Chapter 6: Present day ozone distribution and trends relevant to climate change A. Gaudel, O. R. Cooper, G. Ancellet, J. Cuesta, G. Dufour, F. Ebojie,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preliminary results of the seasonal ozone vertical trends at OHP France Maud Pastel, Sophie Godin-Beekmann Latmos CNRS UVSQ, France  NDACC Lidar Working.
Advertisements

Variability in Ozone Profiles at TexAQS within the Context of an US Ozone Climatology Mohammed Ayoub 1, Mike Newchurch 1 2, Brian Vasel 3 Bryan Johnson.
Validation of Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES) nadir stare ozone profiles using ozonesonde measurements during Arctic Research on the Composition.
Interpreting MLS Observations of the Variabilities of Tropical Upper Tropospheric O 3 and CO Chenxia Cai, Qinbin Li, Nathaniel Livesey and Jonathan Jiang.
Assimilation of TES O 3 data in GEOS-Chem Mark Parrington, Dylan Jones, Dave MacKenzie University of Toronto Kevin Bowman Jet Propulsion Laboratory California.
Data assimilation of trace gases in a regional chemical transport model: the impact on model forecasts E. Emili 1, O. Pannekoucke 1,2, E. Jaumouillé 2,
Seasonal Variations in the Mixing Layer in the UTLS Dave MacKenzie University of Toronto GEOS-Chem Meeting April 2009.
Impact of Seasonal Variation of Long-Range Transport on the Middle Eastern O 3 Maximum Jane Liu, Dylan B. Jones, Mark Parrington, Jay Kar University of.
Integrating satellite observations for assessing air quality over North America with GEOS-Chem Mark Parrington, Dylan Jones University of Toronto
Variability of Atmospheric Composition associated with Global Circulation Patterns using Satellite Data A contribution to ACCENT-TROPOSAT-2, Task Group.
Abstract Using OMI ozone profiles as the boundary conditions for CMAQ calculations significantly improves the agreement of the model with ozonesonde observations.
Is there a Summertime Middle East Ozone Maximum in the Upper Troposphere? Matthew Cooper, Randall Martin, Bastien Sauvage, OSIRIS Team, ACE Team GEOS-Chem.
TEMPO 3rd Science Team Meeting The University of Alabama in Huntsville
Ability of GEO-CAPE to Detect Lightning NOx and Resulting Upper Tropospheric Ozone Enhancement Conclusions When NO emissions from lightning were included.
Introduction A new methodology is developed for integrating complementary ground-based data sources to provide consistent ozone vertical distribution time.
Trans-Pacific Transport of Ozone and Reactive Nitrogen During Spring Thomas W. Walker 1 Randall V. Martin 1,2, Aaron van Donkelaar.
Intercomparison methods for satellite sensors: application to tropospheric ozone and CO measurements from Aura Daniel J. Jacob, Lin Zhang, Monika Kopacz.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS  Most of significant trends for N are negative for all thresholds and seasons. The largest number of significant negative trends.
Observational Evidence: Ozone and Particulate Matter EMEP SB, 13 September summary Chapter 2 Kathy Law LATMOS-CNRS,
Estimating the Influence of Lightning on Upper Tropospheric Ozone Using NLDN Lightning Data Lihua Wang/UAH Mike Newchurch/UAH Arastoo Biazar/UAH William.
Assimilating tropospheric ozone data from TES Mark Parrington, Dylan Jones University of Toronto Kevin Bowman Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute.
TRENDS IN ATMOSPHERIC OZONE FROM A LONG-TERM OZONE CLIMATOLOGY Jane Liu 1,2, D. W. Tarasick 3, V. E. Fioletov 3, C. McLinden 3, J. H. Y. Jung 1, T. Zhao.
S5P tropospheric ozone product: Convective Cloud Differential method First German S5P Verification Meeting Bremen, November 2013 Pieter Valks DLR,
Retrieval and Interpretation of Tropospheric Observations from GOME Randall Martin Daniel Jacob Paul Palmer Sushil Chandra Jerry Ziemke Mian Chin Kelly.
Tropospheric ozone variations revealed by high resolution lidar M. J. Newchurch 1, John Burris 2, Shi Kuang 1, Guanyu Huang 1, Wesley Cantrell 1, Lihua.
Seasonal variability of UTLS hydrocarbons observed from ACE and comparisons with WACCM Mijeong Park, William J. Randel, Louisa K. Emmons, and Douglas E.
Figure (a-c). Latitude-height distribution of monthly mean ozone flux for the months of (a) January, (b) April and (c) July averaged over years 2000 to.
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Year-to-year variability in Western U.S. high-O 3 events tied to climate regimes and stratospheric intrusions: Implications.
Application of Satellite Observations for Timely Updates to Bottom-up Global Anthropogenic NO x Emission Inventories L.N. Lamsal 1, R.V. Martin 1,2, A.
Member of the Helmholtz-Association Tropospheric Ozone Changes Preliminary Workshop Summary Toulouse, April 2011.
Cargese UTLS ozone and ozone trends 1 UTLS ozone and ozone trends D. Fonteyn (My apologies) Given by W. Lahoz (My thanks)
Retrieval of Methane Distributions from IASI
NASA/GSFC Tropospheric Ozone Residual M. Schoeberl NASA/GSFC M. Schoeberl NASA/GSFC.
Ozone time series and trends Various groups compute trends in different ways. One goal of the workshop is to be able to compare time series and trends.
Constraints on the Production of Nitric Oxide by Lightning as Inferred from Satellite Observations Randall Martin Dalhousie University With contributions.
Estimating background ozone in surface air over the United States with global 3-D models of tropospheric chemistry Description, Evaluation, and Results.
Improved understanding of global tropospheric ozone integrating recent model developments Lu Hu With Daniel Jacob, Xiong Liu, Patrick.
1 Monitoring Tropospheric Ozone from Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) Xiong Liu 1,2,3, Pawan K. Bhartia 3, Kelly Chance 2, Thomas P. Kurosu 2, Robert.
Tropospheric Ozone Residual from OMI and MLS J. R. Ziemke, S. Chandra, B. N. Duncan, L. Froidevaux, P. K. Bhartia, P. F. Levelt, and J. Waters (J. Geophys.
Using CO observations from space to track long-range transport of pollution Daniel J. Jacob with Patrick Kim, Peter Zoogman, Helen Wang and funding from.
S5P tropical tropospheric ozone product based on convective cloud differential method Klaus-Peter Heue, Pieter Valks, Diego Loyola, Deutsches Zentrum für.
UTLS Workshop Boulder, Colorado October , 2009 UTLS Workshop Boulder, Colorado October , 2009 Characterizing the Seasonal Variation in Position.
Critical Assessment of TOMS-derived Tropospheric Ozone: Comparisons with Other Measurements and Model Evaluation of Controlling Processes M. Newchurch.
Influence of Lightning-produced NOx on upper tropospheric ozone Using TES/O3&CO, OMI/NO2&HCHO in CMAQ modeling study M. J. Newchurch 1, A. P. Biazar.
1 Xiong Liu Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics K.V. Chance, C.E. Sioris, R.J.D. Spurr, T.P. Kurosu, R.V. Martin, M.J. Newchurch,
Willem W. Verstraeten 1, Jessica L. Neu 2, Jason E. Williams 1, Kevin W. Bowman 2, John R. Worden 2, K. Folkert Boersma 1,3 Rapid increases in tropospheric.
Long-term measurements of surface ozone at remote and rural sites in China Xiaobin Xu 1, Weili Lin 1,2 1 Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences Key.
Picture: METEOSAT Oct 2000 Tropospheric O 3 budget of the South Atlantic region B. Sauvage, R. V. Martin, A. van Donkelaar, I. Folkins, X.Liu, P. Palmer,
TOAR Workshop 1.03 January 25-27, 2016 Xijiao Hotel, Beijing, China Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
LNOx Influence on Upper Tropospheric Ozone Lihua Wang 1, Mike Newchurch 1, Arastoo Biazar 1, Williams Koshak 2, Xiong Liu 3 1 Univ. of Alabama in Huntsville,
Chapter 4: Present day ozone distribution and trends relevant to human Health Zoe Fleming U. Leicester, Ruth Doherty U. Edinburgh UK Cooper, O. R., Xu,
Upgrade from SGP V5.02 to V6.00: Conclusions from delta-validation of Diagnostic Data Set D. Hubert, A. Keppens, J. Granville, F. Hendrick, J.-C. Lambert.
Breakout session – Chapter 6 Present day ozone distribution and trends relevant to climate change TOAR Workshop 1.03, Beijing, January 25 th 2016 A. Gaudel,
Analysis of Satellite Observations to Estimate Production of Nitrogen Oxides from Lightning Randall Martin Bastien Sauvage Ian Folkins Chris Sioris Chris.
Yuqiang Zhang1, Owen R, Cooper2,3, J. Jason West1
Daily Tropospheric Ozone Residual from OMI-MLS
Latmos UPMC/CNRS - ILRC 2015
Analysis of tropospheric ozone long-term lidar and surface measurements at the JPL-Table Mountain Facility site, California Maria J. Granados-Muñoz and.
LNOx Influence on Upper Tropospheric Ozone Mike Newchurch1, Lihua Wang1, Arastoo Biazar1, Williams Koshak2, Xiong Liu3 1Univ. of Alabama in Huntsville,
1st TEMPO Applications Workshop
Randall Martin Dalhousie University
Randall Martin, Daniel Jacob, Jennifer Logan, Paul Palmer
Daniel J. Jacob Harvard University
Evaluation of the MERRA-2 Assimilated Ozone Product
NRT Tropospheric and UTLS Ozone From OMI/MLS
Validation of TES version 2 ozone profiles
Hemispheric 2016 Predicted Ozone
Jan Eiof Jonson, Peter Wind EMEP/MSC-W
Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report (TOAR)
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 6: Present day ozone distribution and trends relevant to climate change A. Gaudel, O. R. Cooper, G. Ancellet, J. Cuesta, G. Dufour, F. Ebojie, G. Huang, S. S. Kulawik, B. Latter, T. Leblanc, J. Liu, X. Liu, J. Neu, H. Petetin, I. Petropavlovskikh, H. Tanimoto, D. Tarasick, V. Thouret, C. Wespes, H. Worden, C. Vigouroux, J. Ziemke TOAR Workshop 1.03, Beijing, January 25 th 2016

Chapter 6: Present day ozone distribution and trends relevant to climate change Section 1 – Introduction Section 2 – Description of data sets Section 3 – Present day distribution of ozone Section 4 – Trends Section 5 – Discussions and Conclusions

Chapter 6: Present day ozone distribution and trends relevant to climate change Section 1 – Introduction 1.1 Present day distribution and trends of ozone metrics relevant to climate 1.2 Description of the relevant metrics Section 2 – Description of data sets Section 3 – Present day distribution of ozone Section 4 – Trends Section 5 – Discussions and Conclusions

Section 1 – Introduction 1.1 Present day distribution and trends of ozone metrics relevant to climate  Summary of what is already available in the peer-reviewed literature 1.2 Description of the relevant metrics  Coordinate with Chapter 3. Must conform to the list of metrics approved by the TOAR Steering Committee on July 31, 2015 and available on the TOAR website:

Chapter 6: Present day ozone distribution and trends relevant to climate change Section 1 – Introduction 1.1 Present day distribution and trends of ozone metrics relevant to climate 1.2 Description of the relevant metrics Section 2 – Description of data sets 2.1 Satellite 2.2 FTIR and Umkehr 2.3 IAGOS, Ozonesondes, TOST, lidar 2.4 Regionally representative surface sites Section 3 – Present day distribution of ozone Section 4 – Trends Section 5 – Discussions and Conclusions

Chapter 6: Present day ozone distribution and trends relevant to climate change Section 1 – Introduction 1.1 Present day distribution and trends of ozone metrics relevant to climate 1.2 Description of the relevant metrics Section 2 – Description of data sets 2.1 Satellite 2.2 FTIR and Umkehr 2.3 IAGOS, Ozonesondes, TOST, lidar 2.4 Regionally representative surface sites Section 3 – Present day distribution of ozone Section 4 – Trends Section 5 – Discussions and Conclusions Overlap with Chapter 2 = Same as in Chapter 2 with much less details

Chapter 6: Present day ozone distribution and trends relevant to climate change Section 1 – Introduction 1.1 Present day distribution and trends of ozone metrics relevant to climate 1.2 Description of the relevant metrics Section 2 – Description of data sets 2.1 Satellite 2.2 FTIR and Umkehr 2.3 IAGOS, Ozonesondes, TOST, lidar 2.4 Regionally representative surface sites Section 3 – Present day distribution of ozone Section 4 – Trends Section 5 – Discussions and Conclusions Overlap with Chapter 2, 3 and 4 = Different criteria, question of homogenization

Section 2 – Description of data sets 2.1 Satellite OMI/MLS, SCIAMACHY, TES, IASI, IASI+GOME2, GOME, OMI Units ppbv, DU, Tg Metrics Monthly mean Key figures Global map (5°x5°) Time series for latitude bands Regional map Relation used to convert DU to ppbv O 3 (ppbv) = 1.25 x x TCO (DU) / (P s – P t ) (Ziemke et al., 2001) O 3 (ppbv) = 1270 x TCO (DU) / (P s – P t )

Section 2 – Description of data sets 2.2 FTIR and Umkehr Units ppbv, DU Metrics Seasonal mean Key figures Time series site by site Global map FTIR 8 sites between 80N and 80S with 20yrs of data column surface-8km Sunny day Umkehr 5 sites between 65N and 45S with 20yrs of data 3 layers:1-column surface-250hPa 2-surface-500hPa hPa

Section 2 – Description of data sets 2.3 IAGOS, Ozonesondes, TOST, lidar Units ppbv, DU Metrics Monthly mean Annual mean Seasonal mean Key figures Global map upper troposphere Global map per altitude range Time series site by site IAGOS Frankfurt/Munich North America Asia Middle East Ozonesondes 12 sites with more than 20yrs of data without changing instrument Lidar OHP, France Table Mountain, California, USA TOST Global tropospheric ozone with resolution: 5°x5°x1km

Section 2 – Description of data sets 2.4 Regionally representative surface sites Rural sites - regionally representative and minimally impacted by local emissions  based on human population and nighttime lights

Chapter 6: Present day ozone distribution and trends relevant to climate change Section 1 – Introduction 1.1 Present day distribution and trends of ozone metrics relevant to climate 1.2 Description of the relevant metrics Section 2 – Description of data sets 2.1 Satellite 2.2 FTIR and Umkehr 2.3 IAGOS, Ozonesondes, TOST, lidar 2.4 Regionally representative surface sites Section 3 – Present day distribution of ozone 3.1 Surface sites 3.2 Free tropospheric mixing ratios 3.3 Tropospheric columns Section 4 – Trends Section 5 – Discussions and Conclusions

Surface Sites - Seasonal cycle Surface rural sites US Summer (JJA) 3.1 Surface sites Section 3 - Present day distribution of tropospheric ozone

TOST km in ppbv DJFMAM JJASON IAGOS - Upper troposphere (15-75 hPa below 2pvu) in ppbv Section 3 - Present day distribution of tropospheric ozone 3.2 Free Troposphere mixing ratios Global maps of the lower, mid- and upper troposphere DJF MAM JJA SON

TOST km in ppbv DJFMAM JJASON IAGOS - Upper troposphere (15-75 hPa below 2pvu) in ppbv Section 3 - Present day distribution of tropospheric ozone 3.2 Free Troposphere mixing ratios Global maps of the lower, mid- and upper troposphere DJF MAM JJA SON

TOST km in ppbv DJFMAM JJASON IAGOS - Upper troposphere (15-75 hPa below 2pvu) in ppbv Section 3 - Present day distribution of tropospheric ozone 3.2 Free Troposphere mixing ratios Global maps of the lower, mid- and upper troposphere DJF MAM JJA SON

4.5km in ppbv – TOST Section 3 - Present day distribution of tropospheric ozone 3.2 Free Troposphere mixing ratios Global maps of the lower, mid- and upper troposphere 1.5km in ppbv – TOST

4.5km in ppbv – TOST Section 3 - Present day distribution of tropospheric ozone 3.2 Free Troposphere mixing ratios Global maps of the lower, mid- and upper troposphere 1.5km in ppbv – TOST

Section 3 - Present day distribution of tropospheric ozone 3.2 Free Troposphere mixing ratios Diurnal Variability IAGOS – Frankfurt – Diurnal variability from the surface to the tropopause between Aug 1994 and Dec 2013

Section 3 - Present day distribution of tropospheric ozone 3.2 Free Troposphere mixing ratios Regional distribution of lower tropospheric ozone Surface-6km in DU 6-12km in DU IASI DJF MAM JJA SON Over China In 2010 IASI+GOME2 Over Europe In August 2009 Surf-3km in ppbv 3-9km in ppbv

DJF MAM JJA SON TOC in DU 2000s – TOST Section 3 - Present day distribution of tropospheric ozone 3.3 Global distribution of tropospheric ozone column TOC in DU – OMI/MLS DJF MAM JJA SON 5°x5° °x5°

DJF MAM JJA SON TOC in DU 2000s – TOST Section 3 - Present day distribution of tropospheric ozone 3.3 Global distribution of tropospheric ozone column TOC in DU – OMI/MLS DJF MAM JJA SON 5°x5° °x5°

DJF MAM JJA SON TOC in DU 2000s – TOST Section 3 - Present day distribution of tropospheric ozone 3.3 Global distribution of tropospheric ozone column TOC in DU – OMI/MLS DJF MAM JJA SON 5°x5° °x5°

Section 3 - Present day distribution of tropospheric ozone 3.3 Global distribution of tropospheric ozone column in ppbv

Chapter 6: Present day ozone distribution and trends relevant to climate change Section 1 – Introduction 1.1 Present day distribution and trends of ozone metrics relevant to climate 1.2 Description of the relevant metrics Section 2 – Description of data sets 2.1 Satellite 2.2 FTIR and Umkehr 2.3 IAGOS, Ozonesondes, TOST, lidar 2.4 Regionally representative surface sites Section 3 – Present day distribution of ozone 3.1 Surface sites 3.2 Free tropospheric mixing ratios 3.3 Tropospheric columns Section 4 – Trends 4.1 Surface sites 4.2 Free tropospheric mixing ratios 4.3 Tropospheric columns Section 5 – Discussions and Conclusions

Section 4 - Global trends of tropospheric ozone Trends between and ending between Surface below 1km Surface above 1km lower troposphere from ozonesondes lower troposphere from aircraft 4.1 Surface sites

Section 4 - Global trends of tropospheric ozone Trends between and ending between Surface below 1km Surface above 1km lower troposphere from ozonesondes lower troposphere from aircraft 4.1 Surface sites

Section 4 - Global trends of tropospheric ozone 4.2 Free troposphere Green triangle = Mountain sites Mountain sites DJF MAM SON JJA

Section 4 - Global trends of tropospheric ozone 4.2 Free troposphere Mountain sites - Median DJF MAM SON JJA Green triangle = Mountain sites

Section 4 - Global trends of tropospheric ozone 4.2 Free troposphere Sonde/MOZAIC/Surface MOZAIC/IAGOS over Frankfurt

Section 4 - Global trends of tropospheric ozone TOST (ppbv) – 4.5 km TOST (ppbv) – 1.5 km 4.2 Free troposphere

Section 4 - Global trends of tropospheric ozone 5°x5° deg 4.3 Tropospheric column

Section 4 - Global trends of tropospheric ozone 4.3 Tropospheric column OMI/MLS TOC °x5° Annual mean White dots indicate grid cells with statistically significant trends

Section 4 - Global trends of tropospheric ozone 5x5 deg DJF MAM 4.3 Tropospheric column OMI/MLS TOC °x5°

Section 4 - Global trends of tropospheric ozone JJA SON 4.3 Tropospheric column OMI/MLS TOC °x5°

Section 4 - Global trends of tropospheric ozone 4.3 Tropospheric column OMI/MLS - Tg

Mean Value Deseasonalized % Anomalies Anomaly = 100 * (x month (lat) – time mean [x month (lat)]) /time mean Tropics and N. mid-lat reach highest % anomaly Section 4 - Global trends of tropospheric ozone 4.3 Tropospheric column

Section 4 - Global trends of tropospheric ozone 4.3 Tropospheric column IASI Column Average VMR surface-400 hPa IASI Column Average VMR (surface-400 hPa) Anomaly

Section 4 - Global trends of tropospheric ozone 4.3 Tropospheric column GOME/OMI - ppbv GOME-1/GOME-2A - VMR

Section 4 - Global trends of tropospheric ozone 4.3 Tropospheric column FTIR surface-8km in DU DJF MAM SON JJA

Section 4 - Global trends of tropospheric ozone 4.3 Tropospheric column FTIR surface-8km in DU DJF MAM SON JJA Significant positive trends Lauder in boreal spring Izana in boreal summer

Section 4 - Global trends of tropospheric ozone 4.3 Tropospheric column DJF MAM SON JJA Umkehr surface-250hPa in DU

Section 4 - Global trends of tropospheric ozone 4.3 Tropospheric column DJF MAM SON JJA Umkehr surface-250hPa in DU Significant positive trends Fairbanks in boreal spring Significant negative trends OHP and Perth in boreal spring and summer

Summary  High ozone values over East Asia, India, East Mediterranean in MAM/JJA  Increase of ozone over Asia  Global increase of ozone according to surface sites and OMI/MLS  Decrease of ozone according to TES-IASI and some Umkehr stations

Coordination/overlap with other chapter Chapter 2: description of data sets Chapter 7: metrics used to evaluate models Chapter 2, 4, 5: Criteria for the regional representativeness of surface sites