Peggy G. Carr Associate Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics June 2010 Peggy G. Carr Associate Commissioner National Center for Education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stuart Kerachsky Acting Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics October 14, 2009 EMBARGOED until October 14, :00 a.m. E.D.T.
Advertisements

Bureau of Indian Education
2013 Mathematics and Reading Trial Urban District Assessment National Assessment of Educational Progress at Grades 4 and 8 Dr. Peggy Carr Associate Commissioner.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics June 27, 2013 #NAEP.
Stuart Kerachsky Deputy Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics March 24, 2010.
Dianne Chadwick Iowa NAEP Coordinator Iowa Department of Education November 8, 2011.
Inside America’s Math Courses The Release of the Algebra I and Geometry Curricula: Results from the 2005 High School Transcript Mathematics Curriculum.
1 NAEP th Grade Economics Assessment. 2 ► First NAEP assessment of economics ► Content areas: market economy, national economy, and international.
NAEP 2008 Trends in Academic Progress in Reading and Mathematics.
The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics National Assessment of Educational Progress 1.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
Grade 3-8 English Language Arts and Mathematics Results August 8, 2011.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008.
OCTORARA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT “CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES - MORE THAN PSSA AND AYP”
1 Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics June 2011.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics December 7, 2011.
1 NCES and NIEA Web Session July Today’s Native American Student American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) students make up about 1 percent of 4th-
Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education Board Georgia Goals for Education Challenge to Lead: Georgia 2006 Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education.
Results of the 2009 NAEP High School Transcript Study America’s High School Graduates Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics.
Alaska Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Youth IT Social Innovation Fund Nicole Barden
1 Results for Students with Disabilities and School Year Data Report for the RSE-TASC Statewide Meeting May 2010.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics January 25, 2011.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics February 24, 2011.
1 The Nation’s Report Card: 2007 Writing. 2 Overview of the 2007 Writing Assessment Given January – March 2007 – 139,900 eighth-graders – 27,900 twelfth-graders.
Stuart Kerachsky Deputy Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics December 8, 2009.
Florida Department of Education Jeanine Blomberg, Commissioner External Factors Review: GRADE 3 FCAT READING 2005, 2006, 2007 Jay Pfeiffer, Deputy Commissioner.
Integrating Success The Transition of All Students From High School to College November 2007 Iowa Educational Research & Evaluation Association Annual.
Grade 3-8 English Language Arts English Language Arts Grades 3, 4, and 5 Total Public.
English Language Arts (ELA) & 2007 English Language Arts (ELA) Total Public In grades 5-8, the percentage of students meeting the ELA Learning.
LIVE INTERACTIVE YOUR DESKTOP June 20, 2012 Science in Action: Understanding what students know and can do in the classroom, in the lab, and.
Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education Board Mississippi Challenge to Lead Goals for Education Mississippi is Moving Ahead Progress Report 2010.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results Challis Breithaupt November 1, 2011.
NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results NAEP State Coordinator Mark DeCandia.
The Nation’s Report Card: U.S. History National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
The Nation’s Report Card Science National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
THE 2005 NAEP HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY. THE 2005 HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY Today ’ s Presentations.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics February 21, 2013.
1. 2 Overview of the 2006 NAEP Assessments Administered in January–March 2006 National results for grades 4, 8, and 12 Results by scale scores and achievement.
The Nation’s Report Card: Geography National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
Academic Excellence Indicator System Report For San Antonio ISD Public Meeting January 23, 2006 Board Report January 23, 2006 Department of Accountability,
N ATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS BPS 2015 NAEP RESULTS Office of Data and Accountability OCTOBER 26, 2015.
Hawaii Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics May 4, 2011.
How did Idaho students perform in the NCLB years when compared with their peers nationwide? All Students – White Students - Hispanic Students NAEP Reading.
Stuart Kerachsky Deputy Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics May 20, 2010.
The Nation’s Report Card: Trial Urban District Assessment: Science 2005.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
The Nation’s Report Card: 2005 Reading and Mathematics Trial Urban District Assessments.
Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 Supplemental Packet.
Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education Board Arkansas Goals for Education Challenge to Lead: Arkansas 2006 Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education.
091 Equity Initiative Status Indicators_March Lodi Unified School District Equity Initiative Status Indicators Prepared by the Assessment, Research,
Novice Reduction & Non-Duplicated Gap Group
NAEP 2005 Reading and Mathematics Results. Overview of the 2005 Reading and Mathematics Assessment 1.
2009 Grade 3-8 Math Additional Slides 1. Math Percentage of Students Statewide Scoring at Levels 3 and 4, Grades The percentage of students.
Gallatin County High School Accountability & Assessment Data.
2011 MEAP Results Board of Education Presentation | 07 May 2012 Romeo Community Schools | Office of Curriculum and Instruction.
Oregon Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
1. 2 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Survey of academic achievement for the nation and the states Assesses various subjects at grades.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007.
Gloria Ladson-Billings University of Wisconsin
Focus on the Learner: Who are the students states serve?
What is API? The Academic Performance Index (API) is the cornerstone of California's Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999 (PSAA). It is required.
Texas Academic Performance Report TAPR)
Bloomington Public Schools Districtwide Achievement Report
How did Idaho students perform in the Obama years when compared with their peers nationwide? All Students – White Students - Hispanic Students NAEP.
The Charleston-Institute (WV) Chapter of the Links, Inc.
2019 Report Card Update Marianne Mottley Report Card Project Director
Chapter 4 Science, Mathematics, and Computer Science Courses
Presentation transcript:

Peggy G. Carr Associate Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics June 2010 Peggy G. Carr Associate Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics June

Background of NIES Conducted in 2005, 2007, and 2009 by the National Center for Education Statistics Funded by the Office of Indian Education (OIE) Reviewed by a technical panel 2

Study describes the condition of education for American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) students Part I – Reading and mathematics performance of fourth- and eighth-graders Part II – Students’ educational experiences 3

Participation in the Study Part I – 9,900 fourth-graders in over 1,400 schools – 8,400 eighth-graders in over 1,200 schools Part II – Grade 4  12,000 students  3,800 teachers  2,300 school administrators – Grade 8  10,000 students  4,600 teachers  1,900 school administrators 4

Results for students in – the nation – regions and selected states – three types of schools  low AI/AN density public schools  high AI/AN density public schools  Bureau of Indian Education schools 5

Regions and Selected States 6 Regions and Selected States 2009

AI/AN students make up about 1 percent of fourth- and eighth-graders – About 90 percent attend public schools – About 7 percent attended BIE schools – About 3 percent attended other schools About 45 percent attend high density schools (including BIE schools) Over 70 percent of AI/AN students attending high density schools are in rural locations Over one-half of AI/AN students are eligible for free or reduced-price school lunch AI/AN Student Demographics 7

8

Performance Results in Reading and Mathematics 9 Average scale scores – Separate 0 – 500 scales Achievement levels – Basic – Proficient – Advanced 9

10

Scores for AI/AN students increase since 2007 at grade 8 but not at grade 4 * Significantly different ( p <.05) from

No significant change in percentages of AI/AN students at or above Basic and Proficient s ince

No significant difference in performance of AI/AN, Black, or Hispanic fourth-graders AI/AN eighth-graders score higher on average than Black students * Significantly different ( p <.05) from

AI/AN students in low density public schools score higher than those in high density public schools and BIE schools Students in BIE schools score lower than those in high density public schools * Significantly different ( p <.05) from

* Significantly different (p <.05) from students in the nation. NOTE: Score gaps are calculated based on the difference between unrounded average scores. 15 Fourth-grade White – AI/AN score gap ― smaller than the national gap in 2 states ― larger in 4 states

16 * Significantly different (p <.05) from students in the nation. NOTE: Score gaps are calculated based on the difference between unrounded average scores. Eighth-grade White – AI/AN score gap ― smaller than the national gap in 2 states ― larger in 7 states

State percentages of AI/AN fourth-graders at or above Basic range from 27 to 62 percent NOTE: AI/AN = American Indian/Alaska Native. Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding. 17

NOTE: AI/AN = American Indian/Alaska Native. Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding. State percentages of AI/AN eighth-graders at or above Basic range from 38 to 71 percent 18

19

No significant change in average scores for AI/AN students since 2007 or

Percentages of eighth-graders at or above Proficient and at Advanced higher than in 2005 * Significantly different ( p <.05) from AI/AN students. 21

AI/AN fourth-graders score higher than Black students and lower than Hispanic students Eighth-grade AI/AN students score higher than Black students and not significantly different from Hispanic students * Significantly different ( p <.05) from AI/AN students. 22

2009 State Gaps Compared to Nation 23

State percentages of AI/AN fourth-graders at or above Basic range from 48 to 79 percent 24 # Rounds to zero. NOTE: AI/AN = American Indian/Alaska Native. Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding.

State percentages of AI/AN eighth-graders at or above Basic range from 41 to 71 percent 25 NOTE: AI/AN = American Indian/Alaska Native. Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding.

26

At least one-half of fourth- and eighth-graders have some or a lot of knowledge about their AI/AN history a Significantly different (p <.05) from low density public schools. b Significantly different (p <.05) from high density public schools. 27

More than one-half of AI/AN eighth-graders attending BIE schools plan to go to college full time after high school a Significantly different (p <.05) from low density public schools. b Significantly different (p <.05) from high density public schools. AI/AN eighth-graders’ plans after high school 28

Students in BIE schools are more likely to be exposed to AI/AN cultural themes and activities as part of the reading/language arts curricula 29 a Significantly different (p <.05) from low density public schools. b Significantly different (p <.05) from high density public schools. AI/AN themes integrated into reading/language arts once a month or more

Highest proportions of AI/AN teachers in BIE schools 30 Percentage of AI/AN teachers a Significantly different (p <.05) from low density public schools. b Significantly different (p <.05) from high density public schools.

Community involvement more common in BIE and high density public schools than in low density schools 31 AI/AN community members’ involvement in various school-related activities one or more times during a typical school year a Significantly different (p <.05) from low density public schools. b Significantly different (p <.05) from high density public schools.

For More Information 32 Photo credits: © Michelle Zahgotah, © Kanowan Kayotawape, © Palo Alto Photography/Veer #PHP ,© ERproductions Ltd/Blend Images/Jupiterimages # , © Darla Hallmark/iStockphoto # , 2010 Chris Arend/AlaskaStock.com, © Jeffrey Van Daele/iStockphoto # , © amygdala_imagery/iStockphoto # , © Anton Foltin/iStockphoto # , © Jon Mullen/iStockphoto # ,© Alexey Repka/Dreamstime #