X’ =  (x – vt) y’ = y z’ = z t’ =  (t – vx/c 2 ) where   1/(1 - v 2 /c 2 ) 1/2 Lorentz Transformation Problem: A rocket is traveling in the positive.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
O’ O X’ X Z’ Z 5. Consequences of the Lorentz transformation
Advertisements

Classical Relativity Galilean Transformations
Time dilation D.3.1Describe the concept of a light clock. D.3.2Define proper time interval. D.3.3Derive the time dilation formula. D.3.4Sketch and annotate.
Classical Doppler Shift Anyone who has watched auto racing on TV is aware of the Doppler shift. As a race car approaches the camera, the sound of its engine.
Postulates of Special Relativity The Relativity Postulate –The laws of physics are the same in every inertial reference frame The Speed of Light Postulate.
Theory of Special Relativity
Physics 3 for Electrical Engineering Ben Gurion University of the Negev
1 Special Relativity (Ch 37) Modern physics special relativity quantum mechanics Both were developed to explain the “few remaining puzzles” of classical.
SPECIAL RELATIVITY -Postulates of Special Relativity -Relativity of time –> time dilation -Relativity of length –> length contraction © 2005.
Principle of special relativity Their is inconsistency between EM and Newtonian mechanics, as discussed earlier Einstein proposed SR to restore the inconsistency.
PHY 1371Dr. Jie Zou1 Chapter 39 Relativity (Cont.)
PH 103 Dr. Cecilia Vogel Lecture 14 Review Outline  Consequences of Einstein’s postulates  time dilation  simultaneity  Einstein’s relativity  1.
Special Relativity & General Relativity
Lecture 14 Space-time diagrams (cont) ASTR 340 Fall 2006 Dennis Papadopoulos.
Special Relativity Classical Relativity 1,000,000 ms -1 ■ How fast is Spaceship A approaching Spaceship B? ■ Both Spaceships see the other approaching.
Quiz Question What is an “intertial” reference frame? A.One in which an object is observed to have no acceleration when no forces act on it. B.One in.
2. Einstein's postulates in special theory of relativity
Chapter 29 Relativity.
IB Physics – Relativity Relativity Lesson 2 1.Time dilation 2.Lorentz Factor 3.Proper time 4.Lorentz contraction 5.Proper length 6.Twin paradox and symmetric.
A lecture series on Relativity Theory and Quantum Mechanics The Relativistic Quantum World University of Maastricht, Sept 24 – Oct 15, 2014 Marcel Merk.
The Death of High Mass Stars. Quiz #8 On the H-R diagram, a high mass star that is evolving off the main sequence will become redder in color and have.
Muons are short-lived subatomic particles that can be produced in accelerators or when cosmic rays hit the upper atmosphere. A muon at rest has a lifetime.
Twin Paradox The Theory of Relativity. About Relativity As an object approaches the speed of light, time slows down. (Moving clocks are slow) (Moving.
PH 301 Dr. Cecilia Vogel Lecture 4. Review Outline  Lorentz transformation  simultaneity  twin paradox  Consequences of Einstein’s postulates  length.
Special Theory of Relativity
Special relativity.
Special Theory of Relativity Space and Time. Inertial reference frames Reference frames in which Newton’s first law is valid. –In other words, a reference.
Phy107 Fall From last time… Galilean Relativity –Laws of mechanics identical in all inertial ref. frames Einstein’s Relativity –All laws of physics.
The Theory of Special Relativity Ch 26. Two Theories of Relativity Special Relativity (1905) –Inertial Reference frames only –Time dilation –Length Contraction.
Time Dilation We can illustrate the fact that observers in different inertial frames may measure different time intervals between a pair of events by considering.
Special Theory of Relativity Einstein pondered the question, “If I could ride a beam of light, what would I see?” Meaning, if a car moved at the speed.
Physics 2170 – Spring Special relativity Homework solutions are on CULearn Remember problem solving sessions.
Education Physics Deparment UNS
Consequences of Lorentz Transformation. Bob’s reference frame: The distance measured by the spacecraft is shorter Sally’s reference frame: Sally Bob.
Physics Lecture 2 1/26/ Andrew Brandt Monday January 26, 2009 Dr. Andrew Brandt 1.Special Relativity 2.Galilean Transformations 3.Time.
Einstein’s theory of special relativity makes some very bizarre and counter-intuitive predictions. Anything that violates common sense like this must.
Einstein’s theory of special relativity makes some very bizarre and counter-intuitive predictions. Anything that violates common sense like this must.
Astronomy 1143 – Spring 2014 Lecture 18: Special Relativity.
Phy 107 Fall From Last Time Physics changed drastically in the early 1900’s Relativity one of the new discoveries –Changed the way we think about.
Monday, Feb. 9, 2015PHYS , Spring 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #6 Monday, Feb. 9, 2015 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Relativistic Velocity.
My Chapter 26 Lecture.
1 Relativity  H3: Relativistic kinematics  Time dilation  Length contraction.
Unit 13 Relativity.
Consequences of Special Relativity Simultaneity: Newton’s mechanics ”a universal time scale exists that is the same for all observers” Einstein: “No universal.
Special Relativity Physics 102: Lecture 28 Make sure your grade book entries are correct.
Spacetime diagrams can help you to visualize relativity. They are similar to scale diagrams and freebody diagrams.
Mon. Jan. 28 – Physics Lecture #4 Relativity – Basic Postulates 0) Quiz 1) Basic Postulates 2) Relative velocities 3) Light Clocks 4) Comparing time between.
1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #5 Wednesday, Sept. 11, 2013 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Time Dilation & Length Contraction Relativistic Velocity Addition Twin Paradox.
1 1.Time Dilation 2.Length Contraction 3. Velocity transformation Einstein’s special relativity: consequences.
Time Dilation. Relative Time  Special relativity predicts that events seen as simultaneous by one observer are not simultaneous to an observer in motion.
Consequences of Relativism SPH4U. Wind Back the Clock Two consequences of relativism discussed: To a stationary observer, time appears to slow down in.
Galileo’s Relativity: Text: The laws of mechanics are the same in all inertial reference frames. More general: The laws of mechanics are the same in all.
Relativity. Historical Development 1600s Newton discovered his laws of mechanics Applied to a wide variety of problems over the next two decades Worked.
By: Jennifer Doran. What was Known in 1900 Newton’s laws of motion Maxwell’s laws of electromagnetism.
There is no universal, ‘absolute’ time in relativity Einstein postulated that the velocity of light c is the same for all observers. That led to the consequence.
Key Areas covered The speed of light in a vacuum is the same for all observers. The constancy of the speed of light led Einstein to postulate that measurements.
RELATIVITY A Special Topic in Physics at Bow High School
Problem: A rocket travels away from earth at constant speed v to planet Q. The trip takes 100 years, as measured on earth but only 25 years as measured.
Some places where Special Relativity is needed
Wacky Implications of Relativity
PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #6
Problem: A rocket travels away from earth at constant speed v to planet Q. The trip takes 100 years, as measured on earth but only 25 years as measured.
General Physics (PHY 2140) Lecture 25 Modern Physics Relativity
Classical Physics “Inertial Reference Frame” (Section 5.2):
Lorentz Transformation
Einstein’s Relativity Part 2
RELATIVITY III SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY
Time Dilation Observer O is on the ground
Key Areas covered The speed of light in a vacuum is the same for all observers. The constancy of the speed of light led Einstein to postulate that measurements.
Physics 1161: PreLecture 26 Special Relativity 1.
Presentation transcript:

x’ =  (x – vt) y’ = y z’ = z t’ =  (t – vx/c 2 ) where   1/(1 - v 2 /c 2 ) 1/2 Lorentz Transformation Problem: A rocket is traveling in the positive x-direction away from earth at speed 0.3c; it leaves earth (x = x’= 0) at t = t’= 0. An observer on earth measures the rocket to be at x 1 at time t 1 =x 1 /(0.3c). What are the corresponding positions and times in the rocket’s frame?  = 1/( ) 1/2 = 1/(1-0.09) 1/2 = 1/0.91 1/2 = x 1 ’ = [x 1 - (0.3c)(x 1 /0.3c)] = 0 (obviously!) t 1 ’ = [t 1 – (0.3c)x 1 /c 2 ] = t 1 [ ] = 0.95t 1 t 1 ’ < t 1 : Less time passed in the “moving frame” (i.e. the frame which moved with the event so “x’ did not change in this frame”) than in the “stationary frame” (i.e. the frame in which x is observed to change).

Time Dilation: Suppose Jack and Jill are in different frames, moving at speed v with respect to each other. Jill uses her clock to measure the time interval between two events:  t Jill = t Jill (2) - t Jill (1) that she observes to occur at the same place:  x Jill = x Jill (2) - x Jill (1) = 0. Note that she has no difficulty in measuring the times of these events, since she can put a clock right next to the event, which is stationary in her frame. Jack sees the event (and Jill’s clock) as moving, so sees the two events as taking place at different values of x: x Jack (2)  x Jack (1). Taking Jack as the primed frame and Jill as the unprimed, and using the time Eqtn.:  t Jack = t Jack (2) – t Jack (1) =  [t Jill (2) – t Jill (1) –v(x Jill (2)-x Jill (1))/c 2 ] =  t Jill v event that is stationary in Jill’s frame

 t Jack =  t Jill Jill’s time interval is called the proper time interval: The proper time interval is the one measured by an observer who sees the events as occurring at the same location. Then for any other frame (e.g. Jack’s) moving at speed v with respect to the proper time frame,  t =  t proper.

What is going on? Einstein demonstrated this with the following “Gedanken” (thought) experiment: Jill (O’) is riding in a train moving at speed v with respect to Jack (O). She measures the time it takes for a pulse of light to go from her hand to a mirror on the ceiling and back to her hand. Since she hasn’t moved her hand, she measures the proper time:  t proper = 2d/c. Jack sees the light traveling along the diagonals, so a longer distance: 2[d 2 + (v  t Jack /2) 2 ] 1/2. Since both observers measure the same speed of light, Jack measures a time interval  t Jack = 2 [d 2 + (v  t Jack /2) 2 ] 1/2 /c

 t proper = 2d/c  t Jack = 2 [d 2 + (v  t Jack /2) 2 ] 1/2 / c (  t Jack ) 2 = 4 [d 2 + (v  t Jack /2) 2 ]/c 2 (1-v 2 /c 2 ) (  t Jack ) 2 = 4d 2 /c 2 = (  t proper ) 2  t Jack =  t proper / (1-v 2 /c 2 ) 1/2  t Jack =   t proper Note that we have shown this for Jack’s “light clocks”, but by the relativity postulate, it must be true for any “clock” (e.g. pendulum, quartz crystal, heart beat, earth rotation, radioactive decay, ….). If not, Jack could compare this other clock to the light clock to determine that he was moving, in contradiction to the relativity postulate.  = 1/(1-v 2 /c2)1/2  1  A clock that is moving so that it can measure the interval between two events at the same location (the proper time clock) always runs more slowly (measures less time) than other clocks, for which the events occur at different locations: Time Dilation [or: a moving clock runs more slowly than a stationary clock]

But   1 / (1-v 2 /c 2 ) 1/2 is very close to 1 unless v  c, so not observed in “everyday” events. v/c  x x x Time Dilation:  t =   t proper

Time Dilation:  t =   t proper has been confirmed many times with extreme precision for a large range of speeds. (For example, the precision of GPS devices utilize time dilation.) One of the first examples was the observation that the lifetime of moving muons was much longer than the lifetime of stationary muons: In the lab, stationary muons have a “proper” lifetime  proper = 2.2  s. Yet muons created when cosmic ray particles hit the top of our atmosphere can make it all the way to ground: since v L/c, where L  the thickness of the atmosphere: L  4.8 km; i.e.  > 16  s. Problem: How fast must a muon be traveling (with respect to an observer on earth) to have a lifetime of 17  s?  = 17  s =   proper =  (2.2  s)   = 17/2.2 = / (1-v 2 /c 2 ) 1/2 = 7.7 (1-v 2 /c 2 ) 1/2 = 1/7.7 = v 2 /c 2 = = v 2 /c 2 = v/c = 0.992

Problem: Jack and Jill are twins. While Jack stays at home on earth, Jill takes a trip on a spacecraft that travels at 0.95c [no such spacecraft exists yet!] to a planet 40 light years away, and then immediately turns around and comes back to earth at 0.95c. How much do Jack and Jill each age during this trip?

Let d = 40 light years, v = 0.95c. The distance Jill travels = 2d = 80 light years. Therefore, as measured on earth,  t earth =  t Jack = 2d/v = 80 light year/(0.95c)  t Jack = 84.2 years Since, in Jill’s frame, earth and the planet are moving to/from her, Jill measures the proper time:  t Jill =  t Jack / , where  = 1/[1-(v/c) 2 ] 1/2 = 1/( ) 1/2 = 1/ /2 = 3.20  t Jill = 84.2 years/3.20 = 26.3 years. Therefore, Jill will be younger than Jack when she returns! They can compare their bodies and see the difference. Jill Jack

 t Jack = 84.2 years and  t Jill = 26.3 years. Therefore, Jill will be younger than Jack when she returns! They can compare their bodies and see the difference. Wait a minute, cries Jill! How do you know I was moving. I think I was sitting at rest in my spacecraft while the earth (and Jack) hurtled away from me at 0.95c and then returned at 0.95c. Therefore, I should end up older than Jack! But when they get together, they can compare bodies and see who is older: this is the so-called “twin-paradox” In fact, Jill’s analysis is mistaken: she can determine that she was moving because she had to turn around, which means that she needed to accelerate at some point in her trip and therefore feel a force. Jack, on the other hand, did not feel any forces during her trip. A correct analysis of the time in Jill’s “accelerating frame” requires general relativity, with the result that  t Jack = 84.2 years and  t Jill = 26.3 years (as Jack concluded in his stationary, and non-accelerating frame).

Problem: A GPS satellite orbits the earth with a velocity  3900 m/s. Suppose the satellite broadcasts a timing signal with a separation T. What is the fractional change in the period of the signal as measured on earth?

Problem: A GPS satellite orbits the earth with a velocity  3900 m/s. Suppose the satellite broadcasts a radio signal with a separation T. What is the fractional change in the period of the signal as measured on earth? The satellite is in the proper frame. T earth =  T satellite [T earth – T satellite ] / T satellite =  - 1  = {1 – [(3900) /(3x10 8 )] 2 } -1/2 = { 1 – (1.3 x10 -5 ) 2 } -1/2   1 + ½ (1.3 x ) 2   x Therefore, [T earth – T satellite ] / T satellite  8.5 x While this effect seems tiny, it is cumulative. In one day, if the clock were not adjusted, it would amount to a timing error  T(1day) = (8.6 x 10 4 s)(8.5 x ) = 7  s, and therefore a position error  d = c  T(1day) = 2 km! [This is only the Special Relativity shift; there is also a larger shift (with opposite sign) in clock rate due to General Relativity: the net error would be 38  s/day.]

Problem: A rocket travels away from earth at constant speed v to planet Q. The trip takes 100 years, as measured on earth but only 25 years as measured on the rocket. What is v? Solution: The rocket measures the proper time:  t rocket =  t proper = 25 y. Therefore  t earth = 100 y =  t rocket  =  t earth /  t rocket =100/25 = 4  v/c = Note that, as measured on earth, the distance from earth to Q must be  x earth = (0.968c) x 100 y  x earth = 96.8 lightyears However, the distance from earth to Q as measured in the rocket must be  x rocket = (0.968c) x 25 y  x rocket = 24.2 lightyears That is,  x rocket =  x earth / 

 x rocket =  x earth /  Note that the earth observer is at rest with respect to Q and the earth, so can take his/her time in measuring the distance between them; we say that the earth observer measures the “proper length”. So any other observer measures a smaller length: Length contraction (or Lorentz contraction) :  x =  x proper /  Proper time: the time interval between two events measured by the observer who sees them happening at the same location. Proper length: The length of an object (or distance between two points) measured by an observer who is at rest with respect to the object (or the two points). In general, the proper length and proper time are not measured by the same observer!