Doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Submission January 2012 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Scanning with FILS Date: 2012-01-15 Authors:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 Submission May 2010 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 M-QoS Comments Date: Authors:
Advertisements

Doc.:IEEE /1523r4 Submission November 2011 Access Delay Reduction for FILS: Network Discovery & Access congestion Improvements Slide 1 Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0553r0 May 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Response Criteria of Probe Request Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/0443r0 March 2014 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 What Is P2P Traffic in HEW Simulation Scenarios? Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0578r0 Submission 2008 May Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Forwarding in mesh containing MPs in power save Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1521r2 Submission January 2012 Marc Emmelmann, FOKUSSlide 1 AP and Network Discovery Enhancements Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0313r1 Submission March 2011 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 SU-MIMO Type for Group Addressed Frames Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/772r0 July 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Non-HT Duplicate PPDU FILS Advertisement Frame Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0327r0 March 2015 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Microsleep for HE STA Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0103r0 January 2015 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Power Save Calibration Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1454r0 November 2014 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide ax Power Save Discussion Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0550 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Kiseon RyuLG Electronics10225 Willow Creek Rd, San Diego, CA, 92131, USA +1
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/279r0 March 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide ai simulations Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1303r5 Submission November 2010 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Overlapping BSS Co-Existence Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/1127r01 Sep 2012 Hiroshi Mano (ATRD)Slide 1 TGai- Motion/Straw Poll-Sep-2012-Indian Wells Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1165r0 September 2013 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Discussion of the comments related to FILS Request Parameter Date:
CWNA Guide to Wireless LANs, Second Edition
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/0259r0 March 2013 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 CID 266 & CID 281 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1054r0 Submission Sep Santosh Pandey (Cisco)Slide 1 FILS Reduced Neighbor Report Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0281r0 March 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Recommendations for association Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0103r0 Submission January 2008 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Peer Service Period Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0897r0 SubmissionJae Seung Lee, ETRISlide 1 Active Scanning considering Operating Status of APs Date: July 2012.
Doc.: IEEE / ai Submission Nov 2011 Huawei Technologies Co. LtdSlide 1 Broadcast Probe Response in TGai Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0061r1 SubmissionJae Seung Lee, ETRISlide 1 Probe Response frame transmission interval Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1234r0 Submission October 2008 L. Chu Etc.Slide s Power Saving Issues Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0553r4 May 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Response Criteria of Probe Request Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0644r2 Submission May 2006 Päivi Ruuska, NokiaSlide 1 Measurement Pilot Transmission Information as optional information in Probe.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/535r1 May 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Scanning and FILS requirements Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0292r1 Submission March 2012 Jonathan Segev (Intel)Slide 1 Beacon Pointer for FILS Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1149r0 Submission September 2010 Jarkko Kneckt, Nokia CorporationSlide 1 Operation rules for > 40MHz Bandwidth Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0097r0 SubmissionJarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Bandwidth Specific TXOP Limits Date: Authors: January 2011.
Doc.: IEEE /0568r0 Submission May 2012 Young Hoon Kwon, Huawei Slide 1 AP Discovery Information Broadcasting Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1204r1 ZTE CorporationSlide 1 Power saving mechanism consideration for ah framework Date: Authors: Sept 2011.
Doc.: IEEE /0263r1 SubmissionJae Seung Lee, ETRI Spec Framework Proposal: Selection of the AP for Scanning Date: Slide 1 March 2012.
Resolutions to Static RTS CTS Comments
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/1051r2 Multi-channel information for AP discovery 1 September 2012 HTC Corp. NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Jing-Rong HsiehHTC.
Doc.: IEEE /0041r1 AP Location Capability January 2007 Donghee Shim et alSlide 1 AP Location Capability Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0042r1 Submission January 2013 Yongho Seok, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Fast Moving Scan Channel Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0294r2 Submission March 2012 Jonathan Segev (Intel)Slide 1 Active Scanning Reply Window Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0587r0 May 2016 Peter Khoury, Ruckus WirelessSlide 1 Dwell Time In Probe Request Presentation Date: Authors:
FILS Reduced Neighbor Report
Wide Scanning Requests and Responses
Overall MAC Procedure for WUR
Some Findings from Real World Measurement
SU-MIMO Type for Group Addressed Frames
Wake Up Frame to Indicate Group Addressed Frames Transmission
Multiple Frequency Channel Scanning
OCT based 6 GHz AP Operation Discussion
Improvement to TWT Parameter set selection
TWT SP initiation and termination and legacy PS
SU-MIMO Type for Group Addressed Frames
FILS Reduced Neighbor Report
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
A Review of the Site Reporting Protocol in IEEE802.11k Draft 0.2
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Power Efficiency for Individually Addressed Frames Reception
April 2009 doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 July 2010
CR for CID 1115 Date: Authors: May 2019
Power Efficient WUR AP Discovery
Fast Active Scan Proposals
Cooperative AP Discovery
Peer Service Period Date: Authors: January 2008 Month Year
Proposed Change to Intra-Mesh Congestion Notification Frame
Reserving STA Date: Authors: January 2011 January 2011
Power Efficiency for Individually Addressed Frames Reception
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
Pekko Orava, Henry Haverinen, Simon Black (Nokia)
Multiple Frequency Channel Scanning
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Submission January 2012 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Scanning with FILS Date: Authors:

doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Submission January 2012 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 2 Abstract The presentation is related to active scanning normative text. This presentation describes: Recap of general description of the passive and active scanning –Recap of available enhancements for passive scanning Improvements for active scanning mechanisms: –Fast transmission of precise availability information with low overhead

doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Submission Recap, Scanning mechanisms as seen by the scanning STA Passive scanning: The STA listens at a channel and detects the availability of the APs from the received frames –Especially Beacons, Measurement Pilots and Probe Responses have good set of information for the scanning STA Active scanning: The STA requests of responses and the STA receives all frames, and detects from the received frames the availability of the AP –A response to request indicates that the response is received –The same frames as in passive scanning are received during the scanning operation –The reception time for probe responses is shorter than in passive scanning January 2012 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 3

doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Submission Recap, Scanning mechanism as seen by AP The passive scanning STA is invisible for AP –No signal from scanning devices –The AP periodically transmits Beacon and Measurement Pilots The active scanning requests are visible to AP –The requests indicate presence of the scanning STAs –The AP responses the requests: Currently each request is responded by a single response Currently there is no means to combine responses and coordinate to deliver the parameters: –To deliver the parameters of the most relevant BSS –To reduce the overhed January 2012 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 4

doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Submission Recap, Measurement Pilot frame The APs may periodically transmit Beacons and Measurement Pilots to provide their availability information for passive scanning devices –Measurement Pilot is defined in standard –Measurement Pilots are transmitted periodically, the AP may select the length of period (for instance AP may transmit a Measurement every 10ms) –Measurement Pilot may include any information elements, so APs may construct a light weight beacon with information AP considers relevant for the scanning devices January 2012 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 5

doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Submission Active Scanning Enhancements January 2012 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 6

doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Submission More precise Probe Request The probe request should indicate the devices to respond and not to respond –Filterlist indicates the APs or SSIDs that are not requested to answer –The repetition of already received information is eliminated This speeds up the responses delivery, coungestion is reduced –The unknown APs have better opportunity to transmit probe responses January 2012 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 7 AP 1 AP 2 AP 3 STA 1 1 st Probe Request STA 1 Probe Response AP 1 AP 2 AP 3 STA 1 2 nd Probe Request + Filtering List Indicate probe response from AP 2 is not desired AP 1 AP 2 AP 3 STA 1 Probe Responses AP 1 AP 2 AP 3

doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Submission Challenge, knowledge of the availability of scanning STA The STA that transmitted Probe Request does not have means to indicate when it will no longer be available to receive Probe Responses –The individually addressed Probe Responses will not be acknowledged and they will be retransmitted –The responses may be transmitted unnecessarily if the requesting STA is not present to receive the responses January 2012 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 8

doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Submission Stopping reception at a channel The scanning device should be able to indicate that it no longer scans the channel –The Max Channel Time parameter is added to Probe Request frame, after Max Channel Time, the scanning STA –Probe End frame to indicate that scanning STA is no longer available to receive –The Probe Responses shall not be retransmitted after Max Channel Time or after Probe End is transmitted January 2012 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 9

doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Submission Probe Response collision avoidance: Comprehensive probe response One probe response may contain information of multiple APs at the same band –The total amount of responses is reduced The sample of the radio performance may be obtained through any frame January 2012 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 10 STA 1 Probe Request Chn 1Chn 6 Request for information of other BSSs AP 1 AP 2 AP 3 STA 1 Probe Response + Neighbor List Contains information of itself (AP 2), as well as AP 1 and AP 3 Chn 1Chn 6 AP 1 AP 2 AP 3

doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Submission Probe Response collision avoidance: Elimination of unnecessary Probe Responses When many probe requests are being transmitted, the amount of probe responses may become high The APs should avoid sending unnecessary copies of probe responses –Single copy of probe response or beacon frame is enough –Probe Response transmitted to Broadcast address avoids retransmissions in congested situations January 2012 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 11 STA 1 Probe Request STA 2 STA2 misses the probe request transmission AP 1 AP 2 AP 3 STA 1 Probe Response STA 2 Receive probe responses AP 1 AP 2 AP 3 STA 1 Probe Request STA 2 AP 1 AP 2 AP 3

doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Submission Summary The filter list more precise Probe Request reduces unnecessary Probe Response The knowledge of the time that the scanning device is available avoids unncessary (re)transmissions The collision avoidance mechanisms to probe response: –Eliminates unnecessary copies of the Probe Responses –Comprehensive Probe Responses combines information of multiple APs to single Response and provides guidance to select the next channel for scanning January 2012 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 12

doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Submission January 2012 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 13 References r1, Active Scanning