Status_Penetrating_Radiation Flag Branislav Mihaljčić, A Fazakerley 1.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

BELGISCH INSTITUUT VOOR RUIMTE-AERONOMIE INSTITUT D’AERONOMIE SPATIALE DE BELGIQUE BELGIAN INSTITUTE FOR SPACE AERONOMY BELGISCH INSTITUUT VOOR RUIMTE-AERONOMIE.

Advertisements

Locations of Boundaries of the Outer and Inner Radiation Belts during the Recent Solar Minimum, as Observed by Cluster and Double Star Natalia Ganushkina.

The challenges and problems in measuring energetic electron precipitation into the atmosphere. Mark A. Clilverd British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, United.

4/18 6:08 UT 4/17 6:09 UT Average polar cap flux North cap South cap… South cap South enter (need to modify search so we are here) South exit SAA Kress,

Impact of the Particle Environment on LYRA Data M. Dominique, A. BenMoussa, M.Kruglanski, L. Dolla, I. Dammasch, M. Kretzschmar PROBA2 workshop, May 04.

Working Group 2 - Ion acceleration and interactions.

Earth’s Radiation Belt Xi Shao Department of Astronomy, University Of Maryland, College Park, MD

Danish Space Research Institute Danish Small Satellite Programme FH Space_Environment.ppt Slide # 1 Flemming Hansen MScEE, PhD Technology Manager.

SPACE WEATHER Definition used by the US National Space Weather Plan: Conditions on the Sun and the solar wind, magnetosphere, ionosphere, and thermosphere.

Effects of Solar Energetic Particle Events on the Martian Surface and Atmosphere F Leblanc, DA Brain, JG Luhmann, GT Delory, RA Mewaldt, CM Cohen 2004.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology A New JPL Interplanetary Solar High- Energy.

Magnetospheric Morphology Prepared by Prajwal Kulkarni and Naoshin Haque Stanford University, Stanford, CA IHY Workshop on Advancing VLF through the Global.

EFFECTS of the TERRESTRIAL MAGNETOSPHERE on RADIATION HAZARD on MOON MISSIONS R. Koleva, B. Tomov, T. Dachev, Yu. Matviichuk, Pl. Dimitrov, Space and Solar-Terrestrial.

New Operational Algorithms for Charged Particle Data from Low-Altitude Polar-Orbiting Satellites J. L. Machol 1,2 *, J.C. Green 1, J.V. Rodriguez 3,4,

SC-A CIR Event 1 March 2013 CME Event 17 March 2013 SC-A SC-B Enhancement of Inner Zone Electron Fluxes Both events caused electron enhancements for

Radiation conditions during the GAMMA-400 observations:

NEEP 541 Radiation Interactions Fall 2003 Jake Blanchard.

CLUSTER Electric Field Measurements in the Magnetotail O. Marghitu (1, 3), M. Hamrin (2), B.Klecker (3), M. André (4), L. Kistler (5), H. Vaith (3), H.

Space Weather from Coronal Holes and High Speed Streams M. Leila Mays (NASA/GSFC and CUA) SW REDISW REDI 2014 June 2-13.

Response of the Polar Cusp and the Magnetotail to CIRs Studied by a Multispacecraft Wavelet Analysis Axel Korth 1, Ezequiel Echer 2, Fernando L. Guarnieri.

The PLANETOCOSMICS Geant4 application L. Desorgher Physikalisches Institut, University of Bern.

ORBITALS Phase A Extended Interim Meeting U of A Phase A2 Work Update ORBITALS Science Team, University of Alberta CSA HQ, St. Hubert, 2010/03/17.

Final Presentation By Matthew Lewis 17 th March 2006 “To Determine the Accuracy that GOES True Numbers can Reproduce the Full X-ray Spectrum of the Sun”

Space Environment SSE-120 Please type in your questions and raise your hand so we can answer it during class.

Locations of boundaries of outer and inner radiation belts as observed by Cluster and Double Star Natalia Ganushkina (1, 2), Iannis Dandouras (3), Yuri.

Earth’s Magnetosphere NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

Scott Thaller Van Allen Probes EFW meeting University of Minnesota June 10-12, 2014.

Low-Altitude Mapping of Ring Current and Radiation Belt Results Geoff Reeves, Yue Chen, Vania Jordanova, Sorin Zaharia, Mike Henderson, and Dan Welling.

Dim ENA Emissions from 1-30 keV D.J. McComas, P. Valek, J.L. Burch, and C.J. Pollock Southwest Research Institute San Antonio, TX H.O. Funsten, R.M. Skoug,

The spatial and temporal distribution of solar and galactic cosmic rays S. V. Tasenko 1, P. V. Shatov 1, I. A. Skorokhodov 1, I. V. Getselev 1,2, M. Podzolko.

1 MAVEN PFP ICDR May 23-25, 2011 Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN) Mission Particles and Fields Science Critical Design Review May ,

Space Weather in Earth’s magnetosphere MODELS  DATA  TOOLS  SYSTEMS  SERVICES  INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS Space Weather Researc h Center Masha Kuznetsova.

CAMMICE Science Report March 31, 2006 There will be two sections to the report: 1.A discussion on the inter-comparison of the responses of the MICS, Hydra,

SST- Solid State Telescope ESA - Electrostatic Analyzer Science Measurement and Operational Requirements.

1 Polar Telecon February 23, 2006 Transient IP Structures Associated with Short-Scale Variations in the SEP and GCR Flux T. Mulligan, B. Blake The Aerospace.

MULTI-INSTRUMENT STUDY OF THE ENERGY STEP STRUCTURES OF O + AND H + IONS IN THE CUSP AND POLAR CAP REGIONS Yulia V. Bogdanova, Berndt Klecker and CIS TEAM.

PEACE DAA Status Andrew Fazakerley, Iryna Rozum, Andrew Lahiff, Branislav Mihaljčić & the PEACE ops team 5 November 2009, DAA meeting, Paris, France MSSL.

CAA PEACE Status Iryna Rozum, Andrew Fazakerley, Natasha Doss, Andrew Lahiff, Yulia Bogdanova, Branislav Mihaljčić & the PEACE ops team MSSL 12 th Cross-Calibration.

1 CAA 2009 Peer Review, Jesus College, Cambridge, UK, March CAA Peer Review: Selected Recommendations.

DAA PEACE Status A. Fazakerley, B. Mihaljčić, I. Rozum, A. Lahiff, G. Watson, D. Kataria UCL Department of Space and Climate Physics Mullard Space Science.

Dream Team Meeting1/25-26/10 Dream Team Meeting1/25-26/10.

Mullard Space Science Laboratory October 2008 A.N. Fazakerley, I Rozum, C. Anekallu, H. Bacai MSSL-UCL CAA PEACE Team Status.

15 th CAA Cross-Calibration Workshop, 17th – 19th April 2012, UCL, London PEACE OPS TEAM Presented by Natasha Doss UCL Department of Space and Climate.

14 th CAA Cross-Calibration Workshop, 5th – 7th October 2011, York, UK PEACE OPS TEAM Presented by Natasha Doss UCL Department of Space and Climate Physics.

CIS : Data Quality Indices Iannis Dandouras, Alain Barthe, Sylvain Brunato CLUSTER ACTIVE ARCHIVE April 2012.

MSSL * I. Rozum, A.N. Fazakerley, A.D. Lahiff, H. Bacai and C. Anekallu PEACE Calibration Status 8 th Cross Calibration Workshop, Kinsale, Ireland, 28.

Earth’s Magnetosphere Space Weather Training Kennedy Space Center Space Weather Research Center.

CIS Action Items 10 th Cross-Calibration Workshop Observatoire de Paris, Nov

DAA Status/Progress B. Mihaljčić, A. Fazakerley, G. Watson, C. Anekallu UCL Department of Space and Climate Physics Mullard Space Science Laboratory 21.

CAA PEACE Status A.N. Fazakerley, I. Rozum, B. Mihaljcic, N. Doss, Y. Bogdanova, G. Watson 11 th CAA Cross Calibration Meeting, 7 – 9 April 2010, Goslar,

MSSL * A.N. Fazakerley, I. Rozum, N. Doss, B. Mihaljcic & the PEACE ops team PEACE CAA Action Items Status 11 th CAA Cross Calibration Meeting, 7 – 9 April.

Detection of photoeletrons from the EFW probes A Fazakerley et al.

CAA PEACE Status PEACE Operations Team Presented by Iryna Rozum MSSL Cross-Calibration Meeting, Uppsala, Sweden, April 2011.

Mullard Space Science Laboratory CAA Cross-Calibration Meeting ESTEC 16 th May 2006 H. Khan, A. D. Lahiff, A.N. Fazakerley, I. Rozum, R. J Wilson MSSL-UCL.

Source and seed populations for relativistic electrons: Their roles in radiation belt changes A. N. Jaynes1, D. N. Baker1, H. J. Singer2, J. V. Rodriguez3,4.

26th Oct 2006CAA cross cal meeting, MSSL RAPID Calibration Status RAPID team.

10 th CAA Cross-calibration meeting, 2nd – 4th November 2009, Paris N. Doss, A. Fazakerley, B. Mihaljčić and I. Rozum UCL Department of Space and Climate.

22 nd CAA Cross-Calibration Workshop, 18 th – 19 th November 2015, Tenerife, Spain N. Doss, A.N. Fazakerley, C. Anekallu, B. Mihaljcic, G. Watson. Presented.

Gyeongbok Jo 1, Jongdae Sohn 2, KyeongWook Min 2, Yu Yi 1, Suk-bin Kang 2 1 Chungnam National University 2 Korea Advanced Institute of Science.

GOES Data Status Mutual Benefits of NASA THEMIS and NOAA GOES

PAD SELECTION QUALITY FLAG STATUS

RAPID/IES Calibration Status Rutherford Appleton Lab

ARTEMIS – solar wind/ shocks

THEMIS and Space Weather

Natasha Doss, Andrew Fazakerley, Branislav Mihaljčić and Gill Watson

SPACE RADIATION DOSIMETRY

Computational Model of Energetic Particle Fluxes in the Magnetosphere

Prepare your scantron:

Simulations of the response of the Mars ionosphere to solar flares and solar energetic particle events Paul Withers EGU meeting Vienna,

Presentation transcript:

Status_Penetrating_Radiation Flag Branislav Mihaljčić, A Fazakerley 1

Introduction The Penetrating Radiation flag is to help the user in identifying intervals when PEACE sensors (HEEA and LEEA) were affected by PR during perigee passes and Solar Energetic Proton (SEP) events. All other intervals during an orbit are treated as no radiation cases 2

Method Identify intervals likely to require checking for Penetrating Radiation – For Earth’s trapped radiation belts we check for intervals based on the JSOC PSE auroral oval events – For SEP events we consider intervals during which the ACE proton flux (>10 MeV) exceeds a threshold We consider: – The ratio, Fn, of LEEA-to-HEEA electron densities in the energy overlap region – This ratio should be close to 1 if the HEEA and LEEA sensors are well inter-calibrated – It may deviate from 1 if there are very high counts in HEEA, or HEEA and LEEA – It may deviate from 1 if there are significant levels of Penetrating Radiation reaching the MCPs We use the best available densities (cal. version 6.0) at the time of writing – We use MOMS_L2 data (short for moments, level 2), more specifically L1L2 and H1H2 moments when both sensors ‘see’ the same plasma, but have the same energy coverage. – The moments product CPCMOM is the original on-board moments data, computed on- board by the DPU, while MOMS_L2 is the same data, but with corrections applied on-the- ground, which change as the sensors age throughout the mission and has to be applied for each sensor according to its unique MCP alpha factor history. 3

Penetrating Radiation during Perigee crossing Perigee Pass (high PR case) HEEA (dEF) RAP e - (line) LEEA (dEF) RAP e - (line) n e (m -3 ) HEEA (black) LEEA (Red) counts HEEA (black) LEEA (Red) When PR is high during a Perigee pass then: LEEA>HEEA density and HEEA=LEEA counts. HEEA & LEEA density match, except during the perigee crossing when PR is present and when HEEA and LEEA counts become equal. 4

Penetrating Radiation during Perigee crossing Perigee Pass (low PR case) HEEA (dEF) RAP e - (line) LEEA (dEF) RAP e - (line) n e (m -3 ) HEEA (black) LEEA (Red) counts HEEA (black) LEEA (Red) 5 When PR is low during a Perigee pass then: LEEA>HEEA density and HEEA>LEEA counts. HEEA and LEEA density match, except during the perigee crossing.

Examples of Penetrating Radiation flag Perigee crossing case ( ) PEACE (dEF) EFW (eV) MCP (level) Fn (LEEA/HEEA) PR Flag (red) Orb. Phase (black) n e (m -3 ) HEEA (black) LEEA (Red) counts HEEA (black) LEEA (Red) 6 Blue box interval, JSOC PSE oval auroral crossing code – PSE flag test is applied inside here for Earth radiation belt penetrating radiation

SEP identification: ACE Proton Flux Identify intervals likely to require checking for Penetrating Radiation – For SEP events we consider intervals during which the ACE proton flux (>10 MeV) exceeds a threshold of 2.5 PFUs – Event list is available if useful to other teams 7

During non-SEP event FGM (nT) FGM θ FGM φ RAP (ions) CIS RAP (e - ) PEACE (#cnts/s) During an non-SEP event, PEACE is not affected in all energies and there is a difference in RAP and CIS behaviour compared to an SEP event. 8

During strong SEP event FGM (nT) FGM θ FGM φ RAP (ions) CIS RAP (e - ) PEACE (#cnts/s) 9 During a strong SEP event, background levels are visibly raised in all the particle instruments, though the degree of background is a function of location in the magnetosphere as well as the SEP fluxes outside the magnetosphere

Examples of Penetrating Radiation flag SEP event case ( ) PEACE (dEF) EFW (eV) MCP (level) Fn (LEEA/HEEA) PR Flag (red) Orb. Phase (black) n e (m -3 ) HEEA (black) LEEA (Red) counts HEEA (black) LEEA (Red) 10 During a strong SEP event, background levels are visibly raised in all the particle instruments, though the degree of background is a function of location in the magnetosphere as well as the SEP fluxes outside the magnetosphere: e.g. pre-perigee we see stronger SEP effects in this example

End 11