron source

RDR Longitudinal acceptance Injection energy acceptance  max = ±5e-3 Max injected bunch length  l inj = 34 mm Max bunch length for  max = ±5e-3 Energy acceptance for  l inj = 34 mm  max = ±7.4e-3 Check with positron source

Energy acceptance and lifetime Injection acceptance  max = ±5e-3 Energy acceptance gives quantum lifetime:  max =5e-3 and  p =1.3e-3   max = 3.9  p  2-3 sec lifetime For emittance tuning ~ 30min is needed   max ≥ 5.5  p ≥ 7e-3 also consider Touschek lifetime, less critical since tuning can be done at low current Energy acceptance should be at least  max = ±0.75%

Nominal parameters of beams extracted from damping rings

Layout and Components Racetrack – Injection/extraction in straight section 1 – RF and wigglers in straight section 2 Magnets (reduce cost with respect to RDR) – Reduce number of magnets, strenghts, number of different types) Injection/extraction as DCO4 –  x ≅ 70m,  y ≅ 10m at kickers –  x ≅ 70m at septum, phase advance between kickers and septum  x =  /2 – Space for kickers and septa as DCO4 Phase adjustment in the straights – DCO4:  Q x = ±0.5 and  Q y = ± 0.25 per straight section – Minimum:  Q x = ±0.25 and  Q y = ± 0.25 per ring Chicane – DCO4 (6.4 km):  C/C = ±   C = ±6.4 mm – For 3.2 km ring:  C/C = ±   C = ±3.2 mm

Layout and Components RF section – Longitudinal space per cavity 3.5 m – Leave space for a number of cavities sufficient to cover all the options (5 Hz, 1310 bunches – 10 Hz, 1310 bunches – 5 Hz, 2620 bunches) – RF cavities upstream of wigglers Wigglers – Space for synchrotron radiation absorbers >0.75 m – Use present RDR CESR-c type wigglers – Or new optimization of field and period for the shorter damping time

RF system and momentum compaction It’s an expensive system, cost containment is important RF has to be sufficient for 5Hz Low Power and High Power, and 10 HZ Low Power 6 mm bunch length Overvoltage V RF /U 0 ≤ 2 is desirable for 50% duty cycle operation of the e + ring at 10Hz (100 ms full current, 100 ms empty ring) A low momentum compaction is preferred:  c < 2  10 -4

DSB3 RF parameters options

References Configuration Studies andRecommendations for the ILC Damping Rings, February ILC RDR Report, August Specifications for the ILCDamping Rings EDR baseline lattice, A. Wolski, December eSpecifications.pdf eSpecifications.pdf DCO4: ILC-NOTE “Parameters and scope for low-power option discussions” N. Walker, AD&I meeting: BAW-2 preparation, 07 January 2011, sId=0&materialId=slides&confId= sId=0&materialId=slides&confId=4962