Coincidence algorithm and an optimal unification of GW – detectors A.V.Gusev, V.N.Rudenko SAI MSU, Moscow, Russia Moscow University Physics Bulletin, 2009,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Multiuser Detection for CDMA Systems
Advertisements

Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course Spring Jeffrey N. Denenberg Lecture 3b: Detection and Signal Spaces.
Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course
Matched Filters By: Andy Wang.
Collaborative Signal Processing CS 691 – Wireless Sensor Networks Mohammad Ali Salahuddin 04/22/03.
1 Digital Communication Systems Lecture-3, Prof. Dr. Habibullah Jamal Under Graduate, Spring 2008.
Adaptive Signal Processing
MIMO Multiple Input Multiple Output Communications © Omar Ahmad
The Search for a Stochastic Background of Gravitational Radiation Part I Rosa M. Luna, D. Auzmus, M. Casquette, C.W. Torres, M.C. Diaz, J.D. Romano, and.
Modulation, Demodulation and Coding Course
July 11, 2001Daniel Whiteson Support Vector Machines: Get more Higgs out of your data Daniel Whiteson UC Berkeley.
Lecture II Introduction to Digital Communications Following Lecture III next week: 4. … Matched Filtering ( … continued from L2) (ch. 2 – part 0 “ Notes.
Digital Communication I: Modulation and Coding Course
UF S.Klimenko LIGO-G Z l Introduction l Goals of this analysis l Coherence of power monitors l Sign X-Correlation l H2-L1 x-correlation l Conclusion.
1/25 Current results and future scenarios for gravitational wave’s stochastic background G. Cella – INFN sez. Pisa.
Dept. of EE, NDHU 1 Chapter Three Baseband Demodulation/Detection.
Statistical problems in network data analysis: burst searches by narrowband detectors L.Baggio and G.A.Prodi ICRR TokyoUniv.Trento and INFN IGEC time coincidence.
1 Part 5 Response of Linear Systems 6.Linear Filtering of a Random Signals 7.Power Spectrum Analysis 8.Linear Estimation and Prediction Filters 9.Mean-Square.
Speech Enhancement Using Spectral Subtraction
S.Klimenko, G Z, December 21, 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida.
LIGO-G Z Peter Shawhan, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting April 25, 2006 Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in Data from the.
Rohit Iyer Seshadri and Matthew C. Valenti
Baseband Demodulation/Detection
Detection and estimation of abrupt changes in Gaussian random processes with unknown parameters By Sai Si Thu Min Oleg V. Chernoyarov National Research.
LIGO-G Z Coherent Analysis of Signals from Misaligned Interferometers M. Rakhmanov, S. Klimenko Department of Physics, University of Florida,
The Analysis of Binary Inspiral Signals in LIGO Data Jun-Qi Guo Sept.25, 2007 Department of Physics and Astronomy The University of Mississippi LIGO Scientific.
Solution of the Inverse Problem for Gravitational Wave Bursts Massimo Tinto JPL/CIT LIGO Seminar, October 12, 2004 Y. Gursel & M. Tinto, Phys. Rev. D,
Analysis of Optimal and Suboptimal Discrete-Time Digital Communications Receivers Clemson University SURE Program 2005 Justin Ingersoll, Prof. Michael.
ECE 5525 Osama Saraireh Fall 2005 Dr. Veton Kepuska
S.Klimenko, July 14, 2007, Amaldi7,Sydney, G Z Detection and reconstruction of burst signals with networks of gravitational wave detectors S.Klimenko,
Study of Broadband Postbeamformer Interference Canceler Antenna Array Processor using Orthogonal Interference Beamformer Lal C. Godara and Presila Israt.
Digital Communications Chapeter 3. Baseband Demodulation/Detection Signal Processing Lab.
G030XXX-00-Z Excess power trigger generator Patrick Brady and Saikat Ray-Majumder University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
EE 3220: Digital Communication
The Restricted Matched Filter for Distributed Detection Charles Sestok and Alan Oppenheim MIT DARPA SensIT PI Meeting Jan. 16, 2002.
S.Klimenko, August 2003, Hannover LIGO-G Z How optimal are wavelet TF methods? S.Klimenko l Introduction l Time-Frequency analysis l Comparison.
1 Watermarking Scheme Capable of Resisting Sensitivity Attack IEEE signal processing letters, vol. 14, no. 2, February. 2007, pp Xinpeng Zhang.
S.Klimenko, G Z, December 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida for.
Outline Transmitters (Chapters 3 and 4, Source Coding and Modulation) (week 1 and 2) Receivers (Chapter 5) (week 3 and 4) Received Signal Synchronization.
Baseband Receiver Receiver Design: Demodulation Matched Filter Correlator Receiver Detection Max. Likelihood Detector Probability of Error.
S.Klimenko, G Z, December 21, 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida.
EE 3220: Digital Communication Dr. Hassan Yousif Ahmed Department of Electrical Engineering College of Engineering at Wadi Aldwasser Slman bin Abdulaziz.
S.Klimenko, G Z, March 20, 2006, LSC meeting First results from the likelihood pipeline S.Klimenko (UF), I.Yakushin (LLO), A.Mercer (UF),G.Mitselmakher.
Data Analysis Algorithm for GRB triggered Burst Search Soumya D. Mohanty Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University of Texas at Brownsville On.
S.Klimenko, March 2003, LSC Burst Analysis in Wavelet Domain for multiple interferometers LIGO-G Z Sergey Klimenko University of Florida l Analysis.
S.Klimenko, December 2003, GWDAW Burst detection method in wavelet domain (WaveBurst) S.Klimenko, G.Mitselmakher University of Florida l Wavelets l Time-Frequency.
Peter Shawhan The University of Maryland & The LIGO Scientific Collaboration Penn State CGWP Seminar March 27, 2007 LIGO-G Z Reaching for Gravitational.
Stochastic Background Data Analysis Giancarlo Cella I.N.F.N. Pisa first ENTApP - GWA joint meeting Paris, January 23rd and 24th, 2006 Institute d'Astrophysique.
Comparison of filters for burst detection M.-A. Bizouard on behalf of the LAL-Orsay group GWDAW 7 th IIAS-Kyoto 2002/12/19.
Performance of Digital Communications System
Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course Spring Jeffrey N. Denenberg Lecture 3c: Signal Detection in AWGN.
The first AURIGA-TAMA joint analysis proposal BAGGIO Lucio ICRR, University of Tokyo A Memorandum of Understanding between the AURIGA experiment and the.
Thomas Cokelaer for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Cardiff University, U.K. APS April Meeting, Jacksonville, FL 16 April 2007, LIGO-G Z Search.
1.) Acquisition Phase Task:
SIGNAL SPACE ANALYSIS SISTEM KOMUNIKASI
Adam Zadrożny The Andrzej Sołtan Institute for Nuclear Studies
A Digital Pulse Processing System Dedicated to CdZnTe Detectors
Rohit Iyer Seshadri and Matthew C. Valenti
The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO
Signal processing.
Igor Yakushin, LIGO Livingston Observatory
ECE 7251: Signal Detection and Estimation
Lecture 1.30 Structure of the optimal receiver deterministic signals.
IEEE Regulatory AHC Power Measurement Method
Targeted Searches using Q Pipeline
Excess power trigger generator
Digital Communication Systems Lecture-3, Prof. Dr. Habibullah Jamal
Signal processing Lecture: Hans-Jürgen Wollersheim
Data Analysis – Part1: The Initial Questions of the AFCS
Optimization under Uncertainty
Presentation transcript:

Coincidence algorithm and an optimal unification of GW – detectors A.V.Gusev, V.N.Rudenko SAI MSU, Moscow, Russia Moscow University Physics Bulletin, 2009, Vol.64,№1, pp73-76 Original Russian:“Vestnik MU”, Fisika, N1, 2009

Sine-gaussian waveform

Wavelet transform S.Klimenko,G.Mitselmakher.C&QG,21(2004)

Non modeled Bursts Search outputs of two GW detectors: vectors a, b total energy : E = normalized and integrated at the (0<t<T) it is reduced to variables: Burst’s Excess Power: Burst’s Cross Power: L.Cadonati,S.Marka.C&QG,22(2005),S1159 S.Klimenko,G.Mitselmakher.C&QG,21(2004) W.Anderson,P.Brady,J.Creighton,E.Flanagan Int.J.Mod.Phys.D v.9,p.303,(2000)

Optimal Filtration theory for multi-receiver network Does not leads to a “coincidence strategy” (CS) How one has to formulate a “detection problem” for to get CS –recommendation ? What is an optimal unification of independent detectors?

LH estimate of Optimal receiver conclusion LH t) ?t) ? one detector

Two detectors + LH estimates Optimal receiver for Conclusion

Two approach in Optimal Filtering Problem of signal detection: Gaussian noise Stochastic pulses Problem of signal distinction:

Maximum LH algorithm For N independent detectors: In the case of Gaussian background:

Results of the distinction problem: Optimal statistics: threshold

The case of two equivalent detectors 0<t<T > ln C - accumulated output

Standard filtering theory requires unification of net detectors at the level of their inputs, then optimal algorithms becomes more complex then the simple CS Coincidence Strategy is resulted from the unification net detectors at the level their outputs: one has in disposal only individual optimal filtering outputs y i but no the common optimal output Σy i

How to unify problems: “detection” and “distinction”? - detection - substitution - distinction Stochastic pulses Gaussian noise It takes into account an interference of signal and noise pulses

Result correlation of the n(t) - remains unchanged

After substitution LH estimates Direct calculation depends on relation between and relaxation times of additive noises n(t) in each channels

Conclusions Coincidences algorithm (“bursts power” and “cross power”) results from the “unification of net detector’s outputs” Optimal procedure requires “unification of net detector’s inputs”. it deals with an accumulated “common net output” in respect of individual detector outputs. Correspondent optimal variable (statistics) for the net of GW- detectors has to be addressed.