Horizontal Flows in the Photosphere and the Subphotosphere in Two Active Regions Yang Liu, Junwei Zhao, Peter W. Schuck.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evolution of Magnetic Setting in Flare Productive Active Regions Yixuan Li Space Weather Research Lab New Jersey Institute of Technology.
Advertisements

Back Reaction on the Photospheric Magnetic field in Solar Eruptions Dandan Ye.
S.L. Guglielmino eHeroes 3 rd General Meeting Davos – March, 2014 High resolution spectro-polarimetric observations of a delta spot hosting eruptive.
Analysis of a C4.1 flare occurred in a δ spot using SDO and SST data
Numerical Simulations of Supergranulation and Solar Oscillations Åke Nordlund Niels Bohr Institute, Univ. of Copenhagen with Bob Stein (MSU) David Benson,
Study of Magnetic Helicity Injection in the Active Region NOAA Associated with the X-class Flare of 2011 February 15 Sung-Hong Park 1, K. Cho 1,
IHY General Assembly, Paris, January 2006 Photospheric flows around sunspots and pores Michal Sobotka Astronomical Institute, Academy of Sciences.
A complete study of magnetic flux emergence, interaction, and diffusion should take into account some “anomalies” In the photosphere we can observe flux.
A complete study of magnetic flux emergence, interaction, and diffusion should take into account some “anomalies” In the photosphere we can observe flux.
Energy and Helicity in Emerging Active Regions Yang Liu, Peter Schuck, and HMI vector field data team.
Emerging Flux Simulations Bob Stein A.Lagerfjard Å. Nordlund D. Benson D. Georgobiani 1.
Simulation of Flux Emergence from the Convection Zone Fang Fang 1, Ward Manchester IV 1, William Abbett 2 and Bart van der Holst 1 1 Department of Atmospheric,
Changyi Tan et al. NJIT, April 2008 Evolution of Evershed and Shear Flows Associated with the X3.4 Flare of 2006 December 13 Evolution of Evershed and.
SSPVE Discussion Group B Question 5 To what extent is it possible to predict the emergence of active regions before they reach the photosphere, or to predict.
Chip Manchester 1, Fang Fang 1, Bart van der Holst 1, Bill Abbett 2 (1)University of Michigan (2)University of California Berkeley Study of Flux Emergence:
Do active Regions Emerge in a Similar Regime? Valentyna Abramenko Valentyna Abramenko Big Bear Solar Observatory Big Bear Solar Observatory California,
Using Photospheric Flows Estimated from Vector Magnetogram Sequences to Drive MHD Simulations B.T. Welsch, G.H. Fisher, W.P. Abbett, D.J. Bercik, Space.
Holography & HMI NorthWest Research Associates, Inc. Colorado Research Associates Division D. Braun, C. Lindsey, A. Birch (NWRA/CoRA) collaborators: P.
Flows in Active Regions Inferred from the Time-distance and the DAVE4VM.
TIME-DISTANCE ANALYSIS OF REALISTIC SIMULATIONS OF SOLAR CONVECTION Dali Georgobiani, Junwei Zhao 1, David Benson 2, Robert Stein 2, Alexander Kosovichev.
HMI – Synoptic Data Sets HMI Team Meeting Jan. 26, 2005 Stanford, CA.
Convection Simulations Robert Stein Ake Nordlund Dali Georgobiani David Benson Werner Schafenberger.
Free Energies via Velocity Estimates B.T. Welsch & G.H. Fisher, Space Sciences Lab, UC Berkeley.
Center for Space Environment Modeling Ward Manchester University of Michigan Yuhong Fan High Altitude Observatory SHINE July.
LCT Active Region Survey: Preliminary Results We proposed to calculate LCT flows (Li et al. 2004, Welsch et al., 2004) in N > 30 ARs, some of which produced.
Ward Manchester University of Michigan Coupling of the Coronal and Subphotospheric Magnetic Field in Active Regions by Shear Flows Driven by The Lorentz.
Helicity on the Sun: What is it good for anyway? Slide 1 of
The May 1,1998 and May 12, 1997 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
Flows in Active Regions Inferred from the Time-distance and the DAVE4VM.
Observations of December 2006 events Yang Liu – Stanford University
ob/data.html 1. Emerging Flux Simulations & proto Active Regions Bob Stein – Michigan State U. A.Lagerfjärd – Copenhagen U.
February 26, 2007 KIPAC Workshop on Magnetism Modeling/Inferring Coronal And Heliospheric Field From Photospheric Magnetic Field Yang Liu – Stanford University.
Study of magnetic helicity in solar active regions: For a better understanding of solar flares Sung-Hong Park Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New.
Kinetic and Magnetic Helicities of Solar Active Regions Ram Ajor Maurya, Ashok Ambastha And Vema Reddy Udaipur Solar Observatory Physical Research Laboratory,
Braun AIA/HMI Feb helioseismic holography of solar subsurface flows : progress & prospects NorthWest Research Associates Colorado Research Associates.
Space Weather Forecast With HMI Magnetograms: Proposed data products Yang Liu, J. T. Hoeksema, and HMI Team.
Using Photospheric Flows Estimated from Vector Magnetogram Sequences to Drive MHD Simulations B.T. Welsch, G.H. Fisher, W.P. Abbett, D.J. Bercik, Space.
Active Region Flux Transport Observational Techniques, Results, & Implications B. T. Welsch G. H. Fisher
B. T. Welsch Space Sciences Lab, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA J. M. McTiernan Space Sciences.
HMI Science Objectives Convection-zone dynamics and the solar dynamo  Structure and dynamics of the tachocline  Variations in differential rotation 
Flow and Magnetic Fields of Solar Active Regions in Photosphere and Chromosphere Na Deng Post-Doctoral Researcher California State University Northridge.
The May 1997 and May 1998 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
LINE OF SIGHT MAGNETIC FIELD EVOLUTION & DATA ANALYSIS Dandan Ye.
Modeling and Data Analysis Associated With Supergranulation Walter Allen.
An Introduction to Helioseismology (Local) 2008 Solar Physics Summer School June 16-20, Sacramento Peak Observatory, Sunspot, NM.
1Yang Liu/Magnetic FieldHMI Science – 1 May 2003 Magnetic Field Goals – magnetic field & eruptive events Yang Liu Stanford University.
Magnetic Correspondence between Moving Magnetic Features and Penumbral Magnetic Fields M. Kubo and T. Shimizu ISAS/JAXA - The 6th Solar-B Science Meeting.
Comparison of time- distance and holography Junwei Zhao and Alexander G. Kosovichev W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University,
Moving dipolar features in an emerging flux region P.N. Bernasconi et al. 2002, Sol. Phys., 209, 119 Junko Kiyohara 2003 Dec 22.
Local Helioseismology LPL/NSO Summer School June 11-15, 2007.
Is there any relationship between photospheric flows & flares? Coupling between magnetic fields in the solar photosphere and corona implies that flows.
Emerging Flux Simulations & proto Active Regions Bob Stein – Michigan State U. A.Lagerfjärd – Copenhagen U. Å. Nordlund – Niels Bohr Inst. D. Georgobiani.
Horizontal Flows in Active Regions from Multi-Spectral Observations of SDO Sushant Tripathy 1 Collaborators K. Jain 1, B. Ravindra 2, & F. Hill 1 1 National.
1 Yongliang Song & Mei Zhang (National Astronomical Observatory of China) The effect of non-radial magnetic field on measuring helicity transfer rate.
Moving Magnetic Features (MMFs) Jun Zhang National Astronomical Observatories Chinese Academy of Sciences Collaborators: Sami Solanki and Jingxiu Wang.
Systematic Center-to-limb Variations in Time-Distance Measurements and Meridional Flows Junwei Zhao & collaborators.
The Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) on NASA’s Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) has continuously measured the vector magnetic field, intensity, and.
WG1-1: Sub-surface Structure and Evolution Motivation: A research program on space weather that ignores the sub-photospheric evolution of magnetic fields.
Ward Manchester University of Michigan
Structure and Flow Field of Sunspot
Magnetic Helicity in Emerging Active Regions: A Statistical Study
Helioseismic data from Emerging Flux & proto Active Region Simulations
HMI Data Analysis Pipeline
On the nature of moving magnetic feature pairs around sunspots
Observations of December 2006 events
Vector polarimetry with HMI
HMI Data Analysis Pipeline
Na Deng Post-Doctoral Researcher
Magnetic Helicity In Emerging Active Regions: A Statistical Study
Supergranule Scale Convection Simulations
Presentation transcript:

Horizontal Flows in the Photosphere and the Subphotosphere in Two Active Regions Yang Liu, Junwei Zhao, Peter W. Schuck

Methodology and Data The photospheric velocity is derived by applying the algorithm DAVE4VM (Schuck 2008) to the HMI time-series vector magnetic field data (data cadence is 12 minutes); The subphotospheric flow at -0.5 Mm (actually within [-1.0, 0] Mm depth) is inferred by a helioseismology method, the time-distance, that is applied to the HMI Dopplergrams (8- hour data). Average is done over 8 hours (one derived velocity each hour) for the photospheric velocity in order to make a comparison. Two active regions are selected for this study: AR11084 and AR AR11084 is a mature, simple active region with less solar activity; AR11158 is an emerging, complex active region that produced several flares and CMEs.

Case 1: AR11084

AR11084 Flows in the AR11084 at 04:00 July on the photosphere from the DAVE4VM (green) and at -0.5 Mm from the Time-Distance (red).

Another way to look at difference: Asterisks denote the areas where the angle between the two flows in the photosphere and -0.5 Mm is greater than 90 degree.

Height Photosphere NOT SCALED

Scatter plots of velocities in the two layers for AR cc(vx) = 0.89, cc(vy) = 0.76, cc(|v|) = 0.48, cc(theta) = 0.64.

Case 2: AR11158

Vector magnetic field in AR11158

Shear motionSpinningSeparation motion

Red: -0.5 Mm; Green: the photosphere

Cutouts of three areas where the flows in the two layers differ significantly. The flow patterns in the photosphere are well- documented that are commonly seen during flux emergence, i.e. spinning of sunspots, separation motion of leading and following fields, and shear motion along the PIL. The flows at -0.5 Mm are basically convergent in the sunspots.

Asterisks denote the areas where the flows in the two layers differ by an angle greater than 90 degree.

Scatter plots for AR cc(vx) = 0.78, cc(vy) = 0.70, cc(|v|) = 0.56, cc(theta) = 0.43.

Conclusions For the simple, mature active region AR11084: –Similarity: The horizontal flows in the photosphere and at the -0.5 Mm layer are very similar: inward flows in the sunspot umbra and outward flows in the areas surrounding the sunspot; The separation between the inward and outward flows is at the penumbra. –Difference: The boundaries of separation in the two layers are slightly different: The inward-flow area in the sunspot is larger in the -0.5 Mm than that in the photosphere. For the emerging, complex active region AR11158: –Similarity: Flows in both layers show similar outward flows in the areas surrounding the sunspots; –Difference: the well-documented flux-emergence-related flows in the photosphere (sunspot rotation, separation between leading and following fields, shear motion along the PIL) do not have counterparts in the -0.5 Mm layer.

Vertical velocity at the photosphere (left) from DAVE4VM and -0.5 Mm (right) from the time-distance.