Working with Performance-based Standards Oregon Youth Authority.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Alcohol and Drug Abuse Administration State Care Coordination 1.
Advertisements

Preparing for Lease Up: Staff Training for Successful MHSA Supportive Housing Operations MHSA Operations TA Call January 5, 2011 Anne Cory, CSH
Laura Nissen National Program Director February 2009.
4/30/20151 Quality Assurance Overview. 4/30/20152 Quality Assurance System Overview FY 04/05- new Quality Assurance tools implemented, taking into consideration.
Reproduction of these materials only by author's explicit permission. Common Solutions & Success to Reduce DMC Heidi Hsia, OJJDP Please visit often:
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification Meeting The purpose of community notification is to provide information to protect you and your family,
Justice Center Update NYSACRA 12 th Annual Leadership Conference December 4,
 Provide overview of the block grant statute requiring planning councils  Provide overview of statutory responsibilities of planning councils  Describe.
702: Leading Those Who Engage Incarcerated Parents.
Department of Transportation Support Services Branch ODOT Procurement Office Intergovernmental Agreements 455 Airport Rd. SE, Bldg K Salem, OR
Restrictive Procedures Certification Certification required. A license holder who wishes to use a restrictive procedure with a resident must.
Performance-based Standards (PbS) for Youth Correction and Detention Facilities: A System for Continuous Improvement NDTAC Webinar Thurs, July 21, 2005.
Reproduction of these materials only by author's explicit permission. Risk Assessment Instrument And the Development of Detention Alternatives Primary.
Evaluation is a professional and ethical responsibility and is a core part of PHN professional practice Commitment to evaluation helps build the PHN intelligence.
Oregon Youth Authority “Hillcrest Youth Correctional Facility” Presented by Jason Bratsouleas April 25, 2005.
INSTITUTIONAL PHARMACY PRACTICE STANDARDS
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Michael Thompson, Director Council of State Governments Justice Center July 28, 2014 Washington, D.C. Measuring.
Mission The Mission of OJP is to increase public safety and improve the fair administration of justice across America through innovative leadership and.
Permanency Enhancement Project Peoria, Illinois Jennifer La Fever Elizabeth Morgan Amy Roman
The Role of Independent Oversight in Preventing Violence against Young People in Detention: An Australian perspective Alasdair Roy Children & Young People.
COUNCILLORS, MAYOR & ADMINISTRATOR ROLES and RESPONSIBILITIES.
Overview of the Child Welfare System International Center for Innovation in Domestic Violence Practice (ICIDVP)
An Overview of the Mental Health Remedial Plan California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Division of Juvenile Justice REDEFINING MENTAL HEALTH.
Network security policy: best practices
DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.
A Multi-State Study of Mental Health Prevalence and Services for Justice- Involved Youth Findings and Implications 19 th Annual Research Conference A System.
State Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention March Board Update 2014.
The 10 Key Components of Veteran’s Treatment Court Presented by: The Honorable Robert Russell.
BUILDING CAPACITY FOR UNIVERSAL PREVENTION THROUGH STATE-NONPROFIT-UNIVERSITY- SCHOOL SYSTEM PARTNERSHIPS Philip J. Leaf, Ph.D. Johns Hopkins University.
9/2/20151 Ohio Family and Children First An overview of OFCF structure, membership, and responsibilities.
Participant Choice – Access to Recovery as a Voucher Service Delivery Model Presented to National Summit on Prisoner Re-Entry Sponsored by the White House.
1 Critical issue module 6 Separated children in emergency settings.
C OUNTY S OLUTIONS FOR K IDS IN T ROUBLE Benet Magnuson, J.D. Policy Attorney Texas Criminal Justice Coalition
Overview.  Accreditation is both a status and a process  Status:  Status: Accreditation provides public notification that standards of quality are.
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
The Goals and Principles of Human Participant Protection Part 4: Vulnerable Populations.
11/8/2006 Benefits and Work Incentives Planning: System Development NCHSD Fall Conference November 8, 2006 Damon Terzaghi: Oregon Competitive Employment.
Mayor’s Office of Homeland Security and Public Safety Gang Reduction Program Los Angeles.
1 © 2009 Council of Juvenile Correctional Administrators Performance-based Standards (PbS) for Youth Correction and Detention Facilities Using Performance-based.
Colorado Children and Youth Information Sharing (CCYIS) Educational Stability Summit April 10, 2015.
Performance Development at The Cathedral of the Incarnation A Supervisor’s Guide.
Population Parameters  Youth in Contact with the Juvenile Justice System About 2.1 million youth under 18 were arrested in 2008 Over 600,000 youth a year.
Lisa Pion-Berlin, PhD President and Chief Executive Officer Parents Anonymous ® Inc. Leah Davis, California State Parent Team Achieving Shared Leadership®
Canadian Criminal Justice Association Congress October, 2011 COMMUNITY ALTERNATIVES A PARTNERSHIP APPROACH TO PUBLIC SAFETY David Pisapio, Correctional.
Page 1 Fall, 2010 Regional Cross Sector Meeting Elements of an Effective Protocol.
Forging New Partnerships and Employment Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities SPI and BARC SSA Projects Office Virginia Commonwealth University Beth.
Chp 1 Managing Medical Records Lesson 3: Releasing, Retaining, and Storing Medical Records.
Health Promotion as a Quality issue
The Regionalization Project New Regional Field Coordinator Orientation.
Presentation to SIG PBIS in Juvenile Justice Center November, 2013 REACH MS Selina Merrell, MS, Ed
Educational and Mental Health Needs of Juvenile Justice Youth What’s Wrong When We Know What’s Right? Ralph B. Thomas December 17, 2007.
1 Evaluating the Orange County School Mobile Assessment and Response Team (SMART) Association for Criminal Justice Research, California 63rd Semi-Annual.
United Way of Delaware Agency Report Education Presented by Paulette Robinson-Wilkerson.
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
National Center for Youth in Custody First Things First: Risk and Needs Assessment Data to Determine Placement and Services Alternatives.
“Safety & Hope” Monitoring Success in the Texas Juvenile Justice System.
StagesOf Assessment Stages Of Assessment. The Stages of Assessment for the Single Assessment Process §Publishing information about services. §Completing.
Program Evaluation Principles and Applications PAS 2010.
PHDSC Privacy, Security, and Data Sharing Committee Letter to Governors.
Key Leader Orientation 3- Key Leader Orientation 3-1.
Comprehensive Youth Services Assessment and Plan February 21, 2014.
The Federal Telework Program U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
IIPP An Overview of the Injury and Illness Prevention Program.
Roles in JDTC Discipline Specific Breakout Session.
Institute For Safety, Compensation and Recovery Research Presentation to Safety Culture from the Regulators' Perspective Symposium Dr Andrea de Silva,
Education and Training Centre for Children - Need for Minimum Standards.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
Isolation and Restraint
13 Managing Medical Records Lesson 3:
Presentation transcript:

Working with Performance-based Standards Oregon Youth Authority

How did Performance-base Standards start The 1994 Congressionally-mandated Conditions of Confinement study of about 1,000 facilities across the country found the programs to be dangerous for youths and staff and lacking adequate services. In 1995 the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) launched a major initiative to improve the conditions of confinement in juvenile facilities, now known as the Performance-based Standards (PbS) project. The Council of Juvenile Correctional Administrators (CJCA) was awarded the grant to develop, test, and implement a set of national goals and standards for youth correction and detention facility operations.

PbS Overview PbS is a national performance outcomes program for state and county facilities to ensure they keep youths and staff safe, hold youths accountable and provide effective rehabilitation services that prevent future crime. The program establishes national standards setting the highest expectations for all aspects of facility operations: safety (ie injuries, suicidal behavior), order (behavior management, use of restraints and isolation), security (escapes), programming (education, vocational training), provision of health and mental health services, preparation of youths to return to the community and overall fairness of the environment.

PbS and OYA Overview During 1999, the Oregon Youth Authority (OYA) implemented PbS at all of its Youth Correctional Facilities and one detention facility. PbS provided an important addition to the agency’s quality assurance efforts and became a prominent part of legislative/budget presentation. Presently all OYA Youth Correctional Facilities and Camps participate in the program.

Continuous Improvement PbS Philosophy of Change Continuous Improvement PbS builds performance improvement and accountability into agency and facility operations using a three part continuous improvement cycle: Data Collection Twice a year participating facilities collect information about the youths, the staff, unusual incidents and conduct climate surveys. The information is entered into the PbS website. Performance Reports and Outcome Measure Analysis At the end of each data collection period the information is calculated and reported back in the form of about 100 outcome measures that indicate how well the facilities are meeting the standards. Facilities are given analysis tools to identify what works and what needs to be improved. For Example, facilities see outcome data comparing to their previous data collections and to the PbS field. Facility Improvement Plans Using the analysis of the data, facilities work with an assigned PbS coach to develop a Facility Improvement Plan (FIP), which is entered into the website and monitored for effectiveness by facility staff, agency leaders and the PbS coach.

PbS Data Collection Domains The PbS model presumes that all areas of facility operation have some impact on the others. These relationships among the seven areas are reciprocal and changes in any area have impact across the facility.

PbS Data Collection Domains The Performance Base Standards model holds that, given these six areas, the primary goal of juvenile confinement facilities is to provide a safe environment for residents and for staff. Hence, Safety is the primary functional area. The model presumes that Programming is the method by which Safety is best achieved. Other factors being equal, a facility in which residents are engaged in vigorous and relevant programming will be safer than a facility in which residents are idle.

PbS Structure Goal is established: An identified objective for the purpose of improving the conditions of confinement for youth and the work environment for staff. Standard: Criterion accepted as a basis for comparison. Outcome Measure: numerical expression of the status or prevalence of a phenomenon; may by expressed as a rate or frequency of occurrences that indicate the extent to which a standard is being met. Data Collection Instruments: Formatted document identifying source and data needed.

Structure of a Standard Order 1 Goal: Minimize the use of force and coercion to maintain order. Outcome Measure: Incidents of youth misconduct per 100 person -days of youth confinement. Expected Practices: Staff and youth know facility rules. The behavior management plan is used as a basis for on-going training for staff them. Processes: Facility has a behavior management system that relies on rewards and incentives. Staff and youth receive a copy of the behavior management plan. Staff and youths have the behavior management plan explained to them.

Data Collection Sources Administrative Report: collects administrative data concerning juvenile population and staff size, scheduled programming, and facility policies. Youth Records: collects information about juvenile treatment and wellbeing taken from health, mental health, substance abuse, education and programming records. Youth Survey: asks youth to comment on their understanding of facility rules, legal rights and treatment plans, contact with parents, guardians and attorneys, programming received, staff professionalism, and safety. Staff Records: records information about staff demographics and training. Staff Survey: asks staff to comment on their training in facility policies, understanding of their legal rights, and personal safety and the treatment and safety of juveniles.

Performance-base Standards Goals To increase accountability through the use of data in the system, which enhances ability to track improvement and identify issues. Historically there is a lack of data to support current practices and policies; To improve understanding of best practices and methods that, when fully employed, can significantly improve conditions of confinement in the juvenile justice system; To provide a reasonably-priced solution across the country that allows for uniform data collection, analysis and use in all jurisdictions; To support the notion that the juvenile justice system is well able to help youths in confinement