07/27/2006 Overview of Replacement Reserve Procurement ERCOT Staff PRS RPRS Task Force.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
October 7, 2013 QMWG Ancillary Services Methodology Changes Bill Blevins Manager, Operations Planning.
Advertisements

2004 Congestion Costs. 2 Transmission Congestion Occurs when analysis shows a given outage of a transmission element (contingency) will result in the.
Critique of Proposal to Designate SAPS-Shrew as CRE Shams Siddiqi, Ph.D. Crescent Power, Inc. (512) June 4, 2009.
March 13, 2013 Day-Ahead Market (DAM) Clearing Process follow-up from February WMS Matt Mereness, ERCOT Manager DAM & CRR.
DSWG Update to WMS May 17, DSWG Goals Update.
ERCOT Load Forecast Uncertainty V2 August 2, 2006.
Electricity Markets Overview Lo-Cal seminar, 09/21/2010.
ERCOT Public 1 AS Demand Curves for Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services.
Wind Cost Allocation Task Force Update to WMS February 17, 2009.
Market Based Solutions for Demand Response Providers Today and the Future Alice Jackson Occidental Energy Ventures Corp.
NSRS deployment April John Adams ROS – May 12, 2005.
Demand Side Working Group Load Resource Performance Subgroup April 9, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
1 Welcome to Load Participation Orientation Elev MenWomen Phones Info Presentation and other Load Participation information will be posted at:
April, 2008 Maximum Shadow Price. April, 2008 Protocol Requirement: Transmission Constraint Management (2)ERCOT shall establish a maximum Shadow.
Market Evolution Program Day Ahead Market Project How the DSO Calculates Nodal Prices DAMWG October 20, 2003.
PRS - RPRS Task Force Status Summary - August 14, PRS RPRS Task Force Status Summary Prepared for WMS and PRS August 2006.
QSE Managers Working Group Meeting Notes 7 November, 2008 Report to WMS 19 November, 2008 David Detelich - Chairperson.
RPRS ERCOT System Wide Insufficiency Charge Presented at the Technical Advisory Committee June 1, 2006.
NPRR XXX: PRR 307 Inclusion in Nodal…Part II. Questions Raised 06/26/06 Section 3 –COP (resource parameters) –CLR participation limits –Telemetry Requirements.
January 21, 2010 Security Constrained Economic Dispatch Resmi Surendran.
Grabbing Balancing Up Load (BUL) by the Horns December 2006.
Report to TAC August In Brief Working Group Reports Working Group Reports CMWG CMWG DSWG (No report) DSWG (No report) MCWG MCWG MWG (No report)
Presentation to House Regulated Industries Committee Chairman Phil King Trip Doggett Chief Operating Officer The Electric Reliability Council of Texas.
QMWG – Feb. 26, 2014 Discussion topic: NPRR585 Clarification of Administrative Pricing Requirements for Self-Committed Combined Cycle Combustion Turbines.
1 ERCOT Wholesale Settlement Module 3. 2 BENA iq = -1 * (Σ (RI iz + LI iz + URC iz + MISD iz + MISR iz ) z + TCRPAY Bei + Σ CSC Bei ) * LRS iq Can you.
1 Reliability Deployment Task Force (RDTF Meeting) December 20 th 2011 December 20, 2011.
1 WMS Report TO TAC January In Brief Two Working Group Reports Two Working Group Reports Two Task Force Reports Two Task Force Reports One PRR.
Analysis of ERCOT Regulation Service Deployments during 2011 David Maggio Market Enhancement Task Force Meeting 3/29/
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services Resmi Surendran.
7 August, 2006 TPTF MMS Issues Review Brandon Whittle Lead, Real-Time Market Operations.
Updated Cost/Benefit Analysis for PRR 567 Multi-Part A/S Bidding PRS January Meeting January 19, 2006.
DAM Overview: Processes & Tools in the DAM Shams Siddiqi, Ph.D. Crescent Power, Inc. (512) April 2, 2008.
Application of High Sustainable Limit With PRR 666/676 WMS November 15, 2006 Ino Gonzalez ERCOT Settlements.
Unit-Specific Bid Limits based on Modified Generic Cost.
Outstanding Issues & Action Items 1.Obligations to Honor Ancillary Services Commitments 2.Variable ERCOT Bias 3.Sign reversals of the Regulation Signal.
RPRS TF and QSE Managers Report to PRS 1)Procurement (QSE Managers) 2)Cost Allocation (RPRS Task Force) –PRR 674 –PRR 676 –PRR 678.
Load Resources Negative RRS Bidding in the Nodal Market Credit Working Group January 30, 2008.
1 RPRS Market the issue of capacity inadequacy solved by the Local Congestion procurements ERCOT Feb 19, 2004.
2003 State of the Market Report ERCOT Wholesale Electricity Markets.
1 Tests for Reasonable LMPs & Price Validation Tool Overview October 27, 2009 NATF.
Floyd Trefny, P.E. Director of Wholesale Market Design Nodal Market Tools to Manage Wind Generation January 29, 2009 Presentation to the Renewables Technology.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Report to ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee December 5, 2002.
ERCOT Public 1 Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services Co-ordination of Power Balance Penalty Curve, VOLL, SWOC for AS Demand Curves.
1 WMS Report TO TAC April In Brief Two Working Group reports Two Working Group reports Two Task Force Reports Two Task Force Reports BENA presentation.
PRS RPRS Task Force Report from July 27 th Meeting Special PRS Meeting August 2, 2006.
ERCOT Wholesale Market Basics Module 3 Settlement.
COPS – ERCOT PROJECTS UPDATE WHOLESALE MARKET DEVELOPMENT Paula Feuerbacher October 20, 2004.
RPRS Settlement Examples Market Support Services March 30, 2005 March 14, 2006 Presented by ERCOT Art Deller Bill Kettlewell.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 High-Level Overview of draft NPRR implementing PUCT Rule Posting Requirements January 8,
Ancillary Services Methodology Changes Bill Blevins Manager, Operations Planning.
1/07/2014 QMWG – RUC and AS update QMWG – ERCOT Update ERCOT Market Analysis.
Real Time Balancing (RTB) & Resource Plan Statuses Change to the QSE practice of showing offline units as online and available ERCOT Presentation to ROS.
OOMC and Local RPRS Settlement Alignment January 2007 WMS Meeting Ino Gonzalez ERCOT Settlements.
QSE Managers Working Group Meeting Notes November 10, 2009 Report to WMS November 18, 2009 Jennifer Troutman – Vice Chair.
Text reason for Deviation from Defined High Sustained Limit/Low Sustained Limit John Adams January 5, 2010 Nodal Advisory Task Force.
Day-Ahead Market Discussion/Clarification TPTF April 24, 2006.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board July 18, TAC Summary 4 PRRs for approval (3 unanimous) 4 PRRs for approval (3 unanimous) 5 Nodal PRRs for approval.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Market Management System Update on TPTF Comments on MMS Clarification Notes May 21,
December 8, 2006 PUCT DR Workshop Status of LaaR Participation in RPRS.
Settlement of Ancillary Service Infeasibility ERCOT QMWG April 15, 2016.
Congestion Management Work Group 2008 Overview CMWG Marguerite Wagner, Reliant Energy Inc.
IMM alternate framework for Look-Ahead SCED November 21, 2011.
RPRS March 23, 2006 Presented by ERCOT Art Deller Bill Kettlewell
Wind Management at MISO
TAC Report to the ERCOT Board
NPRRs 815NPRR Revise the Limitation of Load Resources Providing Responsive Reserve (RRS) Service.  This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) revises.
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services
Review of Abnormal MCPEs
The New Texas Wholesale/Retail Market
Presentation transcript:

07/27/2006 Overview of Replacement Reserve Procurement ERCOT Staff PRS RPRS Task Force

2 07/27/2006 RPRS Objectives Procure capacity from which energy would be available to solve the following power system security violations: –System Capacity insufficiency Using any RPRS bid ( or Generic for units with no bids) –Zonal Congestion Using RPRS bids by Zone in Merit Order ( or Generic for units with no bids) –Local Congestion Using Resource Category Generic Cost

3 07/27/2006 Three Step Clearing Process Step 1: Local Congestion first only thermal limits, voltage related units are OOMCed before RPRS Step 2: Zonal Congestion & System Balance simultaneously Step 3: MCPC Calculation Marginal cost for insufficiency determines MCPC Marginal cost to solve CSC determines Shadow Price for Capacity for CSC Congestion

4 07/27/2006 RPRS Participation Capacity procured from: –Generation Resources Off-line. –Generation Resources expected to be Off-line in the requested hours –LaaRs not able to participate upon initiation of the RPRS functionality.

5 07/27/2006 RPRS Capacity Procurement Scheduled On-line Capacity Day Ahead Forecast Load Regulation & Responsive

6 07/27/2006 RPRS Inputs Inputs –Resource Plans (at time of procurement) HSL LSL –Day Ahead Load Forecast –QSE Schedules (at time of procurement) –Reserves –Transmission Limits

7 07/27/2006 RPRS Clearing The goal of the RPRS Clearing Engine is 24 Hour Optimization to minimize total cost, based on: Resource Category Generic Cost RPRS Bid Price Resource Shift Factors And also respect; Lead time Minimum Up time Minimum Down time For the whole Operating Day while meeting security constraints for each hour.

8 07/27/2006 Outstanding RPRS Issues being Addressed by WMS RPRS TF Combined Cycle Combustion Turbines Procurement Zonal RPRS Market Procurement Consideration of Joint Owned Units in RPRS Market Issues with Black Start Units in RPRS Market RPRS Procurement and Non Spinning Reserves Units

9 07/27/2006 PRR659- Reporting of ERCOT Replacement Reserve Service Procurements “ERCOT shall provide a monthly report by the 20th day of the following month showing the quantity of RPRS procured by hour for system capacity based on the Day Ahead estimate of total ERCOT Load versus the quantity of RPRS that, in hindsight, would have been the proper amount to procure based on actual average adjusted metered Load. This theoretical amount of RPRS procurement shall be calculated as the difference between the actual average adjusted metered ERCOT Load (for an hour) minus the Day Ahead Resource Plan generation On-line used before the RPRS market is run for the hours when RPRS is procured by ERCOT.”

10 07/27/2006 Response to PRS RPRS TF Question 1 Question 1: How does ERCOT consider Load forecast and corresponding standard deviation adjustment? Answer: When procuring RPRS, ERCOT system utilizes the recent Load forecast produced by the mid-term Load forecast tools.

11 07/27/2006 Response to PRS RPRS TF Question 2 Question 2: How are the Resource Plan inputs used in RPRS procurement? Answer: The available High Sustained Limit (HSL) as indicated in the Resource Plan is considered in the RPRS procurement process; those Off-line and available Resources are subject to RPRS procurement.

12 07/27/2006 Response to PRS RPRS TF Question 3 Question 3: Step 1 procurement to resolve Local Congestion vs. the Resource Plan submitted Answer: When the RPRS engine requires that ERCOT procure capacity in Step 2, the step one Local Congestion procurement will be considered as On-line and available capacity. In other words, both the Resource On-line capacity and step 1 Local Congestion procurement are considered in the step 2 capacity procurement process.

13 07/27/2006 Response to PRS RPRS TF Question 4 Question 4: RPRS procurement for additional capacity vs. the Resource Plan submitted Answer: This questions is similar to Question 3. When the RPRS engine analyzes whether to procure additional capacity, it considers all the On-line capacity as indicated in the Resource Plan and Step one Local Congestion RPRS procurement.

14 07/27/2006 Response to PRS RPRS TF Question 5 Question 5: What is the effect of schedule mismatches on RPRS procurement? Answer: No impact, schedule mismatches are not considered in the RPRS procurement process.

15 07/27/2006 Response to PRS RPRS TF Question 6 Question 6: What is the effect on RPRS procurement of a QSE scheduling ERCOT as a Resource? Answer: RPRS does not consider schedules during procurement, it only considers available online capacity. If there is enough online capacity scheduled from other QSEs, to cover the forecast load then there is no impact. If, however; many QSEs schedule ERCOT as a resource, it could result in a RPRS procurement.

16 07/27/2006 RPRS CASE STUDY For market day 6/20/2006 (Day with the biggest difference between Day ahead online capacity and actual metered load)

17 07/27/2006 6/20/2006 Weather/Load Forecast Due to thunderstorms and rain, the Day Ahead weather forecast was 7.5 degrees higher than the actual temperature for the coast (Houston Area), As a result, the actual Real Time load was much lower than the Day Ahead forecasted load.

18 07/27/2006 System Data for Those Hours with Step 2 Procurement Hour Ending Resource Plan (MW) Load Forecast (MW) Metered Load (MW) AS requirement (MW) 13:0055,50548,94043,5812,050 14:0057,18951,44945,9102,050 22:0057,45149,15044,1262,090 23:0051,68845,64341,0582,090

19 07/27/2006 Step 1: Solving Local Congestion Hour Ending No. of local violations No. of Units procured Cleared MW Capacity Procured for local (MW) 13: : :005111,5551,616 23:005112,3232,345

20 07/27/2006 Step 2: Solving capacity insufficiency Hour Ending No. of Units procured Cleared MWCapacity Procured from step 2 (MW) 13: : : :004420

21 07/27/2006 Case study: 6/20/2006 HE22:00 1: Resource Plan On-line Capacity 2: Load Forecast 3: Original Resource On-line Plan Level 4: Adjusted Resource On-line Plan Level 5: Total Procured Capacity (S1+S2) 6: URS+RRS requirement 7: RPRS Cleared MW System Capacity Constraints: 1+5 >= 2+6 System Power Balance Constraints: 4+7=2

22 07/27/2006 Observations System capacity constraints can be satisfied most of the time Due to Local Congestion, Resources can not always reach maximum output. Like the case shown, On-line Resource dispatch MWs were even reduced Thus, ERCOT must procure more Resources to satisfy system power balance constraints Minimum up time can also cause additional RPRS procurement