1 WBS 1 Preparation for FDRs NCSX WBS 1 Engineering Meeting March 17, 2003 What establishes the plan? What are near term deliverables? How will we status.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lab 09: Performance Test 1 Advanced Energy Vehicle.
Advertisements

Widget Project Update Team member1 Team member2 Team member3 Team member4 October 8, 2011.
NCSX Vacuum Vessel Overview Paul Goranson WBS 12 Manager Vacuum Vessel Manufacturing Study Kickoff meeting April 29, 2003.
CEA DSM Irfu - Bernard GASTINEAU - R3B Technical Board Meeting -April 4, Reactions with Relativistic Radioactive ions Beams GSI Large Acceptance.
RFCC Module Update Derun Li Center for Beam Physics LBNL, Berkeley, CA MICO Weekly Phone Meeting March 21, 2011.
Trip Report on the visit to ICST of HIT, Harbin, China Derun Li Mike Green Steve Virostek Mike Zisman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (from December.
MICE Collaboration meeting at CERN March 28 – April 1, 2004 MICE Cooling Channel --- AFC Module work group report Wing Lau – Oxford.
RF Cavity / Coupling Coil Module
LSU 07/07/2004Communication1 Communication & Documentation Project Management Unit – Lecture 8.
First-Year Engineering Program Performance Test 1: Design Concept Comparisons Objective and Goals Lab Procedure Analysis Test Readiness Review.
Project Management Considerations B. Nelson US ITER TBM Meeting INEL August 11, 2005.
NCSX Metrology 1/7/04. Short term purchase recommendation Buy the Spatial Analyzer Software package –This software will be the user interface for operating.
ITER In-Vessel Coils (IVC) Interim Design Review PDR Checklist Items C Neumeyer July 28, 2010 July 26-28, 20101ITER_D_3MAZCX.
ASPERA-3 Sep. 25, 00 Monthly Status Report ASPERA Monthly Status ReportMonthly 9_25/ Page 1 Monthly Status Report Report due 9/25/00 Schedule statused.
VST: dome THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS Ing. Davide Fierro THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS.
ASPERA-3 April. 25, 01 Monthly Status Report ASPERA Monthly Status ReportMonthly 4_25/ Page 1 Monthly Status Report Report due 4/25/01 Schedule statused.
Product Development Chapter 6. Definitions needed: Verification: The process of evaluating compliance to regulations, standards, or specifications.
ITER In-Vessel Coils (IVC) Interim Design Review Introduction C Neumeyer July 26, 2010 July 26-28, 20101ITER_D_3F7XHR.
Rev. 0 CONFIDENTIAL Mod.19 02/00 Rev.2 Mobile Terminals S.p.A. Trieste Author: M.Fragiacomo, D.Protti, M.Torelli 31 Project Idea Feasibility.
Project Status Report Presenter Name Presentation Date.
ISM 5316 Week 3 Learning Objectives You should be able to: u Define and list issues and steps in Project Integration u List and describe the components.
1 WBS 1 Design Analysis Status NCSX Analysis Meeting Dec 3, 2003.
Project Schedule PLAN IT!. Project Schedule Project Schedule is based on Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) Define the WBS correctly or the Project Schedule.
NCSX NCSX Design Review Guide May 27, 2005 Wayne Reiersen NCSX.
Hall 180 Cryogenic test facility: Project management: Project Change Request, EVM and Interface Sheet L. Serio.
12/2/04Module 2D1 The NCSX Engineering Web – An Overview Part IV Engineering Management & Systems Engineering and Other.
SC Project Review of NCSX, April 8-10, 2008 NCSX Coil Services P.L. Goranson Work Package 161.
M. Gilchriese - April 2001 Disk Sector Status. M. Gilchriese - April Technical Status Three prototypes to current dimensions(8-sector disks) except.
NCSX A. Brooks, P. Fogarty, G. Lovett, D. Williamson June 3, 2005 Modular Coil Type-C Final Design Review – Part II.
NCSX VACUUM VESSEL PL Goranson Thermal Insulation Final Design Review July 31, 2006 WBS12 NCSX.
THE PROJECT LIFE CYCLE PROJECT MANAGEMENT LIFE CYCLE LSU 01/18/2005 PROJECT LIFE CYCLE 1.
Metrology Milestones Metrology Task Force –Vacuum vessel manufacture - P. Goranson –Mod. Coil Form manufacture - D. Williamson –Mod. Coil winding- S. Raftopoulos.
Progress to Date PPPL Advisory Board Meeting May 20101NSTX Upgrade – R. L. Strykowsky CD-0 Approved February 2009 The NSTX Upgrade Project organization.
12/2/2004Module 2A1 The NCSX Engineering Web – An Overview Part I Work Planning, Project Files, Management Plans and Procedures.
NCSX NCSX TF Coil Procurement 1 February 3, 2006 Michael Kalish NCSX TF Coil Procurement.
NCSX Systems Engineering Management Plan Peer Review Bob Simmons May 15, 2003.
ITER- TBM Planning and Costing Activity DCLL TBM Mechanical Design ( ) & TBM-Port Interface ( ) Presented by Mo Dagher December
Critical Design Review (CDR)
NCSX Field Period Assembly (FPA) Operations, Cost and Schedule, Staffing, and Metrology Utilization Mike Viola Field Period Assembly Manager NCSX FPA Peer.
11/2/2005Mike Viola1 November Lehman Review November 2, 2005 NCSX VVSA NCSX Vacuum Vessel Fabrication Major Tool and Machine – S F 3 120° segments.
F. Dahlgren -SC Project Review of NCSX, April 8-10, 2008 PF, TF, & Trim Coil Supports (WBS-15) Core Base Support Structure (WBS-17) F. Dahlgren NCSX Coil.
NCSX Field Period Assembly (FPA) Operations, Cost and schedule, staffing, and metrology utilization Mike Viola Field Period Assembly Manager NCSX FPA Peer.
Reproduction interdite © ALMA EUROPEAN CONSORTIUM Reproduction forbidden Design, Manufacture, Transport and Integration in Chile of ALMA Antennas Page.
NCSX Data Management Plan Peer Review Bob Simmons March 31, 2003.
SC Project Review of NCSX, April 8-10, 2008 NCSX Machine Assembly E. D. Perry.
How the NCSX Project Does Business
Strykowsky 1Project Review November 2, 2005 NCSX Project Review November 2, 2005 Cost and Schedule Ron Strykowsky.
1 Assembly Tooling PU Workshop on NCSX Cost & Schedule Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Princeton, NJ Mar 1-4, 2007 T. Brown Princeton Plasma Physics.
September 10, FY 2003 Plans Bob Simmons. September 10, Introduction Overview of Project and Engineering Plans Project Plans Engineering Plans.
NCSX Interface Control Management Plan and Implementing Procedure 003 Peer Review December 19, 2002.
NCSX VACUUM VESSEL PL Goranson Final Design Review November 17, 2005 Man Access Port /Lateral Supports NCSX.
Field Period Assembly Wayne Reiersen SC Project Review PPPL May 2006.
12/2/04Module 2C1 The NCSX Engineering Web – An Overview Part III Design Data, Fabrication, Assembly, and Installation Plans.
NCSX 21 March 2003 Reiersen - 1 PDR Preparations Wayne Reiersen NCSX Engineering Meeting 21 March 2003.
DRAFT Cost and schedule, staffing, metrology utilization 10 AM October 12, 2006 Mike Viola Field Period Assembly Manager.
NCSX Document and Records Plan Peer Review Bob Simmons March 14, 2003.
Preparations for working on Station 1 November 22, 2005.
NCSX Strykowsky 1Cost and Schedule Rebaseline April 25, 2005 NCSX Project Re-baseline Review April 25, 2005 Cost and Schedule Ron Strykowsky.
Strykowsky 1Office of Science Review August 15, 2007 Office of Science Project Review NCSX August 15-17, 2007 Cost and Schedule Ron Strykowsky.
NCSX VVSA / MCWF FDR A Systems Engineering Perspective Wayne Reiersen Bob Simmons NCSX VVSA / MCWF FDR May 19-20, 2004 PPPL.
Collaborating for Quality Quality Assurance (QA) & Quality Control (QC) in the Accelerator Project (ACCSYS) Matthew Conlon ACCSYS QA/QC
LCLS-II Prototype Cryomodule Vacuum Vessel and HGRP Tom Peterson 4 December 2014 Design Review.
1 CD-2 ECP Preparations What is Needed. 2 Background As part of the CD-2 process, we need to establish a fully supported and documented cost and schedule.
NCSX Strykowsky 1Independent Project Review (IPR) June 8-9, 2004 NCSX Project Review June 8-9, 2004 Cost, Schedule, and Project Controls Ron Strykowsky.
Collaborating for Quality through the Project Quality Plan Matthew Conlon ESS ACCSYS QA/QC Quality Learning & Planning.
Accelerator Readiness Review October 31, 2006
2K CB FDR Overview:  Agenda, Charge, Review Process
External Independent Review (EIR)
First Article Inspection
Project Management Considerations
Presentation transcript:

1 WBS 1 Preparation for FDRs NCSX WBS 1 Engineering Meeting March 17, 2003 What establishes the plan? What are near term deliverables? How will we status our progress each week? What about additional reviews?

2 What establishes the plan?  All activities have been planned via WAFs and included in master schedule ( Ron Strykowski )  A separate list of deliverables compiled for WBS 12 and WBS 14  cross check with plans  provides more resolution on goals

3 What are near term activities?  Vacuum Vessel  PVVS fabrication by Rohwedder and Major Tool  Weld joint R&D  Final design and FDR for VVSA – May 19  VVSA procurement  Modular Coils  Prototype winding form R&D  Material property R&D  Winding / potting R&D  Twisted Racetrack Coil testing  Final design and FDR for winding forms – May 20  Winding form procurement  Field period assembly – tooling, metrology  Conventional Coils – preliminary design, analysis, procurement options  Global analyses – field errors, seismic, etc.

4  Requirements documents – SRD or B-specs  Configuration definition – basic design  Specs – Build-to or C-specs  Scale models – STL or other  Interface control documents (ICDs)  Pro-E models and drawings  Analysis reports  Manufacturing Development (R&D)  Manufacturing Procedures (MIT/QA plans, readiness reviews)  Assembly procedures  Other documents – FMECA, RAM plan  Cost and Schedule update  FDR preparations – Design description, presentations What are the types of deliverables?

5 WBS 12 deliverables

6 WBS 14 Deliverables

7 We will status the plan weekly at WBS 1 mtg.  Plan sent out prior to meeting  Each player on plan reports progress  If intended schedule is not on track, don’t wait for meeting to report  Plan can change if necessary, but certain dates must be met:  VVSA FDR – May 19  Mod coil FDR – May 20  VVSA procurement package – May 26  Mod coil winding form procurement package – June 10

8 There are additional reviews prior to FDR  The design needs to work, and we need to agree that it will, so we need to review the work as it is accomplished  Review plan will exist on the web

9 Summary  There is a lot to do before the external final design reviews  Work is planned via  WAFs  Master schedule  Deliverables list attempts to define what constitutes completion of a task – please review your deliverables  Additional internal reviews planned to ensure the design works  We need to keep our eye on completing the deliverables, try not to get distracted by the inevitable what-if studies