CRI – Spanish update (1) 2010 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Relationship of somatic cell score with fertility measures Poster 1390 ADSA 2001, Indiannapolis R. H. Miller 1, J. S. Clay 2, and H. D. Norman 1 1 Animal.
Advertisements

2002 Paul M. VanRaden and Ashley H. Sanders Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
John B. Cole* and Paul M. VanRaden Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD
Impact of selection for increased daughter fertility on productive life and culling for reproduction H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright*, R. H. Miller Animal Improvement.
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 2008 Genetic trends.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2009 G.R. WiggansCroatian.
2005 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD AIPL Projects.
J. B. Cole 1, P. D. Miller 2, and H. D. Norman 1 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 2 Department.
Wiggans, 2013RL meeting, Aug. 15 (1) Dr. George R. Wiggans, Acting Research Leader Bldg. 005, Room 306, BARC-West (main office);
ADSA 2002 (HDN-P1) 2002 Comparison of occurrence and yields of daughters of progeny-test and proven bulls in artificial insemination and natural- service.
2012 ADSA-AMPA-ASAS-CSAS-WSASAS joint annual meeting (1)Norman Comparison of daughter performance of New Zealand and North American sires in US herds H.D.
But who will be the next GREAT one?. USA Bull Proofs * Bulls are ranked based upon their DAUGHTER’S (progeny) production and physical characteristics.
2007 Jana L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA
WiggansARS Big Data Workshop – July 16, 2015 (1) George R. Wiggans Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
December 2014 Proof Changes
2001 ADSA annual meeting, July 2001 (1) Timeliness of progeny-testing through AI and percentage of bulls returned to service (abstract 1020) H.D. NORMAN,*
2002 Paul M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Selection of dairy.
Impacts of inclusion of foreign data in genomic evaluation of dairy cattle K. M. Olson 1, P. M. VanRaden 2, D. J. Null 2, and M. E. Tooker 2 1 National.
WiggansANSC UMD(1) 2013 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD National Association.
2007 ADSA 2007 (1)H.D. Norman Effect of service sire and cow sire on gestation length H.D. Norman,* J.R. Wright, P.M. VanRaden, and J.B. Cole Animal Improvement.
 PTA mobility was highly correlated with udder composite.  PTA mobility showed a moderate, positive correlation with production, productive life, and.
2002 ADSA 2002 (HDN-1) H.D. NORMAN* ( ), R.H. MILLER, P.M. V AN RADEN, and J.R. WRIGHT Animal Improvement Programs.
Norway (1) 2005 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service,
John B. Cole* and Paul M. VanRaden Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD
AFGC Convention 2004 (1) 2004 Possibilities for Improving Dairy Cattle Performance Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD NDHIA San Antonio.
John B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Dairy Cattle Breeding.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Missouri Dairy Summit.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2009 G.R. WiggansInner.
John B. Cole, Ph.D. Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD, USA The U.S. genetic.
2007 J.B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Overview.
2006 Paul VanRaden, John Cole, and George Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
2005 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD An Example from Dairy.
2005 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA Selection for.
Genetic Evaluation of Lactation Persistency Estimated by Best Prediction for Ayrshire, Brown Swiss, Guernsey, and Milking Shorthorn Dairy Cattle J. B.
2002 Paul VanRaden, Ashley Sanders, Melvin Tooker, Bob Miller, and Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA,
Adjustment of selection index coefficients and polygenic variance to improve regressions and reliability of genomic evaluations P. M. VanRaden, J. R. Wright*,
Paul VanRaden and Melvin Tooker* Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 2006.
WiggansCDCB industry meeting – Sept. 29, 2015 (1) George R. Wiggans Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
G.R. Wiggans* and P.M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD
2003 P.M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Genetic Evaluations.
2006 Mid-Atlantic Dairy Grazing Conference, 2006 (1) Is There a Need for Different Genetics in Dairy Grazing Systems? H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L.
2006 H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
XX International Grassland Conference 2005 (1) 2005 Genetic Alternatives for Dairy Producers who Practise Grazing H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L. Powell.
7 th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod Selection of dairy cattle for lifetime profit Paul M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory.
Dr. George R. Wiggans, Ph.D. Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD, USA
Norman, 2014ICAR / Interbull annual meeting, Berlin, Germany, May 20, 2014 (1) Dr. H. Duane Norman Interim Administrator Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding.
H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright, and R.H. Miller Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA
WiggansARS Big Data Computing Workshop (1) 2013 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
Genetic and environmental factors that affect gestation length H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, M. T. Kuhn, S. M. Hubbard,* and J. B. Cole Animal Improvement.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD NDHIA 2009 meeting.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA EAAP.
2003 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Genetic Evaluation.
Multi-trait, multi-breed conception rate evaluations P. M. VanRaden 1, J. R. Wright 1 *, C. Sun 2, J. L. Hutchison 1 and M. E. Tooker 1 1 Animal Genomics.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD California Dairy Herd.
2003 P.M. VanRaden* and M.E. Tooker Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Definition.
H.D. Norman* J.R. Wright, P.M. VanRaden, and M.T. Kuhn Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
2007 John Cole, Paul VanRaden, George Wiggans, and Melvin Kuhn Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD,
2006 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD AIPL Contributions.
2006 GEORGE R. WIGGANS Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, Maryland ,
2001 ADSA Indianapolis 2001 (1) Heterosis and Breed Differences for Yield and Somatic Cell Scores of US Dairy Cattle in the 1990’s. PAUL VANRADEN Animal.
John B. Cole and Daniel J. Null Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Dairy Cattle Reproductive.
2001 NAAB / S-284 Meeting, Baltimore, 2001 (1) Implications of Crossbreeding on Dairy Cattle Improvement Paul VanRaden and Ashley Sanders Animal Improvement.
2007 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA 2007 Genetic evaluation.
H.D. NORMAN,* R.L. POWELL, J.R. WRIGHT
Cross-Breeding What is X-Breeding?.
Correlations Among Measures of Dairy Cattle Fertility and Longevity
Where AIPL Fits In Agricultural Research Service (ARS) is the main research arm of USDA (8,000 employees with 2,000 scientists at >100 locations) Beltsville.
Presentation transcript:

CRI – Spanish update (1) 2010 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA

CRI – Spanish update (2) 2010 H.D. Norman U.S. dairy statistics (2009) l 9.2 million cows l 54,000 herds l 170 cows/herd l 20,850 lb (9458 kg)/cow l ~91% Holsteins, ~7% Jerseys l ~75% bred AI l 47% milk recorded through Dairy Herd Improvement (DHI)

CRI – Spanish update (3) 2010 H.D. Norman U.S. dairy population and yield

CRI – Spanish update (4) 2010 H.D. Norman DHI statistics (2009–10) l 4.5 million cows – 98% fat recorded – 97% protein recorded – 93% SCC recorded l 22,000 herds l 203 cows/herd l 22,274 lb (10,103 kg)/cow – 3.69% fat – 3.09% (true) protein

CRI – Spanish update (5) 2010 H.D. Norman U.S. progeny-test bulls (2008) l Major and marketing-only AI organizations plus breeder proven l Breeds – Ayrshire 10 bulls – Brown Swiss 23 bulls – Guernsey 20 bulls – Holstein1409 bulls – Jersey 167 bulls – Milking Shorthorn 7 bulls

CRI – Spanish update (6) 2010 H.D. Norman National Dairy Genetic Evaluation Program AIPLCDCB NAAB PDCA DHI Universities AIPL Animal Improvement Programs Lab., USDA CDCBCouncil on Dairy Cattle Breeding DHIDairy Herd Improvement (milk recording organizations) NAABNational Association of Animal Breeders (AI) PDCAPurebred Dairy Cattle Association (breed registries)

CRI – Spanish update (7) 2010 H.D. Norman AIPL mission l Conduct research to discover, test, and implement improved genetic evaluation techniques for economically important traits of dairy cattle and goats l Genetically improve efficiency of dairy animals for yield (milk, fat, protein) and fitness (longevity, mastitis resistance, reproduction, conformation)

CRI – Spanish update (8) 2010 H.D. Norman AIPL research objectives l Collect genotypes and new phenotypes to improve accuracy and comprehensiveness of the national database l Characterize phenotypic measures of dairy practices, and provide dairy industry with information needed to determine the impact of various herd management decision on profitability

CRI – Spanish update (9) 2010 H.D. Norman AIPL research objectives (cont.) l Improve accuracy of prediction of economically important traits currently evaluated, determine merit and potential for developing genetic prediction for new traits, and investigate methods to incorporate high-density genomic data

CRI – Spanish update (10) 2010 H.D. Norman AIPL research objectives (cont.) l Investigate economic value of traits and correlations among them to most efficiently combine evaluations to select for healthy dairy animals capable of producing quality milk at a low cost in many environments

CRI – Spanish update (11) 2010 H.D. Norman Traits evaluated l Yield (milk, fat, protein volume; percentages) l Type/conformation l Productive life/longevity l Somatic cell score/mastitis resistance l Fertility – Daughter pregnancy rate (cow) – Estimated relative conception rate (bull) l Calving ease/dystocia (service sire, daughter) l Stillbirth (service sire, daughter)

CRI – Spanish update (12) 2010 H.D. Norman Evaluation methods l Animal model (linear) – Yield (milk, fat, protein) – Type (Ayrshire, Brown Swiss, Guernsey, Jersey) – Productive life – SCS – Daughter pregnancy rate l Sire – maternal grandsire model (threshold) – Service sire calving ease – Daughter calving ease Heritability 25 – 40% 7 – 54% 8.5% 12% 4% 8.6% 3.6%

CRI – Spanish update (13) 2010 H.D. Norman Genetic trend – Milk Phenotypic base = 11,638 kg sires

CRI – Spanish update (14) 2010 H.D. Norman Genetic trend – Fat Phenotypic base = 424 kg sires

CRI – Spanish update (15) 2010 H.D. Norman Genetic trend – Protein Phenotypic base = 350 kg sires

CRI – Spanish update (16) 2010 H.D. Norman Genetic trend – Productive life (mo) Phenotypic base = 24.6 months sires

CRI – Spanish update (17) 2010 H.D. Norman Genetic trend – Somatic cell score Phenotypic base = 3.08 (log base 2) sires

CRI – Spanish update (18) 2010 H.D. Norman Genetic trend – Daughter pregnancy rate (%) Phenotypic base = 21.53% sires

CRI – Spanish update (19) 2010 H.D. Norman Genetic-economic indexes Trait Relative value (%) Cheese merit Net merit Fluid merit Protein (lb)25160 Fat (lb) Milk (lb)–15019 Productive life (mo)1522 Somatic cell score (log base 2)–9–10–5 Udder composite577 Feet/legs composite344 Body size composite–4–6 Daughter pregnancy rate (%)8712 Calving ability ($)355

CRI – Spanish update (20) 2010 H.D. Norman Index changes Relative emphasis on traits in index (%) PTA traits included PD$ 1971 MFP$ 1976 CY$ 1984 NM$ 1994 NM$ 2000 NM$ 2003 NM$ 2006 NM$ 2010 Milk5227– Fat Protein… Productive life……… Somatic cell score………–6–9 –10 Udder composite…………7767 Feet/legs composite…………4434 Body size composite…………–4–3–4–6 Daughter pregnanc. rate……………7911 Service-sire calving ease……………2…… Daughter calving ease……………2…… Calving ability………………65