Argument Against Empiricism (P1)Because we have no reliable method for error-correction, we can’t be certain that we are not dreaming/deluded/ brains-in-vats.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© Michael Lacewing Innate ideas Michael Lacewing.
Advertisements

The value of certainty. Foundationalists suppose that true beliefs held with certainty (indubitable) together with logical and linguistic analysis offer.
Anselm On the Existence of God. “Nor do I seek to understand so that I can believe, but rather I believe so that I can understand. For I believe this.
Meditation IV God is not a Deceiver, Truth Criterion & Problem of Error.
The ontological argument. I had the persuasion that there was absolutely nothing in the world, that there was no sky and no earth, neither minds nor.
The Role of God in the Meditations (1) Context
Descartes God.
The Ontological Argument. Anselm’s Argument So the fool has to agree that the concept of something than which nothing greater can be thought exists in.
Descartes’ rationalism
Descartes’ cosmological argument
Descartes’ trademark argument Michael Lacewing
Meditations on First Philosophy
Descartes’ Meditations. Suppose Descartes has proven his own existence as a thinking thing: Can he prove anything else with absolute certainty? Mathematics?
The first proof for God’s existence I have an idea of God (an infinite, perfect being. The cause of an idea must have as much formal reality as objectively.
Descartes on Certainty (and Doubt)
The Rationalists: Descartes Certainty: Self and God
Skepticism The Causal Argument. God A nd now I seem to discover a path that will conduct us from the contemplation of the true God, in whom are contained.
Sources of knowledge: –Sense experience (empiricism) –Reasoning alone (rationalism) We truly know only that of which we are certain (a priori). Since sense.
The Perfect God Anselm’s clever trick.
René Descartes The father of modern Western philosophy and the epistemological turn Methodological doubt, his dreaming argument and the evil.
Epistemology: the study of the nature, source, limits, & justification of knowledge Rationalism: we truly know only that of which we are certain. Since.
Proof of God cont. Therefore, there is a mind that is causing my perceptual ideas. Therefore, there is a mind that is causing my perceptual ideas. But.
Results from Meditation 2
Descartes’ Epistemology
Modern Philosophers Rationalists –Descartes –Spinoza –Leibniz Empiricists –Locke –Berkeley –Hume Epistemology - the theory of knowledge (what and how we.
 According to philosophical skepticism, we can’t have knowledge of the external world.
In sum, 3 Arguments for God’s Existence are used by Descartes in Meditations: 1. The argument for the existence of God from the fact that I have an idea.
Philosophy 1050: Introduction to Philosophy Week 10: Descartes and the Subject: The way of Ideas.
Rene Descartes 1596—1650. Some dates 1543: publication of Copernicus’s De Revolutionibus 1543: publication of Copernicus’s De Revolutionibus 1633: Galileo.
Epistemology Section 1 What is knowledge?
Is God a Deceiver? (P1)The idea I have of God is of an infinitely perfect being. (P2)The cause of such an idea must itself be infinitely perfect. (P3)Therefore,
© Michael Lacewing Doubt in Descartes’ Meditations Michael Lacewing
René Descartes ( AD) Meditations on First Philosophy (1641) (Text, pp )
PERCEPTION. Why an issue? Sensory perception a key source of our beliefs about the world. Empiricism – senses the basis of knowledge.
Descartes and Buddies “To be or not to be, that is the question”
René Descartes ( AD) Meditations on First Philosophy (1641) (Text, pp ) Revised, 8/20/15.
René Descartes, Meditations Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.
Descates Meditations II A starting point for reconstructing the world.
KNOWLEDGE OF THE EXTERNAL WORLD THEORIES OF PERCEPTION.
After the first dialogue, Hylas admits, he is a skeptic—but so are you, he says to Philonous Phil: Not so! Skepticism only follows if you start by assuming.
Need worksheet from yellow folder – arg from perceptual variation.
Descartes’ cosmological argument. Argument from Perfection 1. I have the idea of perfection within me. 2. I am not perfect. 3. An effect must be at least.
Meditation 3. Clear & Distinct Ideas Knows that he, “a thinking thing”, exists. Believes he exists because it is so “clearly and distinctly” so – this.
Is God real? An argument based on Government and direction There are many objects in the world (natural objects) which have no way of knowing what their.
René Descartes Brandon Lee Block D.
Lauren Dobbs “Cogito ergo sum”. Bio  Descartes was a French born philosopher from the 1600’s.  He’s most famous for his “Meditations on First Philosophy”
LOCKE ON KNOWLEDGE OF THE EXTERNAL WORLD Text source: Essay Concerning Human Understanding, bk. 4, ch. 11; see also bk. 4, ch. 2, sec. 14.
Meditations: 3 & 4.
An Outline of Descartes's Meditations on First Philosophy
Cartesian Circle General Meaning: The veil of ideas that separates us from the external world in the Mind’s Eye Model, the general difficulty of trying.
Descartes II. First Argument for the Existence of God (P1)There must be at least as much reality and perfection in a cause as in its effect. (P2)If an.
DESCARTES: MEDITATION 3 OR: THE WORLD REGAINED — WITH CERTAINTY(?)
1. I exist, because I think. 2. I am a thinking thing 3
Meditation Three Of God: That He Exists.
The Trademark Argument and Cogito Criticisms
Concept Innatism.
The Ontological Argument
O.A. so far.. Anselm – from faith, the fool, 2 part argument
1st wave: Illusion Descartes begins his method of doubt by considering that in the past he has been deceived by his senses: Things in the distance looked.
Descartes’ trademark argument
Descartes’ proof of the external world
Major Periods of Western Philosophy
On your whiteboard: What is empiricism? Arguments/evidence for it?
Descartes -- Meditations Four
Descartes -- Meditations Three
On your whiteboards: 3 differences between philosophical scepticism and everyday incredulity What is meant by “infinite regress”? Why is it a problem.
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Meditation Three Of God: That He Exists.
¶1 - Review Ignore/reject the senses. Knowledge of myself:
Epistemology “Episteme” = knowledge “Logos” = words / study of
Presentation transcript:

Argument Against Empiricism (P1)Because we have no reliable method for error-correction, we can’t be certain that we are not dreaming/deluded/ brains-in-vats. (P2)If we cannot be certain that we are not dreaming, etc., we cannot be certain that what we sense is real. (P3)If we cannot be certain that what we sense is real, we cannot acquire knowledge through sense experience. (C)Therefore, we cannot acquire knowledge through sense experience.

First Argument for God’s Existence (P1)There must be at least as much reality and perfection in a cause as in its effect. (P2)If an idea contains some “objective reality” that is not in its cause, then something has come from nothing. (P3)But nothing can come from nothing. (P4)While my ideas of physical object could have come from me, I also have an idea of God, who is (among other things) infinite. (P5)Being finite, I would not have the idea of infinite substance in me unless it came from a substance that really was infinite. (P6)There is more reality in an infinite substance than in a finite one, and my understanding of myself as imperfect must rely on my understanding of a greater perfection against which my defects are clear. (P7)“[B]ecause it contains more objective reality than any other idea, no idea is in and of itself truer and has less of a basis for being suspect of falsehood” than my idea of God. (C)Therefore, God exists.

Second Argument for God’s Existence (P1)I exist. (P2)Either: (a) I created myself; (b) I have always existed; (c) My parents or some other being(s) less perfect than God created me; or (d) God created me. (P3)Re: (a): If I had created myself, I would have made myself perfect. I am not, so I did not create myself. (P4)Re: (b): Some cause must continually “re-create” or “preserve” me, moment by moment—“conservation differs from creation”—and if this were in my power, I would surely be aware of it. I am not, so there must be some distinct entity upon whom I depend. (P5)Re: (c): This does not explain my having an idea of the infinite, perfect God, nor my sustained existence. Moreover, this solution only leads to infinite regress. (C)So (d): God created me, and, thus, God exists.