Human Resources Department Bridget Paris, Compensation Specialist Work Session July 7, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Planning, Feedback and Merit Allocation TMG Open Meeting May 1, 2008.
Advertisements

Town Hall Presentation January 9-10, 2002 Curtis Powell Vice President for Human Resources The Division of Human Resources and William M. Mercer, Incorporated.
Compensation 101 Today’s lesson plan: Compensation How To Use Market Data To Support Your Compensation Philosophy.
HR Contacts Meeting May 23, 2013 Human Resource Mgmt Services Office of Management & Budget.
Chapter #9.  #1 Decide upon how many pay structures Exempt, Non exempt, by job families, by geography?  #2 Determine market pay line.  Look #213 Clerks.
Faculty & Staff Compensation Programs Board of Regents Meeting
Values and At Our Best tools to guide us Collaboration – We work together Integrity – We build confidence and trust in all interactions.
Fox, Lawson & Associates Compensation Study Summary Findings
Compensation Philosophy Performance-driven and market-referenced –We value high performance and compensate employees based on their contributions to the.
MGMT Managing Employee Reward Systems Salary Structures Purpose and Goals –establish series of grades to classify jobs according to similar worth.
COMPENSATION - OVERVIEW WHAT IS COMPENSATION? PURPOSES BASES FOR COMPENSATION HOW TO IMPLEMENT? TRENDS.
Compensation Deborah Marsh November Total Rewards Total Rewards definition Total Rewards definition Why Total Rewards? Why Total Rewards? Elements.
OS 352 3/25/08 I. Compensation Systems (chapter 11) A. Types of pay B. Job evaluation and job structure. C. Market pricing. D. The big picture II. Syllabus.
Non-Academic Staff Compensation Structure & Administration
MGMT Managing Employee Reward Systems Salary Structures and Pay Grade Dimensions Pay Grade Width –Distance from min. to max. of range –Typical ranges.
Salary Administration East Carolina University Department of Human Resources Classification and Compensation.
© 2007 Hay Group. All rights reserved. Salary Survey Report January 30, 2007 State of Kansas.
Total Rewards and Compensation
© 2010 McGraw Hill Ryerson 8-1 COMPENSATION Third Canadian Edition Milkovich, Newman, Cole.
STAFF COMPENSATION PROGRAM TOWN HALL MEETINGS FEBRUARY 2004.
Competitive Market Compensation Review July 2009 Project Overview.
Sherri Coxon Executive HR Consultant Business Sherpa Group.
PUSD Compensation Project Overview Governing Board Meeting March 14, 2013.
Pay Structure Decisions
Staff Compensation Program – Phase 2 Internal Equity Adjustments October 2005.
Non-Academic Staff Compensation Program Employee Presentation 2013.
Strategic remuneration management
OPEN – C&HR – INFO 1-2 UM Total Rewards Update Board of Curators January 29 - February 1, 2014.
Alternative Pay Program Guidelines for Managers July 2012.
Compensation Project Faculty & Staff Compensation Programs Board of Regents Finance Committee Meeting Project Overview
© 2009 South-Western Cengage. All rights reserved. Chapter 7 Compensation Strategies and Practices.
PENSION REFORM: LACERS TIER II P RESENTATION TO L ABOR O RGANIZATIONS Office of the City Administrative Officer City of Los Angeles September 6, 2012.
Topic 6 - A Designing the Compensation Program. 9. Centralization Vs. Decentralization of Pay Decisions 8. Open Vs. Secret Pay 7. Monetary Vs. Non-monetary.
Chapter 11 Establishing a Pay Structure. MGMT Chapter2 Decisions About Pay Job Structure –Relative pay for different jobs within the organization.
TOTAL REWARDS ANNUAL ACTION ITEM #2. 2 AGENDA  Purpose of the Presentation  Our Approach  Total Rewards Philosophy Review  Compensation- Current State/Future.
Chapter 5 Compensation & Benefits
State Classified Compensation Changes Fiscal Year
McGraw-Hill © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Budgets and Administration Chapter 18.
Chapter 14 Compensation Control & Administration Harcourt, Inc. items and derived items copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. Requests.
Chapter 9 Managing Compensation
AFOA HR CONFERENCE 2015 Compensation 101
Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
Compensation TEAM 10: Panu Kurkela Jouko Kyrola Simo Nieminen
Classification and compensation Analysis Pilot Project MU Staff Job Title and Salary Study Implementation Update.
McGraw-Hill © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Management: Making it Work Chapter 18.
Agenda Study Process Outreach Summary Salary Quartile Analysis
Prentice Hall, Inc. © A Human Resource Management Approach STRATEGIC COMPENSATION Prepared by David Oakes Chapter 1 Strategic Compensation: A.
11-1 McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. fundamentals of Human Resource Management 4 th edition by.
Compensation Study Preliminary Results Presented by: CBIZ Human Capital Services January 11, 2016.
Creating a Salary Structure 101
BPC – 1/15/2016 Staff Compensation Update 1. FY16 Compensation Updates  Annual Reappointment Increases– 2%  $2,858,234  Equity Increases – 1%  $1,134,993.
Compensation Philosophy & Goals Philosophy: –Competitive Pay with Markets in which we compete (Local, Regional, National) ‏ –Competitive Pay with Market.
Building Effective Compensation and Classification Systems to Attract and Retain Talented Employees 5050 Quorum Drive, Suite 625, Dallas, Texas
Discussion on Compensation. Goal To assist in securing and retaining a staff of necessary quality to achieve the goals and objectives of the organization.
Fair Pay for Northern California Nonprofits: The 2016 Compensation & Benefits Survey HIGHLIGHTS AND TRENDS May 12, 2016 Sponsored by CompassPoint Nonprofit.
City of Galveston Classification & Compensation Study Discussion Preliminary Findings and Recommendations.
New Mexico Highlands University
FY2017 Market Program Overview Manager Sessions. 2 Agenda Market Program Refresher FY2017 Market and New Hire Minimum Overview Key Messages and Next Steps.
COMPENSATION 101 CREATING & ADMINISTERING YOUR BASE PAY STRATEGY Consulting Inc.
CBIZ Human Capital Services Trends in Compensation and Best Practices in the Current Economy.
Approve a Market Adjustment to the City of Southlake Employee Compensation Program Item 9B.
Management Advisory Group, Inc. Executive Summary City of Fairfax Compensation and Classification Study July 1, 2016.
Wage and Salary Management
Compensation Structure and Merit Process
Compensation: Creating an Equitable and Market-driven Pay System
Fox, Lawson & Associates Compensation Study Summary Findings
Management Talking Points
2018 UCPEA One-time Performance Awards
FINDING THE RIGHT BALANCE
Presentation transcript:

Human Resources Department Bridget Paris, Compensation Specialist Work Session July 7, 2011

Pay Plan Adjustments Market Data Employee Increases

Market Based Competitive

Midpoint Range Minimum Range Maximum 2008 Average Market Compa Ratio of 1.0 = Midpoint Compa Ratio –.988 Voluntary Turnover – 10.33%

Compensation Strategies & Options Market Value of a job has changed. Inflation impacting wages and salary. Single point in time. External Merit Reward or recognition for the employees specific work – tied to evaluation date. Progresses employees through the ranges. Internal Adjust Ranges and Employee Pay Pass/Fail merit – flat amount Variable merit based on score Based on range penetration Lump Sum

1% pay increase = $1 million 45% is General Fund Considerations Timing Market External Merit Internal Budget Allocation Methods Building Estimates

Market Occupational Group Total Change in Market from Range Movement Business Operations3.22%1.61% Community Protection3.01%1.51% Executive3.06%1.53% Health and Human Services 3.21%1.61% Information Technology1.27%.63% Professional2.75%1.38% Resource Management2.63%1.32% All Jobs Together2.78%1.39% To Support our Compensation Philosophy Address EXTERNAL market - 1.5% range movement to All Jobs and increase to the employees to retain current range penetration Address INTERNAL falling Compa Ratio - 1.0% merit increase (pass/fail ) on employees evaluations dates

Admin Matters For a FINAL DECISION on July 12, 2011 Decisions Needed: 1. External - Range Movement and/or Increase to employees related to the Range Movement. 2. Internal - Increase to employees – method for providing the increase. Eliminate Probationary Increase