Monday Case of the Day History: During acceptance testing of a new general radiographic room, tube output measurements differed between the small and large.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Set Word Option to Reopen a Document in Draft View 1. Click here. 3. Check this box 2. Click here. A document saved in Draft view will not reopen in Draft.
Advertisements

Line focus principle Heal effect Ratings Tube failure
Advanced Biomedical Imaging Lecture 4 Dr. Azza Helal A. Prof. of Medical Physics Faculty of Medicine Alexandria University.
Quality Control in Diagnostic Radiology
Radiographic Quality Chapter 5.
Quality Assurance and Digital Radiography
Digital Radiography.
Chapter 7 Radiographic Image Formation and Exposure Factors.
 Definition- a specialized technique for producing radiographs showing only a section or a slice of a patient  Each tomograph shows the tissues within.
Topic 3 Selection of kV High kV scattered radiation is energetic. Angle of rays is same as those of primary beam and is not deflected very much. Follows.
RADIOLOGY. NEXT GENERATION SCIENCE / COMMON CORE STANDARDS ADDRESSED! CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RST Determine the central ideas or conclusions of a text;
Radiographic Grids II By Professor Stelmark.
ACVR Artifacts Artifacts of Diagnostic Radiology
Analyzing the Image Density. Density Overall blackening of the image.
Dr. Mustafa Zuhair Mahmoud Mr.Ali B Alhailiy بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم 1.
Digital Image Manipulation I By Professor Stelmark.
Basic quality control tests in medical radiography
Digital Radiography Chapter 22. History of Digital Radiography Slower process of conversion because no pressing need to convert to digital radiography.
Factors affecting the X-Ray output
X-Ray Production & Emission
…….CT Physics - Continued V.G.WimalasenaPrincipal School of radiography.
Quality Control Rad T 110.
Radiation and Fluoroscopic Equipment Tour of Ionizing Lab 1.
Computers in Imaging Q & A Robert Metzger, Ph.D..
Current UK legislation and guidelines for radiation protection of patients and staff Prepared by: Dr D. Mladenova.
Ch. 2 – Anatomy of the X-ray Machine
RADIATION PROTECTION IN DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY
Equipment Design for Radiation Protection
IMRT QA Plan Site 5%/3mm3%/3mm2%/2mm 0% noise1% noise2% noise0% noise1% noise2% noise0% noise1% noise2% noise HN
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 7 Sample Variability.
Prime Exposure Factors 1
Chapter 2 The X-ray Beam.
RAD 254 Chapter 15 Radiographic Technique 4 primary exposure factors are: kVp, mA, time, distance.
Computed Radiography By Prof. Stelmark. Presently, an acceleration in the conversion from screen-film radiography (analog) to digital radiography (DR)
RAD TECH A WEEK 2 RADIOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT Spring 2009.
Introduction to Graphical Hardware Display Technologies
Graphic boclair academy TOLERANCES.
PRINCIPLES OF TECHNIQUE AND EXPOSURE
Radiographic Quality Visibility and Sharpness
Radiation Sources in medicine diagnostic Radiology
More digital reading explaining LUT RT 244 Perry Sprawls, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus Department of Radiology Emory University School of.
Oscilloscope The main purposes of the oscilloscope are: Can view the input waveform voltage or current. Can measure instantaneous values of the input waveform.
Set Word Option to Reopen a Document in Draft View 1. Click here. 3. Check this box 2. Click here. A document saved in Draft view will not reopen in Draft.
Grid Performance By Prof. Stelmark.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency General Radiography Radiation Sources in medicine diagnostic Radiology Day 7 – Lecture 1(1)
Monday Case of the Day History: Multiple examinations from a CT scanner using a standard helical scan protocol show diffuse hypointense regions of artifact.
Thursday Case of the Day What is the source of the artifact in the upper right-hand quadrant of the image? History: An AP view of the pelvis was acquired.
Analog X-ray Imaging Recommended Book: Walter Huda, REVIEW OF RADIOLOGIC PHYSICS By: Maisa Alhassoun
Sergeo Guilbaud School of Radiologic Sciences
Week 2: Radiographic Equipment
Comparison Between AM and FM Reception. 21/06/20162 FM Receiver.
An early x-ray by Wilhem Rontgen
Sunday Case of the Day History : Patient presented for screening mammogram. The radiologist noted that there “increased motion on both CC views” limiting.
Thursday Case of the Day The likely cause of the artifact is: A. Patient Motion B. Improper Cupping Correction C.Off-Focus Radiation combined with heel.
Tuesday Case of the Day What is the best solution to mitigate the artifact? A. There is no artifact, patient is wearing compression garment(s) which are.
Patient is placed between X-ray tube and silver halide film.
Diagnostic Radiology II X-ray Tubes. Anode angle Anode angle defined as the angle of the target surface with respect to the central ray in the x-ray field.
UNIT-3 ADVANCES IN METROLOGY
Physics Case of the Day - Sunday
Sunday Case of the Day Physics
Exposure Factors Chapter 4
Tuesday Physics Case of the Day
Tuesday Case of the Day Physics
Tolerances.
Fluoroscopy Static Image Recording Systems
Intrinsic Uniformity QC Setup
TOLERANCES.
Generation of X-rays Q&A
Radiation at a Distance
Computed Tomography (C.T)
Presentation transcript:

Monday Case of the Day History: During acceptance testing of a new general radiographic room, tube output measurements differed between the small and large focal spot. Slit and pinhole camera imaging to verify the small focal spot size produced the images shown below. Author: Ryan Fisher, Ph.D. Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH Physics Figure 2: Pinhole image of small focal spot The likely explanation is: A. Inadequate erasure of the CR cassette used for imaging B. Metal filings on the collimator exit window C. Current in both x-ray tube filaments D. Focal spot blooming due to high imaging technique Figure 1: Slit camera image of small focal spot

Findings: 1.The tube output per mAs for the small focal spot was found to be approximately 30% higher than for the large focal spot. 2.Slit camera images of the large focal spot appeared normal and focal spot size measurements were within tolerances. 3.Slit camera and follow up pinhole camera images of the small focal spot showed a lower intensity ghosted shadow artifact, seen in Figures 1 & 2. Measurements of the darker areas of each were within tolerances for the small focal spot size. 4.Measurements showed the ghosted shadow size corresponded to the measured size of the large focal spot Figure 2: Pinhole image of small focal spot Figure 1: Slit camera image of small focal spot Small focal spot Ghosted shadow artifact

Findings: Figure 3: SFS pinhole image with current to large focal spot shut off 5.The service engineer was consulted and the small focal spot pinhole images were repeated with the filament current to the large focal spot completely shut off, producing the image seen in Figure 3 below. 6.The tube output per mAs for the small focal spot was re-measured with the current to the large focal spot filament cut off, and results were in line with what was previously measured with the large focal spot. Figure 4: Original SFS pinhole image

Diagnosis: C. Current in both x-ray tube filaments

While inadequate erasure of a CR cassette can lead to image artifacts, it is not likely that they would correspond so well with the actual focal spot images. This choice would also not explain the tube output discrepancy between the large and small focal spots. Therefore, choice A, “inadequate erasure of the CR cassette used for imaging,” is incorrect. Focal spot blooming can lead to inaccurate focal spot size measurements to the extent that NEMA recommends testing focal spot size for general radiographic equipment at 50% of the maximum tube current rating allowed during a 0.1 sec exposure (NEMA). All images in this case were acquired with such a technique and focal spot blooming would not explain the ghosted artifacts in both the pinhole and slit camera images. Choice D, “Focal spot blooming due to high imaging technique” is also incorrect. While debris on either the x-ray tube or collimator exit window have been shown to cause inverse pinhole effect artifacts (Cowart), such a scenario would not create the ghosted line artifacts seen in the slit camera images. Thus, choice B, “metal filings on the collimator exit window,” is also incorrect. Discussion: With the small focal spot selected, the generator was still supplying enough current to the large focal spot filament to cause electron emission and subsequent x-ray production. This additional x-ray production caused the higher tube output per mAs measured with the small focal spot, as well as the ghosted shadows visible in the slit and pinhole camera images. After all current was physically cut off from the large focal spot, the output and focal spot images for the small focal spot returned to normal. Replacement of faulty generator components corrected the issue.

References/Bibliography: Cowart, RW. An investigation of the inverse pinhole camera. Thesis. University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences. Houston, TX. June pages. National Electrical Manufacturers Association. (1992). Measurement of dimensions and properties of focal spots of diagnostic x-ray tubes (NEMA XR ). Washington, D.C.: National Electrical Manufacturers Association.