Workshop on Passenger Mobility Conclusions. EU data requirements – DG MOVE  Environmental, economic and social considerations require close monitoring.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The territorial implications of demographic change in the North Sea Region – scope for a transnational planning approach? Stefanie Dühr, Radboud University.
Advertisements

Statistical infrastructure Task Force recommendations Leo Kolttola Second meeting on climate change related statistics for producers and users 8 – 9 October,
Barbara M. Altman Emmanuelle Cambois Jean-Marie Robine Extended Questions Sets: Purpose, Characteristics and Topic Areas Fifth Washington group meeting.
1 European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics Rome, 8-11 July 2008 Improving the quality and the quality assessment of the Labour Force Survey.
The state of the art: DHS and MICS
May 2001European Commission - Directorate General for Agriculture - A2 1 European Commission - Agriculture Directorate-General 28th February 2003 Inventory.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Action Plan on Urban Mobility ADOPTED ON 30 SEPTEMBER 2009.
Action Plan on Urban Mobility
‘Best Practice’ in Police Training? ‘Best Practice’ in Police Training? J. Francis-Smythe, University College Worcester INTRODUCTION.
1 WORKSHOP ON THE PREPARATION OF THE FOURTH NATIONAL COMMUNICATION FROM ANNEX I PARTIES Dublin, 30 September – 1 October 2004 National circumstances in.
MEADOW: Guidelines for a European survey of organisations Nathalie Greenan CEE and TEPP-CNRS Exploring possibilities for the development of European data.
“”Capacity and services to road users” Task descriptions Paul van der Kroon, Paris November 2005.
1 Assessments of the Environment in the European Quality of Life Perception Surveys Klaus Trutzel German KOSIS Association Urban Audit c/o Bureau for Statistics.
United NationsUnited Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division Results of survey on organization of data collection in National Statistical.
HOUSEHOLD SURVEY PROGRAMME IN UGANDA: PAST EXPERIENCES AND FUTURE PLANS By James Muwonge Uganda Bureau of Statistics OCTOBER, 2009.
S t a r t Session 4 Methodologies and model questions: households Methodological recommendations for household/individual surveys on ICT usage Christophe.
Impact assessment framework
Y OUNG C YPRIOT I NTERNET USERS : A QUANTITATIVE SURVEY IN THE CONTEXT OF EU K IDS O NLINE (Co-authors: Tatjana Taraszow & Yiannis Laouris) May 2008.
The ‘INCA KIP’: Knowledge Innovation Project for an Integrated system for Natural Capital and ecosystem services Accounting UNCEEA June 2015 Anton.
Jimmy Armoogum, Ifsttar, Dest – TRB 2012 Harmonization of European Surveys Jimmy Armoogum, Ifsttar, Dest COST Action TU 0804 Survey Harmonization with.
1 Metagora: Current Progress and the Way Forward PARIS21 Steering Committee Paris, 13 November 2007.
National Travel Survey Past, Present & Future Presentation to the Transport Liaison Group Olive Loughnane 19/09/2013.
Comparing approaches of different (partly) register-based countries Eric Schulte Nordholt Senior researcher and project leader of the Census Statistics.
Emerging methodologies for the census in the UNECE region Paolo Valente United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division International.
The Uninsured in Alameda County 2010 December 2010.
Improving international comparability of health expectancy indicators Task Force on Health Expectancies, European Commission, Luxembourg, 2 June 2008.
BES Equitable and Sustainable Well-being in Italy
Erkki Vedder Cooperation with Russia in the Context of the EU Enlargement.
Monitoring public satisfaction through user satisfaction surveys Committee for the Coordination of Statistical Activities Helsinki 6-7 May 2010 Steve.
19 June 2007 Task Force on Major and Chronic Diseases 5 th meeting 1 Update on the implementation of the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS) Eurostat.
Changes to the collection of short walk data in the NTS Glenn Goodman, DfT.
ESSNet workshop, Köln 27 October 2011 Eurostat Laboratory for developments in cross-cutting statistical domains Martina Hahn, Programme manager.
RESEARCH METHODS IN TOURISM Nicos Rodosthenous PhD 14/03/ /3/20131Dr Nicos Rodosthenous.
Overview and challenges in the use of administrative data in official statistics IAOS Conference Shanghai, October 2008 Heli Jeskanen-Sundström Statistics.
1 Conference of European Statisticians Seminar: Impact of the Global Crisis on Statistical Systems Paris, June 2010 Session 3: Social and household statistics.
ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION DE COOPÉRATION ET DE DEVELOPMENT ÉCONOMIQUES OECDOCDE Workshop on improving statistics.
Assessing status and trends of birds in the European Union: Assessing status and trends of birds in the European Union: Reviewing methods and experience.
Eurostat Workshop on Passenger Mobility Eurostat activities and possible future actions – Towards common indicators on passenger mobility?
13-Jul-07 Harmonisation of Regional and Urban Statistics – a Challenge Dr. Berthold Feldmann Eurostat – the statistical office of the European Union.
SHANTI project: Main Results and Recommendations k Presentation at Eurostat Workshop on Passenger Mobility, June by Shanti Consortium, Speaker:
The OPTIMISM project: Data gaps and guidelines for harmonised travel statistics Panayotis Christidis, European Commission, JRC.
DATA FOR EVIDENCE-BASED POLICY MAKING Dr. Tara Vishwanath, World Bank.
ESPON 2013 Programme Info Day on Calls and Partner Café Call for Proposals on ESPON Scientific Platform and Tools A Decade of Territorial Evidence.
Developments in the Community transport policy and their statistical implications The White Paper 2011 sets the Commission strategy on transport for the.
Passenger Mobility Statistics 28 April 2016
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
Latest work on regional statistics and analysis at OECD
Item 5.3 Feasibility studies
A legal framework for Urban Audit – Next steps
Action Plan on Urban Mobility
2nd meeting of the task force on survey based disability statistics
Passenger Mobility Statistics 10 April 2014
Overview of Approaches to Register-Based Populating Censuses
Paolo Bolsi DG MOVE - Unit A3 Economic Analysis and Impact Assessment
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
Passenger Mobility Statistics 10 April 2014
Passenger Mobility Task Force 21 May 2015
Passenger Mobility Statistics 21 May 2015
The change of data sources in the Spanish SILC
A Regulation for the Urban Audit - a blessing or a curse?
Rail transport developments Agenda point 7.2
Fitness Check EU Water Policy
Project on translating and testing a victimisation survey module
Collection and dissemination of data geo-referenced to a 1km² grid Item 3.2 of the draft agenda DSS Meeting 1 and 2 March 2018.
Main recommendations & conclusions (1)
Passenger Mobility Statistics 21 May 2015
Dr. George Bonas Managing Director CeRISS, Greece
COORDINATING GROUP FOR STATISTICS ON TRANSPORT (CGST)
Geospatial data for cities and FUAs: state of play and opportunities
Presentation transcript:

Workshop on Passenger Mobility Conclusions

EU data requirements – DG MOVE  Environmental, economic and social considerations require close monitoring of passenger mobility with comparable indicators and methods. EU White Paper on transport sets quantitative targets on passenger mobility that require harmonized data. Comparable statistics on urban and medium distance mobility by type of transport are required. There is a need for more harmonized travel surveys for meeting current statistical challenges and make them useful also at European and international level

National Travel Surveys United Kingdom Continuous NTS addressing 15 thousand households, since 1965, lowers set-up costs and increases quality of data. Covers households, individuals, vehicles and travelling information. Results are used for economic modeling, policy assessment, mobility indicators, planning at regional level and by associations and businesses. GPS pilot survey showed the current limitations of the technology despite reduced cost and respondents' burden.

National Travel Surveys Germany Two complementary surveys optimise costs and results: MiD (NTS), sample size (households), every 6-8 years MOP (panel), 1000 sample size (households), annual The survey process, content and approach, comparative merits and limitations, methodological challenges as well as the uses of the two surveys were presented. The importance of high quality transport information for planning and forecasting was highlighted.

National Travel Surveys The Netherlands OViN: National (32.100) and regional (10.000) samples, Covers daily travel pattern over a year, since High levels of participation of practically all age groups. Dynamic content, adapted in 2010, leading to break in series. The increasing use of smartphones as additional means of data gathering requires further development to improve quality of results.

National Travel Surveys Sweden Telephone interviews survey (approx.: 20 min.) covering individuals and households Stable content since the mid-1990s. Increasing quality issues: increasing non-response rate and uncertainty of distance travelled. The use of a travel planning service data from the web and later a smartphone/GPS is planned to reduce non- response improve accuracy of distance travelled by public transport.

EU projects related to travel surveys SHANTI 100 researchers from 22 countries participated. Results provide an inventory of NTS across Europe, covering both methods and results. Contains a comparative study of methods and approaches with recommendations for future work. Highlights the diversity of methods used, data gaps and challenges, but also the need for using different approached to meet stakeholders need. A method for post-harmonisation was developed for improving comparability of indicators.

EU projects related to travel surveys Optimism Objectives: to analyse current NTS and data needs and propose ways of bringing closer statistical data and scientific methods on travel behavior. Examined potential matching the content of NTS with the EU data needs, analysing a wide range of variables (demographic info, stock of equipment, infrastructure, etc.). Reviewed the use and relative merits of both automated and non-automated data collection methods Produced an initial list of variables to be used as starting point. Positive message: a common methodological framework can be developed without changing current practices significantly

International activities related to travel surveys UNECE/ITF/Eurostat Common questionnaire with low response rate provides a few of the required variables. Eurostat non-harmonised data collection project: low availability and comparability of results. International initiatives and workshops provide platforms for sharing experience and identifying data needs. Urban mobility is in the center of passenger transport debate.

 NTS are an indispensable source of detailed information for modeling, planning and policy making at regional, national and international level.  Significant resources are already attributed to travel surveys at national level on a regular basis.  Current practices diverge as they are designed to meet the national stakeholders needs.  There is room for more optimal use of resources, making results to some extent comparable also at European and international level.  Large survey samples lead to high costs, the use new technologies however will in future reduce such costs. Today countries mostly rely on traditional survey methods  High non-response is a common issue  An EU support for EU long distance survey would be useful. Workshop conclusions