Leading a Course Review. Summary Evaluation of Second Module.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.

Advertisements

Template: Making Effective Presentation about Your Evidence-based Health Promotion Program This template is intended for you to adapt to your own program.

Education Consultants of America LLC Grant/Proposal Writing Specialist.

Student Experience – Student Satisfaction Robert McCormack Director, Planning Services.

UQ Teaching and Learning Small and Large Strategic Grants Scheme Second Round Applications 30 October 2007.

Presented by Melissa Dibben and Greg Roughsedge Business Intelligence Education Phase.

Teaching and Learning at Deakin University Professor Colin Mason Director, Institute of Teaching and Learning pp John Rosenberg DVCA.

Developing an Effective Tracking and Improvement System for Learning and Teaching Achievements and Future Challenges in Maintaining Academic Standards.

UNSW Strategic Educational Development Grants

A Self Study Process for WCEA Catholic High Schools

 Data file preparation  Item and scale scores  Missing data  Reporting the CEQ  Change in 2010  CEQ Q&A.

Higher Education Summit, Auckland 10 th March 2011 Peter Coolbear Educational leadership in today’s higher education sector.

 A follow-up to the AGS  Three years out ◦ Pilot in 2009 ◦ Inaugural in 2010 ◦ Three years after the AGS ◦ AGS respondents only ◦ Same reference date.

FAMU ASSESSMENT PLAN PhD Degree Program in Entomology Dr. Lambert Kanga / CESTA.

UQ Teaching and Learning Small and Large Strategic Grants Scheme 14 June 2007.

Sit for Autism Developed by The Center of Excellence on Autism Spectrum Disorders Southern Connecticut State University Ruth Eren, Ed.D. Director.

University of Peshawar 13 th QEC Meeting August 18-19,2009, Karachi.

How to write a Report On Assessment Source: AUN Secretariat.

QEP Update CFCC Planning Retreat June 19, QEP Update Mid-Term Report Global Outcomes 1.Measurable improvement of students’ critical thinking skills.

Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.

 A follow-up to the AGS  Three years out ◦ First piloted in 2009 (2006 AGS respondents) ◦ Three years after the AGS ◦ AGS respondents only ◦ Same reference.

 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.

Academic Assessment Report for the Academic Year Antioch University New England Office of Academic Assessment Tom Julius, Ed.D., Director Submitted.

Teaching and Learning Grants Workshop Teaching and Learning Enhancement at UQ Professor Deborah Terry 8 February 2008.

Practical Planning – the OPP at School / Section Level A Presentation to the University’s Managers’ Group Robert McCormack, Director, Planning Services.

Sub-theme Three The Self-Assessment Process and Embedding QA into the Life of an Institution by Terry Miosi, Ph.D. UAE Qualification Framework Project.

Karen Thomson Jacqui McKechnie Douglas Forbes.  Widening access  Progression and retention figures  Scores on national key performance indicators (NSS.

Monash University Library Quality Cycle EXCELLENCE AND DIVERSITY and LEADING THE WAY Monash University’s strategic framework and overall directions MONASH.

Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.

DEVELOPING AND SHARING RESOURCES Embedding Learning Development to enhance student experience.

Streamlined NCATE Visits Donna M. Gollnick Senior Vice President, NCATE 2008 AACTE Annual Meeting.

SACS Coordinators Meeting Non-Academic Units Wednesday, January 9, 2013 Timothy Brophy – Director, Institutional Assessment Cheryl Gater – Director, SACS.

 Advancing Quality in Higher Education  DEEWR web site  PDF – ‘A strengthened Australian Graduate Survey’

Jun 2012 Phil Aungles Director, Performance and Analysis Unit Higher Education Group DIISRTE Department perspective on the AQHE initiative and the AGS.

March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.

School Self – Evaluation

On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.

Educating Professionals - Creating and Applying Knowledge - Serving the Community UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA Evaluating programs.

TEQSA’s Evidence-based approach to regulation | Slide 1 Benchmarking – TEQSA Resources | Slide 1 Benchmarking – TEQSA Resources June 2015.

Sylvia Odell (Science Adviser) e: Alex Fleming (Secondary Science Consultant) e: David Harrison.

Program Framework Review November 2011 Pamela Miller, Ph.D. AVP for Learning.

Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.

Noel Edge Executive Director AGS Review – a brief history so far …

Educator’s view of the assessment tool. Contents Getting started Getting around – creating assessments – assigning assessments – marking assessments Interpreting.

Evaluation of Phase 2 of Choose Life Patricia Russell & Associates.

SUBMITTED TO THE HIGHER LEARNING COMMISSION OF THE NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND SCHOOLS MAY 2010 Progress Report on Outcomes Assessment.

Just before we get started… Who am I? How questions will be handled Resources available after the webinar Key QILT Dates & the AGS Item Review 2.

© Cambridge University Press 2012 THE HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT FUNCTION AREA OF STUDY 1 UNIT 4 MANAGING PEOPLE AND CHANGE CHAPTER 8 HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT.

Module 4 Week 1 Dr Carol Azumah Dennis University of Hull.

RTW Self Assessment using the 5 Steps

What Your Program Needs to Know about Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA.

Community Planning Training 8-1. Community Planning Training 8- Community Planning Training 8-2.

Evaluating your project Going beyond student satisfaction Ivan Moore RAEng, Eng SC

Work package 4 Evaluation, quality and report. Work package 4: Evaluation, quality and report Evaluation strategy: 1. Evaluation of the initial situation.

CEQ and GDS outcomes in psychology, 1994 to 2003 Steve Provost, Kerrie Dennis & Peter Wilson (SCU) Greg Hannan, Frances Martin, & Gerry Farrell (UTas)

M & E System for MI’s Training Program & Guidelines for MI’s Completion Report Presented by Monitoring and Evaluation Officer Mekong Institute January.

Deanne Gannaway BA Scoping Project The ADLTN and future directions of the BA Scoping Project: open discussion.

THE UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME AUSTRALIA 82% Graduate Employment Rate That’s what we deliver at Notre Dame.

QRP = CONTINOUS IMPROVEMENT  The QRP was developed collaboratively with all WI Technical Colleges and the WI Technical College System state office as.

Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence Development, Validation, Implementation and Enhancement for a Voluntary Protection.

Institutional development and evaluation 09. June 2016.

Assessment Committee Meeting Continuous Program Improvement

Learning and teaching – lessons 3 School culture 4

Performance indicators and funding

Institution Name.

Presented by Planning & Research

The Web and Using the VTAC Analysis Tool

Presented by Planning & Research

Learning Strategies WHO BELIEVES: ACADEMIC ADVISING IS TEACHING

Presented by Planning & Research

Presentation transcript:

Leading a Course Review

Summary Evaluation of Second Module

Outcomes Interpret key performance indicators for annual course review (ACR) Work with course team to identify course strengths and devise strategies to maintain them Work with course team to identify course areas for improvement and devise strategies to address them

Learning & Teaching Performance Fund (LTPF) Graduate Destination Survey (GDS) FT employment FT/PT further study Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) Good Teaching Scale (GTS) Generic Skills Scale (GSS) Overall Satisfaction Item (OSI) Student Progress Rates (pass rates) Student Retention Rates Commencing Total

LTPF Results / – ?

LTPF – Comparative Outcomes 2007 to 2008 SCEABLEHAEH Student satisfaction Generic Skills  (-)  (-) (-) Good Teaching  (-)  (  ) (-)  (-) Overall Satisfaction  (-)  (  ) (  )  (  ) Outcomes Full-time employment (-)  (-) (  )  (-) Further FT & PT study  (-)  (  )  (-) Success All Bachelor progress (-) ()() ()() ()() Commencing progress (  )  (  ) ()() ()() (-) No change; (  ) improved against 2007; (  ) declined against 2007

The Need for Course Review! AUQA Cycle 1 Recommendation Course Review Policy developed by a working party based on LTPF indicators and eVALUate Endorsed by UAB Dec 2006 for implementation in 2007 Data readily available through Planning and Quality Information Reportal at

Task In groups of 4, review the course data and prepare an ACR Report –Use Tables 1 – 19 in Bachelor of Example –Additional Course Summary Report –Additional Distribution of Scores Report