Climate Action Team CIWMB Update CIWMB Board Meeting November 15, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB32) The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB32) California Council on Science and.
Advertisements

BACKGROUND ON MATERIALS GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS John Davis High Desert RMDZ April 10, 2014.
State and Local Initiatives to Combat Global Warming AB A Framework for Change James N. Goldstene California Air Resources Board October 22, 2008.
1 AB 32 Scoping Plan Update California Counties A State of Progress Jeff Weir Air Resources Board December 3, 2008 Sacramento, CA.
Discussion of Climate Action Team Subgroup Activities California Integrated Waste Management Board Board Meeting December 11, 2007.
1 AB 32 Scoping Plan Energy Action Plan Meeting Mike Scheible Deputy Executive Officer California Air Resources Board California Public Utilities Commission.
GREEN BUILDING.
City of Fort Collins Department of Natural Resources The Role of Solid Waste Reduction Programs in Climate Protection Plans Annual Conference of Colorado.
Actions to Limit Climate Change SNC2D1 Grade 10 Science.
Anaerobic Digestion and the Path Towards Zero Waste Paul Relis Senior Vice President CR&R Incorporated July 14,2009.
1 West Coast Climate Change Initiative. 2 West Coast Governors’ Global Warming Initiative Oregon, Washington, California Start: Governors’ Directive,
1 Washington Action on Climate Change Hedia Adelsman, Department of Ecology September 25, 2009.
1 Southern California Water Dialogue April 23, 2008 Jon Costantino Climate Change Planning Manager California Air Resources Board AB 32 California Global.
Climate Policy Development Tom Peterson The Center For Climate Strategies August 25, 2005.
Doug Scott, Director Rod R. Blagojevich, Governor Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Governor ’ s Global Warming Initiative Illinois Environmental.
M. Amann G. Klaassen, R. Mechler, J. Cofala, C. Heyes International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Modelling synergies and trade-offs between.
The GAINS model State of play
How the State of California Can Play A Greater Role in Addressing Global Warming Leonard Robinson – Chief Deputy Director California Department of Toxic.
California’s Climate Initiative. 2 Executive Order Established Statewide GHG Targets By 2010, Reduce to 2000 Emission Levels* By 2020, Reduce to 1990.
National Capital Region Climate Change Report OVERVIEW Joan Rohlfs, Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments October.
Just one light bulb Make a difference Save a buck So does a can!
FEDERAL CLIMATE CHANGE LEGISLATION Overview of Key Provisions of House and Senate Bills for Industrial Energy Users John Clancy Godfrey & Kahn, S.C. 780.
NJ GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE PROGRAM Leslie McGeorge, Director Division of Science, Research and Technology New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection.
Discussion & Status Report on Recycling & Waste Management Measures in Climate Change Scoping Plan Prepared Pursuant to AB 32 California Integrated Waste.
HOW WILL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS BE TRANSFORMED IN OUR ENERGY FUTURE? GEORGE A. HUME April 28, 2006 Reference was made to the following internet sites in.
Climate change, land, materials and products: new reports from EPA and the Product Policy Institute GRRN Recycling and Zero Waste Conference October 19,
Stop Trashing the Climate Brenda Platt Institute for Local Self-Reliance BioCycle West, San Diego April 15th, 2008 Brenda Platt Institute for Local Self-Reliance.
Maryland Climate Change Commission USM Overview Session on Sustainability Don Boesch October 11, 2007.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions and the Waste Sector: An Environmental Perspective Scott Smithline, Director of Legal and Regulatory Affairs Californians Against.
The Energy & Climate Benefits of the 3 R’s The Energy & Climate Benefits of the 3 R’s Reduce, Reuse, Recycle Sara Hartwell U.S. EPA Office of Resource.
January ‘06Advice to Minister1. January ‘06Advice to Minister2 Understanding Climate Change Climate Change Action Plan Elements Climate Change Action.
Senate Select Committee on Climate Change and AB 32 Implementation December 3, 2013.
Implementing AB 32: California’s Approach to Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions National Association of Clean Air Agencies Spring Membership Meeting May.
Department of the Environment Reducing Maryland’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A State’s Perspective Renee Fizer, Climate Change Division-MDE.
Life Cycle Assessment of Waste Conversion Technologies April 15, 2004.
Washington State: Climate Initiative
ERT 319 Industrial Waste Treatment Semester /2013 Huzairy Hassan School of Bioprocess Engineering UniMAP.
Sustainable Port of San Diego Michelle White Green Port Program Manager.
CPUC Role in AB 32 Implementation LIOB – 2 nd June, 2010 San Diego, CA.
Biomass Renewable Energy Source Michael Parsons. What is Biomass? Biomass Renewable Energy from Plants and Animals Biomass Renewable Energy from Plants.
Overview and Discussion of Landfill Gas In Relation To Climate Change CIWMB Permitting and Enforcement Board Meeting Item 16 May 16, 2006.
2014 Program Priorities January 23, Outline Major 2014 Goals 2013 Accomplishments Major 2014 Activities Partnerships 2.
Climate Change Workshop: CIWMB GHG Reduction Measures Strategic Policy Development Committee May 8 th, 2007 Judith Friedman, CIWMB.
Discussion Draft October 24, Required by AB 32 Outlines State’s strategy to achieve 2020 GHG goal Built on a balanced mix of strategies 2 Initial.
Overview of Recent Developments Gregory B. Greenwood Science Advisor Resources Agency.
James Goldstene California Air Resources Board AB 32: The Global Warming Solutions Act of th LEA/CIWMB Partnership Conference October 16, 2007.
Why Recycling is Important Monroe Area High Future Business Leaders of America.
Item #11 Alternative Approaches for Linking Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions to Metropolitan Transportation Planning Presentation to the National Capital.
Findings from the Multi-Sector Working Group Future Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategies in the Metropolitan Washington Region Presentation to the WRTC.
Session 2 Buildings and Measurements. Buildings Sector Accounts for About 40% of U.S. Energy, 72% of Electricity, 34% of Natural Gas, 38% of Carbon, 18%
California Energy Commission Global Climate Change: Trends and Policy Issues Susan J. Brown California Energy Commission March 3, 2005.
11 AB 32 Climate Change Scoping Plan Progress Report October 21, 2010 California Air Resources Board.
Energy Conservation and Public Policy. Scope 1 Emission Sources: fugitive emissions Stationary Combustion Mobile Combustion Process Emissions Fugitive.
Smooth Sailing Ahead Partnering With Sustainability and Waste Compliance & Mitigation Fernando Berton, CIWMB.
Industrial Association of CCC ● Thursday, April 14, 2016.
California Integrated Waste Management Board Consideration Of Allocation Proposals To Be Funded From The Integrated Waste Management Account And/Or To.
SAUSALITO COMMUNITY GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY Years 2005 and 2010.
Discussion and Status of the Solid Waste Management & Recycling Strategies included in the Climate Change Proposed Scoping Plan California Integrated Waste.
John Davis Mojave Desert and Mountain Recycling Authority.
Electronics Environmental Benefits Calculator Patricia Dillon, Dillon Environmental Associates & Maria Leet Socolof, Abt Associates Federal Environmental.
The sole purpose of this chapter is to ask students to: Be aware. Be mindful. Know your facts. For YOU. Not for us. This chapter, as any other, prompts.
CRRA Conference, August 2016 Karen Irwin U.S. EPA Region IX
The Greenhouse Gas Connection to Sustainable Resource Management
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
BACWA Air Issues & Regulations ● Wednesday, June 15, 2016
Materials Management and Climate Change
Understanding Updates to the EPA Inventory of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Natural Gas Systems Richard Meyer Managing Director, Energy Analysis August.
Tajiguas Resource Recovery Project Doing More with Our Waste
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory
California Hydrogen Energy Policies
Presentation transcript:

Climate Action Team CIWMB Update CIWMB Board Meeting November 15, 2005

2 Executive Order Established Statewide GHG Targets By 2010, Reduce to 2000 Emission Levels* By 2020, Reduce to 1990 Emission Levels** By 2050, Reduce to 80% Below 1990 Levels * Equals 59 Million Tons Emission Reductions, 11% Below BAU ** Equals 145 Million Tons Emission Reductions, 25% Below BAU

3 Climate Action Team  CalEPA Secretary Chairs the Team  ARB, BT&H, CDFA, CIWMB, CEC, PUC and Resources are Represented  The CAT will: – Evaluate and Recommend Strategies to Meet Targets – Report on Scenario Analysis – Include Cap and Trade Options in the January Report – Report to Governor and Legislature in January and Bi-annually

4 Air Resources Board Vehicle Climate Change Standards130 Diesel Anti-idling12 Public Utilities Commission/Energy Commission Accelerated Renewable Portfolio Std (33% by 2020)511 Million Solar Roofs0.43 Investor Owned Energy Efficiency Programs48.8 Integrated Waste Management Board Achieve 50% Statewide Recycling Goal33 Energy Commission Natural Gas Efficiency Improvements16 Appliance Efficiency Standards35 Fuel-efficient Replacement Tires & Inflation Programs33 Business Transportation and Housing Reduced Venting and Leaks in Oil and Gas Systems11 State and Consumer Services/CalEPA Green Buildings Initiative Air Resources Board/CalEPA Hydrogen VehiclesNot yet estimated Total Potential Emission Reductions (million tons CO2 equivalent)2375 Table 1 – Lead Agency & Strategies Already Underway

5 Table 2--Strategies Partially Initiated or Being Considered Agency Responsible Strategy Air Resources Board Other New Light Duty Vehicle Technology Improvements HFC Reduction Strategies Transport refrigeration units, Off-road electrification, Port electrification (ship to shore) Manure Management Semi Conductor Industry Targets (PFC Emissions) Flared Natural Gas Measure Biodiesel Blends Ethanol in Gasoline Heavy Duty Vehicle Emission Reduction Measures Public Utilities Commission/Energy Commission Additional Energy Efficiency Programs Integrated Waste Management Board Landfill Methane Capture Zero Waste – High Recycling Resources Agency Forest Management Projects Reforestation Projects Conservation Projects Water Management Fire Management Energy Commission Increased Use of Blended Cement

6 CIWMB Implementation of Strategies  Achieve 50% Statewide Recycling Reduce climate change emissions associated with energy-intensive material extraction and production, as well as methane emissions from landfills.  Landfill Methane Capture Capture of methane emitted from landfills via a gas recovery system.  Zero Waste / High recycling Measures that result in additional recovery of recyclable materials from landfills and transforming organic/biomass and plastic waste into marketable products are being considered.

7 Link Between Waste Reduction and Climate Protection  The EPA Climate and Waste Program’s mission: to identify and address linkages between waste reduction and climate protection  Quantification of the GHG and energy impacts of recycling requires a life- cycle approach  Recycling can significantly reduce GHG emissions and conserve energy

8 Climate Change Benefits  Upstream Benefits –Reduce carbon dioxide emissions from energy use in the material acquisition and manufacturing stages –Increase carbon storage in forests –Increase carbon storage in soils when organics are composted and applied to the soil  Downstream Benefits –Avoid landfill methane emissions –Avoid carbon dioxide emissions from combustion  Full Analysis Provided in EPA’s Revised Report: –“Solid Waste Management and Greenhouse Gases”

9 What is the Link?

10 Climate Benefits (cont.)  Waste is important source of GHG emissions  Waste activities account for approximately 3% of total U.S. GHG emissions  Waste-related actions result in emission reduction benefits that are realized across multiple industrial sectors

11 Life-Cycle Approach (cont.)

12 Energy Benefits  Decrease the Demand for Raw Materials (e.g., trees, bauxite) –Reduce energy associated with raw material extraction  Reduce the Amount of Energy Needed for Manufacturing and Transportation  Energy Production from Landfill Gas & WTE

13 Recycling Energy Savings

14 Outreach and Tools  Publications and Outreach Materials available at:  Three Tools also available: WARM, ReCon, DGC

15 Tools Waste Reduction Model (WARM)  Assess GHG and energy impacts of waste reduction activities  Accepts user- specific inputs and provides individualized results  Available online – (under “TOOLS”)

16 Tools Recycled Content Tool (ReCon)  Available online – (under “tools” and “ReCon”)  Estimates GHG and energy benefits of increasing recycled content  Accepts user-specific inputs and provides individualized results

17 Tools Durable Goods Calculator  Assess GHG emissions benefits of different disposal methods for 14 durable goods (i.e., refrigerators, washers, dryers, PCs, autos, TVs, etc.)  Accepts user-specific inputs and provides individualized results  Available in Microsoft Excel version

18 Summary  Recycling Offers Significant Energy and GHG Benefits  The EPA Suite of Tools Can Help Quantify and Communicate These Benefits –Incorporate GHG and energy impacts into decision- making processes –Communicate GHG emission reductions and energy savings to the public –Use GHG and energy impacts to help “sell” recycling programs in new and important ways –Incorporate improved materials management into climate action plans at the municipal and state level

19 Climate Change Strategies  Achieve 50% Statewide Recycling Reduce climate change emissions associated with energy-intensive material extraction and production, as well as methane emissions from landfills.  Zero Waste / High recycling Measures that result in additional recovery of recyclable materials from landfills and transforming organic/biomass and plastic waste into marketable products are being considered.  Landfill Methane Capture Capture of methane emitted from landfills via a gas recovery system.

20 Next Steps  Climate Action Team to Continue to Evaluate Potential Strategies and Implementation Options  Continue Open Public Process  Draft Report Released Early December  Final CAT Public Meeting December 13  Report to Governor January 2006