EEE: PILOT RUN Status of CAGLIARI telescopes November 6, 2014 Corrado Cicalo, Stefano Boi, Luisella Stori, Giulia Murtas, Federico Cinus.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Accidental Coincidences Statistical Analysis By Steve Kliewer 2008 SCIPP Workshop.

Advertisements

Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik - Albert-Einstein-Institut DC Meeting Golm - Karsten Kötter1 Current status of DAQ System

1 Hypothesis testing. 2 A common aim in many studies is to check whether the data agree with certain predictions. These predictions are hypotheses about.

Lecture 18. Final Project Design your own survey! – Find an interesting question and population – Design your sampling plan – Collect Data – Analyze using.

Operationalizing IE: Case Study example: Textbooks and Teacher Training in Sierra Leone APEIE Workshop, May

GLAST LAT ProjectGLAST Flight Software IDT, October 16, 2001 JJRussell1 October 16, 2001 What’s Covered Activity –Monitoring FSW defines this as activity.

Prepared by MORE Team Progress Meeting Thursday, 15/10/2009 MORE status overview.

RF BD statistics in the TD26CC accelerating structure J. Giner-Navarro 18/11/2014 CLIC Breakdown meeting 118/11/2014J. Giner-Navarro.

Identifying anomalous strips David Stuart, Noah Rubinstein University of California, Santa Barbara June 18,

A. McDonald (1), J. Devlin (2). (1) Department of Physics, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia (2) Department of Electronic Engineering, La Trobe.

Binomial Distribution And general discrete probability distributions...

Presenter: Shant Mandossian EFFECTIVE TESTING OF HEALTHCARE SIMULATION SOFTWARE.

Statistical Hypothesis Testing. Suppose you have a random variable X ( number of vehicle accidents in a year, stock market returns, time between el nino.

I can solve systems of equations by graphing and analyze special systems.

5-1 Introduction 5-2 Inference on the Means of Two Populations, Variances Known Assumptions.

13.7 – Graphing Linear Inequalities Are the ordered pairs a solution to the problem?

Coincidence group report Analysis meeting, 13/04/20151.

ICS – Software Engineering Group 1 The SNS General Time Timestamp Driver Sheng Peng & David Thompson.

Vladimir Frolov for Torino group. Experimental activities: The system for testing the MRPC in the Torino INFN laboratory has been fully mounted and checked;

Paris, July 17, 2009 RECENT RESULTS OF THE IGEC2 COLLABORATION SEARCH FOR GRAVITATIONAL WAVE BURST Massimo Visco on behalf of the IGEC2 Collaboration.

Areas For Review L3 Review of SM Software, 28 Oct The Charge From Jim’s with instructions for the review: “The time limit for this review.

1 Chapters 6-8. UNIT 2 VOCABULARY – Chap 6 2 ( 2) THE NOTATION “P” REPRESENTS THE TRUE PROBABILITY OF AN EVENT HAPPENING, ACCORDING TO AN IDEAL DISTRIBUTION.

Chapter 6 Lecture 3 Sections: 6.4 – 6.5.

Update on the new reconstruction software F. Noferini E. Fermi center INFN CNAF EEE Analysis Meeting - 14/09/20151.

The SuperCDMS-SNOLAB Trigger System Report of the Trigger Task Force Scott Oser (co-chair), Dave Toback (co-chair), Dan Bauer, Anders Borgland, Ray Bunker,

String-18 New-DAQ Commissioning Azriel Goldschmidt AMANDA Collaboration Meeting Berkeley, March 2002.

Examination of Corrupted Data in the Tile Calorimeter Stephanie Hamilton Michigan State University The ATLAS Experiment Supervisor: Irene Vichou (U of.

Section 10.1 Confidence Intervals

Solution of the Inverse Problem for Gravitational Wave Bursts Massimo Tinto JPL/CIT LIGO Seminar, October 12, 2004 Y. Gursel & M. Tinto, Phys. Rev. D,

AP Statistics Chapter 13 Notes. Two-sample problems The goal is to compare the responses of two treatments given to randomly assigned groups, or to compare.

LIGO-G D Status of Stochastic Search with LIGO Vuk Mandic on behalf of LIGO Scientific Collaboration Caltech GWDAW-10, 12/15/05.

Charge Sharing & Hit Identification & Cluster Information.

PESAsim – the e/  analysis framework Validation of the framework First look at a trigger menu combining several signatures Short-term plans Mark Sutton.

Section Copyright © 2014, 2012, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 10 Correlation and Regression 10-2 Correlation 10-3 Regression.

LIGO-G E1 Reviewer Report for the S2 Time-Domain Pulsar Search Teviet Creighton, Andri Gretarsson, Fred Raab, B. Sathyaprakash, Peter Shawhan.

LIGO- G D Experimental Upper Limit from LIGO on the Gravitational Waves from GRB Stan Whitcomb For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Informal.

1 Simple Linear Regression and Correlation Least Squares Method The Model Estimating the Coefficients EXAMPLE 1: USED CAR SALES.

SLR2000: current status & issues being worked Jan McGarry & Tom Zagwodzki Khz ranging session ILRS Workshop at Eastbourne October 2005.

1 Oct 2009Paul Dauncey1 Status of 2D efficiency study Paul Dauncey.

2/18/2016I. Ravinovich1 HBD Run-10 data analysis I. Ravinovich WIS.

The SuperCDMS-SNOLAB Trigger System Report of the Trigger Task Force Scott Oser (co-chair), Dave Toback (co-chair), Dan Bauer, Anders Borgland, Ray Bunker,

October 2011 David Toback, Texas A&M University Research Topics Seminar1 David Toback Texas A&M University For the CDF Collaboration CIPANP, June 2012.

WEEK 6 Day 2. Progress report Thursday the 11 th.

Medical Manager Unit 8 ICBS 170. Medical Manager Unique Payments Refunding an overpayment Patient or insurance carrier overpays an account Removing a.

LIGO-G E S2 Data Quality Investigation John Zweizig Caltech/LIGO.

Calorimeter global commissioning: progress and plans Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay & CERN, 25 jun 2008.

Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope Tower 1 TVAC tests Bad ladders issues.

EEE telescope time resolution D. De Gruttola, M.P. Panetta, C. Cicalò.

AP Statistics Part IV – Inference: Conclusions with Confidence Chapter 10: Introduction to Inference 10.1Estimating with Confidence To make an inference.

Laboratoire de Physique des Plasmas 20 TH CAA CROSS-CAL M EETING CLUSTER-STAFF REPORT O CTOBER 2014 G ÖTTINGEN The STAFF Team Laboratoire de Physique.

Atmospheric Shower Studies from last data taking Conferenza Nazionale del Progetto EEE Extreme Energy Events La Scienza nelle Scuole Dicembre 2014.

Laser System Status and Plans November 20 th, 2008 R.Febbraro / S. Viret LPC TileCal Operations 1. Diode 4 study 2. Stability preliminary results 3. Next.

Preliminary search for long distance correlations in EEE

Math 4030 – 10b Inferences Concerning Variances: Hypothesis Testing

Analysis and paper on chamber and telescope performance

fields of possible improvement

De-anonymizing the Internet Using Unreliable IDs

Update on coincidences

Slice Test: Preliminary Data Analysis The Ohio State University

Data Analysis in Particle Physics

Investigation of multi-messenger and rare events in EEE

TESTs about a population mean

Measure of muon velocity in EEE data

Search for coincidences and study of cosmic rays spectrum

Status Report on LDC analysis and MultI-track events

Welcome back from holidays! …for a new year of exciting data taking

Hough-D(mc)- ππJpsi(Data)

Search for anomalous EEE

Search for anomalous EEE

Presentation transcript:

EEE: PILOT RUN Status of CAGLIARI telescopes November 6, 2014 Corrado Cicalo, Stefano Boi, Luisella Stori, Giulia Murtas, Federico Cinus

Posizione dei telescopi 500 m 2500 m 2350 m

CAGLIARI telescopes, Pilot RUN Data collected up to now (since , up to today) CAGL-01: events CAGL-02: events CAGL-03: events

Amphenol cables swapped on CAGL-01 and CAGL-03 Problem found and solved BEFORE the starting of the PILOT RUN

PROBLEMS…. NOISE from a conditioning unit located at 39m from the telescope (ASL building)

Noise on CAGL-01 39m Active sometimes in the night to filter oil. When working, strong noise on CAGL-01. Data not usable. Fortunately up to now. Only one night. BAD RUNS: from 35 to from 1 to 110

More problems… CAGL-03. strong random noise, reason unknown. Permanent strips, very high rate (kHz!). Data useless. From run 39 on 29/10/14 to 02/11/14. Back from 3/11/14 without special intervention.

GPS crosscheck In CAGLIARI we have: – CAGL-01 and CAGL-02 equipped with SPECTRACOM GPS (since 1-2 years) – CAGL-03 equipped with HYTEC GPS CAGL-03: crosschecked data with V15 and V20 ANALYZER software. Found inconsistencies with V20, (probably known problem?). With V15 data seem regular.

run_number,event_number,secs_since_ ,nanosec,microseconds_since_start_of_run track: unit_vector_x,unit_vector_y,unit_vector_z,chi_squared,time of flight[ns],track length[cm] ANALYZER V20 Telescope CAGL-03 GPS HYTEC (VME)

run_number,event_number,secs_since_ ,nanosec,microseconds_since_start_of_runtrack: unit_vector_x,unit_vector_y,unit_vector_z,chi_squared,time of flight[ns],track length[cm] ANALYZER V15 Telescope CAGL-03 GPS HYTEC (VME)

Crosscheck Analyzer V15-V20 ANALYZERV15 run_number,event_number,secs_since_ ,nanosec,microseconds_since_start_of_runtrack: unit_vector_x,unit_vector_y,unit_vector_z,chi_squared,time of flight[ns],track length[cm] ANALYZERv CAGL-01 GPS SPECTRACOM

Search for coincidences CAGL-01/CAGL-02 DATA sample: OCTOBER NOVEMBER. Five full days. Bad RUNS on CAGL-01 removed.

CAGL-01 CAGL-02: 5 days nocut ANALYZER V20 (C++ CODE) ANALYZER V15 (FORTRAN CODE) Identical DATA set BAD RUNS on CAGL-01 removed ( up to run 110)

CAGL-01 CAGL-02: 5 days ANALYZER V15 (FORTRAN CODE) ANALYZER V20 (C++ CODE) Identical DATA set BAD RUNS on CAGL-01 removed ( up to run 110) Cut on CHI2 and tetarel

Identical DATA set: OCT NOV BAD RUNS on CAGL-01 removed ( up to run 110) Cut on CHI2 and tetarel

CAGL-01 CAGL-03: one day, no correlation

Difference in the  2 CAGL-02  2 telescope CAGL-02 ANALYZERV15 ANALYZERV20 No difference found in CAGL-01

Conclusion Three telescope running. Problems. Good data to test hardware/software and GPS. Coincidences search: process all the statistics. Add CAGL-03 data. Crosscheck with 2011 data needed. Need an independent system to Check GPS timing stamp. Work in progress!

Cut only on CHI2