1 GEO Task US-09-01a XX SBA SBA: XX Analyst: Name, Organization Current Status of Report: (e.g., Final, awaiting AG or L. Friedl Input, Preparing Draft,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 15 The Challenge of Writing Up
Advertisements

GEO Work Plan Symposium 2011 Days 2 & 3 Presentation of ID-02 Catalyzing Resources for GEOSS Implementation for Plenary Session.
0 Chicago, IL March 6 th, 2007 Use Case Requirements, Design and Standards Selection HITSP Use Case Requirements, Design and Standards Selection Date:
The EUGENE project and its contributions to the GEO Ministerial 4th GEO European Projects Workshop 29/30 April 2010.
Selecting Transit Priority Areas in the Sacramento Sustainable Communities Regional Planning Process Chris Benner and Bidita Tithi.
Infogain Assessment Services 2007 Subtitle or Speaker Name Designation (Arial Regular, 18 Point)
1 GEO Task US-09-01a Water SBA SBA: Water Analyst: Dr. Sushel Unninayar Current Status of Report: Draft Final: Awaiting final feedback from GEO-UIC as.
As part of the final PP presentation the following slides need to be included.
Oregon Reading First (2010)1 Oregon Reading First Regional Coaches’ Meeting May 13, 2010.
Oregon Reading First (2009)1 Oregon Reading First Regional Coaches’ Meeting May 2009.
11-12 June 2015, Bari-Italy Coordinating an Observation Network of Networks EnCompassing saTellite and IN-situ to fill the Gaps in European Observations.
WRITING A RESEARCH PROPOSAL
11 A presentation on A-16 Themes for The FGDC Steering Committee June 5, by Wendy Blake-Coleman US EPA Lifecycle Management Work Group.
The phases of research Dimitra Hartas. The phases of research Identify a research topic Formulate the research questions (rationale) Review relevant studies.
Accelerated EMS Session 4 – 28 January 2008.
1 GEO Task US-09-01a Health SBA SBA: Health – Air Quality Analyst: Rudolf Husar, Washington University/Lantern Co-Analyst: Stefan Falke, Wash. U./Northrop.
Firstname Lastname, Job Title CGE SURVEY RESULTS ON DIFFICULTIES, CHALLENGES AND PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED BY NON-ANNEX I PARTIES IN USING THE GUIDELINES IN.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection August 8-9, 2007.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division Part B of CMF: Metadata, Standards Concepts and Models Jana Meliskova UNECE Work Session.
Slide: 1 Osamu Ochiai Water SBA Coordinator The GEO Water Strategy Report – The CEOS Contribution Presentation to the 26 th CEOS Plenary at Bengaluru,
Proposed Co-convened WG1/2 Objectives, Schedule, and Activities Group Name: TP#1 Source: Omar Elloumi (Alcatel-Lucent), Laurent Laporte (Sprint) Meeting.
GOVERNOR’S EARLY CHILDHOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL (ECAC) September 9, 2014.
APEC-TEL Broadband Study TEL03/2009A – status report Bangkok, May 20 th.
HSM: Another Tool for Safety Management in Wyoming 1 Excellence in Transportation.
Brandi Kirkland and Skyla Forrester. Is Instruction the Answer? Purpose for identifying the problem is to determine whether instruction should be part.
1 GEO Task US-09-01a Health SBA SBA: Health – Air Quality Analyst: Rudolf Husar, Washington University/Lantern Co-Analyst: Stefan Falke, Wash. U./Northrop.
Requirements & Specification (Chapter 10) CPSC 356 Database Ellen Walker Hiram College (Includes figures from Database Systems by Connolly & Begg, © Addison.
ST-09-01: Catalyzing Research and Development (R&D) Funding for GEOSS Florence Béroud, EC Jérome Bequignon, ESA Kathy Fontaine, US ST Kick-off Meeting.
GEO ADC meeting, Washington DC, USA, Sep Slide # 1 DA DA Virtual Constellations Ivan Petiteville, CEOS GEO ADC Meeting, Washington DC,
“Development of a GEOSS Gap Analysis Strategy” Dr. Stuart Minchin, STC Co-Chair, CSIRO, Australia.
Idaho Energy Plan Proposal (RFI) Energy Policy Institute (EPI)
HAPUA WG No.5 (ESI Services) Updates The WG2, 5, 6 and Chairman of APGCC Meeting Jakarta, Indonesia ● 26 February 2009 By WG 5 Project Coordinator: MR.
Chapter 10: The Art of Structuring and Writing a Policy Analysis
“Development of a GEOSS Gap Analysis Strategy” Dr. Stuart Minchin, STC Co-Chair, CSIRO, Australia.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
1 GEO Task US-09-01a Health SBA SBA: Health – Air Quality Analyst: Rudolf Husar, Washington University/Lantern Co-Analyst: Stefan Falke, Wash. U./Northrop.
Level 2 Unit 2 Investigating Engineering Design Engineering Diploma Level 2 Unit 2 Investigating Engineering Design In this unit you will find out how.
Name of Energy Drink Name of Ingredient & Caffeine
Building a User-Driven GEOSS: Methods to Capture, Analyze, and Prioritize User Needs GEO Task US-09-01a and Earth Observations Identification Lawrence.
Revisions to original presentation are in "Red"1 Available Flow-gate Capacity Stakeholder Kickoff Meeting January 19, 2005.
1 Task 2 – High Tier Source Categories  Overall goal of Task 2 is to identify high-tier source categories and present detailed methodologies to estimate.
CAREER RESEARCH PROJECT. Objective Research and identify a job that corresponds with the field of sports and entertainment.
EVALUATION OF THE SEE SARMa Project. Content Project management structure Internal evaluation External evaluation Evaluation report.
A Workflow-Accounting Methodology to Determine Earth Observation Requirements for Air Quality A Contribution from the GEO Air Quality Community of Practice.
 CHAPTER 8 Mixed-Methods Research By Laura Fox Fall 2015 EDCI 695.
Valuation in the SEEA Update The World Bank 15th Meeting of the London Group on Environmental Accounting Wiesbaden, November
Guidelines Revisions Next Steps April 23, Process to Date Staff and others identified a number of “issues” since guidelines were last approved April.
Stages in Research Process Formulate Problem Determine Research Design Determine Data Collection Method Design Data Collection Forms Design Sample & Collect.
Review of literature S. Balakrishnan. What is literature review? The terms literature search, literature review and literature survey are one and the.
MA-PAL TASK 1 LEADERSHIP THROUGH A VISION FOR HIGH STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT.
Physical and behavioral
Finance Subcommittee City of Arvada May 27, 2008
The GEO-6 Matrix Drafting Approach
Book Review Format A book review is an exercise in analysis (a critical assessment of what the book says, not an exercise in description (simply what the.
INTRODUCTION TO RESEARCH PROJECT
Universal Systems Model
Submitting Your Essay.
Unified Approach to Stormwater Monitoring (UASM)
End of Fieldwork Debriefing
From the workshop to the Seminar
Workshop on Gap Analysis and Prioritization
Topic of the final thesis
Topic of the diploma thesis
AET/515 Instructional Plan Template (Shirmen McDonald)
Your agenda should answer WHEN, WHO, WHY, WHAT, PREPARE, HOW.
10 Step Plan …how to write a report
On growth and Improvement
Towards a sustainability process for GEOSS Essential Variables
7. EAFM cycle overview Essential EAFM Date • Place 1.
Action Workshop Template
Presentation transcript:

1 GEO Task US-09-01a XX SBA SBA: XX Analyst: Name, Organization Current Status of Report: (e.g., Final, awaiting AG or L. Friedl Input, Preparing Draft, etc.) Date Final Report will be completed (if not already):

Sub-Areas Analyzed List sub-areas chosen for analysis: 2

Prioritization Methodology Describe methodology used to prioritize parameters, both within sub-areas (if applicable) and in Chapter 5 (overall): 3

Analyst Feedback on Methodology List pro’s and con’s of prioritization methodology. Is the prioritization methodology broadly applicable (e.g., for other SBAs or the cross-SBA analysis), or specific to your SBA? Would you recommend this methodology for other US reports in the future? (either as is, or in a modified form?) 4

Priorities Identified Number of priority parameters identified: List parameters from Chapter 5, and note whether they are in priority order, no order, tiered lists, etc. (use 2 nd slide as needed): 5

Interpretation of Results Note any “themes” that emerged, surprising or expected conclusions, considerations for incorporating results into Cross- SBA Analysis. 6

Limitations/ Caveats Additional notes about interpretation of priority results – i.e., inherent biases, gaps, overlaps with other SBA reports, etc. 7