Sustaining and Spreading Surgical Safety Improvements with SUSP Mike Rosen, PhD Elizabeth Wick, MD ARMSTRONG INSTITUTE FOR PATIENT SAFETY AND QUALITY.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© 2009 On the CUSP: STOP BSI Physician Engagement.
Advertisements

A Look Back AHQPSC - Spread and Sustainability Learning Series.
Building Your SUSP Team Part II
Healthcare Safety: How will your next patient be injured?
Learning Objectives Review the impact of errors and patient harm and the underlying causes of errors Show how CUSP supports other quality and safety tools.
What’s Next? So You’ve Decided to Implement – Brenda Sprite, MLIR, PMP, CSM and Founder Organizational Change Leadership Practice.
Learning Objectives Review key steps of the CUSP Toolkit
1 Surgical Unit-Based Safety Program Proposed Resources for Partnership for Patients Terri Conner, Ph.D. Nybeck Analytics Partnership for Patients.
Learning Objectives Define roles and responsibilities of team members
Implementation Planning. T EAM STEPPS 05.2 Mod Page 2 Implementation Planning Objectives  Describe the steps involved in implementing TeamSTEPPS.
On the CUSP: STOP BSI Physician Engagement. Immersion Call Overview 1.Project overview 2.Science of Improving Patient Safety 3.Eliminating CLABSI 4.The.
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 Team Leadership Behaviors Michael A. Rosen, PhD Assistant Professor,
DRAFT – final pending AHRQ approval Kristina Weeks, MHS, DrPH(c) January 13, 2015 Designing and Using Scorecard for SUSPtainability 1.
CSTS: The Cardiovascular Surgical Translational Study Senior Leadership of Quality and Safety Initiatives in Health Care Peter J. Pronovost, MD, PhD The.
SUSP: Improving Surgical Care through TRIP and CUSP
THIS PRESENTATION/PUBLICATION/ OR OTHER PRODUCT IS DERIVED FROM WORK SUPPORTED UNDER A CONTRACT WITH THE AGENCY FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH AND QUALITY (AHRQ)
Building Your CUSP Team Part I Michael Rosen, PhD August 28, 2012 Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality Conference Number(s):
Morning Briefings and Huddles
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 Sustaining and Spreading surgical safety improvements with SUSP Mike.
LEARN FROM A DEFECT Emily Pasola RN, MSN, CNL Clinical Nurse Leader Surgical Intensive Care Unit Saint Joseph Mercy Hospital Ann Arbor, Michigan.
NICU CLABSI Affinity Group Meeting May 9, 2012
Everyone Has A Role and Responsibility
Hawaii Surgical Unit Safety Program: The Journey Begins with the Comprehensive Unit-Based Safety Program May 21, 2013 Della M. Lin, M.D.
Welcome to the GHA Infection Prevention Power Hour January 17, 2013 Denise M. Flook, RN, MPH, CIC Georgia Hospital Association
BC NSQIP SITE ASSESSMENT SUMMARY FINDINGS SURGICAL QUALITY ACTION NETWORK MEETING FEBRUARY 18 TH 2015.
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 CUSP for VAP Adaptive CUSP Sustainability Sustainment and Spread David.
OPERATING ROOM DASHBOARD Virginia Chard, RN, BSN, CNOR
© 2009 On the CUSP: STOP BSI Building a Team. © 2009 Learning Objectives To understand the central importance of your ICU quality improvement team To.
1 Reducing Healthcare Associated Infections (HAI): Barriers and Challenges MHA Keystone Center for Patient Safety and Quality (MHA Keystone) Chris George,
DRAFT – final pending AHRQ approval 1 Deep-Rooting Your Data Liza Wick, MD Deb Hobson, RN.
Learning Objectives 2 2 Explain the role of the senior executive in addressing technical and adaptive work Identify characteristics to search for when.
Performing an SSI Investigation Deb Hobson, RN BSN 1.
Physician Engagement. Learning Objectives To relate what is meant by physician engagement To discuss strategies at management and staff levels to enhance.
Building Your SUSP Team Part I Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality.
CUSP 4 MVP – VAP Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Content 1: Science of Safety & Identifying Defects ARMSTRONG INSTITUTE FOR PATIENT.
Building a Team. Slide 2 Immersion Call Overview Week 1: Project overview Week 2: Science of Improving Patient Safety Week 3: Eliminating CLABSI Week.
December 3, 2014 Lauren Benishek, PhD & Sallie Weaver, PhD
CSTS Staff Empowerment Christine A. Goeschel ScD MPA MPS RN.
DRAFT – final pending AHRQ approval Kristina Weeks, MHS, DrPH(c) June 3, 2014 Designing and Using Scorecard for SUSPtainability.
The Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program (CUSP)
NEXT STEPS Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality 1.
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2012 Optional SUSP Tools: Briefing Audits, Morning Huddle, and Shadowing.
Science of Safety and Identifying Defects CUSP 4 MVP-VAP Content Call, Module #2.
CUSP 4 MVP – VAP Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Revisiting Science of Safety & Identifying Defects ARMSTRONG INSTITUTE FOR PATIENT.
Lessons from CUSP/CLABSI – Getting to Zero and Sustaining your Improvements On the CUSP: Stop BSI Jill Marsteller, PhD, MPP Armstrong Institute for Patient.
DRAFT – final pending AHRQ approval Perform an SSI Investigation Deb Hobson, RN BSN March 10 & 12,
Getting to Zero and Sustaining Success: The Virginia Experience Barbara Brown, Vice President Virginia Hospital and Healthcare Association May 8, 2012.
Interpreting Safety Culture Survey Data and Using Results for Improvement Sallie J. Weaver, PhD.
AHRQ Safety Program For Long-Term Care: HAIs/CAUTI Module 1: Using the Comprehensive Long-Term Care Safety Toolkit: Applying Safety Principles.
Deep-rooting your data CUSP FOR SAFE SURGERY: SURGICAL UNIT-BASED SAFETY PROGRAM (SUSP) Elizabeth Wick, MD November 11, 2014.
Small Rural/CAH Learning Community Meeting May 23, 2012 Denise Flook, RN, MPH, CIC HAI Collaborative Lead Vice President, Infection Prevention/Staff Engagement.
© 2009 On the CUSP: STOP BSI Nurse Empowerment Christine A. Goeschel RN MPA MPS ScD (candidate) Tennessee Center for Patient Safety December 2, 2009.
Nurse Empowerment On the CUSP: Stop BSI
Sustaining Your Gains.  Up to 70% of change initiatives fail, impacting: › Best possible care › Staff and provider frustration › Reluctance to engage.
Staff Safety Assessment 1. Learning Objectives To understand Step 2 of CUSP:Identify Defects To understand how to Implement the Staff Safety Assessment.
AHRQ Safety Program for Long-Term Care: HAIs/CAUTI Long-Term Care Safety Toolkit: Building a Culture of Safety National Content Webinar April 16, 2015.
Results of Quarterly Team Update Interviews Kisha Ali, MS Donna Farley, PhD, MPH August 8, 2013.
Engaging Senior Executives in SUSP Work Mike Rosen, PhD and Liza Wick, MD December 9 and December 11, 2013.
Spread and Sustainability Robert A. Gabbay, MD, PhD Connie Sixta, PhD, RN, MBA.
Identifying Defects Chris Goeschel June Identifying Defects What DO you know? What SHOULD you know?
© 2009 On the CUSP: STOP BSI Senior Leadership of Quality and Safety Initiatives in Health Care.
Plans for Phase III of Transition Age Youth Initiative.
AHRQ Safety Program for Improving Antibiotic Use
AHRQ Safety Program for Improving Antibiotic Use
Staff Safety Assessment
Getting Started with Your Malnutrition Quality Improvement Project
SUSP Sustainability Pre-Mortem
Staff Safety Assessment
Celebrating Success and Making a Plan for Sustainability
Presentation transcript:

Sustaining and Spreading Surgical Safety Improvements with SUSP Mike Rosen, PhD Elizabeth Wick, MD ARMSTRONG INSTITUTE FOR PATIENT SAFETY AND QUALITY

Polling Question #1 What is your current role? Surgeon Quality improvement practitioner Infection preventionist OR nurse OR technician Anesthesiologist OR manager Other

Objectives Define sustainment and spread Determine if you are ready to sustain Plan key actions for sustainment Prioritize needs for successful sustainment

Sustainment is… What you do to continue to build on your successes How you persist in your efforts to change culture and improve safety When you apply the process of surgical safety improvement efforts to new challenges

Adaptive or Technical? Adaptive CUSP Technical SSI’s

Why worry about sustainment? Recidivism is not pretty Failure rates Risks to sustaining progress – Staff turnover – Overlying priorities – Organizational changes

Definition of Spread 1 “Spreading takes the process from the narrow, segmented population(s) or group(s) and broadens it to include all the population(s) or group(s) that will use the process.” “Formalizing a process provides a reference to others; those new to the organization and those in the organization needing clarity about the specifics of the process.”

Polling Question #2 How ready are you to sustain? On the previous slide, how many of the boxes could you check? 0-1Not so ready yet 2-3We are still implementing 4-5We are close 6+Ready to sustain our progress

What do effective teams look like? Effective teams have: – Regular meetings – Active surgical champions who partner with others – Executive / Leadership support – Believe that progress is possible – Invent ways to create engagement (and then reinvent more ways) – Frequent communication

What sustainment strategies work? Stick to formal processes – Test changes on small scale first – Measure and make data-driven decisions Maintain access to continuous feedback – Require current data to validate progress

What sustainment strategies work? Secure time and resources – Formalize job responsibilities for SUSP and patient safety improvement—protected time for doing QI work – Dedicated financial resources and personnel – Make data support available Take care of your team – Plan for team growth and turnover – Offer highly engaged team members professional development opportunities

We are ready to sustain: Now what?  Re-administer Perioperative Staff Safety Assessment (2 question survey) every months  Complete Learning From Defects (LFD) tool at least once quarterly  Share results and stories with frontline staff  Orient all new staff to the Science of Safety  Continue updating staff on SUSP activities  Continue collaborative activities  Revisit the “right team mix” and augment needs as team and projects evolve

Preview of Pre-mortem Looking ahead to the next session- Imagine that your teams’ gains in technical and adaptive work have slipped away. You’re back where you began. Why? List all the reasons you can that would result in loss of the gains you’ve made in SUSP. Review the CUSP Pre-Mortem Tool and jot down responses

Resources Look for these resources on the SUSP Project Site Perioperative Staff Safety Assessment (PSSA) Learning from Defects through Sensemaking (LFD) Tool CUSP Pre-Mortem Tool URL: URL:

Remember, we are here to help!