Consistency in Students’ Accounts of Carbon-transforming Processes Hui Jin The Ohio State University Charles W. Anderson Michigan State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Yeast Lab!. What makes something living? Consider the following questions… How big/complex must something be? What must it be able to do? Where must it.
Advertisements

A view of life Chapter 1. Properties of Life Living organisms: – are composed of cells – are complex and ordered – respond to their environment – can.
An inquiry learning progression for carbon-transforming processes Dr. Jenny Dauer Michigan State University Department Teacher Education.
Rachel Verbois and Melanie Villanueva 2005 Science Cohort.
Next Generation Science Standards
INTRODUCTION TO THE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION’s ACHIEVEMENT CHART Bedford Park PS September 2013.
Science and technology in elementary school Evaluation in the cycles 2 and 3 Spring
The Importance of Technology in Elementary Science Stephanie Nowak · January 27, 2014.
Teaching Experiments and a Carbon Cycle Learning Progression 2009 AERA Presentation Written by: Lindsey Mohan and Andy Anderson (Michigan State University)
Primary Process Skills Developmentally Appropriate for ages 5 & above SkillInstructional Implication Observe first step in gathering information require.
A Cross-cultural Study: Comparing Learning Progression for Carbon-Transforming Processes of American and Chinese Students 2010 NARST Presentation Written.
Unit III: Observing Children: A Tool for Assessment.
Introduction to Science: The Scientific Method
Institute for Collaborative Research in Education, Assessment, and Teaching Environments for STEM NGSS Resources by CREATE for STEM Institute MSU licensed.
This research is supported in part by three grants from the National Science Foundation: Developing a research-based learning progression for the role.
Karen Draney (University of California, Berkeley) Lindsey Mohan (Michigan State University) Philip Piety (University of Michigan) Jinnie Choi (University.
The Scientific method By Biology Guy An Introduction to the Scientific Method and Investigation.
Yeast Lab!. What makes something living? Consider the following questions… How big/complex must something be? What must it be able to do? Where must it.
A special partnership between the Georgia Department of Education and the Educational Technology Training Centers in support of the 8 th Grade Physical.
LIVE INTERACTIVE YOUR DESKTOP 1 Start recording—title slide—1 of 3 Introducing the Next Generation Science Standards Originally presented by:
TEA Science Workshop #4 October 3, 2012 Kim Lott Utah State University.
Learning Progressions Immersion Activity Power point presented to teachers during professional development to help teachers learn about learning progressions.
This research is supported in part by three grants from the National Science Foundation: Developing a research-based learning progression for the role.
This research is supported in part by three grants from the National Science Foundation: Developing a research-based learning progression for the role.
WHAT IS SCIENCE? WHAT IS SCIENCE? An organized way of gathering and analyzing evidence about the natural world.
Promise and Problems of Learning Progression-guided Interventions Hui Jin, Hyo Jeong Shin, Michele Johnson, Jinho Kim.
Understanding of Carbon Cycling: An Interview Study in the US and China 2009 NARST Presentation Written by : Hui Jin, Li Zhan, Charles W. Anderson (Michigan.
A comparison study on American and Chinese secondary students’ learning progression for carbon cycling in socio- ecological systems 2009 AERA Presentation.
Energy Performances in the K-12 Curriculum Andy Anderson, Hui Jin MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY Environmental Literacy Research Group.
Understanding Respiration. Common Core/ Next Generation Science Standards Addressed CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RST Determine the meaning of symbols, key.
Chapter 2: The Science of Biology. 1.Investigate and understand the natural world 2.Explain events in the natural world 3.Use those explanations to make.
SCI 230: Module I Carbon, Life, and Cycling Part I: Carbon Atom & Life “Engage” Activity: The decomposition of sucrose
Salem School District What does proficient look like? Questions Salem High teachers were asking in the spring of 2002 regarding competency based assessment:
Unpacking the Elements of Scientific Reasoning Keisha Varma, Patricia Ross, Frances Lawrenz, Gill Roehrig, Douglas Huffman, Leah McGuire, Ying-Chih Chen,
ENVIRONMENTAL LITERACY PROJECT This research is supported in part by grants from the National Science Foundation: Developing a Research-based Learning.
Click on a lesson name to select. The Study of Life Section 1: Introduction to Biology Section 2: The Nature of Science Section 3: Methods of Science.
Analyzing students’ learning performances in terms of practices for developing accounts Hui Jin, Jiwon Kim and Charles W. Anderson.
This research is supported in part by grants from the National Science Foundation: Developing a Research-based Learning Progression for the Role of Carbon.
Click on a lesson name to select. The Study of Life Section 1: Introduction to Biology Section 2: The Nature of Science Section 3: Methods of Science.
This research is supported in part by three grants from the National Science Foundation: Developing a research-based learning progression for the role.
A K-12 LEARNING PROGRESSION TO SUPPORT ENVIRONMENTAL LITERACY MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY Environmental Literacy Research Group.
This research is supported in part by the National Science Foundation Center for Curriculum Materials in Science grant (ESI ) and a Michigan State.
Biology—the study of life  Study the origins and history of life and once-living things  Study the structures of living things Chapter 1 The Study of.
ENVIRONMENTAL LITERACY Developing a Learning Progression for Energy and Causal Reasoning in Socio-ecological Systems 2010 NARST Presentation Written by:
1 URBDP 591 A Analysis, Interpretation, and Synthesis -Assumptions of Progressive Synthesis -Principles of Progressive Synthesis -Components and Methods.
The Effects of Teaching Materials and Teachers’ Approaches on Student Learning about Carbon- transforming Processes Li Zhan, Dante Cisterna, Jennifer Doherty,
Connections between students’ explanations and interpretations of arguments from evidence Allison L. Freed 1, Jenny M. Dauer 1,2, Jennifer H. Doherty 1,
THE NATURE OF SCIENCE VOCABULARY.
ENVIRONMENTAL LITERACY PROJECT This research is supported in part by grants from the National Science Foundation: Developing a Research-based Learning.
Argumentation in Students’ Accounts of Carbon-transforming Processes Kennedy Onyancha, Michigan State University Charles W. Anderson, Michigan State University.
A K-12 LEARNING PROGRESSION TO SUPPORT UNDERSTANDING OF WATER IN THE ENVIRONMENT Beth Covitt & Kristin Gunckel Geological Society of America, North-Central.
This research is supported in part by three grants from the National Science Foundation: Developing a research-based learning progression for the role.
NGSS EQuIP RUBRIC SMD EPO PD Part 4: Supporting 3D Learning April 15, 1:00-2:00 pm ET Hilarie B Davis, Ed.D. Bradford Davey, Ed.D. TLC Inc.
Inquiry Primer Version 1.0 Part 4: Scientific Inquiry.
UMass Dartmouth College of Arts & Sciences umassd.edu/cas Introduction and Purpose Methods Methods - ContinuedFindings - Continued Conclusions Acknowledgement.
Hypothesis-Based Science The Scientific Method. Science as Inquiry The process of investigation to answer questions about the natural world.
The Relationship Between Students’ Explanations and Their Interpretation of Inquiry Investigations Emily E. Scott, Kirsten D. Edwards, Charles W. Anderson.
Long Term Ecological Research Math Science Partnership
MODERNIZING ECOLOGY CONTENT IN THE REQUIRED K-12 SCIENCE CURRICULUM:
Hypothesis-Based Science
Charles W. Anderson Michigan State University
Hui Jin, Li Zhan, Charles W. Anderson Michigan State University
American and Chinese Secondary Students’ Written Accounts of Carbon Cycling in Socio-ecological Systems Jing Chen1, Charles, W. Anderson1, & Xinghua Jin2.
Teaching Experiments and a Carbon Cycle Learning Progression
Science Chapter 1.
Hui Jin, Charles W. Anderson
Learning Progressions in Environmental Science Literacy
Components of Productive Level 3 Reasoning
Bloom’s Taxonomy Higher Order Thinking HOT
Chapter 1-4: Scientific Models & Knowledge
Presentation transcript:

Consistency in Students’ Accounts of Carbon-transforming Processes Hui Jin The Ohio State University Charles W. Anderson Michigan State University

What we have done before A learning progression framework for energy and causal reasoning in socio- ecological systems

Instrument: Clinical Interviews

Instrument: Written Assessments The grape you eat can help you move your little finger. a.Please describe how one glucose molecule from the grape provides energy to move your little finger. b.Do you think the SAME glucose molecule can also help you to maintain your body temperature, when it is used to provide energy to move your finger? How do the foods you eat help you move your finger?

Data Sources Students of two elementary teachers (4th grade), two middle school teachers (7th and 8th grade), and two high school teachers (9th and 11th grade). The schools are located in suburban and rural areas in Michigan. We conducted interview and written assessments twice in order to provide the variety of students’ responses. AssessmentsElementary SchoolsMiddle SchoolsHigh Schools First-tests Second-tests First-interviews888 Second-interviews888

The Learning Progression Framework Students rely on different entities to explain what causes change in socio-ecological events: Level 1. natural ability Level 2. vital power Level 3. beginning energy concept Level 4. scientific energy concept At each level, students demonstrate different performance in Association (what things are and are not energy) and Tracing (what happens to energy during the event). Association: from broad association to gradually restricted association. Tracing: from incomplete tracing to complete and successful tracing.

Level 1. Natural Ability Association: Associate energy with emotions, feelings, and actions of actors and enablers. Tracing: Trace cause-effect chain

Level 2. Vital Power Association: Associate energy with properties and structure of enablers Tracing: Trace energy back to enablers

Level 3. Beginning Energy Concept Association: Associate energy with energy indicators including organic molecules, but do not distinguish between energy forms and organic molecules. Tracing: Matter-energy conversion; Trace energy without degradation

Level 4. Scientific Energy Concept Association: Associate energy with a limited number of energy indicators. Tracing: Trace energy separately from matter and with degradation.

An Unresolved Problem Are the different levels in the learning progression: –Coherent “theories” that students of different ages have about what causes events to happen and the role of energy –“Knowledge in pieces,” loose collections of metaphors that students use to build their explanations

Consistency of Students’ Accounts What are we doing now?

Research Questions Association: To what extent do individual students demonstrate consistent performance in associating entities (natural ability, vital power, energy) with different aspects of carbon-transforming processes? Tracing: To what extent do individual students demonstrate consistent performance in tracing entities (natural ability, vital power, energy)?

Data Sources & Data Analysis Data Sources: 48 interviews Data Analysis: Six Account Units: TG (Tree Growth), BG (Baby Girl Growth), GR (Girl Running), TD (Tree Decaying), FB (Flame Burning), and CR (Car Running). Each Account Unit is analyzed in terms of three units of coding: ENENABLER: Questions about how energy enabler helps the actor to grow or move and how energy change in the event & Responses to these questions --- Association; Tracing ENSOURCES: Questions about where energy comes from & Responses to these questions. --- Association ENSTORED: Questions about where energy is stored & Responses to these questions. --- Association AssessmentsElementary SchoolsMiddle SchoolsHigh Schools First-interviews888 Second-interviews888

Data Analysis TG: Tree Growth ENENABLER: How does sunlight helps the tree to grow? Where does light energy go when it is used by the tree? --- Association; Tracing ENSOURCES: What are energy sources for the tree? Does sunlight provide energy? Does water/air/soil provide energy? Why do you think it has energy? --- Association ENSTORED: Where does the tree store energy in its body? Do you think that the tree is made of cells/molecules? Do you think energy could be in cells/molecules? --- Association BG: Baby Girl Growth

Data Analysis

Patterns of Consistency of Reasoning Three patterns of consistency of reasoning: Reasoning at single level: The account unit only contains indicators of one level. Synthetic reasoning framework: The account unit contains indicators of two or more levels and the indicators (elements of reasoning) are synthesized into a coherent framework. Apparently inconsistent reasoning: The account unit contains indicators of two or more levels. There is no evidence in the account unit that the student makes the indicators compatible.

Example 1. Apparently Inconsistent Reasoning (Association Performance)

Example 2. Synthetic Reasoning Framework (Tracing)

Summary and Future Work Summary –Students may not connect school science with their everyday life experience and therefore tell about two different stories about the events. –Students may integrate their naïve reasoning and school science knowledge and therefore generate many misconceptions. Future Work –Generate graphs that show percentage of different consistency patterns –Analyze written data and see if there are similar patterns.