Hexavalent Chromium MCL Regulation Guidance Eric Zuniga, PE San Bernardino District SWRCB – DDW.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chromium 6 Philip Sithi-Amnuai An overview for the Sierra Club 2012.
Advertisements

Hayward Water System Public Health Goal Report Alex Ameri, Deputy Director of Public Works Utilities Division Department of Public Works.
7:00 pmWelcome and introductions 7:05pmHLWD planning overview Plan update process 7:25 pmStakeholder involvement Watershed problems 7:40 pmPublic comment.
FFATA S UB A WARD R EPORT & OMB G UIDANCE ON T RANSPARENCY A CT D ENISE S TINES F RANCIS – FFATA.
Electronic Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) Rule AWWA Alabama-Mississippi Section ADEM Regulation Update May 30, 2013 Laura A. Taylor (334)
IE 2, CHARTER, AND STATUS QUO SCHOOL SYSTEMS Flexibility Options Comparison F EBRUARY 26, 2015 Ken Thompson Chief Financial Officer.
School Facility Program Update County School Facilities Consortium September 25, 2012 Presenters: Lisa Silverman, Executive Officer Rick Asbell, Chief.
Office of Federal and State Accountability September 11, 2012.
{Your District Name Here} District Small MS4/Municipal Storm Water Update {Date Here}
1 Proposed Changes to the Accreditation Process CDE Briefing for the Colorado State Board of Education March 5, 2008.
Districts In Good Standing. Origins Discussed at November 2010 meeting Approved by the Soil and Water Conservation Commission during January 2011 meeting.
2014 Sustainable Groundwater Management Act Environmental Management Agency Environmental Health Department Report to LAFCo - October 20, 2014.
SB4 Implementation & Kern County Oil and Gas EIR Update Air and Waste Management Association – Golden Empire Chapter Western States Petroleum Association.
SCOPING MEETING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT REQUIRED BY PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 3161 (b)(3) AND (4) (SENATE BILL 4) (PAVLEY) C ALIFORNIA D EPARTMENT.
Investigating Ground Water Contamination at Ohio’s C&DD Landfills Aaron Shear Ohio’s Solid Waste and C&DD Program Annual Meeting May 9, 2013.
Operational Evaluation Level Stage 2 D/DBP Rule Compliance Michael W. Deal Compliance Assurance Section Central Office Division of Drinking And Ground.
Los Angeles County Office of Education Division for School Improvement School Site Council (SSC) Training September 9 th 2008 Anna Carrasco From presentation.
Indiana Environmental Health Summit Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) June 6, 2011 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, QEP Commissioner,
Leah A. Guzman Environmental Program Specialist Drinking Water Program Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation Sustained Compliance—What It Means.
Mississippi State Department of Health
Senate Bill X7-7 Implementation CII Task Force March 1, 2011 Manucher Alemi, Ph. D., P.E. Water Use and Efficiency Program Manager.
1 CDHS - DDWEM Public Workshops - Prop 84 - Draft Criteria Proposition 84 Safe Drinking Water, Water Quality and Supply, Flood Control, River and Coastal.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION – Reviewed on 8-May-12. The content was not modified. Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Quality.
Regional Grant Funding Coordination for Implementation of Watershed Management Plans Project Clean Water Summit July 15, 2004 David W. Gibson SDRWQCB
Los Osos Community Services District Basin Management Planning and Proposed Work Program June 5, 2008.
Interim Executive Director June  Financial Management Practices Audit Results Fiscal Year Audit Results Fiscal Year Internal.
The University of Texas at San Antonio June 19, 2013 Merit Policy.
2014 IRWM Drought Grants Sierra Water Workgroup Summit June Tracie L. Billington Department of Water Resources Financial Assistance Branch.
VI. Developing a VSMP Program General Stormwater Training Workshop.
Protecting Drinking Water: The U.S. Safe Drinking Water Act Chapter 16 © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
MORRIS MILL PROPOSED URBAN SERVICES DISTRICT Presentation to County Council September 17, 2013.
Contra Costa County Office of Education May 2015 Local Control Funding Formula: Supporting Continuous Improvement.
Pasadena Water and Power Public Health Goals Report Presented by David Kimbrough, Ph.D. Water Quality Manager City Council September 9, 2013 Item 14.
Public Workshop Airborne Toxic Control Measure (ATCM) for Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coatings Public Workshop Airborne Toxic Control Measure (ATCM)
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Quality Education Investment Act of 2006 (QEIA) February.
Water System Consolidation and Restructuring Scott Torpie Washington State Department of Health Drinking Water Advisory Group November 3, 2014.
11 Cap-and-Trade Auction Proceeds Funding Guidelines for Agencies that Administer California Climate Investments September
Noncompliance and Correction (OSEP Memo 09-02) June 2012.
EPA Groundwater Rule 40 CFR Parts and 142. Reasons for the Groundwater Rule  To protect public health due to viruses and other bacterial exposure.
Adem.alabama.gov Revisions to the Total Coliform Rule (RTCR) AWWA Alabama-Mississippi Section ADEM Regulation Update February 26, 2014 George Cox (334)
1 Indiana Regional Sewer District Association Annual Meeting Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, Commissioner Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
Using GIS to Map Chromium Occurrence in Drinking Water Nate Rogers CEE 6440.
1 Update on Efforts to Reduce Emissions and Risks at High Risk Railyards February 25, 2010 BNSF San Bernardino California Environmental Protection Agency.
Work Related to Senate Bill 2202 (effective January 1, 2001)
Item 21 May 11-12, 2004 CIWMB Meeting Discussion And Request For Rulemaking Direction To Formally Notice Proposed Regulations For RCRA Subtitle D Program.
The Sustainable Groundwater Management Act and DWR’s Role in Sustainable Groundwater Management California Irrigation Institute 2016 Conference January.
Public Notices and Violations. Abbreviations To Know RTCR – Revised Total Coliform Rule TCR – Total Coliform Rule TC – Total Coliform EC – E. coli PN.
NH Department of Education Developing the School Improvement Plan Required by NH RSA 193-H and Federal Public Law for Schools in Need of Improvement.
Sustain Noblesville Committee September 19, 2011 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
Board of Governors Fee Waiver SMCCCD LOSS OF ELIGIBILITY REGULATORY CHANGES Staff Training March 14, 2016 Margie Carrington.
SAFE DRINKING WATER GENERAL UPDATE TO CHAPTER 109 June 19, 2007 Bureau of Water Standards and Facility Regulation.
Water Quality Facts John Shirey City Manager William Busath, P.E. Director of Utilities Pravani Vandeyar Water Quality Superintendent.
Water Quality/Stormwater Seminar September House Bill 2031 Requires TCEQ to adopt an expedited permitting process for discharge permits for treated.
Outline Background on Lead in Drinking Water How Lead is Regulated
California Department of Education
Chromium 6 Regulation Corrective Action Plan October 6, 2015
Lead and Copper Rule (LCR)
Board of Supervisors May 9, 2017
Chromium 6 Regulation September 1, 2015
Consideration of Final Rulemaking
Drinking Water Services Program Update Dave Emme May 2017
July 13, 2016 Department of Environmental Quality Proposed Amendments to UST Rules 15A NCAC 02N and 02O Ruth Strauss.
September 8, 2016 Department of Environmental Quality Proposed Amendments to UST Rules 15A NCAC 02N and 02O Ruth Strauss.
Finance Options: Funding Water Infrastructure Projects George Bryan South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control State Revolving Fund.
Annual Tribal and EPA Conference October 31, 2018
San Luis Obispo County Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM) Region Regional Water Management Group (RWMG) Meeting SLO City/County Library Community.
Board of Public Utilities August 17, 2017
City Council Public Hearing August 16, 2010
California Water Boards PFAS Efforts
Presentation transcript:

Hexavalent Chromium MCL Regulation Guidance Eric Zuniga, PE San Bernardino District SWRCB – DDW

Cr6 MCL Regulation Development Background Chromium is a heavy metal that occurs throughout the environment. The trivalent form (chromium-3) is a required nutrient. The hexavalent form (chromium-6) has been known to cause cancer when inhaled and has also been linked to cancer when ingested Low-levels of chromium-6 in drinking water is naturally occurring and present in geological formations throughout CA Areas of contamination also from historic industrial use (manufacturing of textile dyes, wood preservatives, leather tanning, anti-corrosion coatings)

Cr6 MCL Regulation Development History of Regulation 2000: Public awareness of chromium-6 increased with release of the Erin Brokovich movie Prior to the MCL, chromium-6 is regulated as total chromium (CA MCL: 50 ppb, CA DLR: 10 ppb, US EPA: 100 ppb)

Cr6 MCL Regulation Development Regulation Proposed MCL of 10 ppb announced in August 2013, initiated a public review and comment period, 2 public hearings, over 18,000 comments received. On July 1 st, in accordance with California’s statutory requirements - an MCL of 10 ppb for hexavalent chromium became effective. The MCL applies to applicable public water systems. The MCL was the first in the country specific to hexavalent chromium.

Cr6 MCL Implementation Initial Monitoring Initial sampling from all sources was to be completed by January 1, Results collected between July 1, 2012 and June 30, 2014 could be grandfathered for initial sampling (GW sources only) Quarterly monitoring is triggered if the initial sample is greater than 10 ppb Compliance based on an average of the samples taken over 4 consecutive quarters

Cr6 MCL Implementation Routine Monitoring If the initial sample did not exceed 10 ppb: – Groundwater: One sample every 3 years – Surface water: Annual sampling If the initial sample was grandfathered, sampling is due 3 years from the previous sampling date Total chromium may be substituted for routine monitoring if total chromium is non-detect (CA DLR = 10 ppb)

Cr6 MCL Implementation MCL Exceedances MCL Exceedances require Tier 2 public notification when water exceeding the MCL is delivered to the public – Direct delivery to each customer, posting in public place/Internet, newspaper publication, and community organizations – Must be given within 30 days, repeated every 3 months

Cr6 MCL Implementation Compliance Plan Criteria Senate Bill (SB385) became effective on September 4, Provides additional time for systems to come into compliance with the new MCL – No later than January 1, 2020 A plan for compliance within the shortest period of time and milestones for accountability

Cr6 MCL Implementation Compliance Plan Criteria Letter of Intent – a written notice to the Division from a public water system who is in violation of the MCL – No later than March 31, 2016 Declare intent to submit a Compliance Plan – No later than June 30, certlic/drinkingwater/documents/lawbook/sb385 _hexavalent_chromium_compliance_fnl_.pdf certlic/drinkingwater/documents/lawbook/sb385 _hexavalent_chromium_compliance_fnl_.pdf

Cr6 MCL Implementation Compliance Plan Criteria Compliance Plan – Why it is not feasible for a water system to presently comply – Summary of the available funding sources and options evaluated to be in compliance – Dates, method and content of Public Notification, twice annually – Begin and end dates for each milestone

Cr6 MCL Implementation Compliance Plan Criteria Description of milestone actions, including but not limited to: – Evaluation/Planning/Feasibility Study – Design, including treatment options – Environmental Review – Funding – Land acquisition, if needed – Construction Contracting – Construction, and Testing

Cr6 MCL Implementation Compliance Plan Criteria Quarterly progress reports, updates on status of milestone activities Chromium-6 monitoring running annual averages and results Public Notice: – c/drinkingwater/documents/lawbook/sb385_hex_chr omium_pub_notice_temp.pdf c/drinkingwater/documents/lawbook/sb385_hex_chr omium_pub_notice_temp.pdf

Cr6 MCL Implementation Other Corrective Actions Possible actions include: – Inactivating the well (physical disconnection) – Standby status (limited use per Title 22, CCR) – BLENDING should be evaluated Treatment Possibilities – [BAT] Strong Base Ion Exchange – Weak Base Ion Exchange – Reduction-Coagulation/Filtration (RCF) – [BAT] Reverse Osmosis Piloting is strongly recommended

Cr6 MCL Implementation Corrective Actions If you have not already done so, discuss with our local SWRCB-DDW District Office or County Environmental Health Program Compliance Order will require submittal of corrective action plan with timeline and milestones to be achieved to return to compliance (3 years)

Cr6 MCL Implementation Financial Assistance Funding is available through Safe Drinking Water State Revolving Fund – Low-interest loans (~2%, 20-year repayment) – Disadvantaged community status will be reviewed for grant eligibility FAAST application – Can begin application process at any time – General application package to get started NO MORE PRE-APPLICATION, PRIORITY LIST, OR INVITATION

Cr6 MCL package development… In the future The State Board’s Division of Drinking Water (DDW), as well as OEHHA, will continue to follow new scientific evidence pertaining to health effects from hexavalent chromium exposure. The DDW will continue to follow treatment technologies, and their associated costs, for hexavalent chromium. Changes in treatment costs or the PHG can lead to revisions in the MCL. U.S. EPA is currently gathering information in consideration of establishing a hexavalent chromium- specific MCL. If U.S. EPA establishes a lower MCL than California’s, California will adopt a standard at that standard or one that is lower.