Describing and Evaluating Curriculum by Identifying Skills, Goals, Experiences, Content and Values Mary Savina Department of Geology, Carleton College.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is a Research Lesson?
Advertisements

SENIOR SEMINARS Specifics & Example Performances CEPR Center for Educational Policy Research.
Our Mission: Preparing Students for Postsecondary Success Mansoureh Tehrani R. L. Turner High School
Developing Mathematical Practices for Geometry, Algebra II and Beyond Developed by Education Development Center, Inc. with support from the Massachusetts.
An Exploration of Who You Are and Who You Want to Be! Henrico High School 2011.
CURRICULUM/ CO-CURRICULUM ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY January 24, 2013.
Making Time for it All: Integrating Writing, Speaking, and Quantitative Reasoning in Disciplinary Courses The 12th annual Northeast Consortium on Quantitative.
Principles of Powerful Teaching and Learning for Social Studies
1 Engaged Campus – Institutional Level and Department Level presented to Engaged Department Summit CSU Chico – May 5, 2006 Season Eckardt, Administrative.
A Skills Matrix as a Geology Department Planning Tool SAVINA, Mary E., BUCHWALD, C. Edward, BICE, David M., and BOARDMAN, Shelby J. Department of Geology,
Fostering Continuous Improvement of Curriculum - Learning Outcomes Peter Wolf Director, Centre for Open Learning Educational Support University of Guelph.
1 How Chemistry Faculty Infuse Classroom Practice with Active Thinking Prepared by the National Center for Postsecondary Improvement: Project 5.3 A Summary.
Promoting Universal Values in the Face of Societal Change The Council of Europe Caryn McTighe Musil November 20, 2007 Association of American Colleges.
ALISE 2014 Conference Jeonghyun Kim & William E. Moen
Common Core State Standards. Instructional Shifts Implementation of the Common Core State Standards College & Career Ready Students Data.
Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) at Sojourner Douglass College Faculty and Staff Session One Saturday, November 9, 2013.
SOCIAL SCIENCES STANDARDS REVIEW AND REVISION February 2009-June 2011 PRESENTATION TO THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION.
The Common Core State Standards emphasize coherence at each grade level – making connections across content and between content and mathematical practices.
Essential Elements of a Workable Assessment Plan Pat Tinsley McGill, Ph.D. Professor, Strategic Management College of Business Faculty Lead, Assessment.
Common Core State Standards in Connecticut ELMS PTA Presentation October 16, 2012 Dr. Judy DeLeeuw, Principal Jason Bitgood, Assistant Principal Jennifer.
Project Based Learning
PEGGY MAKI, PH.D. EDUCATION CONSULTANT IN ASSESSING STUDENT LEARNING PRESENTED AT CCRI SEPTEMBER 21, 2012 Assessment at Three Levels: Institution, Program,
Student Engagement: 2008 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Office of Institutional Research and Planning Presentation to Senate November 2008.
Building Strong Geoscience Departments for the Future Cathy Manduca, Carol Ormand Carleton College Heather Macdonald, Geoff Feiss, College of William and.
Institutional Outcomes and their Implications for Student Learning by John C. Savagian History Department Alverno C O L L E G E.
MODULE 7 Putting All Together and Designing the Course.
Program Assessment Randy Richardson University of Arizona 1.Assessing Your Environment Departmental SWOT Analysis 2.Assessing a Degree Program Learning.
PROJECT BASED LEARNING
Common Core Standards for Mathematics Standards for Mathematical Practice Carry across all grade levels Describe habits of mind of a mathematically expert.
21 st Century Science Osborne (2007): 21st Century Scientific Literacy To become scientifically literate, science education requires a focus on: The scientific.
Teaching to the Standard in Science Education By: Jennifer Grzelak & Bonnie Middleton.
Selected Teaching-Learning Terms: Working Definitions...
Model for Sustaining Departmental Student Outcomes Assessment Russ E. Mullen, Mary H. Wiedenhoeft, Thomas A. Polito, Sherry L. Pogranichniy, and Michelle.
Common Core State Standards A Brief Overview for Staff Members of Public Schools of Petoskey September 2011.
Considerations for Curricular Development & Change Donna Mannello, DC Logan University.
Describing and Evaluating Curriculum: I. Identifying Skills, Goals, Experiences, Content and Values II. Curriculum Maps and Matrices Randy Richardson Department.
Resources and Reflections: Using Data in Undergraduate Geosciences Cathy Manduca SERC Carleton College DLESE Annual Meeting 2003.
An overview for parents and families Butler Avenue School Julie Gillispie--March st Century Community Learning Center.
Government of Nepal Ministry of Education National Center for Educational Development.
INTERMEDIATE WORKING GROUP 4 Working group 7 Working group 8.
InTeGrate-ing Geoscience Learning in Undergraduate Education Cathy Manduca, Sean Fox, Ellen Iverson, Carleton College; David Blockstein, NCSE; Tim Bralower,
The Role of Geoscience Departments in Preparing Future Geoscience Professionals Carol J. Ormand*, Science Education Resource Center R. Heather Macdonald,
Teaching with Data: Context and Resources Sean Fox, SERC Carleton College.
QCC General Education Assessment Task Force March 21 and 22, 2016 Faculty Forum on General Education Outcomes.
Assessment Reboot January 31, 2014 GAC 38. Review of Assessment Cycle Documenting & Reporting.
Developed in partnership with the Montgomery County Public Schools (MD), Forward is a K–5 instructional system of services, tools, and curriculum. Forward.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
What is Forward? Forward K-5 Instructional System Consultative Services Progress Monitoring Integrated Curriculum and Assessment Professional Development.
Supporting Your Child in the IB MYP and Diploma Programme.
Personal Development from a Student Perspective: Introducing and using the NUS Personal Development Benchmarking Tool Kate Little Senior Project Officer.
The New Illinois Learning Standards
Describing and Evaluating Curriculum I
Report from Curriculum Committee 4/3/2017
Assessment Planning and Learning Outcome Design Dr
Introduction to Pearson Forward
Intro to GETSI-Field Development Model & Guiding Principles
BU Hub Information for CAS Faculty and Staff
COMMON CORE AND THE LIBRARIAN
Mastery-Based Learning:
A five-year community effort to improve Earth literacy and build a workforce prepared to tackle environmental and resource issues InTeGrate supports integrated.
Common Core State Standards and Disciplinary Literacy
First-Stage Draft Plans for Gen Ed Revision
The New Illinois Learning Standards
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
InTeGrate Materials Development
Mapping Outcomes it’s not so bad.
Whole group instruction
Carol J. Ormand*, Science Education Resource Center
Taking a Giant Leap Using the Taxonomy of Significant Learning to Inform Instructional Design Ashlynn Kogut Texas A&M University.
Changing College Delivery Models to lessen Amounts Borrowed Scott Pulsipher, President AUTHOR’S NAME HERE.
Presentation transcript:

Describing and Evaluating Curriculum by Identifying Skills, Goals, Experiences, Content and Values Mary Savina Department of Geology, Carleton College Visiting Workshop Program,

Predicting the future: What will the next 15 years hold in geoscience and geoscience education? More interested in applications More collaboration Different and broader career paths More societal relevance More complex data management tasks (from Beyond Earth System Science - Kip Hodges, 2007)Beyond Earth System Science - Kip Hodges, 2007 Visiting Workshop Program,

Trends in Higher Education Changing nature of the student body, Change in what it means to be an “educated person,” Emphasis on skills and habits of mind rather than content, Recognizing learning outside the classroom, A more cohesive and coherent first year experience, a capstone. (thanks to Chico Zimmerman, Perlman Center for Learning and Teaching, Carleton College) Visiting Workshop Program,

Thinking About Curriculum – Model #1 Emphasizing individual course titles and content: –Introductory geology (audience) –Specialized geoscience courses OR Visiting Workshop Program,

Thinking About Curriculum - Model #2 Emphasizing sequence and student intellectual development – –What are good second level courses? –What work as advanced courses? –What should students carry from one class to the next? OR Visiting Workshop Program,

Thinking About Curriculum – Model #3 – Identifying: Skills –Geoscience-specific –General Experiences Goals Values “Threshold concepts” (Randy Bass, Georgetown University) – (What are the central ideas from geoscience that are important to all students (majors and non- majors))? Other Content Visiting Workshop Program,

First fundamental question What do you want your (seniors, graduates, alumni) to be able to do? First exercise: Defining goals, values, experiences, skills, knowledge (about 20 minutes of independent/small group work followed by 20 minutes of post-it organizing and reporting out). Visiting Workshop Program,

Photos: Tim Vick and Craig McCaa

Obstacles and challenges on the way Scott Bair, Ohio State University: Advancing By RetreatingScott Bair, Ohio State University: Advancing By Retreating Other comments from this group: Visiting Workshop Program,

Photos: Tim Vick

Second fundamental question: Where in the curriculum (or co-curriculum) do students get these skills, experiences, etc.? A matrix approach to curricular design Using the curricular map Exercise 2 Mapping curriculum and identifying where in curriculum experiences, goals, etc. are situated (about 20 minutes of independent and small group work on the maps and matrix). Visiting Workshop Program,

Google Earth; Library of Congress, Historic Buildings Survey (wikimedia)

So – where do they get these skills? Visiting Workshop Program, This matrix concept has been used by the geology departments at Carleton and at College of William & Mary, as well as by other Carleton departments.

Another version of the general matrix Visiting Workshop Program,

A breakdown of one category Visiting Workshop Program, A = always; S = sometimes

More fundamental questions How can a department design (or modify) a curriculum that is true to its department and institutional values, takes advantage of its geological setting, and focuses on the goals, content, skills and experiences that students should have? How can such a curriculum be made flexible enough to respond to trends in geoscience and higher ed? How can such a curriculum be described and assessed? Visiting Workshop Program,

Thinking about assessment Use the capstone projects –Subjects and methods –Sources and experiences Use the department review process Check in with alumni Evaluate the course content Visiting Workshop Program,

Managing the department discussion – barriers and obstacles Identify principles and broadest learning objectives Identify skills, experiences, goals, values, threshold concepts, content areas Diagram or map structure of the major – as it is Identify the curricular (or co-curricular) locations of the skills, etc. Affirm (or at least acknowledge) perennial debates Check in with institutional and broader higher ed priorities Repeat more often than you think you need Visiting Workshop Program,

Connecting with institutional initiatives Importance of cross-cutting skills – not just “general education,” but also in major Quantitative reasoning, Writing Across the Curriculum, visuality, academic civic engagement, ethics, sustainability.... (Carleton has between eight and twenty, depending on who is counting) Visiting Workshop Program,