Evaluation Criteria and Measures of Effectiveness MAJ Eric Evans Seminar 6.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CREATING THE FUTURE THROUGH ACTIONABLE PLANS Leadership Institute March 2006.
Advertisements

Unified Land Operations
Chapter 5 Planning and Decision Making
US Army Combined Arms Center UNCLASSIFIEDAs of 10 FEB 09 FM 3-24 Principles, Imperatives, and Foundations of COIN 1.
The Principles of War.
Previous Slide TRADOC DCSINT Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command TRADOC DCSINT.
The American Military Experience The Principles of War Wayne E. Sirmon, M.A.Ed., M.A. Military Science & History Departments University of South Alabama.
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports: New Team Training Acknowledgement Program Established Day 2.
Planning and Decision Making
NATURE OF WAR Major Carlos Rascon.
The Operations Process
Doctrine 2015 Information Briefing
Total Quality, Competitive Advantage, and Strategic Management
Army Doctrine Publication (ADP) 3-37; and Army
United States Army Combined Arms Center
Commander’s Intent & Guidance
The National Intelligence Model (NIM)
Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Planning and Strategic Management Chapter 04.
The Military Decision Making Process
Battle Drills Break Contact React to Ambush React to Contact
The Staff Study Individual Requirement Introduction and Overview.
TSP VG 1 The Principles of War “The nine principles of war provide general guidance for the conduct of war....They are the enduring bedrock.
Previous Slide TRADOC DCSINT Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command TRADOC DCSINT.
Development of Counter Improvised Explosive Device (C-IED) Metrics Simon Crabtree Counter-IED Effects Team ISMOR 2011.
Previous Slide TRADOC DCSINT Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command TRADOC DCSINT.
United States Army Combined Arms Center "Responsive to Change Today, Ready for Tomorrow's Challenges.” FM 7-0 Training.
Principles of War and Tenets of Air Power
Program Evaluation.
LEARNING DOMAINS & OBJECTIVES Southern Illinois University Carbondale Instructor Workshop.
Performance Objectives and Content Analysis Chapter 8 (c) 2007 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.
Dead Guy Quote: “to be a successful soldier, you must know history” Gen G. S. Patton The study of Military History provides an understanding of the interplay.
JOINT TASK FORCE TRAINING Course of Action Comparison.
Cheryl Simonson, CESA 6 Jacob Hollnagel, DPI. Guiding Successful Implementation of Educator Effectiveness Understand successful educator effectiveness.
Human Resource Training and Individual Development Employee Development March 1, 2004.
Strategy Implementation. Managers’ Mental Models (Beliefs & Understanding Vision and Mission Business Definition Corporate Strategy Business Strategy.
Hard Date Change in Master 1 TRADOC: Where Tomorrow’s Victories Begin Adaptive Leaders Methodology (ALM) 18 February 2009 Mr. Donald Vandergriff Leader.
Enabling Learning Objective B (ELO B)
TSP VG 1 Apply the Principles of War During Mission Planning Task Title.
Multi-National Brigade (East)
Reconnaissance and Surveillance Leader Course OPFOR TTP.
COMMANDER’S INTENT & GUIDANCE
Defense Policy Making You may not be interested in war, but war is interested in you.
MPAT SECRETARIAT Multinational Force Crisis Action Planning Overview COALITION/COMBINED TASK FORCE TRAINING.
Course of Action Comparison Purpose u Define course of action comparison and its role in the crisis action planning process u Discuss the associated task.
Office of Service Quality
Operations Overview The levels of war are doctrinal perspectives that clarify the links between strategic objectives and tactical actions.
UNIT 7 MONITORING AND EVALUATION  Monitoring and evaluation is the process of examining progress against institution’s goals or plan.  The term SM &
Offensive Operations.
1. Objective 2. Offensive 3. Mass 4. Economy of Force 5. Maneuver 6. Unity of Command 7. Security 8. Surprise 9. Simplicity.
Critical Facts & Assumptions
Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff
OPERATIONS SECURITY 16 August August 2004.
Military Power: Explaining Victory and Defeat in Modern Battle Stephen Biddle.
UNCLASSIFIED 6/24/2016 8:12:34 PM Szymanski UNCLASSIFIED Page 1 of 15 Pages Space Policy Issues - Space Principles of War - 14 June, 2010.
Development of Counter Improvised Explosive Device (C-IED) Metrics
INFANTRY SMALL UNIT LEADER COURSE
Planning for Information System
Policies and Planning Premises: Strategic Management
PHASING AND TRANSITIONS
The Competition Continuum Joint Doctrine Note Proposal
Peacekeeping and Stability Operations Institute The Army’s only organization for Peace and Stability Operations at the strategic and operational level.
WARM UP: What did Thomas Paine argue in Common Sense?
ADVANCED ASSAULTMAN COURSE
ADVANCED INFANTRYMAN COURSE
Operations Security (OPSEC)
Header Title 2/23/2019.
AGCCC Battle Analysis Adjutant General School - Advanced Officer Training Division.
ADVANCED INFANTRYMAN COURSE
The Planning Process for Differentiating Instruction
ADVANCED MACHINEGUN COURSE
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation Criteria and Measures of Effectiveness MAJ Eric Evans Seminar 6

Purpose Provide understanding and context for the terms Evaluation Criteria and Measures of Effectiveness

Agenda 1.Context 2.Definition and Components of Evaluation Criteria 3.Definition of Measures of Effectiveness 4.Definition of Measures of Performance 5.Historical Examples 6.References

Context

Evaluation Criteria Used to differentiate between courses of action, often during COA Comparison. Identified during COA Analysis. Evaluation Criteria are often weighted with respect to their importance A method of developing a complete evaluation criteria (FM 6-0, 4-22) Title - Surprise Definition – NVA/VC cannot predict where/when cross border incursion will occur Unit of Measure – Enemy units Benchmark – Company sized elements securing bases Formula – Less than a company is advantageous. Greater than a Company is disadvantageous

Measure of Effectiveness A measure of effectiveness is a criterion used to assess changes in system behavior, capability, or operational environment that is tied to measuring the attainment of an end state, achievement of an objective, or creation of an effect (JP 3-0). These measures focus on the results or consequences of task execution and provide information that guides decisions to take additional or alternate actions. Examples of measures of effectiveness include reduced insurgent activity, reduced inflation rates, and improvements in agricultural production. (ADRP 3-07, 4-70) A measure of effectiveness would be the prevention of an offensive against Saigon “Are we doing the right things”

Measure of Performance Measures of performance in stability track implementation of an activity. They answer the question, “Is the stability activity progressing?” and in the long run, “Is the activity complete?” Examples of output indicators might be the number of miles of road paved or number of police trained. Forces monitor output indicators during the implementation of an activity until they complete the activity (ADRP 3-07, 4-68) Tonnage of weapons and rice seized during the raids into Cambodia are a measure of performance “Are we doing things right”

Historical Examples Where Operational Art and Tactics collide – What should happen versus what does happen Combined Bomber Offensive in World War II Destroying Ball Bearings versus forcing the Luftwaffe to fight a battle of attrition Cambodia Campaign Tonnages seized versus offensive prevented The paradox of the counter IED Patrol IED strikes are increasing so we launch more patrols

References Army Doctrinal Reference Publication 5-0, The Operations Process. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, Field Manual 6-0, Commander and Staff Organization and Operations. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, Field Manual 3-07, Stability. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 2014.