T HE I MPOSSIBLE S TANDARD On June 30, 2010, the Yurok Tribe asked the Science Advisory Team to assign a high level of protection MPAs that permitted traditional.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Species at Risk Act : K O D A K January 7, 2004 Implications for Pacific Fisheries.
Advertisements

Renewable Common-Pool Resources: Fisheries and Other Commercially Valuable Species Chapter 14.
Bartlett River Salmon Escapement: a case study in wilderness fisheries management Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve.
History and Benefits of Wildlife Management
Salmon Conservation, Culture and Economy
Virginia Marine Resources Commission : Actions to Promote Rebuilding of Chesapeake Bay Blue Crab Stock,
Causes of the Red Knot Decline Sarah Karpanty 1, Jim Fraser 1, Jim Berkson 1, Jonathan Cohen 1, Eric Smith 2 1 Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences.
ODFW Marine Data Collection Efforts Northwest Area Committee Meeting November 2011 David Fox Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife Marine Resources Program.
Island County SMP Shoreline Residential Development Workshop December 5, 2011.
HUNTING ANALYSIS OF WHITE-TAILED DEER IN VERMONT BY COREY RICHARDSON.
5. MOVING TOWARD EAFM Essential EAFM Date Place 5. Moving towards EAFM Version 1.
The National Aquaculture Policy and The State Shellfish Initiative Perry Lund Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program 17 November 2011.
 Mammals  Males weigh between 49 to 99 lbs and are 4 to 5 ft in length  Females weigh between 30 to 73 lb and are 3-4 ½ ft in length  Found along.
Endangered Species Preservation Act Passed by Congress in 1966 Provided a means for listing native species as endangered – Gave them limited protection.
FISHERIES IN BC. HISTORY - Thousands of years ago, the native peoples of BC were fishing with nets and spears -After settlers came, they made homes and.
First nations and inuit were first to fish here in the 1500’s Natives gained great knowledge of fish growth in BC Used traps and hooks Only took what.
MARINE PROTECTED AREAS. What Are MPAs? – Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are geographic areas designated to protect or conserve marine life and habitat.
Proposed Approach for Developing Columbia Basin Salmon and Steelhead Goals June 3, 2015.
 “ Wildlife conservation is the practice of protecting endangered plant and animal species and their habitats. Among the goals of wildlife conservation.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 14 Renewable Common- Pool Resources: Fisheries and Other Commercially Valuable Species.
Pacific Fishery Management Council Jurisdiction –3 miles to 200 miles –4 states (includes Idaho) Members -- appointed –State governments –Federal Agencies.
The Marine Life Protection Act and Marine Protected Areas Of the Central Coast of California.
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
Alaska Seafood – Wild, Natural & Sustainable Species of Alaska Seafood.
By: Helena Brantz Period 2 APES-Rall.  Draft Years: 1973, 1982, 1985, 1988  National Scope: First signed by Nixon in As of November 2011, there.
NOAA Science Advisory Board …advises the Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere on long- and short- range strategies for research, education,
Endangered Species Act of 1973, 1982, 1985, and 1988 By: Nicole Wypychowski Period 6 President Nixon signed the bill December 28, 1973 ESA is administered.
The Endangered Species Act 1973, 1982, 1985, 1988
1 Marine Life Protection Act; a Tribal Science Perspective Michael Belchik, Yurok Tribal Fisheries Program.
11 Spatial Bioeconomic Model Evaluation of Blue Ribbon Task Force Recommended Marine Protected Area Proposals for the North Coast Study Region Presentation.
1 Marine Life Protection Act Initiative Levels of Protection in the MLPA North Coast Study Region Presentation to the MLPA Master Plan Science Advisory.
Chapter 18 Conservation of Biodiversity. The 6 th Mass Extinction Extinction- when there are no longer any of the species in the world. We are currently.
Chapter 18 Conservation of Biodiversity. The 6 th Mass Extinction Extinction- when there are no longer any of the species in the world. We are currently.
What are fisheries?. What do you think of when you hear the word “FISHING”?
California Anadromous Fish. There are 5 Native Species of Salmon in California Chinook Chum Pink Coho Sockeye.
Chapter 14 Renewable Common-Pool Resources: Fisheries and Other Commercially Valuable Species.
1 Methods Used to Evaluate MPA Proposals in the MLPA North Coast Study Region Presentation to the MLPA Master Plan Science Advisory Team March 16, 2010.
MPAs. Albacore Tuna Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument Marinas Trench Marine National Monument Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument.
Why do we fish? Survival- many costal communities, particularly in developing countries, fish as a primary food source. Recreation- fishing for fun.
August 1 st Draft of Offshore Aquaculture Amendment Gulf Council Meeting August 11-15, 2008 Key Largo, FL Tab J, No. 6.
Marine Life Protection Act Overview of Department of Fish and Game Evaluation of the NCRSG Round 3 Proposal North Coast Study Region October 25, 2010 Eureka,
Size and Spacing Evaluations of the Round 1 External Proposed MPA Arrays for the MLPA North Coast Study Region Presentation to the MLPA North Coast Regional.
1 Overview of Round 3 North Coast Regional Stakeholder Group Marine Protected Area Proposal Presentation to the MLPA Master Plan Science Advisory Team.
North Coast Marine Protected Areas Presentation to the California Fish and Game Commission October 19, 2011 Monterey Department of Fish and Game – Marine.
1 Pacific Grove Parking Program: CDP A3.
Fish and Game Commission Meeting December 12, 2012 Randy Botta South Coast Region/Wildlife Program Bighorn Sheep in the Peninsular Mountains Photo by J.
1 Evaluation of Potential Impacts to Commercial and Recreational Fisheries from the Round 3 NCRSG MPA Proposal Presentation to the MLPA Blue Ribbon Task.
Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas (ESHA) Overview Slide 1.
MLPA Planning and Recommendations for the North Coast Study Region Presented to the California Fish and Game Commission and MLPA Blue Ribbon Task Force.
COMPLEMENTING ECOLOGICAL SCIENCE IN MARINE PROTECTED AREAS LEGISLATION Dr. Vernon G. Thomas, Professor Emeritus Department of Integrative Biology College.
1 Overview of MLPA Blue Ribbon Task Force North Coast MPA Proposals and Special Closures Recommendations Presentation to the California Fish and Game Commission.
Wildlife Management. Endangerment vs. Extinction Extinct –a species that has disappeared from the Earth –due to food shortages, pollution, destruction.
Resident Canada Goose Regulations
Chapter 18 Conservation of Biodiversity
Final ESA Listing Determination for Nassau Grouper
AQUATIC NUISANCE SPECIES
The Endangered Species Act (ESA)
Chapter 55 Conservation Biology.
Endangered Species Act of 1973
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.
Chapter 18 Conservation of Biodiversity
Chapter 18 Conservation of Biodiversity
Renewable Common-Pool Resources: Fisheries and Other Commercially Valuable Species Chapter 14.
Chapter 18 Conservation of Biodiversity
Chapter 18 Conservation of Biodiversity
Chapter 18 Conservation of Biodiversity
Chapter 18 Conservation of Biodiversity
Ology Conservation Biology.
Sociocultural Targets in the San Juan Islands CAP
Presentation transcript:

T HE I MPOSSIBLE S TANDARD On June 30, 2010, the Yurok Tribe asked the Science Advisory Team to assign a high level of protection MPAs that permitted traditional tribal activities. The Science Advisory Team’s guidelines impose an Impossible Standard that assumes recreational harvest to the maximum extent permitted by law Is integral to the levels of protection analysis Has been consistently applied against the Tribes Prevents introduction of abundance and survey data Under this standard, even if Native Americans can show no harm from traditional harvest, we still lose. It REFUSED.

The science guidelines assume that activity can occur locally to the maximum extent allowable under current state and federal regulations.” Under this standard, the number of recreational fishermen assumed to fish in a marine protected area per day: 1,213,692 That is 46 sport fishermen per foot along the coastline in a 5 mile MPA. A N E XCESSIVE A SSUMPTION :

According to the SAT:In Reality: Shaded Area: 2.5 Hours Driving Each Way Limitations on access time: 8 Hours Sleep 8 Hours Work 2 Hours to eat, shop, family 5 Hours Driving 1 Hour to Harvest = 24 Hours. R EADING R OCK For instance: “Any activity can occur locally to the maximum extent allowable under current state and federal regulations.”

In applying the level of protection analysis to Dungeness crab, the MLPA staff departed from its claimed assumptions by considering: Commercial take numbers Restrictions on female take Population abundance Activities allowing take of Dungeness crab received a moderate-high level of protection. Your MPA wants to allow Native Americans to harvest rock crabs? I NCONSISTENT APPLICATION : So you want to allow take of Dungeness crab in an MPA? No problem. Sorry. The impossible standard is the one applied to Native American activities. Rock crabs therefore receive a low level of protection.

Pacific euchelon: NOAA Status: Threatened Coho salmon: NOAA Status: Threatened to Endangered Tidewater goby: NOAA Status: Endangered Mussel: Unrestricted harvest permitted Unacknowledged High Moderate-high Low Threatened Restricted Unrestricted Reverse correlation Reverse correlation : Threat to species versus levels of protection under the Marine Life Protection Act Endangered

Excessive Harvest Assumption Under the Excessive Harvest Assumption, any activity can occur locally to the maximum extent allowable under current state and federal regulations. Recreational fishermen per day: Resident licenses: 1,179,373 Lifetime licenses: 10,804 Non-resident: 10,383 Non-resident 10-day: 397 (= 10 x (14504/365)) 1 day: 1567 (= 572,095/365) 2 day: 702 (=2 x (128,115/365)) Reduced fee: 10,468 Total: 1,213,692 That is 46 sport fishermen per foot along the coastline in a 5 mile MPA.

In applying the level of protection analysis to Dungeness crab, the MLPA staff departed from its claimed assumptions by considering: Commercial take numbers Restrictions of female Population abundance The Native American standard did apply to rock crabs, which receive a low level of protection. Inconsistent application: Didn’t apply the Native American Standard to Dungeness crab ! Didn’t apply the Native American Standard to Surf smelt ! Didn’t apply the Native American Standard to Spearfishing !