Vaughn G. Update Idalyn Hauss Deputy Officer for Special Education Debra Y. Barbour Director of Low Incidence and Inclusion November, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Common Legal Mistakes Districts Make
Advertisements

What Every Principal Needs to Know About Special Education
Changes to Administrative Rules Impacting Secondary Transition Florida Department of Education Dr. Eric J. Smith, Commissioner.
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
DEPARTMENT OF SPECIAL SERVICES PROJECTIONS PREPARED BY KIM CULKIN, DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL SERVICES MARCH 2013.
Ensuring Effective Services to Immigrant &/or LEP/ELL Children & Families: It’s Right, & It’s the Law! © Statewide Parent Advocacy Network.
Finalizing the IEP Process Consent for Initial IEP PWN following the IEP Copies to Parent IEP Amendments Revocation of Consent West Virginia Department.
LEARNING FROM STATE COMPLAINTS AND DUE PROCESS COMPLAINTS Office of Special Education Fall Forum 2013.
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt Transition.
1 The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA 2004) Implementation Training Spring/Summer 2005.
Surrogate Parent Training
Appropriate Education for students with disabilities.
Educational Access Project for DCFS An Overview of a Partnership Between Northern Illinois University and the Illinois Department of Children and Family.
ACCOMMODATIONS MANUAL How to Select, Administer, and Evaluate Use of Accommodations for Instruction and Assessment of Students with Disabilities.
Connecticut Comprehensive System of Monitoring the use of Accommodations in Testing Connecticut Comprehensive System of Monitoring the use of Accommodations.
Discipline and the Pupil Fair Dismissal Act Special education students have a special set of entitlements: They comprise a “protected class”. Their IEP’s.
Identification, Assessment, and Evaluation
Laws and Regulations.
What Is TRANSITION & Transition PLANNING?
Content Mastery Center- Opening the Doors of Success
Special Education in Baltimore Mary Jo Student. Vaughn G. was the systemic reform lawsuit initially filed by MDLC (Maryland Disability Law Center) in.
School Board’s Role in Special Education Vermont School Boards Association.
Margaret Rose McDonnell Kathleen A. Rinehart.  The IDEA – ◦ Applies from birth to age 21, or until the student receives the regular education diploma.
1 Role of the Case Manager Cypress-Fairbanks Independent School District 2009.
Illinois EMSC1 Planning for Students with Special Health Care Needs Objectives Upon completion of this lecture, you will be better able to: Develop an.
April 2010 Copyright © 2010 Mississippi Department of Education Mattie T. Updated Timeline and Goals.
James Aiello PricewaterhouseCoopers Africa Utility Week 06 International Good Practice in Procurement.
A Review of the Special Education Integrated Monitoring Process BIE Special Education Academy September 12-15, 2011 Tampa, Florida.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 1 Program Guidelines for Students who are Visually Impaired PRESENTATION TO: California Transcribers.
CFN 609 Principals’ Meeting October 4, 2012 Creating Effective Student Support Teams.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Prekindergarten Contacts' Meeting February 3, 2015 Bureau Update.
Significant Changes to the Monitoring Process  Self-assessment by school districts.  Greater involvement of parents and other stakeholders.  Improved.
2012 Change Documents ARD Process Guide & Notice of Procedural Safeguards.
 Indicator 1 – Graduation  Indicator 2 – Dropout Rates  Indicator 3 – Assessment  Indicator 4 – Suspension/Expulsion  Indicator 5 – School Age LRE.
BIE Special Education Academy September 2011 Tampa Bay, Florida Presenter: Donald Griffin Education Specialist, Special Education Bureau of Indian Education.
A Technology-based Approach to Ensure the Provision of Related Services to Students in an Urban School Setting Kimberly A. Lewis, Ed.D. Executive Director,
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Legal Aspects of Special Education and Social Foundations Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11 Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11.
Complaints Information Santina Thibedeau March 5, 2009.
Continuous Improvement and Focused Monitoring System US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Overview of the OSEP Continuous Improvement.
1 McKinney-Vento and Special Education  Overview  Revocation of Consent  FAQ’s  Resources.
Improvement Planning Mischele McManus Infant/Toddler and Family Services Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services July 20, 2007
Educational Benefit Review (EBR)
Noncompliance and Correction (OSEP Memo 09-02) June 2012.
The New IDEA in Special Education
West Virginia Department of Education Introducing ……. Policy 2419: Regulations for the Education of Students with Exceptionalities.
IDEA FORMAL COMPLAINTS Administrative Accountability Branch Kentucky Department of Education Understanding the Self-Investigation Process.
In accordance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Chapters 14 and 15 of the State Board Regulations, PDE provides general supervision.
Categorical Findings of Noncompliance March 24, 2011 Guidance & Intensive Technical Assistance Related to Correction of Noncompliance for SY
C HAPTER 5 Individuals With Disabilities EDAD 859 By: Group 2.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
AT Consideration Overview of Issues & Solutions. P ROCEDURAL ISSUES … Consideration / Assessment / Evaluation Integration into IEP Implementation & Progress.
State Performance Plan ESC-2 Presentation For Superintendents September 19, 2007.
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
V: Maryland’s High School Assessments (HSAs) & the Bridge Plan for Academic Validation Overview.
What’s New for Transition to Special Education Services? Paula E. Goff, Part C Coordinator May 23, 2013.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
Required Services and Procedures for Students with Disabilities Presented by Scott Hall and Ty Manieri 2010 Oregon Special Education Fall Conference Eugene,
THE APR AND SPP--LINKING SPECIAL EDUCATION DATA TO ACCOUNTABILITY FOR EDUCATION RESULTS Building a Brighter Tomorrow through Positive and Progressive Leadership.
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
Training for Scheduling of Students with Disabilities in Secondary Schools Debra Y. Barbour Office of Low Incidence and Inclusion May 2008.
Special Education District Validation Review (DVR) Team Member Training and School Preparation Information.
Huntsville City Schools Centralized Registration
Understanding the Section 504 Process
Understanding the Section 504 Process
TEA Corrective Action Plan
IEP REPORT OF PROGRESS AND ACHIEVEMENT K-12
SECN – Transition Role Group Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Vaughn G. Update Idalyn Hauss Deputy Officer for Special Education Debra Y. Barbour Director of Low Incidence and Inclusion November, 2007

History of “Vaughn G.” 1984 – original complaint filed by MDLC on behalf of a student (Vaughn G.), et al. (Class action suit) Basis for complaint was failure to provide assessments and timely development and implementation of IEPs 1988 – School district and MDLC entered into the original Consent Decree 1994 – MSDE became a join defendant in the Decree 1997 – Long Range Compliance Plan (LRCP) for Special Education became the 1 st systemic plan agreed upon by all parties agreed. LRCP was a 70 page document outlining actions and verifiable and measurable outcomes identifying all senior administrative staff as responsible for implementation LRCP required broad systemic reform – it was not just a special education issue

2000 Consent Order Currently in effect Appointed Amy Totenberg as Special Master Set forth 15 ultimate measurable outcomes that replaced the LRCP The plan became the “Implementation Plan” Of the original 15 outcomes, 7 outcomes remain in effect

Outcomes Dismissed by Court Report post-secondary employment (2002) Participation in vocational programs at same rate as total high school population (2003) Evaluation Meetings on Time (2002) IEPs implemented on time (2002) SETS accuracy (2002) IDEA Parent Complaint Resolution (2006) OSEMC IEP Report Card Standards (2006) OSEMC IEP Content Standards (2002)

Implementation Plan Major Components School completion and exit rates Discipline Inclusion Interruptions in Service IEP meetings for students designated as “drop-outs”

Outcomes 3 and 4 BCPSS will increase the rate of school completion for students with disabilities BCPSS will increase its graduation rate for students with disabilities Includes maximizing student choice, expanding programs, more students passing HSAs, improving attendance

Outcome 7 BCPSS will ensure that all students suspended/expelled are done so in accordance with IDEA Focus is on students not being denied access to their routine daily instructional program as the result of disciplinary action(s) IEP meetings held when appropriate Removals are documented consistently in student record

Outcomes 8 and 9 Students will receive IEP services in regular/combined programs to fullest extent possible Students will receive IEP services in the school they would attend if they were not disabled Inclusion Action Plans for each school – part of SIT IEPs will reflect high standards of quality, individualization, and compliance with legal requirements Ongoing support to principals to ensure successful implementation of the students’ IEP in the LRE

Outcome 11 Ensure that all required IEP services are provided without interruption Implementation of the Prevention Plan Process within required timelines Document the provision of IEP required services using Encounter Tracker Supervision of service delivery and performance standards

Outcome 13 Students with disabilities (14 and above) who are designated as “dropouts” will have an IEP review meeting Implementation of attendance policy and dropout procedures Implementation of due diligence requirements for students designated as “dropouts”

How is this plan “different”? Previous plans focused on establishing institutional mechanisms, development of policies, procedures and guidelines Main activities were directed to central and area office Focus and accountability now shifted to the schools, specifically principals and AAOs Plan activities require follow-up and corrective actions A primary area of focus for Dr. Alonso

What’s next? Central Office will continue to provide ongoing communication to schools, monitor progress in meeting outcomes, provide technical assistance and resources, provide appropriate follow- up Principals and AAOs will implement the plan, monitor, conduct appropriate follow-up, and report progress Special Master and MSDE will monitor all activities within the plan BCPSS will maintain systemic documentation and provide quarterly reports to the Court Court will determine compliance in meeting outcomes based on all available information BCPSS will achieve substantial compliance in order to request release from some of the outcomes by end of next school year