The Solar Radiation Budget, and High-latitude Climate Sensitivity Alex Hall UCLA Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences University of Arizona October.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lecture 8 Climate Feedback Processes GEU Forcing, Response, and Sensitivity Consider a climate forcing (e.g., a change in TOA net radiation balance,
Advertisements

Changes in Surface Albedo as a Result of Forest Fires in Northern Arizona Ponderosa Pine Forests Isaac Bickford, Kyle Jones George Koch, Bruce Hungate,
Seasons.
James Dewar presenting liquid hydrogen: Physics Today, March 2008.
Water Vapor and Cloud Feedbacks Dennis L. Hartmann in collaboration with Mark Zelinka Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Washington PCC Summer.
Climate Sensitivity & Climate Feedback Instructor: Prof. Johnny Luo
Climate Forcing and Physical Climate Responses Theory of Climate Climate Change (continued)
Outline Further Reading: Detailed Notes Posted on Class Web Sites Natural Environments: The Atmosphere GE 101 – Spring 2007 Boston University Myneni L29:
Outline Further Reading: Detailed Notes Posted on Class Web Sites Natural Environments: The Atmosphere GG 101 – Spring 2005 Boston University Myneni L31:
Ocean Heat Uptake Gregory C. Johnson 1,2, John M. Lyman 3,1, & Sarah G. Purkey 2,1 1 NOAA/Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, 2 University of Washington.
Outline Background, climatology & variability Role of snow in the global climate system Indicators of climate change Future projections & implications.
Lesson 2 AOSC 621. Radiative equilibrium Where S is the solar constant. The earth reflects some of this radiation. Let the albedo be ρ, then the energy.
Challenges in Modeling Global Sea Ice in a Changing Environment Marika M Holland National Center for Atmospheric Research Marika M Holland National Center.
Anthropogenic Climate Change The Greenhouse Effect that warms the surface of the Earth occurs because of a few minor constituents of the atmosphere.
Reflected Solar Radiative Kernels And Applications Zhonghai Jin Constantine Loukachine Bruce Wielicki Xu Liu SSAI, Inc. / NASA Langley research Center.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Total Amount Altitude Optical Depth Longwave High Clouds Shortwave High Clouds Shortwave Low Clouds.
Processes responsible for polar amplification of climate change Peter L. LangenCentre for Ice and Climate Niels Bohr InstituteUniversity of Copenhagen.
Numerical diffusion in sectional aerosol modells Stefan Kinne, MPI-M, Hamburg DATA in global modeling aerosol climatologies & impact.
LLNL-PRES-XXXXXX This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract DE-AC52-07NA27344.
Natural and Anthropogenic Drivers of Arctic Climate Change Gavin Schmidt NASA GISS and Columbia University Jim Hansen, Drew Shindell, David Rind, Ron Miller.
Radiative Properties of Eastern Pacific Stratocumulus Clouds Zack Pecenak Evan Greer Changfu Li.
Causes of Climate Change Over the Past 1000 Years Thomas J. Crowley Presentation by Jessica L. Cruz April 26, 2001.
Radiation Group 3: Manabe and Wetherald (1975) and Trenberth and Fasullo (2009) – What is the energy balance of the climate system? How is it altered by.
The Greenhouse Effect. What controls climate? Energy from the Sun – Radiation! Consider the 4 inner planets of the solar system: SUN 342 W m W.
How Do Forests, Agriculture and Residential Neighborhoods Interact with Climate? Andrew Ouimette, Lucie Lepine, Mary Martin, Scott Ollinger Earth Systems.
Comparative global energy budgets for Earth, Mars and Venus P. L. Read, S. Chelvaniththilan, P. G. J. Irwin, S. Knight, S. R. Lewis, J. Mendonça, L. Montabone.
5. Temperature Change due to the CO 2 Forcing Alone Spatial variability is due to spatial variations of temperature, water vapor, and cloud properties.
Global Scale Energy Fluxes: Comparison of Observational Estimates and Model Simulations Aaron Donohoe -- MIT David Battisti -- UW CERES Science Team Meeting.
Human fingerprints on our changing climate Neil Leary Changing Planet Study Group June 28 – July 1, 2011 Cooling the Liberal Arts Curriculum A NASA-GCCE.
Energy Balance and Circulation Systems. 2 of 12 Importance Energy from Sun (Energy Budget) –“Drives” Earth’s Atmosphere  Creates Circulation Circulation.
Seasonal Cycle of Climate Feedbacks in the NCAR CCSM3.0 Patrick Taylor CLARREO Science Team Meeting July 7, 2010 Patrick Taylor CLARREO Science Team Meeting.
Arctic Sea Ice – Now and in the Future. J. Stroeve National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC), Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 The Influences of Changes.
Poleward amplification of Northern Hemisphere weekly snowcover extent trends Stephen Déry & Ross Brown ENSC 454/654 – “Snow and Ice”
How Do Forests, Agriculture and Residential Neighborhoods Interact with Climate? Andrew Ouimette, Lucie Lepine, Mary Martin, Scott Ollinger Earth Systems.
Variability of Northern Hemisphere Spring Snowmelt Dates using the APP Snow Cover during Hongxu Zhao Richard Fernandes Canada Centre for Remote.
Arctic Minimum 2007 A Climate Model Perspective What makes these two special? Do models ever have 1 year decline as great as observed from September 2006.
Hongxu Zhao and Richard Fernandes
Climatic implications of changes in O 3 Loretta J. Mickley, Daniel J. Jacob Harvard University David Rind Goddard Institute for Space Studies How well.
The role of clouds in the continuing decline of the Arctic sea ice Irina Gorodetskaya, Bruno Tremblay and B. Liepert AWI, Potsdam, 29 January 2008 Thanks.
How Much Will the Climate Warm? Alex Hall and Xin Qu UCLA Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences UCLA Institute of the Environment Environmental.
AEROCOM AODs are systematically smaller than MODIS, with slightly larger/smaller differences in winter/summer. Aerosol optical properties are difficult.
Narrowing the Divergence in Simulations of Climate Feedbacks Alex Hall and Xin Qu UCLA Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences Berkeley Atmospheric.
Interannual Variability and Decadal Change of Solar Reflectance Spectra Zhonghai Jin Costy Loukachine Bruce Wielicki (NASA Langley research Center / SSAI,
Sea Ice, Solar Radiation, and SH High-latitude Climate Sensitivity Alex Hall UCLA Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences SOWG meeting January 13-14,
What Controls Planetary Albedo and its Interannual Variability over the Cryosphere? Xin Qu and Alex Hall Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences,
Shortwave and longwave contributions to global warming under increased CO 2 Aaron Donohoe, University of Washington CLIVAR CONCEPT HEAT Meeting Exeter,
Sea-ice albedo, clouds, and cloud-radiation interactions in the Arctic in the CMIP5 model ensemble Johannes Karlsson and Gunilla Svensson Department of.
Understanding and constraining snow albedo feedback Alex Hall and Xin Qu UCLA Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences 2nd International Conference.
Aim: study the first order local forcing mechanisms Focusing on 50°-90°S (regional features will average out)
Issues surrounding NH high- latitude climate change Alex Hall UCLA Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences.
Natural Environments: The Atmosphere
Seasonal Arctic heat budget in CMIP5 models
Quantifying rapid adjustments using radiative kernels
Constraining snow albedo feedback with the present-day seasonal cycle
Natural Causes of Climate Change
The Interannual variability of the Arctic energy budget
Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing
Jeff Key*, Aaron Letterly+, Yinghui Liu+
+ = Climate Responses to Biomass Burning Aerosols over South Africa
Dynamics of Annular Modes
Seasons.
Ming-Dah Chou Department of Atmospheric Sciences
A Strategy to Reduce the Persistent Spread in Projections of Future Climate Alex Hall and Xin Qu UCLA Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences University.
Understanding and constraining snow albedo feedback
A Strategy to Reduce the Persistent Spread in Projections of Future Climate Alex Hall and Xin Qu UCLA Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences University.
UCLA Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences
What controls the variability of net incoming solar radiation?
Dynamics of Annular Modes
Presentation transcript:

The Solar Radiation Budget, and High-latitude Climate Sensitivity Alex Hall UCLA Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences University of Arizona October 28, 2004

climate sensitivity parameter change in outgoing longwave with SAT change in net incoming shortwave with SAT classical climate sensitivity framework

surface albedo feedback has been thought for quite some time to be a possible contributor to high-latitude climate sensitivity… --Budyko (1969), Sellers (1969) --Manabe and Stouffer (1980) --Robock (1983) --Ingram et al. (1989) --Meehl and Washington (1990) --Bitz and Holland (2003)

surface albedo feedback to dQ/dT s. Climate sensitivity parameter Change in outgoing longwave with SAT Change in net incoming shortwave with SAT change in solar radiation with surface albedo change in surface albedo with SAT

Simulated reduction in reflected solar due to CO 2 doubling (Hall, 2004)

Geographical and seasonal distribution of the quasi- equilibrium SAT response to CO 2 -doubling.

Geographical and seasonal distribution of the SAT sensitivity when surface albedo feedback is suppressed.

Surface albedo feedback to dQ/dT s. Climate sensitivity parameter Change in outgoing longwave with SAT Change in net incoming shortwave with SAT change in solar radiation with surface albedo change in surface albedo with SAT

Could clouds neutralize ice albedo feedback? To address this question, we examine the controls on planetary albedo in the recent climate record.

The ratio of photons reflected by the surface or atmosphere to the total number of photons reflected by the planet in the ISCCP data set. This is done for various regions, and broken down by season.

What is the surface contribution to planetary albedo variations? (Qu and Hall, 2005) standard deviation of seasonal-mean planetary albedo (%) in the ISCCP D2 data set broken down by season

We assess the controls on planetary albedo variability by examining the ISCCP D2 data set ( ). For both clear and all-sky cases, the ISCCP data set (D2) contains (1) surface radiation fluxes (2) TOA radiation fluxes These were generated based on observations at 3 different channels (visible, near IR, and IR) and a radiative transfer model. Rossow and Gardner (1993a and b) J Clim. Rossow and Schiffer (1999) BAMS.

SURFACE CLOUD RESIDUAL COVARIANCE Planetary albedo variability can be divided into contributions from four components: (1) SURFACE: the portion unambiguously related in linear fashion to surface albedo variability (2) CLOUD: The portion unambiguously related in linear fashion to cloud cover and optical depth variability (3) RESIDUAL: The portion that cannot be linearly related to either surface or cloud variability (4) COVARIANCE: The portion linearly related to surface and cloud variability but not unambiguously attributable to either. (1) (2) (3) (4)

We defined six regions, guided by known differences in the behavior of surface albedo variability: (a) northern hemisphere snow-covered lands (b) northern hemisphere sea ice zone (c) southern hemisphere sea ice zone (d) snow-free lands (e) ice-free ocean (f) Antarctica We averaged the contributions of the four components over each region for each season and normalized by the total planetary albedo variability. Note that the definition of the regions varies seasonally. SURFACE CLOUD RESIDUAL COVARIANCE

contributions from the four components normalized by total planetary albedo variability in ISCCP

SURFACE CLOUD RESIDUAL COVARIANCE The magnitude of the covariance term is generally small, indicating that interannual variability in surface albedo and cloud are largely uncorrelated. However, on land and in the SH sea ice zone, it is not negligible, suggesting surface-cloud interaction.

SURFACE CLOUD RESIDUAL COVARIANCE The magnitude of the residual term is larger than the covariance term but is also generally small, except over Antarctica and the sea ice zones during winter. This may be due to nonlinear dependence of planetary albedo on surface albedo and cloud

SURFACE CLOUD RESIDUAL COVARIANCE The cloud contribution to planetary albedo variability in ISCCP dominates the snow- free lands and the ice- free oceans

SURFACE CLOUD RESIDUAL COVARIANCE The surface contribution to planetary albedo variability in ISCCP is significant everywhere except for the ice-free oceans. It is dominant in the SH sea ice zone year around, and in the other cryosphere regions for most of the year.

SURFACE CLOUD RESIDUAL COVARIANCE The surface contribution to planetary albedo variability in ISCCP is significant everywhere except for the ice-free oceans. It is dominant in the SH sea ice zone year around, and in the other cryosphere regions for most of the year.

SURFACE CLOUD RESIDUAL COVARIANCE The surface contribution to planetary albedo variability in ISCCP is significant everywhere except for the ice-free oceans. It is dominant in the SH sea ice zone year around, and in the other cryosphere regions for most of the year.

SURFACE CLOUD RESIDUAL COVARIANCE The surface contribution to planetary albedo variability in ISCCP is significant everywhere except for the ice-free oceans. It is dominant in the SH sea ice zone year around, and in the other cryosphere regions for most of the year.

SURFACE CLOUD RESIDUAL COVARIANCE The surface contribution to planetary albedo variability in ISCCP is significant everywhere except for the ice-free oceans. It is dominant in the SH sea ice zone year around, and in the other cryosphere regions for most of the year.

Comparison to a climate model To allow for as direct a comparison with the ISCCP data as possible, we used a simulated time series with approximately the same mix of internal variability and externally-forced climate change:  a recent CCSM3 scenario run (T85)  data taken from the same time period as ISCCP ( ).

SURFACE CLOUD RESIDUAL COVARIANCE Controls on planetary albedo variability in CCSM3

CCSM3ISCCP SURFACE CLOUD RESIDUAL COVARIANCE A side-by-side comparison of CCSM3 and ISCCP reveals much more contribution from the surface in ISCCP to interannual planetary albedo variability in all regions except for ice-free oceans.

ISCCP CCSM3 DJF MAM JJA SON The surface contribution is larger in both sea ice and snow zones of the NH. The difference is particularly striking over the NH snow-covered lands, with planetary albedo variability in CCSM3 being overwhelmingly determined by cloud rather than surface variations.

Why is the contribution of the surface so much smaller in CCSM3? --Is it that clouds are more variable, increasing the relative contribution of clouds? --Or is it that the CCSM3 atmosphere is more opaque to solar radiation, attenuating the effect of surface albedo anomalies? --Or is surface albedo itself less variable in CCSM3?

ISCCP CCSM3 Clear-sky surface albedo standard deviation (%) in ISCCP and CCSM3, broken down by season. ISCCP has consistently more surface albedo variability.

ISCCP CCSM3 Clear-sky surface albedo standard deviation (%) in ISCCP and CCSM3, broken down by season. The larger surface albedo variability in ISCCP is particularly apparent in the interior of the northern hemisphere snowpack. (e.g. DJF)

ISCCP CCSM3 Clear-sky surface albedo standard deviation (%) in ISCCP and CCSM3, broken down by season. A similar pattern is seen in NH spring.

conclusions  The surface contribution to planetary albedo variability in ISCCP is significant everywhere except for the ice-free oceans. If surface albedo were to vary in cryosphere regions in the future, the planet’s shortwave radiation absorption would be significantly affected.  CCSM3 has substantially less surface albedo variability than ISCCP, particularly in the interior of ice and snow packs, resulting in a much smaller simulated contribution of the surface to planetary albedo variability. This may lead to ways to improve the model’s surface albedo parameterization.

surface albedo feedback to dQ/dT s. Climate sensitivity parameter Change in outgoing longwave with SAT Change in net incoming shortwave with SAT change in solar radiation with surface albedo change in surface albedo with SAT