1 David Santoyo sLHC OXFORD 17/06/2010 EC Structure Review ? ? ? ? ? ? IFIC-Valencia.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Technical Board, 12 July 2005Børge Svane Nielsen, NBI1 Status of the FMD Børge Svane Nielsen Niels Bohr Institute.
Advertisements

PANDA Mechanical Workshop Backward Endcap Calorimeter Geometry David Rodríguez Piñeiro GSI Darmstadt PANDA Mechanical Workshop GSI
1 David Santoyo Petal Locking Points: AUW Nov 2014 Petal Locking Points.
Designing for Stiffness
Mechanical Status of ECAL Marc Anduze – 30/10/06.
The Art of Matrix Reduction
VG1 i T i March 9, 2006 W. O. Miller ATLAS Silicon Tracker Upgrade Recent Study Topics Full length model with wafers, hybrids and cable as dead weight.
SPACE FRAME Interface between the LGT and the IST 21/06/2011 Marco Ciapetti.
STATUS OF THE CRESCENT FLEX- TAPES FOR THE ATLAS PIXEL DISKS G. Sidiropoulos 1.
Performance of the DZero Layer 0 Detector Marvin Johnson For the DZero Silicon Group.
1 David Santoyo Petal meeting: 24 October 2014 Petal vs Services: design concerns.
SLHC - WP7 Barrel UPDATE on LAYOUT OF SERVICES AT THE BARREL ENDS OPTO PCBS: Sketches describe options after discussion with Tony Weidberg ( ) Preference.
13 Dec. 2007Switched Capacitor DCDC Update --- M. Garcia-Sciveres1 Pixel integrated stave concepts Valencia 2007 SLHC workshop.
Dimensions of the PDM frame: 167mm x 167mm x 28.7mm.
Pixel Support Tube Requirements and Interfaces M.Olcese PST CDR: CERN Oct. 17th 2001.
SLHC Pixel Layout Studies S. Dardin, M. Garcia-Sciveres, M. Gilchriese, N. Hartman LBNL November 4, 2008.
18 November 2010 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) SVD Mechanics IDM.
26 April 2013 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) Belle II SVD Overview.
ATLAS Upgrade ID Barrel: Services around ‘outer cylinder’ TJF updated According to the drawing ‘Preparation outer cylinder volume reservation’
Ron Madaras, LBL U.S. Pixel Meeting, SCIPP, July 9-10, 2003 Patch Panel 1 (PP1) Brief Review Cost and Effort Estimate.
1 Module and stave interconnect Rev. sept. 29/08.
EC front unit status. Outline Conclusions from mechanical prototype and actions taken Status of electrical prototype KIT’s work for TA Dev plan (tests)
1 Advanced Endplate - mechanics: Development of a Low-Material TPC Endplate for ILD Dan Peterson Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, Cornell University.
1m 3 SDHCAL Mechanic Structure M.C Fouz 8/10/2010 The 1m 3 prototype Mechanical Structure is financed by: Spanish HEP National Program by the project FPA
09/03/2010 ADO-PO section meeting Beam Pipe Extraction/Insertion R. Vuillermet.
W. Karpinski, Nov CMS Electronics week CMS Microstrip Tracker grounding & shielding of the CMS Tracker R. Hammarstrom (CERN EP/CMT) & W. Karpinski.
Ronald Lipton PMG June Layer 0 Status 48 modules, 96 SVX4 readout chips 6-fold symmetry 8 module types different in sensor and analog cable length.
Positioning fork M. Ciappeti R. Vuillermet 29/09/20111.
NSQP X-1 ASSEMBLY Lessons learned Sébastien MICHAL January 30 rd 2012.
CLAS12-RICH Mechanical Design Status-Report CLAS12 RICH Review September 5-6 th 2013 S. Tomassini, D. Orecchini1 D. Orecchini, S. Tomassini.
1 4 PCB: LEFT TOP 115 channels, LEFT BOTTOM (115), RIGHT TOP (106), RIGHT BOTTOM (106). For LEFT TOP board 115 channels we have: 115 smd connectors (AMP.
Physics requirement Radial envelope: 1265 mm to 1473 mm 12 wedges over 2  20 tungsten layers of 2.5 mm 10 tungsten layers of 5 mm Instrumented gap 1.25.
Anatoli Romaniouk TRT Introduction TRT in ATLAS p. 2-4TRT in ATLAS p. 2-4 TRT design p. 5-7TRT design p. 5-7 TRT operation principles p. 8-9TRT operation.
PMG Meeting February 2000 A Split Central Silicon Tracker W. E. Cooper on Behalf of the D0 Silicon Group 3 February 2000.
1 Outer Barrel, Phase 2 Mech Review 26 Aug 2013, indico: Antti Onnela, CERN Tracker Phase 2 Mechanics Review, 26 August 2013 Status of the Outer.
E.Guschin (INR) 21 November 2003Integration EDR PRS/SPD static envelop, assembly and installation Detector layout Static envelop along the beam Detector.
End-of-stave region. 2 Space Z-dimension is critical –Keep gap small (might help getting rid of stubs) Edge of last barrel silicon (at corner) is 1277.
D. M. Lee, LANL 1 07/10/07 Forward Vertex Detector Overview Technical Design Overview Design status.
TC Straw man for ATLAS ID for SLHC This layout is a result of the discussions in the GENOA ID upgrade workshop. Aim is to evolve this to include list of.
RICH2 support and cooling mechanics status update Massimo Benettoni July 30,
C.BAULT November 9 th  LAYOUT STRAWMAN 07V13 Vs STRAWMAN 07V14  SERVICES AND STRUCTURES INVENTORY  ENVELOPE SERVICES  BARREL SERVICES ROUTING.
Additional muon stations for the Upgrade of the Elevator Regions in the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer. Installation scenario, status on the installation tools.
August 04 Jason Tarrant CCLRC1 SCE EC Design & Manufacture l Progress of SCT EC »Support Structure (Required for Disc Assembly 2004) »Services (Required.
1.2 m Stave with Co-cured Facings Using Low Areal Density Fiber G. Viehhauser (Oxford) C. Haber (LBNL) T. Hurteau, W. Emmet (Yale) R. Rurns, D. Lynn (BNL)
PH/DT2 Scientific Tea PH-DT2 Scientific Tea, 29 April 2005 : The CMS Tracker - Mechanical Aspects Antti Onnela, PH-DT2: 1. CMS Tracker and.
1 A Self-Cooled Lithium Blanket Concept for HAPL I. N. Sviatoslavsky Fusion Technology Institute, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI With contributions.
IPN Lyon ILD Mechanical structure February 2015 Design, Integration & Services J.C Ianigro - IPN Lyon -
Central Tracker Cabling and Mechanics Paola Gianotti26/4/111.
13 Januar 2011 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) Annekathrin Frankenberger (HEPHY Vienna) SVD Cooling Cooling Meeting Karlsuhe.
Development of a low material endplate for LP1 and ILD Dan Peterson, Cornell At previous meetings, , showed the carbon fiber molded.
EC: 7 DISK concept Preliminary considerations
Florian Buchsteiner (HEPHY Vienna)
Panda Solenoid Content Interface Box Cold Mass Layout Cooling Lines
Micro Vertex Detector of PANDA Status of Strip BARREL and DISC
CEA Validation tests and constraints
Update of MVD services and requests
Strip Petals: Local supports and prototype tests
- STT LAYOUT - SECTOR F SECTOR A SECTOR B SECTOR E SECTOR D SECTOR C
Development of a low material endplate for LP1 and ILD
? ENDCAP: Mechanics IFIC-Valencia.
Integration issues at IHEP
Chamber Design and Integration RE3/1 and RE4/1
(A) (B) - CENTRAL SUPPORT FRAME - INFN-LNF - SPAS 1
Rod adaptors for module tests Module positioning studies
First of all we will remind some numbers:
SIT AND FTD DESIGN FOR ILD
Final Design CGEM Workshop HIEP, 14/03/2017 M. Melchiorri - INFN FE.
Inner DET. Integration Inner detector envelope Radial clearances.
TBM Design Meeting UCLA
as a prototype for Super c-tau factory
Presentation transcript:

1 David Santoyo sLHC OXFORD 17/06/2010 EC Structure Review ? ? ? ? ? ? IFIC-Valencia

2 David Santoyo sLHC OXFORD 17/06/2010 Presented at Nikheff Ws Petals supported by a wheel - Hub and rim of the wheel sustained by a set of radial rods EARLY MODEL: Mass reduction target

3 David Santoyo sLHC OXFORD 17/06/2010 Presented at Nikheff Ws 2008 Overlap in Φ with upper/lower petals CONTROL CARD LOCATION FIXED: - Control Card on the side. No space left at the top (outer radius) - Control Card at the bottom difficulties services connections. - “T-shape” difficulties Control Card cooled down with the return pipe Two Control Cads per petal on same side

4 David Santoyo sLHC OXFORD 17/06/2010 Presented at LBL Mech-Ws 2009 Stiff enough? At least Inner Cylinder (Cone shaped) required ”End insertion”-like concept is complicated for petals: - Control cards on the side “only 1 rail?” - There is no mov. constrain in z (No disk) - Rings separate petals in z even more (Rods Ø) - Build accuracy requirements: r-φ=50um r=200um z=500um

5 David Santoyo sLHC OXFORD 17/06/2010 Presented at LBL Mech-Ws 2009 This would improve considerably the stiffness but…

6 David Santoyo sLHC OXFORD 17/06/2010 Presented at LBL Mech-Ws 2009 What about services?? Risky: multiple obstacles with NO “end-insertion”-like concept

7 David Santoyo sLHC OXFORD 17/06/2010 SB EC Pix EC Service Module Connection Space Characteristic, Repeated 1/16 Arc Segment Poly Moderator Supplement PP1 PCB’s Services: Presented by Neal D. Hartman (Jan.2009)

8 David Santoyo sLHC OXFORD 17/06/ Service channels for EndCap SB EC Pix From Ian Wilmut concept applied to petals Characteristic, Repeated 1/16 Arc Segment

9 David Santoyo sLHC OXFORD 17/06/2010 A single “rail” makes end- insertion easier until the very end of the assembly process… Single guide pin This gap can be reduced depending on the piping and cabling connectors. 16 Service channels for EndCap

10 David Santoyo sLHC OXFORD 17/06/2010 Services: Presented by Christophe Bault (Feb.2009) R=1007R=974

11 David Santoyo sLHC OXFORD 17/06/2010 CMS Benchmark

12 David Santoyo sLHC OXFORD 17/06/2010 CF Inner Cylinder 8 support bars constrain disks Inner cylinder with 4 different diameters to constrain disks and sustain petals Apertures on Outer cylinder to permit services exit Master disk supports entire structure

13 David Santoyo sLHC OXFORD 17/06/2010 CFRP-KOREX Disks 1.- Master Disk + Support bars + Inner cylinder 2.- Disks are assembled into the structure.

14 David Santoyo sLHC OXFORD 17/06/2010 CF Frames

15 David Santoyo sLHC OXFORD 17/06/2010 Lateral Support Beams

16 David Santoyo sLHC OXFORD 17/06/2010 Services Support Rings

17 David Santoyo sLHC OXFORD 17/06/2010 (4/16) Rows of Petals: Insertion

18 David Santoyo sLHC OXFORD 17/06/2010 (4/16) Rows of Petals: Services and Testing 40 petals from 160 (25%)

19 David Santoyo sLHC OXFORD 17/06/2010 (12/16) Rows of Petals: Insertion

20 David Santoyo sLHC OXFORD 17/06/2010 (12/16) Rows of Petals: Services and Testing

21 David Santoyo sLHC OXFORD 17/06/2010 ENDCAP Envelope

22 David Santoyo sLHC OXFORD 17/06/2010 Services & cabling Services estimation includes: -Opto fibers x18 -HV cabling x18 -LV cabling x2 -Inlet and Outlet capillaries -DCS x18 -Al service channel Total per petal (g/mm) 0, Total per Disk (g) Services Disk 1: from z: 2956mm to z: 1376mm19972,5192 Services Disk 2: from z: 2956mm to z: 1476mm18708,43571 Services Disk 3: from z: 2956mm to z: 1744mm15320,69194 Services Disk 4: from z: 2956mm to z: 2141mm10302,28047 Services Disk 5: from z: 2956mm to z: 2791mm2085, Total 5 Disks (g) 66389,66509 Capillaries

23 David Santoyo sLHC OXFORD 17/06/2010 Electrical & Cooling Services Interface Electrical Connectors on top to improve accessibility. Also located at the center to optimize the area for the Control Card on the side. The aim is to reduce the petal width as much as possible.

24 David Santoyo sLHC OXFORD 17/06/2010 Services Connections 2D-Layout: conflictive area at rails CONNECTORS NEED TO BE DEFINED: AT MANIFOLDING PIPES SHOULD HAVE THE SAME IMPEDANCE 1.4m

25 David Santoyo sLHC OXFORD 17/06/2010 Accessible area after services 1.4m 40 petals from 160 (25%) +12 (32,5%) +12 (40%)

26 David Santoyo sLHC OXFORD 17/06/2010 ENDCAP Envelope: Substructure #1 Support Frames Support Beam Disks supports Inner Cylinder

27 David Santoyo sLHC OXFORD 17/06/2010 ENDCAP Envelope: Substructure #2 Rings Services Channels

28 David Santoyo sLHC OXFORD 17/06/2010 Petal Envelope Dimensions 12mm GAP??? >>>>> 7mm GAP??? >>>>> Only element to determine Inner diameter of ring >>>>>

29 David Santoyo sLHC OXFORD 17/06/ Rings for Services; Weights and Clearances ← ≈74mm ← ≈88mm ← ≈242mm ← ≈74mm ≈ 4.4 Kg → ≈ 4.0 Kg → ≈ 3.1Kg → ≈ 2.2 Kg → TOTAL SERVICES = 33.6 x 2 = 67.2 Kg (TOP + BOT) TOTAL nº RINGS = 9 x 2 = 18 (TOP+BOT) Openings

30 David Santoyo sLHC OXFORD 17/06/ Models considered… Real model with openings Equivalent model 12mm GAP? Equivalent model 12mm GAP?-> Real model 12mm GAP?-> Real model reinf. inserts

31 David Santoyo sLHC OXFORD 17/06/2010 Results and Conclusions… For the real model without inserts, the areas where the load is distributed provide about 80% of the deflection because there is not enough rigidity at those areas. This is why the equivalent model is done to avoid the previous situation. The model with Inserts shows the best data it is possible to get, the load is sheared between all nodes in contact with the inserts areas. To achieve a deformation under 5mm is not impossible, but some safety factor must be also considered and it is difficult with current estimations to understand if already there is a safety factor included at the load or not. Results: Outer diameter: 1.007mm Inner diameter: mm Results: Outer diameter: 1.007mm Inner diameter: 0.974mm Deformation results: Units in mm Material Properties 7mm GAP 12mm GAP Carbon Fiber: XN50-A Matrix: RS-3 Honeycomb: KOREX 5/32-2.4

32 David Santoyo sLHC OXFORD 17/06/2010 Next Future… The structure frames are the only element which affects to the dimension for the inner ring diameter. Rings are part of the full structure and if frames could pass through the rings by small openings -> Next idea to develop! …This concept would make possible to reduce rings width allowing bigger clearances to extract petals. Opening for frames Opening for services Service Ring