MARTIN-LUTHER-UNIVERSITY HALLE-WITTENBERG Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Group Animal Breeding Genetic evaluations for birth weight:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TEMPLATE DESIGN © John B. Cole 1,*, Kristen L. Parker Gaddis 2, Francesco Tiezzi 2, John S. Clay 3, and Christian Maltecca.
Advertisements

Factors affecting milk ELISA scores of cows tested for Johne’s disease H. D. Norman 1, J. R. Wright 1 *, and T. M. Byrem 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs.
Relationship of somatic cell score with fertility measures Poster 1390 ADSA 2001, Indiannapolis R. H. Miller 1, J. S. Clay 2, and H. D. Norman 1 1 Animal.
Impact of selection for increased daughter fertility on productive life and culling for reproduction H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright*, R. H. Miller Animal Improvement.
2006 J.B. Cole,* G.R. Wiggans, and P.M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
2006 J.B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Genetic.
Colorado Agriscience Curriculum
J. B. Cole 1, P. D. Miller 2, and H. D. Norman 1 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 2 Department.
ADSA 2002 (HDN-P1) 2002 Comparison of occurrence and yields of daughters of progeny-test and proven bulls in artificial insemination and natural- service.
THE ISRAELI BREEDING PROGRAM elite cows selected based on their genetic evaluations. About ½ of these cows are mated to local elite bulls, and.
India Emerging Markets Conference, May 2009 (1) Leigh Walton Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
Principal Components Approach for Estimating Heritability of Mid-Infrared Spectrum in Bovine Milk H. Soyeurt 1,2,*, S. Tsuruta 3, I. Misztal 3 & N. Gengler.
2001 ADSA annual meeting, July 2001 (1) Timeliness of progeny-testing through AI and percentage of bulls returned to service (abstract 1020) H.D. NORMAN,*
2007 ADSA 2007 (1)H.D. Norman Effect of service sire and cow sire on gestation length H.D. Norman,* J.R. Wright, P.M. VanRaden, and J.B. Cole Animal Improvement.
Why are records important? Allow you to analyze your operation – What expenses are excessive? – Where are your greatest profits? – Where should you focus.
 PTA mobility was highly correlated with udder composite.  PTA mobility showed a moderate, positive correlation with production, productive life, and.
Enhancing Quality Of Dystocia Data By Integration Into A National Dairy Cattle Production Database C. P. Van Tassell 1,2 and G. R. Wiggans 1 Animal Improvement.
Comparison of Holstein service-sire fertility for heifer and cow breedings with conventional and sexed semen H. D. Norman*, J. L. Hutchison, and P. M.
2002 ADSA 2002 (HDN-1) H.D. NORMAN* ( ), R.H. MILLER, P.M. V AN RADEN, and J.R. WRIGHT Animal Improvement Programs.
Norway (1) 2005 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service,
Selection for Disease Resistance Gert Pedersen Aamand Nordic Cattle Genetic Evaluation.
2003 G.R. Wiggans,* P.M. VanRaden, and J.L. Edwards Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
Assessment of voluntary waiting period and frequency of estrus synchronization among herds R.H. Miller, 1, * H.D. Norman, 1 M.T. Kuhn, 1 and J.S. Clay.
AFGC Convention 2004 (1) 2004 Possibilities for Improving Dairy Cattle Performance Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
REGRESSION MODEL y ijklm = BD i + b j A j + HYS k + b dstate D l + b sstate S l + b sd (S×SD m ) + b dherd F m + b sherd G m + e ijklm, y = ME milk yield,
John B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA The use and.
B66 Heritability, EPDs & Performance Data. Infovets Educational Resources – – Slide 2 Heritability  Heritability is the measurement.
2006 Paul VanRaden, John Cole, and George Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
Genetic correlations between first and later parity calving ease in a sire-maternal grandsire model G. R. Wiggans*, C. P. Van Tassell, J. B. Cole, and.
2005 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD An Example from Dairy.
2005 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA Selection for.
Genetic Evaluation of Lactation Persistency Estimated by Best Prediction for Ayrshire, Brown Swiss, Guernsey, and Milking Shorthorn Dairy Cattle J. B.
Genetic interactions for heat stress and herd yield level: predicting foreign genetic merit from domestic data J. R. Wright*, P. M. VanRaden Animal Genomics.
2007 J.B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Genetic Evaluation.
Factors affecting heifer fertility in U.S. Holsteins M. T. Kuhn* and J. L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service,
Effect of temperature and humidity on gestation length H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright,* and J.B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research.
Accuracy of reported births and calving dates of dairy cattle in the United States Poster 1705 ADSA 2001, Indiannapolis H. D. Norman *,1, J. L. Edwards,
 Objective 7.03: Apply the Use of Production Records.
J. B. Cole *, G. R. Wiggans, P. M. VanRaden, and R. H. Miller Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,
H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright, and R.H. Miller Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA
WiggansARS Big Data Computing Workshop (1) 2013 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
Genetic and environmental factors that affect gestation length H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, M. T. Kuhn, S. M. Hubbard,* and J. B. Cole Animal Improvement.
H.D. Norman* and J.L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD NDHIA 2009 meeting.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA EAAP.
Multi-trait, multi-breed conception rate evaluations P. M. VanRaden 1, J. R. Wright 1 *, C. Sun 2, J. L. Hutchison 1 and M. E. Tooker 1 1 Animal Genomics.
Cow Herd Performance Testing. Introduction Help evaluate economically important traits Calving ease Birth weight Weaning weight Calving interval Calf.
2002 George R. Wiggans and Curt P. Van Tassell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
Selection & Judging of Beef Cattle
2003 P.M. VanRaden* and M.E. Tooker Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Definition.
H.D. Norman* J.R. Wright, P.M. VanRaden, and M.T. Kuhn Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
2004 P.M. VanRaden, M.E. Tooker*, and J.B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
ADSA Indianapolis 2001 (1) 2001 A Global Scale for Ranking Dairy Bulls Using Blended National Rankings Rex L. Powell * Paul M. VanRaden Animal Improvement.
Effects of dam’s dry period length on heifer development H. D. Norman and J. L. Hutchison* Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research.
C.P. Van Tassell 1, * G.R. Wiggans 1, J.C. Philpot 1, and I. Misztal Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA,
G.R. Wiggans, T. A. Cooper* and P.M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD
CRI – Spanish update (1) 2010 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
Meori Rosen Past, Present, and Future Dairy Cattle Breeding in Israel.
Bull Selection: Beef Kay Farmer Madison County High School edited by Billy Moss and Rachel Postin July 2001.
2006 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production (1) Trait Selection When Culling U.S. Holsteins H.D. Norman, J.L. Hutchison, J.R. Wright,
Fundamentals of the Eurostar evaluations
IHFA Cork Club 27th Jan 2014.
Using EPDs in Selection
Use of a threshold animal model to estimate calving ease and stillbirth (co)variance components for US Holsteins.
Where AIPL Fits In Agricultural Research Service (ARS) is the main research arm of USDA (8,000 employees with 2,000 scientists at >100 locations) Beltsville.
Effectiveness of genetic evaluations in predicting daughter performance in individual herds H. D. Norman 1, J. R. Wright 1*, C. D. Dechow 2 and R. C.
3Canadian Dairy Network, Guelph, ON Canada
Expected Progeny Difference EPD
Relationship of gestation length to stillbirth
Economics of Reproduction: the Quality of the Pregnancy
Presentation transcript:

MARTIN-LUTHER-UNIVERSITY HALLE-WITTENBERG Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Group Animal Breeding Genetic evaluations for birth weight: comparison of continuous and discrete definitions of birth weight under varying accuracies of recording Waurich 1), B., Wensch-Dorendorf 1), M., Cole, J.B. 2) and Swalve, H.H. 1) 1 Group Animal Breeding, University of Halle, Theodor-Lieser-Str.11, D Halle/Saale Germany, 2 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA. 62 th Annual Meeting of the European Federation of Animal Science Stavanger, Norway August 29th-September 2nd, Session 36, Paper 2

MARTIN-LUTHER-UNIVERSITY HALLE-WITTENBERG Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Group Animal Breeding Introduction many countries have calving problems birth weight is highly heritable and strongly connected with dystocia documentation of birth weight takes economic efforts  weighing or scoring?

MARTIN-LUTHER-UNIVERSITY HALLE-WITTENBERG Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Group Animal Breeding Introduction Data from Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania cooperator test herd scheme with precise documentation ( 22 herds from 2005 ) Documentation for all calvings of a herd (also stillborn) Weighing of all calves heifers (41±4,5kg) and cows (45±5,2kg) All calvingsheiferscows 81,41930,58950,830

MARTIN-LUTHER-UNIVERSITY HALLE-WITTENBERG Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Group Animal Breeding The Idea For birth weight parameter estimation: weighing necessary or subjective scoring precise enough ? frame Weighing data: For research purposes  manipulation of data  grouping weights into in classes birth weight muscle mass

MARTIN-LUTHER-UNIVERSITY HALLE-WITTENBERG Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Group Animal Breeding Manipulation of weight data - varying accuracies RANUNI(-1,0,1) Birth weight + N(0,1.5) + N(0,2) A B C D E

MARTIN-LUTHER-UNIVERSITY HALLE-WITTENBERG Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Group Animal Breeding Calf size - The discrete definitions very light lightmedium very heavy heavy lightheavymedium lightmediumheavy Five Classes, each about 20 Percent of weighings Three Classes equal, each about 33 Percent of weighings Three Classes wide, thresholds 25, 75 Percent of weighings Birth weight Thresholds Continuous Birth weight

MARTIN-LUTHER-UNIVERSITY HALLE-WITTENBERG Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Group Animal Breeding Outcome of class allocations 5 classes 3 classes equal3 classes wide same±1 class±2 classessame±1 classsame±1 class A 100 B C D E

MARTIN-LUTHER-UNIVERSITY HALLE-WITTENBERG Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Group Animal Breeding Model y ijklmno = µ + H i + YS j + PAR k + SEX l + sire m + mgs n + e o Calculation of genetic parametersCalculation of maternal breeding value fixed effectsrandom effects H i Herd (i=1 to 20) YS j combined Year-Season (j=1 to 15) PAR k Parity (k=1 to 3) SEX l Sex of calf (l=1,2) sire m sire of calf mgs n maternal grandsire of calf E o residual

MARTIN-LUTHER-UNIVERSITY HALLE-WITTENBERG Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Group Animal Breeding Heritabilities and genetic correlations Continuous BW5 classes3 classes equal3 classes wide ValueseValueseValueseValuese directA B C D E A B C D E Genetic correlations range between and 0.15 maternal

MARTIN-LUTHER-UNIVERSITY HALLE-WITTENBERG Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Group Animal Breeding Rank correlations of EBVs with undistorted original birth weight Original BW5 classes3 classes equal3 classes wide Value Direct N=830 A B C D E Maternal N=2,195 A B C D E

MARTIN-LUTHER-UNIVERSITY HALLE-WITTENBERG Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Group Animal Breeding Conclusions - birth weight heritability is situated mainly on calf side - manipulation of documentation accuracy leads to reduced heritabilities - subsumming into discrete variables leads to decreased heritabilities  decrease is far not as strong as expected  estimated breeding values stay robust This study may not be a perfect imitation of the outcome of a subjective scoring system (where farmers may describe weights inaccurately), but some assessment of such a system is given

MARTIN-LUTHER-UNIVERSITY HALLE-WITTENBERG Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Group Animal Breeding End