CIPFA SCOTTISH STUDENTS’ SOCIETY “The Challenge of Change”
Presentation Structure Background - Scottish FE Colleges Merger – Why? Merger – How? Merger – Any lessons? Merger – Positive outcomes?
Background Scottish FE Colleges 42 Colleges Governance – Board of Management Performance Management Funding contract based on student numbers Financial Stability Quality assurance Local Bargaining
Anniesland College North Glasgow College Stow College Central College GCBP GCFT GCNS Cardonald College John Wheatley College Langside Background Glasgow FE Colleges
Background Glasgow City Centre
Background Merger Colleges incorporated April 1993 1997 GCBP & GCFT merger proposal rejected Sept 2001 GCBP, GCFT and Central College March 2002 Feasibility Study & Due Diligence Sept 2002 all 3 Board agree to move forward February 2003 Consultation issued May 2003 Central College withdrew Nov 2003 GCBP & GCFT submit merger proposal Approved by Minister June 2004 Glasgow Met formed 1 st August 2004 Transfer 1 st February 2005
Merger – Why?
Political steer Financial Stability Operating Surplus Historic Surplus Income & Expenditure Reserves Net Current Assets Capital Investment
TurnoverI&E ReservesStaff FTE Merger – Why?
Merger – Why? Operating Surplus
Merger – Why? Historic Surplus
Merger – Why? Income & Exp Reserve
Merger – Why? Net Current Assets
Merger – Why? Capital Expenditure
Merger – How? Governance Phoenix Model Completely new legal entity created by statute GCBP and GCFT transferred to Glasgow Met Difficult to enter into contracts as new entity (Glasgow Met) not established until 1 st August 2004 Could not appoint Board or Principal until on or after 1 st August 2004 High Risk Model Effective leadership difficult Weak management Decisions often based on compromise
Merger – How? Governance Board of Management Appointed by Deputy First Minister Established 1 st August 2004 50:50 GCBP and GCFT 12 members Principal, industry & other stakeholders (7), staff reps (2), Scottish Enterprise (1), student rep (1)
Merger – How? Governance
Merger – How? Leadership & Management Confident leadership Strong management control No redundancies (if affordable) Effective communications Trade union involvement Matching-in
Merger – How? Matching-In Organisation Structure Key planning activity Should not be designed by committee Desk research Meticulous care Span of control (set at 6) Number of levels (scalar max set at 6) Consultation
Merger – How? Organisation Structure
Merger – How? Matching-In Matching in Procedures Developed Minimal Impact Groups All lecturers Cleaners Catering Assistants Workshop/General Assistants Some Technicians Matching-in Committees
Merger – How? Matching-In Committee
Merger - Lessons Matching-In Matching-in Committees 4 formal grievances Competitive Interviews Out of 600 less than 5% interviews Strong emphasis on competencies and evidence-based selection. No disputes with trade unions No Employment Tribunals
People Lessons TUPE EU directive on transfer of undertakings Employment law minefield Single biggest barrier to harmonising terms & conditions of employment
People Lessons TUPE Terms & Conditions Terms & Conditions Lecturers (GCBP) Management Support (GCFT) Lecturers (GCFT) Support (GCBP)
People Lessons TUPE & Equal Pay Fertile ground for equal pay challenge Current defence – differences arise from transfer of undertaking Cannot take risk of forcing through new contracts for new appointments Cannot talk about “harmonisation”
People Lessons TUPE & Equal Pay Age discrimination legislation (October 2006) has provided a spring board for change
People Lessons Other Staff morale – high risk Senior management – high risk Decision making overload Complex & time-consuming decisions Operational service delivery stagnates Creativity stifled
Computerised Management Systems Accounting System – Symmetry Oracle Payroll/personnel (Wealdon) Student Records (Capita) Estates & Facilities (Concept) Bursaries (Tequious)
Finance & Accounting Financial Management Systems Management Accounting Financial Reporting
Finance & Accounting Implementation Audit Scotland No additional staff 2004/05 1.GCBP 2.GCFT 3.Glasgow Met 2004/05 1.GCBP 2.GCFT 3.Glasgow Met
Financial Management Lessons Importance of organisation structure Cost centre relationships need to be built-up at an early stage Allows for budgets to be built around new organisation structure
Finance & Accounting Lessons Hand Pick Your Managers Hand Pick Your Managers
Financial Reporting Lessons FRS6 – Mergers & Acquisitions If merger part way through financial year, then consider keeping separate systems for full-year – because It allows continuation of budgetary control and accountability
Merger - Outcomes Financial Performance
Merger Outcomes Financial Performance
Merger Outcomes Student Recruitment
Merger Outcomes wSUMs Performance
Merger Outcomes Absence Management Saving = £350,000
Merger Outcomes Organisation “refreshed” Future risks – better spread College more influential Economies of scale Improved space utilisation Improved market brand & identity
CIPFA SCOTTISH STUDENTS’ SOCIETY “The Challenge of Change”