Systems-level Alignment Issues Challenges and Strategies to Recruiting, Preparing and Retaining HQ Special Education Personnel presented by The contents.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Improving Teacher Quality State Grants
Advertisements

The Common Core State Standards: Opportunities and Challenges for the Mathematical Education of Teachers.
MINNESOTA P-16 EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP January 28, 2009 Overview of Potential Future P-16 Partnership Initiatives to Strengthen Teacher Effectiveness.
Special Education Licensure Restructuring: Issues related to policy and practice Phoebe Gillespie, Ph.D. Director National Center for Special Education.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Continuum of Teacher Development and Shared Accountability Leading to Increased Student Performance Teaching Quality Policy Center Education Commission.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
STEM Education Reorganization April 3, STEM Reorganization: Background  The President has placed a very high priority on using government resources.
OCTOBER 25, m-NET Mobilizing National Educator Talent (“m-NET”) is an innovative, nontraditional program to help special education teachers earn.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
1 Professional Development Planning and Needs Assessment Regional Trainings Spring 2006.
Certification and HQT Christina Linder, Director Certification and Professional Standards Teacher Quality
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
META Alternate Licensure Program for Special Education Teachers Terry Dozier, Director VCU Center for Teacher Leadership Wednesday, May 24, 2006 National.
The Maryland Co-teaching Framework
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Copyright © 2007 National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. All rights reserved. Innovation Configurations Daniel J. Reschly, Ph.D., and Susan.
EVIDENCE THAT CONSTITUTE A “GOOD PRACTICE IN THE EVALUATION OF POLICIES Education Commission of the States National Center for Learning and Citizenship.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
State Practices in Personnel Recruitment and Retention Phoebe Gillespie, Ph.D. Director National Center to improve Recruitment and Retention of Qualified.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
EC Personnel: Status, Challenges, Preservice and Inservice Training, and Resources in Kansas David P. Lindeman, Ph.D. Presented at: Kansas Interagency.
ASSESSING CANDIDATE PERFORMANCE William Sharpton Richard Hall University of New Orleans Project Directors’ Meeting July 2007.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
REPORT ON THE OHIO CLINICAL ALLIANCE OCTEO CONFERENCE DUBLIN, OHIO MARCH 6, 2015.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Designing and Delivering Preparation in Response to Local Need: Challenges in Preparing and Retaining HQ Special Education Personnel presented by: Phoebe.
Center for Improving Teacher Quality (CTQ) Funded through the Office of Special Education Programs, U. S. Department of Education.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
The National Center for Special Education Personnel and Related Service Providers Phoebe Gillespie, Ph.D. Project NASDSE.
1 August 22, 2008 Jay Doolan, Ed.D, Assistant Commissioner Division of Educational Standards and Programs SURVEY RESULTS OF THE HIGHLY QUALIFIED.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Leadership for Personnel Development: State, Local and Higher Ed collaboration Phoebe Gillespie, Ph. D. Director The National Center for Special Education.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
TECHNOLOGY USE PLAN INFORMATIONAL LETTER: 7 POLICY CODE: IJND Technology Planning Guidelines July 26, 2002.
Recruiting, Developing, Mentoring and Retaining Quality Teachers Phoebe Gillespie, Ph.D. Director, Personnel NASDSE Vincent B. Watkins, JD.D.
Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform H325A
Illinois Community College BoardIllinois State Board of Education Programs of Study Self-Assessment: Starting the Journey on the Right Foot February 4,
The New York State School Improvement Grant Initiative Five Years On Office of Professional Research & Development, Syracuse University, NY.
1 Willa Spicer, Deputy Commissioner Cathy Pine, Director Carol Albritton, Teacher Quality Coordinator Office of Professional Standards, Licensing and Higher.
Preparation Program Partnerships: Best practices for meeting state and local personnel needs Phoebe Gillespie, Ph.D. Director, Personnel Improvement Center.
Center for Improving Teacher Quality (CTQ) Ensuring that Special Education Students are Served by Highly Qualified Teachers Funded by the Office of Special.
Leveraging Federal Resources: Teacher Quality, Research, and Program Improvement Peggi Zelinko Office of Innovation and Improvement (OII) Robert Ochsendorf.
Special Education Teacher Preparation Program Improvement Grants (325T) Bonnie D. Jones, Ed. D. Education Program Specialist Office of Special Education.
Pennsylvania’s State Personnel Development Grant “Improving Student Results: A Focus on Highly Qualified Special Education Personnel” An Overview PDE Conference.
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
Tennessee Learning Centered Leadership System FAQ.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
1 Willa Spicer, Assistant Commissioner Cathy Pine, Director Carol Albritton, Teacher Quality Coordinator Office of Professional Standards, Licensing and.
“Successes, Challenges and Technical Assistance: A Dialog with State Teams” Lisa Stooksberry – AACTE David Paradise – CTQ Kathleen Paliokas –CTQ Michele.
SEA Strategies for Promoting Equity: SEA/IHE Collaboration on Teacher Preparation Lynn Holdheide, Center on Great Teachers and Leaders & Collaboration.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
PRESENTERS: DR. DAREN OTTEN YUBA COLLEGE JOHN STANSKAS SAN BERNARDINO COLLEGE FACILITATOR: DONNA DAVIS BUTTE COLLEGE Workforce Taskforce Recommendations.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
325D: PREPARATION OF LEADERSHIP PERSONNEL Webinar on Project Objective and Performance Measures for the Annual Performance Report for Continuation Funding.
Grant Activities, Needs Assessments And other SPDG application Issues to Consider.
August 1, 2016 Erica McCray, CEEDAR Center
Educator preparation policy as a lever for improving teacher and leader preparation: Keeping promises in Tennessee Collaboration for Effective Educator.
Compact Goals Improved capacity of Ohio teacher, administrator, and related services personnel preparation programs to better prepare professional educators.
The Wicked Problem of Measuring the Impact of Teacher Preparation: Increasing Rigor in Documenting Preparation Practices Larry Maheady, Buffalo State University.
Teacher Prep.
Highly Qualified Special Education Teachers
Multiple background possibilities
Presentation transcript:

Systems-level Alignment Issues Challenges and Strategies to Recruiting, Preparing and Retaining HQ Special Education Personnel presented by The contents of this power point were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education. However, those contents do not necessarily represent the policy of the US Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government.

2 State P-12 Student Standards State Teacher Licensure Standards Pre-Service Preparation State Licensure Professional Development For Re-Licensure State Program Approval Standards © INTASC/CCSSO State Licensure Assessment State Prof. Dev. Requirements State Teacher Quality System

3 Systems-level Issues Related to Licensure and Prep Program Alignment Teacher licensure policy Teacher licensure policy Requires special educators have a content degree or pass a content test Requires special educators have a content degree or pass a content test Requires general ed license before special ed license Requires general ed license before special ed license Requires licensure in both general and special education be aligned with scientifically-based research Requires licensure in both general and special education be aligned with scientifically-based research Program approval policy Program approval policy Requires more collaboration between general and special education during prep process (dual, merged, integrated programs) Requires more collaboration between general and special education during prep process (dual, merged, integrated programs) Requires program approval standards be aligned with scientifically-based research Requires program approval standards be aligned with scientifically-based research Licensure renewal policy Licensure renewal policy Requires all teachers have more collaborative/co-teaching skills around serving students with disabilities in general education classroom Requires all teachers have more collaborative/co-teaching skills around serving students with disabilities in general education classroom Requires professional development and licensure renewal coursework be aligned with scientifically-based research Requires professional development and licensure renewal coursework be aligned with scientifically-based research

4 Four Challenges to Special Education Personnel Development Data systems management Data systems management  for personnel that meet the HQT challenge and informs policy and practice at the state, higher education and local district/community level. Capacity of higher ed preparation programs to align with restructured state licensure system Capacity of higher ed preparation programs to align with restructured state licensure system  in relation to HQ requirements in NCLB and IDEA, Increased need for supply Increased need for supply  that responds to demand of local schools and communities. Building-level staffing patterns and supports Building-level staffing patterns and supports  that work to appropriately train and retain personnel for increased options in service delivery, including those utilized in inclusive environments.

5 System-level Issues Related to Personnel Data Vision for data systems alignment and its impact on policy and practice. Vision for data systems alignment and its impact on policy and practice. Capacity to collect data and build necessary infrastructure to support systems-level analysis. Capacity to collect data and build necessary infrastructure to support systems-level analysis. Documentation of academic content competency for individual personnel to determine HQT requirement. Documentation of academic content competency for individual personnel to determine HQT requirement. Time, resources and personnel for implementation and ongoing management. Time, resources and personnel for implementation and ongoing management.

6 System-level Issues Related to Alignment of Preparation Programs and State Licensure Restructuring Collaborative planning for new preparation program development among state, higher ed and local districts to deliver Highly Qualified personnel for local classrooms. Collaborative planning for new preparation program development among state, higher ed and local districts to deliver Highly Qualified personnel for local classrooms. Movement away from K-12 special ed licensure. Movement away from K-12 special ed licensure. Inclusion of core academic subject areas in licensure and program approval standards. Inclusion of core academic subject areas in licensure and program approval standards. Practicum experiences in collaborative teaching environments. Practicum experiences in collaborative teaching environments. Higher ed and LEA partnerships that help define what novice teachers need to know and be able to do. Higher ed and LEA partnerships that help define what novice teachers need to know and be able to do. Coursework that reflects critical pedagogy for initial practice. Coursework that reflects critical pedagogy for initial practice. Coursework that reflects research based principles and strategies for instruction Coursework that reflects research based principles and strategies for instruction

7 System-level Issues Related to Alignment of Preparation Programs and State/Local District Needs  Articulation agreements  Between 2 and 4 year programs  Course scheduling  Night and weekend undergraduate offerings  Distance learning opportunities  Shared coursework among IHEs Earlier and more meaningful field experiences Earlier and more meaningful field experiences Focus on retention through ongoing professional development Focus on retention through ongoing professional development

8 Systems-level Issues Related to Supply (Recruitment) Use of data systems alignment to inform strategic development of IHE/LEA partnership prep Use of data systems alignment to inform strategic development of IHE/LEA partnership prep State capacity to leverage change in IHE prep program offerings to respond to regional S & D issues State capacity to leverage change in IHE prep program offerings to respond to regional S & D issues Aligning of state licensure requirements to LEA need for content/field experiences that mirror classroom practice. Aligning of state licensure requirements to LEA need for content/field experiences that mirror classroom practice.

9 Systems-level Issues Related to Demand (Retention) State licensure requirements to leverage change in practice: State licensure requirements to leverage change in practice: administrator prep programs administrator prep programs collaborative roles for gen and special ed teachers collaborative roles for gen and special ed teachers Higher ed role in meeting needs of in-service training for administrators and teachers Higher ed role in meeting needs of in-service training for administrators and teachers State capacity to support high-quality building level supports (mentoring and induction, etc) State capacity to support high-quality building level supports (mentoring and induction, etc) Changes in program approval standards that respond to HQT requirements Changes in program approval standards that respond to HQT requirements

Five Principles Relevant to All Four Challenges

11 Principle # 1 Data systems management is the first step in addressing your state’s Teacher Quality needs.

12 The ongoing development of HQ special educators will require not only significant changes to teacher licensure, based on NCLB's required scientifically-based research, but more importantly the alignment of teacher preparation programs to both licensure and practice. Principle # 2

13 Personnel preparation programs must become involved in and responsive to community-based issues of recruitment, preparation and retention. Principle # 3

14 State, district and preparation program partnerships are essential to meeting the Highly Qualified teacher challenge. Principle # 4

15 Principle # 5 All special education teacher quality and quantity initiatives must be integrated into larger state DOE focus areas.

16 Additional Issues/Strategies In Your State?

17 Contact Us Phoebe Gillespie, Ph.D. Director, National Center for Special Education Personnel and Related Service Providers (Personnel NASDSE ext Kathleen Paliokas Director, Center for Improving Teacher Quality CCSSO Amy Jackson Deputy Director, National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality Learning Point Associates