SRS Calibration Part II: Dynamic Range, Signal/Noise, Pulse Shape and Timing Jitter + initial results from scan of FIT zigzag board Michael Phipps, Bob.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HBD Meeting 4/25/06 SB and BNL Crew. 4/25/06 B. Azmoun 2 Installation of HBD into PHENIX Transported HBD from USB under gas (CF4) flow (maintained ~ 1Torr.
Advertisements

INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN Fast Real-time SANS Detectors Charge Division in Individual, 1-D Position- sensitive Gas Detectors Patrick Van Esch.
X5 TEST BEAM preliminary studies Outline  Voltage scan  PLL scan + Neighbour Strips  Sensor Uniformity  Comments  Special Trigger (Friday)
LI Gain Curves Peter Litchfield Calibration Workshop, 6 th September 2005  Beginning to understand the LI system  Beginning to understand the software.
Front-end electronics for Time Projection Chamber I.Konorov Outlook:  TPC requirements  TPC readout options  Options for TPC FE chips  Prototype TPC.
TOF0 calibration The resolution in a given pixel can be measured before the absolute time calibration (see the plot) The expected total resolution of the.
CMS Physics Meeting, Dec. 6, Analysis Note on the Validation of the ORCA Simulation of the Endcap Muon CSC Front-end Electronics S. Durkin -- Ohio.
1 Analysis of TOF data Yordan Karadzhov St.Kliment Ohridski University of Sofia.
Position sensing in a GEM from charge dispersion on a resistive anode Bob Carnegie, Madhu Dixit, Steve Kennedy, Jean-Pierre Martin, Hans Mes, Ernie Neuheimer,
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
VELO ADC vs Charge Calibration Jianchun Wang April 16, 2008 This is an update to the presentation at April 11 st VELO Group Meeting. A new scan data of.
FPIX0 Electronic Test Marina Artuso Paul Gelling Jianchun Wang  The system works fine with charge injection calibration  Gain curve, threshold, and noise.
ITOP carrier amplifier test at Indiana University G. Visser 4/27/2015 (latest update) I use the recently (here) characterized JT0947 ch3 as input source.
Oct, 2000CMS Tracker Electronics1 APV25s1 STATUS Testing started beginning September 1 wafer cut, others left for probing 10 chips mounted on test boards.
FLASH Toroid Review Progress since last meeting in April Next steps Summary Johnny Ng FLASH Coll. Mtg. 7/25/03.
Performance test of STS demonstrators Anton Lymanets 15 th CBM collaboration meeting, April 12 th, 2010.
MuTr HV Optimization RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa 1.
Timing Jitter and Cross Talk in the SRS + Xray scan of FIT zigzag board Michael Phipps, Bob Azmoun, and Craig Woody 1.
Tests with JT0623 & JT0947 at Indiana University Nagoya PMT database test results for JT0623 at 3220V: This tube has somewhat higher than usual gain. 5×10.
14/02/2007 Paolo Walter Cattaneo 1 1.Trigger analysis 2.Muon rate 3.Q distribution 4.Baseline 5.Pulse shape 6.Z measurement 7.Att measurement OUTLINE.
Updates on GEMs characterization with APV electronics K. Gnanvo, N. Liyanage, K. Saenboonruang.
Chevron / Zigzag Pad Designs for Gas Trackers
GEM MINIDRIFT DETECTOR WITH CHEVRON READOUT EIC Tracking Meeting 10/6/14 B.Azmoun, BNL.
A.Chekhtman1 GLAST LAT ProjectBeam test meeting, September 27, 2006 CsI afterglow - possible explaination of pedestal drift and excess of energy. Alexandre.
Analysis chain for MAGIC Telescope data Daniel Mazin and Nadia Tonello Max-Planck-Institut für Physik München D.Mazin, N.Tonello MPI for Physics, Munich.
Hold signal Variable Gain Preamp. Variable Slow Shaper S&H Bipolar Fast Shaper 64Trigger outputs Gain correction (6 bits/channel) discriminator threshold.
1 G.Pessina, RICH Elec Upg, 11 April 2010 Analog Channels per chip4 to 8 Digital channel per chip4 to 8 Wire-bond pitch (input channels) Input capacitance.
A.Chekhtman1 GLAST LAT ProjectInstrument Analysis meeting, February, 27, 2006 CAL features and idiosyncrasies. Alexandre Chekhtman NRL/GMU Gamma-ray Large.
5 July 2010Ivo Polák, FZU, Prague LED notched fibre distributing system Calibration system for SiPM Ivo Polák, Ji ř í Kvasni č ka
Nov 2002T. Ljubicic DAQ100 Calibration Needs 10 to 8 bit (and back!) conversion table Gain correction per pad T0 correction per pad.
Trip-t testing progress report
Calibration of the gain and measurement of the noise for the apv25 electronics K. Gnanvo, N. Liyanage, C.Gu, K. Saenboonruang From INFN Italy: E. Cisbani,
FNAL Beam test results A. Zhang, V. Bhopatkar, M. Phipps, J. Twigger, M. Hohlmann HEP Group A, Florida Tech 2013/11/18.
Feature Extractor Dima Chirkin, LBNL The future is here.
DOM MB Test Results at LBNL Main Board Readiness Status Review LBNL, July 2003 Azriel Goldschmidt.
Quality control for large volume production GEM detectors Christopher Armaingaud On behalf of the collaboration GEMs for CMS.
Time and amplitude calibration of the Baikal-GVD neutrino telescope Vladimir Aynutdinov, Bair Shaybonov for Baikal collaboration S Vladimir Aynutdinov,
1 HBD Commissioning Itzhak Tserruya DC meeting, BNL December 13, 2006 Progress from October 3 to November 28, 2006.
SRS Calibration Michael Phipps, Bob Azmoun, Craig Woody 1.
Chapter No. 18 Radiation Detection and Measurements, Glenn T. Knoll, Third edition (2000), John Willey. Multichannel Pulse Analysis.
M. LefebvreATLAS LAr week, November 19th HEC-EMEC beam test data analysis Filtering weight synchronization and timing issues TDC timing Cubic timing.
Development of a pad interpolation algorithm using charge-sharing.
Testbeam analysis Lesya Shchutska. 2 beam telescope ECAL trigger  Prototype: short bars (3×7.35×114 mm 3 ), W absorber, 21 layer, 18 X 0  Readout: Signal.
TRIUMF laboratory studies Christopher Hearty University of British Columbia/IPP 27-Sep-2010.
PHOTOTUBE SCANNING SETUP AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND Doug Roberts U of Maryland, College Park.
SRS TIMING ANOMALY RD51 Mini-Week June 9, 2015 M. Phipps, BNL 1.
 13 Readout Electronics A First Look 28-Jan-2004.
June 4, 2009 STAR TPC review Estimation of TPC Aging Based on dE/dx Measurements Yuri Fisyak.
FCal Energy Scale Predictions J.Rutherfoord 9 June 2003.
Feb C.Smith UVA EC energy calibration – g13 pass0 For pass0 data were cooked with CALDB calibration constants reset to nominal 10 channels / MeV.
LED notched fibre distributing system Calibration system for SiPM
Analysis of LumiCal data from the 2010 testbeam
PreShower Characterisations
Daniel Mazin and Nadia Tonello Max-Planck-Institut für Physik München
Jinfan Chang Experimental Physics Center , IHEP Feb 18 , 2011
EZDC spectra reconstruction and calibration
Sassan Tabatabaei, Freddy Ben-Zeev and Michael Lee
techniques and studies
BNL electronics: first tests
Michael Lupberger Dorothea Pfeiffer
Power pulsing of AFTER in magnetic field
Pulse Shape Fitting Beam Test September, October CERN
A First Look J. Pilcher 12-Mar-2004
FFT analysis Goal : Energy calibration ( systematic error estimation)
The ATLAS LAr. Calibration board K. Jakobs, U. Schaefer, D. Schroff
Imperial laser system and analysis
Beam Beam electronics Block diagram disc gated disc gate disc gated
The Ohio State University USCMS EMU Meeting, FNAL, Oct. 29, 2004
CAL crosstalk issues and their implications
Gain measurements of Chromium GEM foils
Presentation transcript:

SRS Calibration Part II: Dynamic Range, Signal/Noise, Pulse Shape and Timing Jitter + initial results from scan of FIT zigzag board Michael Phipps, Bob Azmoun, Craig Woody 1

Muxgain: Signal/Noise 2 ** For better signal to noise, use Muxgain 3 (which is really Muxgain 4) - Mux 1 Mux 2 Mux 3 Mux 4 Fe55 Spectrum: Peripheral pad from highly collimated xray gun

Muxgain: Dynamic Range 3 ** For better dynamic range, use Muxgain 1 - IMUXIN of 0x01 is safest location for pedestal Fe55 spectrum across all pads for scaled Muxgains Peripheral primary peak - Scale the spectrum for each Muxgain from the mean of this peak Primary Fe55 peak in center of cluster - Falls at edge of saturation, so convenient measure of dynamic range

Nonlinearity Curves 4 Mux 1: Best dynamic rangeMux 4: Used in the past -Correct by linear fit after kink -If anyone wants the root file, just let me know

Characteristic SRS Pulse Shape: Internal APV pulser, post-nonlinearity correction 5 - Characteristic pulse shape from the APV shaper - Alexander has used this expected pulse to deconvolve FBTF signals from multiple ionization events

SRS Timing Jitter: ns? 6 UVA’s external pulser tests -Internal FEC clock has 25 ns period -Shows up as a jitter in peak timing bin relative to the trigger -Max time bin is a function of injected charge -In test beam data, these plots show broader distribution from ionization statistical effects -May be possible to partially recover absolute clock by fitting rising edge of signal and normalizing z coordinate BNL external pulser tests across virtual capacitor: similar to UVA results ~1150 ADC ~1100 ADC