CJ 305 Unit 3. Housekeeping  Coming up in Unit 4  DB questions  Seminar  No U4 quiz  No U4 writing assignment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TRIAL EVIDENCE.
Advertisements

Psychology of Homicide Unit III Lecture
Chapter 8 Witnesses— Competency and Perjury.
Courtroom Roles and Responsibilities
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS OF FORENSIC SCIENCE CHAPTER 2.
Criminal Justice 2011 Chapter 18: Preparation for Court Criminal Investigation The Art and the Science by Michael D. Lyman Copyright 2011.
Randy J. Cox.  F.R.E. 301 is short and vague, with no definition of “presumption.”  Note F.R.E. 302 provides that state law governs the effect of presumptions.
Hearsay and Its Exceptions
Jail Call Analysis 4 th Amdt – Waiver because of Consent (Banargent, Scheinman, Poyck) 4 th Amdt. – Society not ready to recognize prisoner’s expectation.
Advanced Direct and Cross-Examination
Standard 11: Criminal Trial Procedures I can identify and describe the standard procedures in a criminal jury trial.
PRIOR INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS FRE 801(d) Non Hearsay by definition Rule 801(d)(1) Prior Statement by Witness is not hearsay If declarant testifies and.
Evidence Prof. William A. Woodruff Federal Criminal Practice Seminar Nov 2, 2012 Raleigh, NC © 2012.
The Roles of Judge and Jury Court controls legal rulings in the trial Court controls legal rulings in the trial Jury decides factual issues Jury decides.
FRAUD EXAMINATION ALBRECHT, ALBRECHT, & ALBRECHT Legal Follow-Up Chapter 18.
CJ227 Criminal Procedure Welcome to our Seminar!!! (We will begin shortly) Tonight – Unit 4 (Chapter 9 – Pretrial Motions, Hearings and Pleas) (Chapter.
OPINION EVIDENCE. OPINION EVIDENCE FRE Evid. Code §§
CHAPTER X HEARSAY EVIDENCE. Hearsay Evidence Evidence of a statement that was made other than by the witness while testifying that is offered to prove.
Criminal Evidence 6th Edition
#1 Explain due process The average person does not care about due process until he/she is accused of a crime Fair procedures: Jury trial in public, informed.
 Judge  Prosecutor  Defense Attorney 2 Copyright Texas Education Agency (TEA)
Analytical Forensic Science The adventure Begins Now.
Expert Witnesses Texas Rules of Evidence Article VII. Opinions and Expert Testimony Judge Sharen Wilson.
AJ 104 Chapter 5 Witnesses. 5 Issues Related to a Trial Witness 1. Who is competent to testify 2. How the credibility of a witness is attacked 3. What.
Chapter 13 Testifying in Court. Testifying in Court  To effectively testify in court:  Be prepared.  Look professional.  Act professionally.  Attempts.
Trial Procedures II CLN4U. The Judge, The Crown, The Defence Judge: Judge: Impartial and unbiased Impartial and unbiased Applies law to case, instructs.
The Forensic Accounting Legal Environment McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Crawford v. Washington US Supreme Court, March 2004 Implications for Elder Abuse Prosecutions Adapted from material presented June 30, 2004 by Sean Morgan.
Analytical Forensic Science The adventure Begins Now.
Chapter 20 Writing Reports, Preparing for and Presenting Cases in Court.
Unit 3 Seminar! K. Austin Zimmer Any question from Unit 2! Please make sure you have completed your Unit 1 & 2 Papers!
The Trial. I. Procedures A. Jury Selection 1. Impanel (select) a jury 2. Prosecutors and Defense lawyers pose questions to potential jurors (VOIR DIRE)
Questioning Witnesses Miss Getsch Crime and Justice.
Trial. Trial: broken down  Pre-Trial hearings: Judge makes decisions on various motions  Opening statement: attorneys tell the story of the case. No.
Criminal and Civil Cases
ADVANCED DIRECT AND CROSS-EXAMINATION Module 2. Organization Of Discussion  Direct examination techniques  Refreshing recollection, past recollection.
THE TRIAL IN CANADIAN COURTS – Part 3 RULES AND TYPES OF EVIDENCE LAW 12 MUNDY
Twelve Angry Men By: Reginald Rose. Discussion What is a jury? How is it chosen? What responsibility does an individual have to accept jury duty? How.
Unit 6 The Trial: Players, Motions, Hearings, and Pleas Or I am getting my day in court.
Police Reports Admissible or Not?. The MYTH “A police officer’s regular practice in the business of policing is to observe crime and report it. Thus,
Crawford v. Washington US Supreme Court, March 2004 Implications for Courts NYC Elder Abuse Training Project.
1 PRESENTATION OF EVIDENCE Learning Domain PURPOSE FOR THE RULES OF EVIDENCE Protect the jury from seeing or hearing evidence that is: (w/b p. 1-3)
Unit 6  What needs to be done this week SeminarSeminar QuizQuiz Discussion boardDiscussion board Unit 9 Analysis and ApplicationUnit 9 Analysis and Application.
AJ 104 Crime Scene Evidence, Experiments, and Models.
CJ227: Criminal Procedure Unit 4 Seminar Trial options and the Defendants Rights Or I am in trouble, I need a good attorney, fast Who will decide my fate?
“ Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Criminal Evidence Chapter Eight: Witnesses This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law.
Evidence and Expert Testimony. Expert Testimony  Two Types of Witnesses: Fact and Expert  Fact -- have personal knowledge of facts of case  Cannot.
September 10, 2012 Warm-up: Use pg. 13 in your text book to answer the following question: 1.What was the most significant modern advance in forensic science?
TESTIMONY OF WITNESSES. TESTIMONY The sworn statement given by a lay or expert witness who has personal knowledge of the facts being tried in court.
PROCEDURES IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM, 8 th ed. Roberson, Wallace, and Stuckey PRENTICE HALL ©2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ
CJ305 Criminal Evidence Welcome to our Seminar!!! (We will begin shortly) Tonight – Unit 3 (Chapter 5 – Witnesses -- Lay & Expert) (Chapter 6 – Credibility.
DAY #3: The Legal System: Trying a Criminal Case 1.What do lawyers do BEFORE a trial? 2.What are some reasons why a judge may dismiss or suppress evidence?
CJ227: Criminal Procedure Unit 6 Seminar Mary K Cronin.
Attorney/Judge. The purpose of opening statements by each side is to tell jurors something about the case they will be hearing. The opening statements.
 Judge  Prosecutor  Defense Attorney Santa Teresa High School Intro to LPSCS.
Courtroom Participants
Arizona High School Mock Trial
Hearsay Hector Brolo Evidence, Law 16 Spring 2017.
Crime Scene Processing 5th & 6th Amendments
EVIDENCE—BASES OF OPINION TESTIMONY BY EXPERTS
OBJECTIONS.
Opinion Testimony, In General
How Witnesses are Examined
Inn of Court: Trial Practices
EVIDENCE—BASES OF OPINION TESTIMONY BY EXPERTS
Analytical Forensic Science
WHO’S WHO IN THE COURT ROOM?
THE TRIAL IN CANADIAN COURTS – Part 3
Presentation transcript:

CJ 305 Unit 3

Housekeeping  Coming up in Unit 4  DB questions  Seminar  No U4 quiz  No U4 writing assignment

Witnesses  Witnesses: FRE  Opinions/Experts: FRE Extras: Subpoena Extras: Subpoena Out of State Out of State Segregation during trial Segregation during trial

Witnesses Continued  Lay Witnesses  Expert Witnesses

Lay Witnesses  Under rules of evidence, various types of witnesses can testify in court of law  Can lay witnesses give opinions?  Direct exam v. cross exam

Lay Witnesses  Types: Eyewitnesses Eyewitnesses Police Officers Police Officers Alibi Witnesses Alibi Witnesses Occurrence Witnesses, to name a few Occurrence Witnesses, to name a few

Lay Witnesses…For the Prosecution or Defense  Example crimes: Forgeries Thefts Thefts Burglaries Burglaries Murders Murders How the lay witness may look as a defense witness? How the lay witness may look as a defense witness?

Victims……  …..are lay witnesses.  Types of crimes that do not have a victim as a witness?

Victims continued  When you might not have a victim/witness?  Drug Case  DUI  Murder….  Any others?

Can lay witnesses give their opinions?  Sometimes. FRE 701  Example: Lay opinions on intoxication (foundation questions?)  …on human emotions like anger  …Speed, height….other examples?

A witness forgets….  Refreshing memory FRE 612  Recorded Recollection FRE 803 (5) AKA Past Recollection Recorded

Expert Witnesses FRE  Offer Opinion Testimony  Voir Dire and Foundation questions Judge must find witness is qualified to be expert in the relevant field for them to offer opinion Judge must find witness is qualified to be expert in the relevant field for them to offer opinion Private experts are often compensated for their time

Experts  Three requirements 1. The testimony must be relevant to an issue in the case. 1. The testimony must be relevant to an issue in the case. 2. The expert’s field must be one requiring scientific, technical or specialized knowledge. 2. The expert’s field must be one requiring scientific, technical or specialized knowledge. 3. The witness must have to background necessary to qualify as an expert in that field. 3. The witness must have to background necessary to qualify as an expert in that field.

Types of Experts…  Law Enforcement examples: gang expert, blood spatter, ballistics, GSR, fingerprint, hair/fiber, chemist, bomb and arson  Forensic psychologist/psychiatrist On staff or privately hired On staff or privately hired Commonly used for sanity and fitness Commonly used for sanity and fitness

Other types of Experts…  Physician/Doctor - Pediatrician/neurologist: “shaken baby” cases - Pediatrician/neurologist: “shaken baby” cases - Neurologists: permanent disability, GSW,etc. - Neurologists: permanent disability, GSW,etc. - Forensic Odontologist: bite marks - Forensic Odontologist: bite marks Mitigation Expert Addiction Specialist Coroner/medical examiner Child rape counselor

Impeachment  What does it mean? FRE 607  Methods: - Prior Inconsistent Statement - Prior Inconsistent Statement - Contradiction - Contradiction - Bias - Bias - Character Witness - Character Witness -Prior Conviction -Prior Conviction - Witness Incapacity - Witness Incapacity

Impeachment Continued  Defendant’s statement and Impeachment Even if his statement is inadmissible, it can be used for impeachment if defendant takes the stand at trial. Even if his statement is inadmissible, it can be used for impeachment if defendant takes the stand at trial.  Witness: self incrimination and immunity Use Immunity Use Immunity Transactional Immunity Transactional Immunity

Next week in Unit 4  Hearsay  Chapter 6  DB: 2 questions  No quiz, no project