Meson Test Cherenkov Measurements Michael Backfish Dec 2015.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 MICE Beamline: Plans for initial commissioning. Kevin Tilley, 16 th November. - 75days until commissioning Target, detectors, particle production Upstream.

Advertisements

STAR Pixel Detector Phase-1 testing. 22 Testing interrupted LBNL-IPHC 06/ LG Lena Weronika Szelezniak born on May 30, 2009 at 10:04 am weighing.

Why do we need particle accelerators Two reasons The higher energy the beam of particles in the collision the more massive or energetic the particles will.

Cherenkov Detectors. Index of Refraction When light passes through matter its velocity decreases. –Index of refraction n. The index depends on the medium.

MTest Facility Low Energy Beam Erik Ramberg AEM 15 October, 2007.

Calibration for LHAASO_WFCTA Yong Zhang, LL Ma on behalf of the LHAASO collaboration 32 nd International Cosmic Ray Conference, Beijing 2011.

The performance of Strip-Fiber EM Calorimeter response uniformity, spatial resolution The 7th ACFA Workshop on Physics and Detector at Future Linear Collider.

Reflectivity Measurements of Critical Materials for the LUX Dark Matter Experiment Theory My experiment was a cyclic process involving software, engineering,

Low beam intensity (MERIT beam spot size – part II) Goran Skoro 30 June 2008.

Beam Loss in the Extraction Line for 2 mrad Crossing Angle A.Drozhdin, N.Mokhov, X.Yang.

Karl Bane AC Wake--Measurement, April 7-8, Resistive Wall Wakes in the Undulator Beam Pipe – Theory, Measurement Karl.

“Pinhole Measurement” Approach to K Measurements using Spontaneous Radiation November 14, 2005 J. Welch, R. Bionta, S. Reiche.

TB & Simulation results Jose E. Garcia & M. Vos. Introduction SCT Week – March 03 Jose E. Garcia TB & Simulation results Simulation results Inner detector.

APOLLON TEAM HOOKE vs. NEWTON. Discussion 1: Hooke: Light is a wave motion Newton: Light is a particle beam Interference shows the following: Which can.

28 April 2005Ckov1 Update -- S. Kahn1 Update to the Upstream Cherenkov  -  Separation Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab May 2, 2005 Detector Tele-Meeting.

Optical or Photoelectric Smoke Detector Sue Shryock and Sherrie Anderson.

Previous Work. Gauss fit with pion, proton, electron.

ECAL TIMING. 20/04/092 Ratios’ Method Basics Position of pulse maximum parameterized using the ratio of two consecutive samples, i.e., R = A(t)/A(t+1)

TOF/ACC test Overview M. Yoshida Osaka Univ.. TOF / ACC in the prototype test For the prototype test in May, we will need PID: –TOF counter Distinguish.

Ultra-sensitive HALO monitor N. Vinogradov, A. Dychkant, P. Piot.

Electron and Ion Spin Dynamics in eRHIC V. Ptitsyn Workshop on Polarized Sources, Targets and Polarimetry Charlottesville, VA, 2013.

Oct 15, 2003 Video Conference Energy Deposition Steve Kahn Page 1 Energy Deposition in MICE Absorbers and Coils Steve Kahn November 2, 2003.

IES Calibration Modeling Phil Valek and Roman Gomez May 29, 2013.

A phosphor is any material that, when exposed to radiation, emits visible light. The radiation might be ultraviolet light or a beam of electrons. Any fluorescent.

Report of the NTPC Test Experiment in 2007Sep and Others Yohei Nakatsugawa.

Physics Program and Runs: Autumn 2011 & Step IV V. Blackmore MICE Project Board, 08/03/12.

PHENIX Fig1. Phase diagram Subtracted background Subtracted background Red point : foreground Blue point : background Low-mass vector mesons (ω,ρ,φ) ～

Particle Production in the MICE Beam Line Particle Accelerator Conference, May 2009, Vancouver, Canada Particle Production in the MICE Beam Line Jean-Sebastien.

Calibration of the new Particle Identification Detector (PID) Tom Jude, Derek Glazier, Dan Watts.

October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.

Background Subtraction and Likelihood Method of Analysis: First Attempt Jose Benitez 6/26/2006.

1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting Rutherford Appleton Lab Tuesday 25 th April 2006 M. Ellis.

A simple formula for calculating the momentum spread from the longitudinal density distribution and RF form Recycler Meeting March 11, 2009 A. Shemyakin.

Oct 15, 2003 Video Conference Energy Deposition Steve Kahn Page 1 Energy Deposition in MICE Absorbers and Coils Steve Kahn November 2, 2003.

Geant4 Simulation of the Beam Line for the HARP Experiment M.Gostkin, A.Jemtchougov, E.Rogalev (JINR, Dubna)

Oct 6, 2008Amaresh Datta (UMass) 1 Double-Longitudinal Spin Asymmetry in Non-identified Charged Hadron Production at pp Collision at √s = 62.4 GeV at Amaresh.

Douglas P. Moehs Emittance Probe 1 (side) Distance from slit to detector: inches Detector with multiple collectors Expected collector width based.

Jyly 8, 2009, 3rd open meeting of Belle II collaboration, KEK1 Charles University Prague Zdeněk Doležal for the DEPFET beam test group 3rd Open Meeting.

KEK Test Beam Phase I (May 2005) Makoto Yoshida Osaka Univ. MICE-FT Daresbury Aug 30th, 2005.

Luminosity Monitoring Issues  ZDC  what’s the advantage?  problems  BBC  can they do it? A. Drees QCD critical point workshop, Mar

Momentum Corrections for E5 Data Set R. Burrell, G.P. Gilfoyle University of Richmond, Physics Department CEBAF The Continuous Electron Beam Accelerating.

Super-Kamiokande and Neutrino Oscillation

1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting U.C. Irvine Monday 21 st August 2006 M. Ellis & A. Bross.

Oct. 12, 2007 Imran Younus k T Asymmetry in Longitudinally Polarized p +p Collisions at PHENIX.

F ERMILAB T EST B EAM F ACILITY Aria Soha June 12, 2012.

DREAM Coll. Meeting, Rome 2009F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa Template Analysis of DRS Data  Motivations  Preliminary results F. Bedeschi, R. Carosi, M. Incagli,

Issues Concerning Different Beam Lines Integration C. Bracco, E. Gschwendtner, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi, A. Petrenko, F. Velotti Acknowledgements: WP3 and.

Interaction Region Design and Detector Integration V.S. Morozov for EIC Study Group at JLAB 2 nd Mini-Workshop on MEIC Interaction Region Design JLab,

Detector / Interaction Region Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski Joint CASA/Accelerator and Nuclear Physics MEIC/ELIC Meeting.

Minerva Test Beam 2 Status Geoff Savage for the Test Beam 2 Team March 23, /23/2015AEM - Minerva Test Beam 2 Status1.

Particle Physics Group Meeting January 4 th – 5 th 2010 Commissioning EMMA, the Worlds First Non Scaling Fixed Field – Alternating Gradient Accelerator.

The LHCb Calorimeter system

M. Sullivan International Review Committee November 12-13, 2007

The Interaction Region

Compression (of this 8-bit 397,000 pixel image):

Analysis Test Beam Pixel TPC

Final Focus Synchrotron Radiation

How to turn on MICE Step IV

Status of the TOF Detector

MDL0L02 Dipole Field July 6, 2016.

MERIT beam intensities

Momentum Corrections for E5 Data Set

Preparation of the CLAS12 First Experiment Status and Time-Line

T32 status as of 17-Oct.

Electron Beam as a standard candle for EHECR air shower

Volume 108, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)

Which One Doesn’t Belong?

T18_VG2.4_Disk_#2 processing summary

IR/MDI requirements for the EIC

Presentation transcript:

Meson Test Cherenkov Measurements Michael Backfish Dec 2015

Reason for Studies The sequencer uses the equation below to set F:MT4W for the desired Magnetic field F:MT4WH = 57.92*Momentum (This equation was found using the relationship found from the save files) F:MT4WH = * Momentum (This equation was from Geelhoed’s Spreadsheet) F:MT4WH = * Momentum (This equation was from “Notes on Mtest Energy Scale and hall Probes” Coleman Oct 3, 2014 A new method for Zeroing hall probes was used for getting rid of the DC offset next we check the slope

FTBF Equipment for Verification Lead glass Calorimetry (lead glass is currently not large enough to contain a full electron shower……another idea is brewing) Minerva’s New Time of Flight System (Before Christmas we ran a few days worth of studies….a hardware problem in one of the TDCs needs resolved though it seems we have good data. Analysis continues) Cherenkov Detector (appearance of light is determined by pressure, particle type and momentum…..This talk will elaborate)

There are 2 Cherenkov Detectors Upstream has only 1 PMT light is seen at 0 mRad The Downstream has an Inner and Outer PMT Light is seen at 0 mRad on inner and 7 mRad on outer Image from

FTBF Documentation

Using Python to Efficiently Analyze the Cherenkov Data

Fit(x) is the integral of a Gaussian Fitting the pressure scan data with this equations provides an analytic method for determining at what pressure the light appears (the parameter mu). The width of the derivative of this function (sigma) is impacted by both the momentum spread and beam divergence. Fit(x) = A*(sqrt(3.14/2.0))*sigma*erf( (x - mu) / (sqrt(2.0)*sigma) ) +const Derivative(fit(x))=Gaussian(x) = A*e^(-(x-mean)**2/(2.*sigma**2)) For this analysis (mu-2*sigma) is used as the point where light first appears (mu-2*sigma)

These plots show (mu-2*sigma) or the pressure where Cherenkov light is first seen for both positive and negative particle momentums Positive particles are Red and Negative are Green The theoretical value shown in blue and comes from the equation below This equation is derived on the next page

These 2 equations found at From Weidemann “Particle Accelerator Physics” pg 14 Insert Beta there to get this